User talk:Menarie221

Welcome!

Hello, Menarie221!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Menarie221! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 11:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youtube may only be used as a reference in very race circumstances. Seee WP:YOUTUBE. Please remove instances whch do not comply

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deepa Jha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Deepa Jha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Camilear (talk) 08:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. Thank you for helping me. I can only convert the draft after collecting enough reliable sources about the topic. Menarie221 (talk) 10:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure :) Camilear (talk) 12:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kamaal Khan (singer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kamaal Khan (singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 08:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. I will look out for more sources and expand the article for publishing later. Menarie221 (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandeep Anand (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lemonaka were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per comments below, citing unreliable source and seemed not meet notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandeep Anand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Lemonaka 05:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girija Shankar (Actor) (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Girija Shankar (Actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamaal Khan (singer) (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamaal Khan (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. I am currently watching and searching for references about this film. I found that a movie with the same title released in 2021 is being linked in the film list of the actors of 1984 version. So I thought of creating this page as necessary. I am open for any suggestions to make this page suitable for publishing. Thank you. Menarie221 (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Menarie221 I'm really sorry for this draftification. I didnt realize that it was not an hour before the creation. Feel free to continue working on the page here itself. Really sorry for my actions again. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, please don't be sorry at all. I really love Wikipedia. I am just a beginner and trying to make corrections in the existing page or create any page the is justifiable and beneficial for Wikipedia readers. I really respect any actions or suggestions from anyone who reviews works in Wikipedia. I will just keep looking for good sources to the support of information. Menarie221 (talk) 06:38, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What probably happened really is the page was moved which you were still editing it, Menarie221, so your edit was published as a new page, causing what appears to be a cut-and-paste move. Moving the page to draftspace minutes after you had created it was premature. But please do add sources soon. SilverLocust 💬 06:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, sir. What trouble I am having is that I couldn't easily find the news articles online related to old films or anything which was published in the past (except videos). One page I created Sourav Chakraborty (comedian) is still said to lack good sources. So I am just thinking about how or where to find the source which I know exists somewhere but out of my visible range. Menarie221 (talk) 06:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hum Do Hamare Do (1984 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neshma Chemburkar

The article Neshma Chemburkar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any strong reason why this subject is notable. Please provide a strong reason and additional citations to establish the person's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Garvitpandey1522 (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sir. Would you mind taking a look at the page. I have added some credits and links to the page. It would be helpful if you provide suggestion for the improvement of the page. Thank you. Menarie221 (talk) 05:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]