Jump to content

User talk:Mangokeylime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Plankton (SpongeBob SquarePants) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Legal intoxicant may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Hipster (contemporary subculture), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Strangelove

[edit]

I undid your edit. We would need a source or sources to make such an interpretation in the article. --John (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Legal Status of Coca".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Legal Status of Coca}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of religious slurs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zapatismo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Anti-European sentiment, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ogress 01:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Technical Barnstar
For your excellent navigation templates: Youth rights sidebar and Black Power sidebar. Thank you! Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 21:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HEY! ALRIGHT! Thanks...

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JustBerry. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Cornel West, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Does not seem to be a mention of Black Power (movement) in the article. Could you provide a reference? JustBerry (talk) 00:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Assata Shakur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please address previous issue. JustBerry (talk) 00:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding any further Black Power sidebars, please discuss your reasons for placing multiple sidebars on different articles. @Huon: for additional comments. --JustBerry (talk) 00:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure why I, specifically, was pinged here, but having looked into the issue, I tend to agree with JustBerry. The Template:Black Power sidebar seems at best a collection of very loosely associated topics. To pick a random example, John Brown (abolitionist) is related to the Black Power movement? The article doesn't say so. The same goes for many other topics linked in that sidebar. We should give that sidebar a stronger focus on topics clearly associated with Black Power. Huon (talk) 01:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For clarification purposes, I had asked Huon for a second opinion over IRC. Not for a particular "reason" I would say. --JustBerry (talk) 01:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Guys just change the sidebar, its okay, no need to message me, its your responsibility! Do whatever you wish, to be honest the only thing I knew a lot about was the ideologies.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zapatismo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BPowerLogo.png

[edit]

What does "mash up" mean in regards to the image File:BPowerLogo.png? Mitchumch (talk) 21:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Psychedelia sidebar

[edit]

Sorry, but although the new article message has gone, this is still creating a line space at the start of the articles it is on.--SabreBD (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you suggest we do SabreBD?

I will have a go at fixing it, if that is ok. If that fails I will see if I can get some help.--SabreBD (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Go for it just don't ruin anything.
I think I got it.--SabreBD (talk) 23:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What did you fix?
I think there was an extra line in the list that was, for some reason, turning up as a line at the top of the page.--SabreBD (talk) 07:14, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-German sentiment: Revision history

[edit]

Hi. Three weeks ago you expanded Anti-German sentiment including at least 14 new References (count up from 79 to 93). Perhaps you can find a 15th that is broken, for an error message now (newly with your big edit) follows number 93. --P64 (talk) 19:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

[edit]

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 October

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Power movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltimore riots. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of left-wing movements

[edit]

Hi, I'm Parrotz1461. Mangokeylime, thanks for creating List of left-wing movements!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. active/defeated is not NPOV

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Parrotz1461 (talk) 04:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of left-wing movements

[edit]

Hello Mangokeylime,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of left-wing movements for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Parrotz1461 (talk) 04:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of left-wing movements

[edit]

Your article has been moved to Draft:List of left-wing movements. I don't think it is an attack page, and perhaps doesn't have POV issues either, but you should probably work on adding some references before moving it back to the mainspace. Going to talk to the concerned user as I don't think they are qualified to be patrolling. Hope this helps, happy editing! MusikAnimal talk 05:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Days of Rage
added links pointing to Jeff Jones and David Gilbert
Brink's robbery (1981)
added a link pointing to Armored car

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huey P. Newton Gun Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blacks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Riders Liberation Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ten Point Program. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hippie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • radar/big-lebowski-spawns-religion Big Lebowski Spawns Religion] - Don't Panic.com - 11 April 2011]</ref><ref>[http://otisryanproductions.blogspot.com/2012/02/interview-oliver-benjamin-founder-of.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ethnic riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Population transfer has been accepted

[edit]
Template:Population transfer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Racism in the Soviet Union has been accepted

[edit]
Racism in the Soviet Union, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pulaski riot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pulaski. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broad Street Riot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Mangokeylime, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 15:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you created Draft:Template:Leninism sidebar. However, drafts are for drafting articles and not templates, so I moved it to Template:Leninism sidebar, which is now in the correct namespace (Template namespace). —MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 23:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Black Liberation Militia for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Black Liberation Militia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Black Liberation Militia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meatsgains (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment here: Talk:Malawi_Gold#Split_off_Cannabis_in_Malawi.3F Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 07:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Workers' Councils (November 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 21:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"420" collaboration

[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "2016 French labor protests".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Workers' Councils

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Workers' Councils".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of left-wing movements".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Workers' Councils, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Workers' Councils

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Workers' Councils".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 22:09, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magic truffle has been accepted

[edit]
Magic truffle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep (talk) 12:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mound Builders box

[edit]

Do we really need that? Not only does it mess with the lede photo in most of those articles by shoving it down, "Mound builders" as a term is a leftover fantasy from the 1800s, there was no overarching "mound building" society but a bunch oftentimes unrelated cultures. Also, most of the links included in it are in collapsed navigation templates at the bottom of the pages. Heiro 02:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per your reply at my talk[1] (and can we keep this at one talk page, how about here?) Archaeologists and historians did not "coin the term", as I said it is a leftover from the 1800s when many thought the "mound builders" were one great civilization, and on top of that they thought they were Romans or Celts or Phoenicians or Egyptians, etc. Archaeologists and historians rarely use the term. Use of and promotion of this term perpetuates a flawed thinking about who these different cultures were and how they related to each other. It is why you do not see it used in individual articles about those cultures, but confined mostly to the article about the term. Heiro 02:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Heironymous Rowe: What do you recommend as action? I personally just wanted to organize a box on pre-colombian civilizations in North America. Mangokeylime (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
While it could be useful on the Mound Builder page itself, since it condenses much of the material in the article to a system of links, I don't think it's appropriate to be at the top of all of the other pages for the reason outlined above. On the mound builder page the nature of the term is discussed, but having it on the other pages without explanation that it is deprecated terminology that does not accurately describe current understanding of those cultures and their relationships would give people the false impression that it is still valid terminology. Also it pretty much duplicates this Template:Pre-Columbian North America and other nav templates created for the individual mound building cultures such as Template:Mississippian and related cultures and Template:Hopewellian peoples. Heiro 04:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Heironymous Rowe: That makes sense, I'll move the box to more relevant parts of the page rather than just the very top.
I guess I wasn't clear in my language. It is not only about its position on the page, it is that I don't think a box using deprecated terminology based on an archaic and flawed understanding of these cultures (and not explaining anywhere that it is archaic, flawed, and deprecated by professionals in the field) should be placed on any of these articles except for possibly the Mound Builders article itself and only then as a navigational aid. It's not about having it somewhere other than the top. Heiro 00:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Heironymous Rowe: Well what do you recommend as a better way of organizing a box? In general I just was trying to make a box for Northern American civilizations.

I am unsure as to why they need one at all? A box isn't required for any of these pages. The navigation boxes at the bottom of the pages already have loads more links and information than that box could ever comfortably fit. Except for the catchall Template:Pre-Columbian North America they are all custom built for each of the mostly unrelated cultures; the Mississippian culture box alone has links to hundreds of articles. Having a box for the sake of having a big box visible on the page makes no sense to me. Heiro 03:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have a template, why would we duplicate it with an infobox that might easily get out of sync with the template. If you want more input, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Archaeology is the right place IMHO. Doug Weller talk 11:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "nation" infoboxes from articles on Florida chiefdoms

[edit]

Hi - It's good to see your interest in the indigenous peoples of Florida and other parts of the Southeast, but I encourage you to learn more about some of the conventions in this area of academic study. The study of ancient and historic indigenous peoples in the Americas has been increasingly well-developed. There are academic classifications and conventions about how to refer to them, in part based on documentation through archeology and/or written records. For instance, peoples who are identified through archeology are generally referred to as participating in an archeological culture. There may be chiefdoms and groups of bands, such as the Uzita or Pohoy, but they do not comprise a nation state in any contemporary meaning of the word. It is Original Research, prohibited on Wikipedia, to make up a new way to classify them, as was done bu your "nation" infobox for these groups. Reliable Sources on these peoples, which we as editors are required to use, do not classify them as "nations" or countries. It's important to learn more to understand the context for materials and articles on the indigenous peoples. Thanks again for your enthusiasm for Wikipedia.Parkwells (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Parkwells: Okey dokey, good to hear you guys came to a consensus

Category:Black Power has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Black Power, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Anomalous+0 (talk) 10:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maleconazo

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give August 1994 protest in Cuba a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Maleconazo. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 20:08, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Jamaican Maroon religion) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Jamaican Maroon religion.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 23:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arab Winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you interested in Cuba Wikiproject?

[edit]

Hi there! I am looking to revive the Cuba WikiProject over at WP:CUB! I am contacting you because you are on the member list, but I want to see who is willing to still work on this. If you are interested, please let me know! I would love to see this project as successful as possible. Feel free to contact me with any questions - please ping me so I don't miss it! Have a great day, Snowycats (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Friends with benefits

[edit]

Friends with benefits is discussed within the context of causal dating/casual sexual relationships. I don't see that it needs its own Wikipedia article. If the Casual dating article doesn't seem a perfect fit for it, it can go in the Casual sex article, where "friends with benefits" is mentioned. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cubonics) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Cubonics.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Cubonics.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariel boatlift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afro-American religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hoodoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime

Thank you for creating Acts of repudiation.

User:Newslinger, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for contributing this article on a Cuban term to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Newslinger}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Newslinger talk 01:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft evasion into Draft evasion in the Vietnam War. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution is required

[edit]

When you copy content from one Wikipedia article to another, you are required to include an attribution statement. I have added the statement to Draft evasion in the Vietnam War for you. Please read WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Schazjmd (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Schazjmd, I had thought it was done automatically.Mangokeylime (talk) 16:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, the software isn't quite that smart. Schazjmd (talk) 16:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian removal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam

[edit]

Vietnam War: Missing section on Mercantile Companies Proxy War. The Vietnam War was nothing less then one of the last Mercantile Companies Proxy Wars. French mercantile companies versus Localized, with pretends of resoure maraudes.

Iraq War, similar. Statements made by Barack Obama in relation to the Russia in the Ukraine was also a merantile company proxy statement. Large U.S., U.K., French investments in East Germany, also a Western (mostly U.S.) mercantile empire move in quote conquest.

You should add those particulars, completing the article and joining patches of overal Western society kickouts the World over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.185.141.186 (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is this about?Mangokeylime (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghetto riots for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghetto riots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghetto riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox George Floyd protests has been nominated for merging with Template:George Floyd protests. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cuba under Fidel Castro into Aftermath of the Cuban Revolution. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pie

[edit]

Good morning. The mango key lime pie sold by Publix is one of my all-time favorites. Have a great day! Jacona (talk) 11:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have good taste!Mangokeylime (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting Amatonormativity

[edit]

I removed the prod and then did some work on the article. I found it very interesting. Thanks for starting the article. Lightburst (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Venceremos Brigade

[edit]

Hello Mangokeylime,

I see that you added a list of notable members, but did not provide any references to reliable sources. Accordingly, I will remove that section and start adding back names that are properly referenced. You are welcome to add names too, but they must be properly referenced. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——Serial 04:15, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:White supremacist riots in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate infoboxes, again

[edit]

Per your addition of the "country" infobox to several protohistoric and early historic Native American entities pages, please do not. They were not, and are not, described in academia using the modern sense of a "country" or "state". No academic cite exists for using this term for these entities. What you are engaging is is basically WP:OR, so please don't do it. Heiro 20:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Heironymous Rowe: What do you recommend? I see some pages use the ethnic group infobox which I feel is inappropriate for a chiefdom. A polity isn't an ethnicity. Is there a more appropriate infobox? I don't want to imply that these societies were total nation states but they sure weren't just an ethnic group. (Also I just read our old convo, my bad for never starting that convo with other editors, I apologize).Mangokeylime (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Articles do not have to have infoboxes. It's nice when we have one that fits, but it's best not to try and shoehorn one in that doesn't fit just to have one. Especially when using one breaches WP:OR by implying something about a culture, group, ethnicity, or people that is not born out in the academic literature. I know you like adding infoboxes, I do as well (I've added more than my fair share to many many articles), I just don't feel we have one currently for this situation (or I probably would have added it myself) and I'm not sure there are enough similar articles to warrant creating one specifically for this kind of group. Heiro 00:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Heironymous Rowe: Actually how would you feel about the government infobox? I feel it might fit best? If not I think we'll have to scrap the infoboxes on the chiefdom pages like you said.Mangokeylime (talk) 01:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please reread my last comment. I don't think any infoboxes describing modern concepts of nation states, territories, or countries belong there. We also do not really know enough about how these prehistoric and protohistoric groups worked to describe their "government'. You're looking to add an info box, just to add an infobox. Stop. Articles are not required to have one. We currently do not, to my knowledge, have one that is appropriate. I'm pretty sure the other knowledgeable long term editors of those article would probably agree with me. If you find one, take it to the article talkpage and ask for consensus from those other editors. Heiro 04:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Periods in US history

[edit]

Template:Periods in US history has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. jps (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Nations of Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article Creation

[edit]

Hello! I see you're a member of the WikiProject Cannabis and I was wondering if you would you be able to help out with the creation of Poke A Bowl (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Poke_A_Bowl). I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. 67.76.114.156 (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Conflicts in the War on drugs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:85:C101:C9D0:3D8C:B4:93BE:7248 (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grey years

[edit]

Hey. I saw that you "thanked" me for making some edits on the grey years page and realized that you are the one who created it in the first place. This was a school assignment but I just wanted to let you know I liked the original page before I went in and changed it up and I think your contributions were cool. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, I think it's pretty awesome that there are people out there working to make a free website a better place. --Fudgevillain (talk) 01:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Mangokeylime (talk) 17:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Workers' Councils

[edit]

Hello, Mangokeylime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Workers' Councils".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do copy-paste moves leading to duplicate articles

[edit]

Please do not do copy-paste moves, such as you did here at History of Cuba (1902–1959), turning a 152-byte redirect into a 21kb duplicate copy of the article Republic of Cuba (1902–1959). That is not how we implement article name changes at Wikipedia. In the future, please follow the procedure at WP:MOVE; and as a general rule, do not perform unilateral moves of articles to a new name, without first obtaining consensus for the move at the article Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the content you added and restored History of Cuba (1902–1959) to the redirect it contained in the version of October 2017 just before your edit. If you have any questions, feel free to {{Reply}} below, or contact me on my Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, you did the right thing.Mangokeylime (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Anti-White Racism" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anti-White Racism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 16#Anti-White Racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:12, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Afrikan Black Panther Party for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Afrikan Black Panther Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Afrikan Black Panther Party (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CentreLeftRight 04:15, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cocaine boom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superfly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Campaignbox Nadir of American race relations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Sit-in movement

[edit]

Template:Campaignbox Sit-in movement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Communalism sidebar

[edit]

Template:Communalism sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. czar 23:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Anti-White Racism" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-White Racism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 4#Anti-White Racism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy within

[edit]

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 23:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks, I try. Mangokeylime (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vietnam War resisters has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Vietnam War resisters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anarchies

[edit]

Template:Anarchies has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. czar 15:31, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

[edit]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Nzambi a Mpungu, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 17:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite, but I think it is outside by expertise. Mangokeylime (talk) 23:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That’s okay, you don’t need to be an expert. If you’re sort of interested there’s a section on the page with some sources for people interested but unfamiliar, but no worries if not Kowal2701 (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Counterculture of the 1960s

[edit]

I've reverted this edit. Obviously you didn't click through, as the relation with 1960s counterculture is documented in the lead of the article, third paragraph. Skyerise (talk) 12:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

You probably know the drill by now. I've fixed the attribution for your History of Cuba edit, but please make sure you're doing this yourself from now on. I know another user who kept forgetting actually ended up making a checklist for himself so he wouldn't forget to provide attribution when he copied material across between pages. Have you considered doing something like that? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh crap. Thanks. I'll keep the attribution tab open now. Mangokeylime (talk) 22:05, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 22:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]