User talk:Mohammed Qays/Archive 1

Archive 1

unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed Qays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, please unblock my account, and I pledge not to repeat any violation in the future:

1. Full compliance with encyclopedia policies.
2. Useful Contributions
3. Stay away from problems and don't do any subversive action. Mohammed Qays (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

You can check my pore in Arabic Here Mohammed Qays (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That is not being more specific. If your English skills are such that you can't be more specific, you may wish to edit the version of Wikipedia that is in a language with which you are more familiar. 331dot (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please be more specific as to how you will do these things. 331dot (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

331dot

1. I do not create articles aimed at promoting any topic that is not compatible with Wikipedia policies.
2. I do not create any article that does not comply with the policy of noticing people
3. Do not create other accounts. Mohammed Qays (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mohammed Qays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, please lift the ban from my account, as it was better to provide a one-day ban instead of a permanent direct ban, I ask you to remove the ban on my account to return to editing and start a new phase and fully comply with the conditions and policies followed, and I pledge not to repeat any violation in the future. What I will add to the encyclopedia, is editing the articles that concern Iraq, my country, please consider my request kindly. Mohammed Qays (talk) 5:38 am, 5 January 2024, Friday (18 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

Accept User agrees to not edit with a conflict of interest and to use only one account-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. You haven't described your relationship to Hzm Coin -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra

I have nothing to do with it, someone asked me to write it in exchange for a financial amount, and then I realized that this is contrary and the article is contrary according to the policies of the encyclopedia. Mohammed Qays (talk) 03:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

The blocking admin has not edited in six months. @331dot: Can we unblock on our own, or take it to WP:AN. Should we unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

If the blocking admin is unavailable, I think we can do either one depending on the situation. I'm not sure how I feel about unblocking here, they don't seem to understand paid editing(it's not against policy as long as its disclosed), though maybe it's a language barrier. Their story has changed too, initially saying they had nothing to do with it at all(though again, maybe a language barrier). It does sound like they won't edit about the same company again, though. If you feel like unblocking, I think you could. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

@331dot @Deepfriedokra Thanks Mohammed Qays (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Vielen dank! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

I'll pass/ -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

@Yamaguchi先生: OK to unblock? Thoughts? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

🤦‍♂️ emailed blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra I have a problem, I get a message that the account is blocked??!!! Mohammed Qays (talk) 10:39, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Text sorry for the inconvenience -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra Thank you for everything Mohammed Qays (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

U R welcome -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bassem Fleifel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bassem Fleifel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassem Fleifel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Kevin Rumley have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Please explain why you placed a "decline" template on this draft. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:16, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ar:ناجح_المعموري to Najih al-Mamouri. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces thanks ♥ Mohammed Qays (talk) 14:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Razzak Abdul Wahid (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mims Mentor were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Razzak Abdul Wahid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— MimsMENTOR ^talk 07:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mohammed Qays! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — MimsMENTOR talk 07:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Yasin Taha Hafiz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yasin Taha Hafiz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Hey man im josh,

Unfortunately, interacting on English Wikipedia is very discouraging. I often try to ignore some of the warnings because they are misplaced, and this makes me consider leaving it and focusing solely on contributing to Arabic Wikipedia. No matter what you do, you find your articles being deleted or ignored for unconvincing reasons. The biographies I wrote about are well-known, and there are numerous Arabic sources about them. However, it seems that searching for the Arabic name instead of relying on the English name should be the standard for determining the significance of a topic or article. This might be my last contribution here. Best regards.   Mohammed Qays  (🗣) 18:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

You are allowed to use non-English sources for articles on English Wikipedia @Mohammed Qays. The article was moved to draft space (not deleted) primarily due to a lack of sources which help to establish the person's notability. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh And what about the article Abdul Razzak Abdul Wahid? The response was unconvincing despite the presence of sources for every piece of information.   Mohammed Qays  (🗣) 18:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

The Reuters and Al Jazeera sources are certainly good sources, but I'm not familiar with the first source used, the one hosted on Archive.org. Perhaps that's the issue that @Mims Mentor ran into as well? I'm not sure since I did not review that myself. I think if you found one or two more sources mentioning him as any of those poet titles it would help significantly towards having the article be accepted at AfC. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh Thank you for explaining each paragraph, this is exactly what I needed. Best regards to you, have a great day!   Mohammed Qays  (🗣) 18:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

You as well, and thank you for the effort you're putting in to improve English Wikipedia's coverage in areas that are often more neglected due to language barriers! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)