User talk:Oliver Puertogallera

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Oliver Puertogallera/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 04:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Thorncrag 03:41, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Minor" edits

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Will Beback talk 01:47, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Eckankar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chela and Darshan Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Julian Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darshan Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oliver Puertogallera (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know who is "Ponds071994" Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Oliver Puertogallera (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

203.87.206.102 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ponds071994". The reason given for Ponds071994's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Jauerback (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I can find no trace of this block. The autoblock must have expired. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest Scout Groups

Please comment on my suggestion at Talk:Oldest Scout Groups#Philippines. --Bduke (Discussion) 04:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Notable outdoor exponents in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chart of English animal nouns

Hello Oliver Puertogallera,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chart of English animal nouns for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, List of animal names.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 15:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chart of English animal nouns

Hi, I'm Ratzd'mishukribo. Oliver Puertogallera, thanks for creating Chart of English animal nouns!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. A page already exists for this subject: List of animal names

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Chart of English animal nouns aka List of English animal nouns

Hello Oliver, I kind of like your chart, and it does have a lot of additional info compared to the pre-existing article List of animal names. Could you let us know where you found all the info in your list? Was it mostly from one source or did you compile it all yourself? It would be good to give it a reference or two if possible. Invertzoo (talk) 21:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Oliver and thanks for your nice note on my talk page. You managed to leave the note just fine, except that it is good to have a heading on a brand new note about a different subject than the previous one. You can leave a heading the next time you start a new note by simply putting two equal signs at the beginning and end of the words that you want to use as the heading. If you do that, after you save, it comes out as a proper heading with a line underneath it to make it clearer and a nice little "edit" button above the end of that line. That's all automatic, like the signing of your name from putting four tildes, which you did perfectly.

And yes, there is a huge amount to learn when you start on Wikipedia; it can be overwhelming. However, I would be glad to help explain things to you if you like, so just ask me. I should explain that in general we recommend that new editors start out by making many relatively small edits on pre-existing articles, which is not too hard to do, and then gradually over the course of many weeks or months new editors can work their way up to creating new articles from scratch, which of course is harder to do. Once an editor is ready to tackle creating a new article, we have something called the "Article Wizard"] which is extremely helpful, because it guides you step by step through the whole process, so you get everything pretty much correct. Talking of which, with your "chart" article, maybe under the heading "References" there, you could mention just a few of the main references you used over the years, if you can remember what they were. I mean just a simple list of some of the books you used would be better than nothing at all; sources are very important on Wikipedia. Since that article has not been deleted yet, it may stick around for a while, although eventually it may get merged with one of the other similar articles, who knows. All good wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome Oliver! :) Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions or comments about any aspect of Wikipedia. Invertzoo (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sat Gurus of Sabd Marg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of sexy Philippine actresses

The article List of sexy Philippine actresses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No demonstration of notability per the general notability guideline. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and this list will be primarily populated by OR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:59, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of 20th-century Philippine comedians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael V (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of sexy Philippine actresses for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of sexy Philippine actresses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sexy Philippine actresses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog 21:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete the articleOliver Puertogallera (talk) 06:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of 20th-century outdoor proponents and outdoor educators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Foster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of 20th-century Philippine comedians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pabo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

28 patriarchs

Great work! I've replaced the table by a template {{Zen Lineage 28 Patriarchs}} so it can be used at other pages as well. The adress of the template is Template:Zen Lineage 28 Patriarchs. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan (talk) 08:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Joshua Jonathan Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of 20th-century Philippine comedians

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether List of 20th-century Philippine comedians should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 20th-century Philippine comedians .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Op47 (talk) 22:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 05:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changed "Nasadami" to "Dasanami"

WikiThanks

I also had some trouble with Aruchanala. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

28 Patriarchs

Hi Oliver Puertogallera. Thanks for the addition of the Korean names. I've added them to the template, and replaved the tables by this template. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Could you provide some information on your userpage, if only that you're interested in chart-diagrams etc? The links are so red now... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to learn how to do that. Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 02:05, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You know how to edit those lienage-pages, so you'll handle this too.

Succes! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of American guerrillas in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Distinguished Service Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Myron Henry Phelps

The article Myron Henry Phelps has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bluefist ^talk 07:00, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 12:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete it.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Julian Philip Matthew Johnson

Hello Oliver Puertogallera. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Julian Philip Matthew Johnson.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of English animal nouns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cub, Caw, Hiss, Growl and Croak

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boy Scouts of the Philippines

That is an impressive amount of work. However I do have a few of comments.

For VP Binay, you can't reference another wikipedia page, so you should instead get the reference that the Alpha Phi Omega members page uses for him.
For Elwood brown, the multiple URLs shoved together in the reference that he introduced volleyball to the Philippines aren't needed. Pick one or maybe two and make a more normal reference
With all of the links to the Diamond Jubilee Yearbook and On My Honor, it probably makes more sense to list those books at the bottom and reference by page number as you have done. See the reference section to Joseph Stalin
The groups should probably be separated out, it is sort of awkward the way that it is.
While this is long enough to be its own article, I can't figure out whether it would survive in its current form that way, I don't think there are any individual country lists of notable members other than those which are specific to those who have received a specific award (like USA Eagle Scouts)
Please compare with List of Scouts#The Philippines to see whether additional people should be added in one place or another (and link the entry on List of Scouts to the link in the BSP article with a "main" template.

I'm a brother of Alpha Phi Omega and work on and off with APO-Philippine brothers and sisters.Naraht (talk) 19:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a conference this weekend. I'll respond to the points on Monday, OK?Naraht (talk) 11:18, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson

Hello Oliver Puertogallera. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Julian Philip Matthew Johnson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julian Philip Matthew Johnson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Biographical dictionaries

Thanks for your additions. I think the list should be moved to List of biographical dictionaries. The existing article then becomes about the idea of the biographical dictionary. What do you think? Philafrenzy (talk) 12:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jinje Seon Sa's lineage chart

The article Jinje Seon Sa's lineage chart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a lineage chart for a non-notable person. An earlier discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lineage Chart for Ji Bong showed consensus that such articles should not be included in the encyclopedia. If the person is notable, then please link to his article!

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rigadoun (talk) 03:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheng-yen's lineage chart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheng-yen's lineage chart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheng-yen's lineage chart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite) 08:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hsu Yun's lineage chart

The article Hsu Yun's lineage chart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The user has created a few similar lineage charts of monks, several have been deleted or nominated for deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zanhe (talk) 23:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thích Nhất Hạnh's lineage chart

The article Thích Nhất Hạnh's lineage chart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The user has created a few similar lineage charts of monks, several have been deleted or nominated for deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zanhe (talk) 23:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Scouting in the Philippines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malaya and Chief Scout. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the link for Malaya to Federation of Malaya. "Chief Scout," however is used in the general sense, referring to that position in three different countries. Hence, the link should point to the generic article of "Chief Scout," which also stands as the disambiguation page.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 15:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kapatirang Scout ng Pilipinas

"the BSP was restructured as the KSP under the Marcos administration. After the removal of Pres. Marcos in 1986..." This is fascinating, and not covered in detail in the BSP article. I think it deserves more depth in the article, possibly its own section. Can you find more on that period? Thanks! --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will try. Thanks. All my books and papers from that period have been lost.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 05:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of Scouting in the Philippines

A couple of tweeks I'd make, refering to Alpha Phi Omega in the states as Alpha Phi Omega (USA) for clarity. I cleared the multiple links for Alpha Phi Omega (USA), I'll look to so so for APO-Philippines as well. I'm an APO-USA brother (Kappa Chapter - Carnegie-Mellon University - Fall 1986).Naraht (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of Scouting in the Philippines‎

I recognize that you have done a *great* deal of work here, but in some respects the article doesn't feel right, First, Wikipedia prefers prose for history, which this doesn't appear to fit, secondly some of the information (for examples on members of organizations that were responsible on bringing Scouting to the Philippines) doesn't appear to fit with this and thirdly, the references seem more used for parenthetical comments which probably belong in a separate notes section. Is there any article currently on Wikipedia that you are patterning it after?Naraht (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia prefers prose for history" — The lines make for clarity and easy reading, and keep the reader oriented so he/she does not need to plod through and get lost in a mass of information, a lot of it disjointed. The bullet style minimizes connectives required in a narrative – in order to avoid wordiness and to facilitate the quick delivery of more info detail.
"some of the information (for examples on members of organizations that were responsible on bringing Scouting to the Philippines) doesn't appear to fit" — The information on the founding of the Rotary Club of Manila reflects an historian's interest in historical connections, that could look tangential to the casual reader. But since the information is not readily available elsewhere, I have chosen to include it in the chronology if only to provide the completeness which the historical researcher might require or which the interested reader might find fascinating. If you feel very strongly about it, I shall remove the passage on the founding of the Rotary Club of Manila.
"the references seem more used for parenthetical comments which probably belong in a separate notes section" — I am still working on achieving a balance between parenthetical comments and footnotes.
"Is there any article currently on Wikipedia that you are patterning it after?" — The timeline style is similarly used in Scouting for Filipino Boys (1949) and Boy Scout Book (1972), and the Wikipedia article "Boy Scouts of the Philippines."Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 23:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for copying it over to my talk page, I'll respond here...

Let me say you have done a *very* comprehensive job and I'd enjoy reading a history of scouting in the Philippines written by you, my concern is what belongs in a Wikipedia article. As far as I can tell, the mini-biographies boxes simply don't belong. For some of these it may be appropriate to have biographical articles of their own though.

Comparing the Timeline section on Boy Scouts of the Philippines to this is like comparing the hill behind my house to Mount Makiling.

I'd like to see whether we can get people from the WP:SCOUTING project (I tried posting to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting a while ago and would like to again.

In your article, you've already got enough information to raise the 10th World Scout Jamboree article from stub class to something higher.

You can have notes and references separate, I'm just not sure how.

Whether or not events in the history of Alpha Phi Omega Philippines should be part of this is a separate issue, its creation yes, but specifics on the hazing incidents don't seem as relevant. (If you've got more information on the exact relationship between BSP and APO-Phil, I'd love to see that added to the Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines)Naraht (talk) 13:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is the most comprehensive history of Philippine Boy Scouting anywhere. It would not fit in the Wikipedia article Boy Scouts of the Philippines, as I had planned it to be comprehensive, for the purpose of recovering, preserving, and disseminating the lost history of Philippine Scouting. I felt compelled to write it because no one else is willing and able to do it. The old guards are gone; I'm among the last remnants of the old days of Philippine Boy Scouting. If I didn't write this, my knowledge would die with me, and a lot would be lost. The last time something like this was done was in the Boy Scout Book of 1972. I tried and could not find a single copy of that work anywhere, not even in the National Library which handles copyrighting in the Philippines.

Before this Wikipedia article was made, the charter members of the BSA Philippine Islands Council were nothing more than 20 or 22 names in a list. Although sometimes inserted in BSP printed material, no one knew who they were (except for Manuel Camus and Arsenio Luz who were also charter members of the Boy Scouts of the Philippines). For the very first time, they are being introduced to the Philippine Scouting world. That is how important this Wikipedia article is. (Possibly, it could also be the last time those pioneers will ever be remembered. As this article does not toe the party line regarding history, it could be suppressed or revised later. I tried before to disseminate info through the Wikipedia "List of Scouts," but an editor in the Netherlands performed a "clean-up" that left the list sterile and senseless.) Hence, I feel that the biographies should be included, if only to teach new generations of Filipino Scouts about their heritage and to give them good examples for emulation, like Doltz, Carman, Bordner, Townsend, Chapman, Hart, Quasha, etc.

Some Scouts are also interested in Scouting history. If they could derive gratification from reading something substantial on Philippine Scouting history, it might develop in them a regular reading habit, something that most Filipinos don't engage in, and might encourage them to do further research following leads within the short narratives included in this article.

On APO (P), I've already deleted several references to APO (P). BSP National President Binay, holder of the BSP Presidency for the longest time, is also the most famous APO (P) member in history.

Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 07:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Articles...

For both the KSP and the BSA council, I'd suggest two things. First, a summary of what they were at the top of the article (two paragraphs max) and then move the article so that it is no longer "History of", Both topics I think make more sense as a full article rather than being *entirely* a chronology. (But keep all of what you've transfered there and keep the link from the History of Scouting in the Philippines)Naraht (talk) 00:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kapatirang Scout ng Pilipinas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chief Scout and Isabela. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chief Scouts of the Boy Scouts of the Philippines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chief Scouts of the Boy Scouts of the Philippines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Scouts of the Boy Scouts of the Philippines until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 13:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Americans in Philippine Scouting, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lanao, Zamboanga and Portland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boy Scouting in the Commonwealth of the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino Scout biographies

Hello! If you can take a look, Hermengildo B. Reyes is badly in need of cleanup. Also, we could use Jorge Ma Cui and Francisco S. Roman if you have time, thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Americans in Philippine Scouting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Americans in Philippine Scouting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americans in Philippine Scouting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please* comment on the AFD, this isn't an attack on you, it is an effort to get your contributions into a form consistent with the Wikipedia Guidelines. You've done a *lot* of work, a few of us are just trying to focus it.Naraht (talk) 18:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Naraht. Thanks for your comments. I can disagree agreeably with you.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oscar M. Alcaraz

The article Oscar M. Alcaraz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable person, Various copyright issues, No good version to revert to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oscar M. Alcaraz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oscar M. Alcaraz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar M. Alcaraz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gamebuster19901 (Talk | Contributions) 17:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gopal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ram Gopal, Gopalpur, Gopal Rao and Gopalan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopal Das Bhandari Award

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gopal Das Bhandari Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fit India 14:30, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gopal Das Bhandari Award for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gopal Das Bhandari Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopal Das Bhandari Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fit India 16:27, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shiv Dayal Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dadu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pratap Singh Seth moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pratap Singh Seth, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shiv Dayal Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raj (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shiv Dayal Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siddhartha Mahanta

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Siddhartha Mahanta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 04:01, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Siddhartha Mahanta

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Siddhartha Mahanta.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:47, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hridayananda Das Goswami

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hridayananda Das Goswami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prabhupāda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sripada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pratap Singh Seth

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Pratap Singh Seth.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darshan Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Rawat

As you seem to be the contributor who made the edit being discussed [1] you may possibly wish to comment at Talk:Prem_Rawat#MOS:SURNAME_with_regard_to_this_article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dashanami Sampradaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sode.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Ernest Stranges (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Zero sources cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Ernest Stranges and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Ernest Stranges (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A list of references at the bottom of the page is not sufficient. Please use inline citations to back up the content + demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Ernest Stranges and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 11:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Ernest Stranges

Hello, Oliver Puertogallera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Ernest Stranges, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of 20th-century outdoor proponents and outdoor educators for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 20th-century outdoor proponents and outdoor educators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 20th-century outdoor proponents and outdoor educators until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SilverStar54 (talk) 16:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]