User talk:Krishnarthiindia

This is Krishnarthiindia's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Krishnarthiindia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raju Tiwari has been accepted

Raju Tiwari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Faction and Separate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	keep it up Iansumanbhagat (talk) 03:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamshedpur Co-operative College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Degree.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akevsharma (talk) 08:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamshedpur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jubilee Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ansuman Bhagat has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ansuman Bhagat. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Life

added links pointing to Classified and Characteristic

Adham Nabulsi

added a link pointing to Producer

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ansuman Bhagat (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

27 sources for 4 lines? All that and still no indication of notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ansuman Bhagat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ansuman Bhagat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 23:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raghav Nayyar

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raghav Nayyar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raghav Nayyar (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No demonstration of pass of WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. Also see WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raghav Nayyar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raghav Nayyar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 06:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm The Alternate Mako. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tuhin Sinha seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (talk) 08:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jan Ki Baat

Hello, Krishnarthiindia

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jan Ki Baat for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sonu Singh Rajput

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sonu Singh Rajput, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhagat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Man have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please read comments next to images (in this case "PLEASE NOTE: This image was selected following extensive discussion at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Man/sandbox...") before replacing them with your own selfies. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chetan Bhagat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Public School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Legend of Birsa Munda

The article The Legend of Birsa Munda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Advertisement. Article refbombed with non-independent promotion, plainly lacks adequate sources to meet WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 08:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Similarities with Iansumanbhagat and COI

You claim to be Ansuman Bhagat here. If so, you need to declare WP:COI before editing anything related to him. Further your edits seem similar to Iansumanbhagat. If that is also your account, you need to stop using multiple accounts and stick to one. Hemantha (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tuhin Sinha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuhin Sinha, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuhin Sinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seema Jain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seema Jain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 17:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seema Jain (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kirbanzo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Seema Jain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Seema Jain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 17:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Female entrepreneur

A tag has been placed on Category:Female entrepreneur indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tuhin Sinha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tuhin Sinha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuhin Sinha. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 10:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wife's Hemant Soren has been nominated for deletion

Category:Wife's Hemant Soren has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Star Mississippi 13:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalpana Soren

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kalpana Soren requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JoyStick101 (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tuhin Sinha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuhin Sinha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuhin Sinha (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 15:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You've continued to edit about Ansuman Bhagat despite my previous request to clarify your relationship. To repeat, since you've claimed (now deleted, but I'd seen it before deletion, though I can't remember which page it was) to be Bhagat, you cannot edit anything related to him. I also note that Draft:Ansuman Bhagat is exclusively edited by you. Also, this tweet by Tuhin Sinha to an account (also named Ansuman Bhagat) about his article's deletion makes it seem like there was some canvassing to recreate Tuhin Sinha. Can you please clarify your relationship with Tuhin Sinha? Hemantha (talk) 07:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madhubala, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages East African and European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mukesh Bharti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mukesh Bharti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukesh Bharti (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 09:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mukesh Bharti. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 07:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raghav Nayyar

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raghav Nayyar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shiv Sena Balasaheb moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shiv Sena Balasaheb, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DIVINE 21:30, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shiv Sena Balasaheb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shiv Sena Balasaheb, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Szmenderowiecki (talk) 23:31, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Seema Jain

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seema Jain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ansuman Bhagat

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ansuman Bhagat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Seema Jain

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Seema Jain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shiv Sena Balasaheb

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shiv Sena Balasaheb, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mithlesh Kaushik (Mith) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mithlesh Kaushik (Mith) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithlesh Kaushik (Mith) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

echidnaLives - talk - edits 08:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yohan Poonawalla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yohan Poonawalla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohan Poonawalla (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uncle Spock (talk) 08:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Yohan Poonawalla. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Uncle Spock (talk) 14:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You see that bit where it says "Do not remove this notice? well, that means... wait for it... do not remove the notice. Amazingly simple really isn't it? Moons of Io (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Yohan Poonawalla. Uncle Spock (talk) 17:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Yohan Poonawalla) for a period of 1 week for edit-warring to remove the {{AFD}} template from the article despite numerous warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note If you continue to disrupt other articles about persons named Poonawala or any others, the next block is likely to be permanent. Abecedare (talk) 01:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That notice on the page advises anyone that there is a discussion about the page's deletion. Removing the notice will not stop the discussion (or the deletion of the page, should the discussion end that way) so is totally pointless, and will only serve to make you look a poor editor. Also be aware that logging out just to edit the page after you have been blocked from editing will not make you look any better. Moons of Io (talk) 09:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yohan Poonawalla (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Yohan Poonawalla instead.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NBIO is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NBIO for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

There is also an article, which has been nominated for deletion. This draft may be kept, but is not ready for article space, and neither is the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yohan Poonawalla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MediaTribe per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MediaTribe. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 15:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shiv Sena Balasaheb

Hello, Krishnarthiindia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shiv Sena Balasaheb".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]