User talk:NikNaks

If you are posting a comment or request relating to vector images, you may wish to try my talk page on Commons.

Chess diagrams & PGNs

Saw your note on my talk page, I'm not used to wikipedia yet so I have no idea how to reply, sorry if answering here does not follow the standard practice. About your comments on the SVG pieces, it makes a substantial difference between the chess diagram and the game text notation. In the chess diagram any image format can be used of course, my extension uses PNG at the moment but it could be changed to the SVG of your choice. For the game text notation, using a chess font rather than images works much better, both aesthetically (at least in my experience) and functionally (for example, my extension uses a chess figurine font, but if you select the game text notation and you copy&paste the content in a text editor you still have a fully readable text with the proper letter replacing automagically the figurine font; this would not happen using SVG images for the piece initials. Regarding your comment about fairy pieces, well, up to you to make your SVG set and font all inclusive of the pieces you need/want; I'm personally interested in chess, hence the support of the standard pieces so far. About the most common sizes for SVG images, for the chess diagram yuo need something that scales down to 20px and up to as large as you can think of. For the chess game notation, the typical font size is 16px but your font or images should scale well down to at least 8px (that might be tricky, one more reason why a font works better). Casaschi (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of "Design (disambiguation)"

The deletion of an article you created, Design (disambiguation), has been proposed for the following reason:

Please establish the notability of the former band first.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello NikNaks93! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 355 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Roderick Bradley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Edit summaries save the rest of us time and trouble. On your recent edit of List of British flags, if you had said something like "file name changed", it would have saved my tracking down what you did and why. So, please, add a few words of explanation to every edit. Thanks Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 13:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that! I'll try to be a little more informative in future. NikNaks93 (talk) 13:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 16:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I notice you haven't gotten a formal welcome -- usually that happens before you get to fifty edits, and you're closing in on 200, so here it is:

---

Welcome!

Hello, NikNaks93, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

---

The paragraph above is a template, but still sincerely meant and if I can be helpful in the future, please let me know. Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 16:35, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank-you! I'll let you know if I have any questions. NikNaks93 (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Commisioners' Flags

Actually, they're excellent, I really appreciate it. Unfortunately I do not know of any SVG versions of the Arms of Nunavut available. Fry1989 (talk) 16:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Railway signal icons

Railway signals example

Many thanks for taking this task on. To give you an idea of what semaphore signals look like in real life, have a look at the Bluebell Railway signals webpage. The righthand signal in the top image is a good example of what we are trying to depict, although that signal is to the right of the track, not the left.

The icon you created will need to be redrawn so that the signal post is near the railway line, and the arm pointing to the left. The arm itself is red, with a single white band towards the lefthand end. When I say rotated, I mean rotate clockwise 90° and then rotate clockwise through another 90°. I think we should get the first one correct then worry about rotating, and creating icons for the signal on the right of the track. Mjroots (talk) 18:23, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

It's getting there! Needs a top to the signal post (small triangle?) and the arm needs to be reduced in length. Suggest that if you take the distance of the outer red bit, and make the arm 4x that length, then reduce the white band by 50% by recolouring the half nearest the signal post, it'll be pretty much there. From left to right the arm will then be 25% red, 12½% white, 62½% red in width. Mjroots (talk) 11:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Having introduced the icon into a diagram, the size of the signal is going to need to be increased. What I'm aiming for is a display something like that in the part diagram from Chettisham signal box, although ours will be in the vertical plane rather than the horizontal. Mjroots (talk) 12:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

The third alternative is a bit better. Try thinning the signal arm, and separating the post from the track. It may be we'll need to split the signal over two icons (base and top), but if we can get it all on one icon that will be much better. Mjroots (talk) 13:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I've not forgotten abou this. Could you e-mail me as I have a few small images which will show better what I'm trying to achieve. It may be that we have to create a base and top to get the desired effect. Mjroots (talk) 15:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. You can e-mail me via the "E-mail this user" feature in the toolbox when on my user or talk pages. I have e-mail enabled so you should be able to contact me OK. Mjroots (talk) 19:44, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NikNaks. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop/Archive/Apr 2010.
Message added 20:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Any updates? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Flag_of_the_Commisioner_of_Northwest_Territories.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Flag_of_the_Commisioner_of_Northwest_Territories.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 15:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

File: Flag_of_Lovely.png

sorry, we've registered us for the top4-image nearly simultaneously. i didn't wan't to overwrite your "taken by" entry McSushtalk 16:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

white dots in small chess diagrams

A change you made may have messed up white dots in small diagrams. See your change to queen and pawn versus queen endgame. What you changed to x is supposed to be a small white dot. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 15:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry that I incorrectly blamed you for breaking the small white dots. Thank you for fixing it! Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 16:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

See also the problems here (pawn moves tables). Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for signing up for the July Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two and a half years, all the way back to the beginning of 2008! We're really going to need all the help we can muster to get it down to a manageable number. We've ambitiously set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog this month. In order to do that, we're going to need more participants. Is there anyone that you can invite or ask to participate with you? If so, we're offering an award to the person who brings in the most referrals. Just notify ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! or Diannaa ^TALK of who your referrals are. Once again, thanks for your support! Diannaa ^TALK 14:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Crt-telecine.svg

For this image it is very important the light source is a CRT tube, not a light bulb. Thanks again, and keep up the good work!--Svgalbertian (talk) 20:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

• Something like File:Cathode ray tube diagram-keys.svg might work, check commons:Category:Cathode ray tubes for more.--Svgalbertian (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Backlog Elimination Drive Has Begun

Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. Enjoy! ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 04:06, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi! This message is just a friendly reminder that you signed up to participate in the GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive. I noticed that you haven't logged a single copy edit yet. We'd love to see you participate! The drive runs three more weeks so there's still plenty of time to earn barnstars. Thanks! --Diannaa ^(Talk) 22:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox BAFLactive

Template:Infobox BAFLactive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Newsletter

GOCE July 2010 backlog elimination drive chart Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! We have now passed the halfway point, so here's an update. Progress Report - Progress toward the targets has been good. 751 articles out of the approximately 1,600 we would like to get completed by the end of the month were done by July 15, so we will be very close to meeting the target for volume. However, we would like to clear all of the 2008 articles from the backlog, and there are still 892 left to do. Please consider choosing one of these older articles when looking for something to copy edit. If we focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue. Participation Report - 95 people signed up for the July drive. This is a great result compared to May, when we had 36. However, in May only one person that signed up didn't do any copy edits, and in July only 59 of the 95 have posted any copy edits on the big board. The task may seem insurmountable but please remember that if all 95 participants copy edit just one article a day from now until the end of the month, we will eliminate 1,300 more articles from the backlog. So please consider participating at whatever level you can! All contributions are appreciated. This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa (Talk), S Masters (talk), and The Raptor Let's talk.

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody! Stats If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars. GOCE backlog elimination drive chart up to 31 July Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest. Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+). The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc. The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono. Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+). The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK. The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey. The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr. The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW. Gold Star Award Gold Star Award Leaderboard Articles Words 5k+ Articles 1. Diannaa (248) Shimeru (200,392) Shimeru/Ericleb01 (13) 2. Slon02 (157) Diannaa (164,960) Chaosdruid (8) 3. GaryColemanFan (101) Chaosdruid (130,630) Derild4921 (7) 4. Torchiest (100) The Utahraptor (117,347) GaryColemanFan/Slon02 (6) 5. Shimeru (80) Ericleb01 (114,893) Bejinhan/The Utahraptor (5) Coordinator: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! Co-coordinators: Diannaa TALK and S Masters (talk) | Newsletter by: The Raptor You rang?/My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 18:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive invitation

There are currently 2,524 articles in the backlog. You can help us! Join the September 2010 drive today!

The Guild of Copy-Editors – September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive The Wikipedia Guild of Copy-Editors invite you to participate in the September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive will begin on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on 30 September at 23:59 (UTC). The goals for this drive are to eliminate 2008 from the queue and to reduce the backlog to fewer than 5,000 articles. Sign-up has already begun at the September drive page, and will be open throughout the drive. If you have any questions or concerns, please leave a message on the drive's talk page. Before you begin copy-editing, please carefully read the instructions on the main drive page. Please make sure that you know how to copy-edit, and be familiar with the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GoCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. Thank you; we look forward to meeting you on the drive! — ɳorɑfʈ Talk! and S Masters (talk).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 23:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC).

Flags of Commisioners of Canadian Territories

File:Flag of the Commisioner of Northwest Territories.svg
File:Flag of the Commisioner of Yukon.svg

Is there any particular reason you decided to tag the images non-free? For the Yukon, it is clear the majority of the artwork came from the free file File:Coat of arms of Yukon.svg. Everything else is standard heraldry for Canada and is below the threashold of orginality to be copyrighted. Would you consider changing the license to {PD-self}} and linking File:Coat of arms of Yukon.svg as a source? Also if the artwork for File:Flag of the Commisioner of Northwest Territories.svg came from File:Coat of arms of Northwest Territories.svg, the same would apply and I would be happy to start an undeletion request.--Svgalbertian (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

• I have adjusted the copyright status of File:Flag of the Commisioner of Yukon.svg and have started an undeletion request for the NWT file at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#File:Flag of the Commisioner of Northwest Territories.svg --Svgalbertian (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
  • All images have been restored, if you have any questions on copyright feel free to ask me. --Svgalbertian (talk) 00:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

November copy edit drive

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! The Wikipedia Guild of Copy-Editors invites you to participate in the November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive will begin on 1 November at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on 30 November at 23:59 (UTC). The goal for this drive is to reduce the backlog by 10% (approximately 500 articles). We hope to focus our efforts on the oldest three months (January, February, and March 2009) and the newest three months (September, October, and November 2010) of articles in the queue. Sign-up has already begun at the November drive page, and will be open throughout the drive. If you have any questions or concerns, please leave a message on the drive's talk page. Before you begin copy-editing, please carefully read the instructions on the main drive page. Please make sure that you know how to copy-edit, and be familiar with the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants, some of which are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. Thank you; we look forward to meeting you on the drive! — The UtahraptorTalk to me/Contributions, S Masters (talk), and Diannaa (Talk)

GOCE elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our inaugural Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, Friday 1 December – 23:59 UTC, Tuesday 14 December. All GOCE members in good standing, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are six candidates vying for four positions. The candidate with the highest number of votes will become the Lead Coordinator, therefore, your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report

Season's Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2010. Read all about these in the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report. Highlights Membership grows to 503 editors 2,589 articles removed through four Backlog elimination drives Our encounter with Jimbo Wales Guild home pages reorganized and redesigned Report on our inaugural elections Guild Plans for 2011 New barnstars introduced Requests page improved Sign up for the January 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Get your copy of the Guild's 2010 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. See you in 2011! – Your Coordinators: S Masters (lead), Diannaa, The Utahraptor, and Tea with toast.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the C14 image!

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		Thanks for the speedy production of the Carbon 14 creation and decay image - it was just what the articles needed! Malkinann (talk) 22:44, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter

The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GOCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest

You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NikNaks. You have new messages at S Marshall's talk page.
Message added 20:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—S Marshall T/C 20:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Creating a flag

Hi I would like to request if you can make this flag into svg format:http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/fic%5Egeas.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drax90 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't see why this flag would need vectorisation with any kind of priority, seeing as it's only useful for Code Geass related articles, and as it's so complicated, I'll have to decline. Please request in the workshop in future. Now, what is the issue with the Serbian flag, please? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 11:01, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

sorry about that flag request,thinky you could fix this flag,a portion of feathers graphic is missing on the eagle:http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Supposed_Serbian_Empire_flag.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drax90 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Morris Air

Replied at WP:GL. Thanks. Connormah (talk) 02:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to be a bug, but did you have a chance to check the thread at the Graphcs Lab? Thanks! Connormah (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors The latest GOCE backlog elimination drive is under way! It began on 1 July and so far 18 people have signed up to help us reduce the number of articles in need of copyediting. This drive will give a 50% bonus for articles edited from the GOCE requests page. Although we have cleared the backlog of 2009 articles there are still 3,935 articles needing copyediting and any help, no matter how small, would be appreciated. We are appealing to all GOCE members, and any other editors who wish to participate, to come and help us reduce the number of articles needing copyediting, as well as the backlog of requests. If you have not signed up yet, why not take a look at the current signatories and help us by adding your name and copyediting a few articles. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". >>> Sign-up now <<<

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Ownership of Parliament diagrams

Hi, In May of last year, I worked on and uploaded to the commons several diagrams of the UK Parliament. I was recently reading the article on the House of Commons for some research and couldn't help but notice that my diagram is still there, albeit with a key added, however when I clicked on it to see who added it (you), I noticed that no reference was made to me being the original author. I have no issue with you altering these diagrams, indeed it improves it, but I would very much like it if you could give mention to me being the original author of the diagram.

I am referring to the original file at the following URL: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Parliament2010UK.svg and your version at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:UK_Commons_Current_Composition.svg

I will post this on WikiPedia and the Wiki Commons

Thank you,

95jb14

Hi, thanks for amending it, it's fine now. I didn't want to come across rude, but I was just conscious that it was based on mine.

Thanks,

95jb14 Talk, Founder of WikiProject Latin. 17:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Chess font?

Hi, do you know if there is a chess font that was used to supply the basic chess piece icons for chess position diagram templates? (The icon style reminds me of that used in Batsford books, and I'm wondering if Wiki has a font for it, and if so, can I get the .ttf file somewhere?) Thank you for any help! Ihardlythinkso (talk) 04:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know of any such font. What do you need it for? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 15:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I resolved there is no such font on WP. (Such font would be useful when creating images for gameboard geometries when WP templates for that sort of thing are limited.) Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 18:04, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Al smelting

Thanks for your help so far. More tweaks please (mea culpa): (1) Cryolite should not be capitalized on either new diagram (it would be in German, because they capitalize all nouns but in English, not.) (2) For the simplified diagram, please cut (T = 950C).

TCO (talk) 21:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

almost there

Looks nice. I like the shorter captions and that they are tailored for my atom.

The "neon shell" dashed circle goes OUTSIDE the blue. It is a wider circle than the blue cloud circle.TCO (Reviews needed) 22:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NikNaks. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 03:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Graphics Lab

Currently there is a photograph which awaits conversion from jpg to svg format. Its been several days and no response has come. I was wondering whether you could carry out the conversion. Here is the link for the photo's section in the Graphics Lab page. In case you are unable to do this, could you point out anyone who will be able to do so? Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 10:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

A little help

Hey help me out a bit here. I recently uploaded File:FlagOfYorkshire.svg. But the preview has many things missing which can be seen in the full sized image. I am having the same problem with File:County Flag of North Yorkshire.svg also. Is there a problem with the file or the renderer?? Thanks Roshan220195 (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hm, that's very odd. Are you talking about the blurring of the edges between dark and light parts of the petals? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the central yellow circle also disappears on the raw SVG. I suspect that it is due to the effects you've used in Inkscape (if you're using that), that work in most renderers, but not in MediaWiki. Have you used the normal blur, for instance, or a different effect? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 12:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Pardon me but i am a beginner at this(that includes using inkscape). I have used the blur option that is available in 'fill and stroke'. Actually, the central yellow circle is visible but the shading in some petals is missing. This is a screenshot of what i can see: File:Screenshot 1234.png. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshan220195 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Ah, yes, I can see. I think the circle disappearing must be an issue with Chrome. As far as I was aware, blur was supported by MediaWiki, but apparently not. I think we'll just have to accept that it doesn't work! The alternative is to use a radial gradient to create the same effect, which is definitely supported. As for the petals, I can fix those if I have more time. I'm not sure what's causing the issue exactly. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 15:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh ok. Thanks anyway. 117.193.33.95 (talk) 07:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

WP:GL

Should I just delete the existing files tagged as non-free currently here? I uploaded them all to Commons as they all seem to be simple text/shape logos. CMAH (Connormah's Sock) 22:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm slightly concerned that some logos that have been considered non-free here are being uploaded to Commons as PD-Text, but I am far from an expert. As for deleting the files here, if they're no longer used, I think it's policy to remove fair use files, so I would go ahead. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 06:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

New workshop

Hey there. Please take a look at this proposal to start a new workshop in the graphic lab. Please add your views on this. Roshan220195 (talk) 15:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Yet another electron shell request

Could you please correct lawrencium to 2,8,18,32,32,8,3? Thanks. Double sharp (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Done! I'm always happy to do these as I've written a bit of javascript to generate the angles for any number of electrons. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 14:48, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

In that case, could you please make images for the ones beyond Uuo with articles? None of these have images yet. They need 8 (or, for the last one, 9) electron shells, and can have as many as 50 in one shell. They're all predictions, though, but so is everything beyond Rf. In brackets I give the colour the ball in the centre should have.

119. Ununennium: 2,8,18,32,32,18,8,1 (#d8bcbc)
120. Unbinilium: 2,8,18,32,32,18,8,2 (#ffecd3)
121. Unbiunium: 2,8,18,32,32,18,8,3 (#d1ddff)
122. Unbibium: 2,8,18,32,32,18,9,3 (#d1ddff)
124. Unbiquadium: 2,8,18,32,36,18,8,2 (#d1ddff)
126. Unbihexium: 2,8,18,32,38,18,8,2 (#d1ddff)
137. Untriseptium: 2,8,18,32,49,18,8,2 (#d1ddff)
173. Unsepttrium: 2,8,18,32,50,35,18,8,2 (#c6dd9d)

Thanks in advance, Double sharp (talk) 08:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

May I suggest these format changes: 1. Use font Sans (or DejaVu Sans), not Times New Roman (no serifs, no unfree font in general). 2. Reduce the padding (inside "margin", to say 2px) for these top texts, so that the topline can use a bit more height & width (symbol text should be central of course). 3. If there is space (as expected), make the toprow font larger. Good for readibility when the image is shown not-too-big (150px we are using). When these improvements work, they could be done for the existing ones too. -DePiep (talk) 11:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

I can certainly do these. However, I'm not sure why these should have a different format to the other ones. As far as I can see, the font chosen in the current files is "Arial", not Times, and I have no particular interest in changing so many files. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 13:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

The reasons for the format change I wrote. Currently, these images are to be used in 150px width (see sandbox: {{lead}}). At that size, every pixel counts for readibility. So I proposed a bigger font. About font type: whatever the entered font in this, what counts is the ultimate show image, on a page. I see a different font (example: File:Electron_shell_038_Strontium.svg shows a different (serif even) font with me). Serif letters makes the text less readible in this situation. About Arial: Wikipedia:SVG Help says: Fonts such as Arial and Times New Roman require licencing fees to distribute, and so are not used by Mediawiki internally. So Mediawiki picks another font for the show (curious that in the Strontium example a serif font was used btw). -DePiep (talk) 14:10, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Could you put this on hold for a moment? I have a question about the colors, Double Sharp. See the talk at WP:ELEM. -DePiep (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC) done -DePiep (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Oops. Fixed. Double sharp (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

NikNaks, maybe I invoked too many details, let's skip them. I suggest you proceed as you think best and are happy to do. When they are ready they will show nicely or I will adjust the template. -DePiep (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

No, no, I will get to these in due course, but I see no point in starting to then go back and edit them!  :) Would it be out of turn to propose something on the Elements talk page? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 18:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I didn't even want to hurry you. Yesterday was fine, tomorrow is fine. Have a nice edit. (Any afterward change to them, would be ~125 then, is next step -- on top of these eight. Rome was not built in a day). -DePiep (talk) 22:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Second thought, good point by you. Well, this is my idea.

First, you make these eight in the existing form: with label, names in the same pattern. This way we have the complete set in a single form: commons:electron shell. (An incomplete set is not convenient, anytime anywhere anyperson). All editors, in other languages too, can rely on this one. The current {{infobox ununennium}} already checks for File:Electron shell 119 Ununennium.svg by composing this name, so when it is uploaded it will appear. All fine I'd say, nothing broken.

Afterwards, we can discuss to create all of them into a nolabel variant set, the label text stripped (copy-&-edit or create from zero). That set will be complete too, and with different (systematic) names. Maybe you like to do that, or we can look for a GL bot. When this set is made and uploaded, we'll change the template to use these, since they are better suited (for this template). Note that this does not edit your eight additions, but copy-then-edits them. -DePiep (talk) 08:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that sounds much more workable! I will post my proposal for the new diagram at some point. Apologies for not replying sooner; I have full-time work experience and it's eating up more of my time than I'd anticipated! NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 17:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Any time soon? -DePiep (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done nrs 119--127. See commons:Electron_shell#Period_8 and [WT:ELEM]]. -DePiep (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

invalid data and coloring

Hi,regarding Sudan % ,before South Sudan seceded 70% Muslims is understandable, but since you already split it in the map Its more than 97% now , here, regards--2.50.234.129 (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

As discussed here [1], the map should not have the two countries split as the data was collected when they were one country. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 16:25, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Chess pieces

Any chance of getting the full Alfaerie graphic set (redrawn?) up? ^_^ It would certainly make it a lot easier to create articles on chess variants... Double sharp (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I would be delighted to, so long as you're willing to assist in placing them in sensible letters and moving others around if needs be, as I have done with the ship and the elephant. If you could list the ones that are most useful and give them letters here then I will make them and add them (although not in red, green and yellow for the time being).

Incidentally, do you have any suggestions on the best places to put the inverted king or pawn? I have found a piece called a "Berolina pawn" which used the inverted image, so perhaps capital B? For king I have no ideas. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 14:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Inverted king is used for the anti-king.

Might be hard to get the entire Alfaerie set up, as there are more letters than piece shapes. Can you use letter pairs as well as single letters? Double sharp (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Posted on User:NikNaks/Chess. Huge list, I'm afraid, but we won't really need anything else too badly. Double sharp (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

It certainly seems possible to use double letter schemes as well, so that seems good. I will reply to some of your suggestions my subpage and strike out ones that are already available. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 14:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bhavini logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Bhavini logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

SVG

Hi NikNaks. I'm a Wikipedian from sr.wp and currently I'm working on something for my school (A0 conference poster) and I need to convert an image from PNG to SVG format. I have tried to do it with Inkscape but I have no experience with that program at all and the results are not so good. So maybe you can help me? I would be very grateful to you :) It's just a simple logo consisting of letters. Thanks in advance. micki 07:08, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Sure! If you post a link to the image here then I can do it for you, or if you'd prefer, I could just give you some tips on how to fix a file you've tried yourself. Whichever is easier. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 11:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

I didn't upload file here because it's possibly copyrighted, although I can always get the permission from the school. Here you can see the logo in question. Any help would be nice :) As you can see, it's a small PNG file and I need much larger image for a A0 poster. micki 11:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

If you know what the font that's there is, then that would make the job very easy, but I assume you don't? If you can find out and get permission, I could do it in about ten minutes. Without the font, I'd have to guess and attempt to find something similar or just manually hand trace it, and that won't be as accurate. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 12:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't know which font it is. I believe it's Arial but I'm not sure. I cannot get the permission before Monday, but maybe you can try to make SVG file and post it on postimg.org as I need the logo to finish the poster. And next week I'll upload it on Commons after I get the permission. There is a possibility that the logo is not copyrighted as it consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text and it does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection. micki 12:34, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, I had a crack at it, and you're right that the bottom font seems to be Arial (except for the R, which is more like Helvetica for some reason) but the top font eludes me. I tried to improvise by editing some letters from Futura, and I think it turned out okay. Let me know if it's suitable. The file is here: [2] NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 13:20, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Wow, it's wonderful :) Thank you so so so much. As I already said, I tried to do something like this but I failed. Thanks again :) micki 13:28, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Dozenal multiplication table

Ping. Double sharp (talk) 13:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Heraldry and Vexillology project

Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Hatching system

Hello. I had a question about you post at Talk:Hatching system, I hope you might answer it there. Arms Jones (talk) 15:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

A second request

Hello there,

Thank you for the excellent job that you did on the Council of States diagram at the Graphics Lab. I'd like to take up your offer, if possible, to create a second diagram - this time for the 545 seat House of People (Lok Sabha), now that the election is over.

A placeholder image with the seat number already in place

Here's the colour coding scheme for the parties, with results below:

• National Democratic Alliance (NDA)

  Telugu Desam Party (TDP)

  Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

  Shiv Sena (SS)

  NDA minority parties, including:

• Pattali Makkal Katchi
• Shiromani Akali Dal
• Lok Janshakti Party
• Rashtriya Lok Samata Party
• Apna Dal
• Swabhimani Paksha
• All India N.R. Congress
• National Peoples Party
• Naga People's Front
• United Progressive Alliance (UPA)

  J&K National Conference (J&KNC)

  Nationalist Congress Party (NCP)

  Indian National Congress (INC)

  UPA Minority parties

, including:

• Rashtriya Janata Dal
• Indian Union Muslim League
• Kerala Congress (M)
• Jharkhand Mukti Morcha

• Third and Fourth Front / Unaligned regional parties

  Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM)

  Communist Party of India (CPI)

  All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazagham (AIADMK)

  Biju Janata Dal (BJD)

  Samajwadi Party (SP)

  Janta Dal (United) (JD(U))

  All India Trinamool Congress (AITMC)

  Minority parties

  Independents and others

  Nominated (NOM)

  Vacant seats

Results:

Party	Won
Bharatiya Janata Party	282
Communist Party of India	1
Communist Party of India (Marxist)	9
Indian National Congress	44
Nationalist Congress Party	6
Aam Aadmi Party	4
All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam	37
All India N.R. Congress	1
All India Trinamool Congress	34
All India United Democratic Front	3
Biju Janata Dal	20
Indian National Lok Dal	2
Indian Union Muslim League	2
Jammu & Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party	3
Janata Dal (Secular)	2
Janata Dal (United)	2
Jharkhand Mukti Morcha	2
Kerala Congress (M)	1
Lok Jan Shakti Party	6
Naga Peoples Front	1
National Peoples Party	1
Pattali Makkal Katchi	1
Rashtriya Janata Dal	4
Revolutionary Socialist Party	1
Samajwadi Party	5
Shiromani Akali Dal	4
Shiv Sena	18
Sikkim Democratic Front	1
Telangana Rashtra Samithi	11
Telugu Desam	16
All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen	1
Apna Dal	2
Rashtriya Lok Samta Party	3
Swabhimani Paksha	1
Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party	9
Independent	3
Nominated Seats	2
Total	545

Many thanks once again!

--RaviC (talk) 17:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure I've done my counting correctly, but I've ended up with 33 minority third front party seats, which seems like a lot. Could you double-check the numbers for the minority parties and see if there are any that aren't listed under one of the headings that should be? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 23:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

My appreciations for the quick reply and creation of the graphic. I think you are right - my counting gives the same number. It does seem like a lot, but in proportion of 545 seats, it's only 6% of the total seats. Regards --RaviC (talk) 08:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay then, I guess this is done! Let me know if the composition changes again. :D NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 13:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback from Graphics Lab

Hello, NikNaks. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Selection_shadow.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Silverseren^C 13:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Mughal Empire Flag

Hi NikNaks, thank you for your help with the flag. Could you move the central symbol just a little bit to the left, by one vertical star row? Gryffindor (talk) 06:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I mean, yes I can, but why? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 11:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Android Runtime (ART) bird's-eye view

Hello there! Sorry for bugging, just wanted to let you know there's something you might be interested to have a look at – Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop § Android Runtime (ART) bird's-eye view. Any help there would be greatly appreciated! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 01:50, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Any chances to have those completed, please?

Hello! I apologize for bothering, but would you, by a chance, be willing to pick up a few requests I've placed quite a long time on Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop‎? Or do you maybe know someone else willing to do that? It would highly benefit the articles in which those illustrations would be used, and I have one or two more illustrations that could be created. Any help would be appreciated! — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 12:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

@Dsimic: I realise you're keen to have your requests filed, but if I felt that your requests were something I would want to do or be capable of doing adequately, I would not have marked them stale. In my opinion, the Android version chart needs a complete overhaul so that new data can be added manually and consistently; the PCI Express image should be left for Victor to complete so that the style is consistent (whether he will be back or not I don't know), and although I could rip the image directly from the PDF, this would ensure copyright issues; the other two requests are complex and would be time-consuming to do, and as I have little interest in the subject and they wouldn't really improve my ability in any way, they're not really for me. I'm sure it's frustrating seeing later requests getting completed with yours sitting there, but we're all hobbyists. You're welcome to keep updating your requests to prevent them going stale if you want, but I personally won't be completing them, sorry. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 13:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

No worries, totally understood. Thank you very much for a detailed explanation, and once again sorry for bothering. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 13:39, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

MiniStop logo

Thank you so much for doing that! Unfortunately, I am away from my home computer for two weeks. May I ask you to upload it to the en:wp? It will be easier to tag and defend there. Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

@Kintetsubuffalo: I will leave it to be deleted; just message me on your return and we can have another go.  :) NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 12:49, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

FYI

Have nominated {{Country data Mughal Empire}} for deletion. Informing you given that you created the image that is the subject of discussion. Abecedare (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

@Abecedare: Thanks for the heads up. The image was created at the request of User:Gryffindor in a GL request last year, and it seems he is also the last one to edit this template before me (adding the SVG version). He provided the source for the flag (another digital image) and I simply vectorised it. I have no knowledge of its authenticity, although it has been marked as a fictitious flag at Commons already, as you probably know. He was very adamant about the detail of the flag though, so perhaps he can offer more sources or information as for why it should be kept. I myself have no such information I'm afraid, I'm merely a graphics editor. I will leave it to you to bring him into the discussion if you so choose. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 19:26, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Give your editing interests I suspected something along those lines, but couldn't figure out the provenance based solely on the template/image file history. Will leave a note for Gryffindor, who well may be just another link in the chain (since their interest too seem to be related to graphics, rather than Mughal history). Thanks for the quick response. Abecedare (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

NikNaks is it possible you can alter the image, there is a dispute, the Mughal Flag that you made while wonderful, the problem is the lion is standing, the original Mughal Flag based on the findings in the Mughal Flag talkpage is shown to be couchant. RussianDewey (talk) 23:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

@RussianDewey: The image was composed using the pre-existing lion from the square version of the flag. I am not a good enough artist to be able to redraw it lying down, but there are many vector lions on other flags that, if appropriate, could be borrowed from this category. However, that aside, I'm not convinced that there is enough definitive evidence that the lion is couchant in the green field depiction that is represented there. If there are more complex graphical requests that you want to make based on the new sources, you may want to try the graphics lab. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 00:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

The lion is indeed couchant, we have SOLID evidence, the one you based your work on wasn't solid or reliable where the lion was standing, let me show you the evidence:

1)Edward Terry's description and engraving. He calls it the Imperial Standard of the Great Mughals

2)The second evidence is from a book called Exotic Aliens: The Lion and the Cheetah in India which shows the lion couchat on the flag.

3) The third evidence is William Baffin’s 1619 map of the Mughal Empire, if you look at the top right corner of the map you see the lion couchant.

i hope you can work and create one of use, because the one you did was simply beautiful, I never realized it was wrong except after some users remove it. You should use the same outline, except give the sun two eyes and make the lion couchant, I think you choose which lion you want. RussianDewey (talk) 15:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm still unconvinced that any of those depictions of lions are intended to be used on a triangular field of small stars, and source for the image that this flag was created from clearly shows the lion passant. Moreover, the third image is not a flag, rather an emblem? And the second one is too unclear for anyone to be able to replicate whatever the background of the design is. Again, I am not a good enough artist to redraw these flags without clear, unambiguous sources that I can either trace or use existing elements to create. I am also 99% sure that even a version of the triangular flag with a couchant lion would be neither uncontroversial nor acceptable for use as the flag of the Mughals. If you would like me to create a version of the triangular flag using one of the lions from this category (that you need to select) then I am happy to make the change, but anything requiring a more complicated redrawing of the flag or a new lion should be taken to the graphics lab. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 15:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

The website you got if from is very un-reliable, since it gives no clue or source on how they got it, even the emblem is a good source, at least we know the Mughals depicted their lion couchant and is well sourced from a guy we know who created the map in early 17th century, at the height of the Mughal Power. Also the issue of the multiple dots apparently is from a late Mughal Period, where a painting depicts Mughal Celevrating Eid with a different flag that has no Lion in it, just the sun and someone did a work on it, your flag is based on the time of Aurangzeb which was the most powerful time of the mguhals, the green flags were darker, but I see no evidence of little dots/stars. I don't know what graphic lab is, I'm kinda new RussianDewey (talk) 01:14, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seal of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Coats of arms of Guatemala

Hi, may I help improve some coats of arms of Guatemala , as they have very poor quality and some of them are in poor condition . Plus I could help make all logos appearing on this link: Ministry of National Defense of Guatemala , Thanks !.

• 
  Escudo de Guatemala (1851-1858)
• 
  Escudo de Guatemala (1858-1871)
• 
  Escudo del Parlacen
• 
  Escudo de los Altos

Basada en estad imagen, y porfavor podrían hacer todos los logos y banderas que aparecen en esta página y podrían hacer una bandera de Guatemala que diga en dorado Fuerzas Armadas de Guatemala? Gracias. Thanks" --ElisonSeg (talk) 23:53, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm very confused as to what you actually want! Do you want these images to be vectorised or altered in some way? If so, try the graphics lab and make it explicit exactly what you want changed to improve them. Saying they are "poor quality" may be true, but doesn't help us to fix them for you. NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 15:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

You do beautiful work!

Do you take requests?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

@Kintetsubuffalo: I'm certainly open to requests but I can't guarantee that I'll be able to do them! NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 13:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! They are Scouting images in need of improvement, which the Graphics Lab generally doesn't like to take.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

@Kintetsubuffalo: Do you have an example? NikNaks _{talk - gallery} 16:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Kentucky Seal (colored).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Kentucky Seal (colored).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Neyveli Lignite Corporation.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neyveli Lignite Corporation.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NikNaks. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NikNaks. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Qrendi

An article that you have been involved in editing—Qrendi —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Beckettnoti (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:US Open.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:US Open.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:US Open.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:US Open.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, NikNaks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhavini logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhavini logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)