User talk:Kenneth Saclote

Kenneth Saclote, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kenneth Saclote! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Destinee Arnold. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Logged-out editing gives the appearance of deception

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Bri.public (talk) 20:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsourced content

Hello Kenneth, almost of every edit of yours in the article Miss Universe 2019 are unsourced. Meaning, your edits may be untrue without providing a reliable source. For tutorial or guide, you can visit WP:Citing sources.

I gave you four warnings and once you violated the violation. You will be reported at the administrator intervention against vandalism. If an administrator approved the report, you will be blocked temporarily OR definetly. Triila73 (talk) 04:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

When you remove large amounts of content like this, you need to provide an edit summary. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:49, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuanza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bria Smith moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bria Smith, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bria Smith

Hello, Kenneth Saclote

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 331dot and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bria Smith, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|331dot}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

331dot (talk) 11:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to ABS-CBN has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. -WayKurat (talk) 09:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss World 2019. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 23:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jjj1238. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Miss Universe 2020, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 00:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe 2020. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 06:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --{ [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 01:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, you may be blocked from editing. If you wish to add/edit content on said article, please do so with reliable sources (RS). Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 20:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe 2020. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about you at WP:ANI

An editor has complained that you have removed sources here from Miss Universe 2020, for a reason which doesn't make sense: "Sources doesn't needed anymore like last year's Wikipedia Draft." At first glance this is not correct English. Can you please give us a reasonable explanation why those sources are not needed? You were previous blocked (in September) for adding unsourced information, and here you are removing sources. That's usually not a good idea. EdJohnston (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the ANI discussion at WP:ANI#User:Kenneth Saclote. If you can't provide a good reason for your changes, an admin may decide to block your account for a longer time. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:58, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miss South Africa 2020 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Miss South Africa 2020, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Miss Universe Philippines 2020 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Laguna, Kalinga, Zamboanga and Isabela

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bria Smith concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bria Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bria Smith 2 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bria Smith 2, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mirna Naiia Marić

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mirna Naiia Marić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Smjg (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mirna Naiia Marić for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirna Naiia Marić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirna Naiia Marić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uygurche (talk) 02:22, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bria Smith

Hello, Kenneth Saclote. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bria Smith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bria Smith 2

Hello, Kenneth Saclote. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bria Smith 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miss South Africa 2020

Hello, Kenneth Saclote. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Miss South Africa 2020".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 02:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss World 2021 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss World 2021 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss World 2021 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss USA 2020. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I draftified an article you wrote

An article you recently created, Chantal Wiertz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Please make sure to consult WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources when constructing your article. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, you may be blocked from editing. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 22:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You cannot remove AfD notices before the process is complete. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roxanne Allison Baeyens

The article Roxanne Allison Baeyens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO, there is no automatic notability for winning a beauty pageant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roxanne Allison Baeyens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roxanne Allison Baeyens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Allison Baeyens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe Thailand 2020. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Miss USA 2020, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 15:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 03:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, you may be blocked from editing. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 02:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Universe 2020. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe 2020 accidental insertion of Uganda

Kenneth, regarding the warning from Jjj1238 just above, would be helpful if you could just say that this edit was accidental and you will take more care in editing Miss Universe 2020. Without an acknowledgement, these sort of things look a lot like vandalism. Are you reading your talkpage? - Bri.public (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri.public: If I'm being totally honest, Kenneth has vandalized and edited disruptively for as long as I've known him on Wikipedia. I've had to give numerous warnings and not one of them was ever acknowledged, nor has his behavior ever changed. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 16:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If we still don't get a response here, then I guess re-visiting a noticeboard is inevitable. This would be the third WP:ANI post for this editor, I think. Bri.public (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jjj1238:, @Bri:, @Bri.public: You should report it to WP:ANI if violates without given a source. ApprenticeFan work 02:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unless you start responding to concerns about your editing and start making an effort to comply with Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines, your next block is likely to be indefinite. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1022#Another thing (October 2019)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1025#User:Kenneth Saclote (December 2019)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1026#User:Kenneth Saclote (December 2019)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1041#User:Kenneth Saclote (July 2020)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1046#Beauty pageant disruption (September 2020)

Your editing has been discussed at the incident noticeboard listed above, in addition to your talkpage (here), and I don't see any replies from you. This failure to participate and discuss is disruption in and of itself. - Bri.public (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for vandalizing wikipedia, I promise next time I wont do it again.❤ Kenneth Saclote (talk) 05:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty pageant reliable sources

In the spirit of editing in concert with consensus: Please read WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources and either follow the guidelines, or challenge them. Adding missosology.org like this is in opposition to currently developed consensus and can be construed as continued disruptive editing. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Miss USA 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Miss USA 2021 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Miss USA 2021. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content, again and still

This is virtually a repeat of the warning and block you received a year ago regarding Miss Universe 2019. Please do read and heed these notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss Universe 2020, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Bri.public (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ayu Maulida may be notable

Hi, I noticed that you redirected Ayu Maulida to another article. The article had over 40 sources from over a span of years when I visited it earlier in January, so she seemed notable to me. Now another editor has complained about the redirect on my talkpage. You might want to give it a second thought. Also, I would encourage you to use edit summaries so your edits aren't mistaken for vandalism. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri: He is doing disruptive edits by deleting all the content until nothing left, including removing the protection for prevention against sock-puppet of blocked and banned users from editing (the page was blanked and redirected to other page by him). I'm reverting his non-summary vandalism edits to the last version by you.--Lukewon (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ayu Maulida. --Lukewon (talk) 05:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chantal Wiertz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chantal Wiertz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantal Wiertz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 07:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFD noms

Are you intending to finish the AfD nominations you started? If they're not completed soon, they'll be reverted. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still adding unsourced beauty pageant stuff

Like this which was properly reverted by another editor here. Please cooperate with your fellow editors and add sources so we can concentrate on building content, not clean-up. - Bri.public (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removals without reason given

You removed cited content at Miss International 2021 and Miss World 2021 with no explanation in either edit summary [1][2]. Please explain? - Bri.public (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chantal Wiertz

Hello, Kenneth Saclote. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chantal Wiertz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chantal Wiertz

Hello, Kenneth Saclote. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chantal Wiertz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Miss Universe 2020 into Miss Universe 2021. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:26, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i'll edit it. Kenneth Saclote (talk) 01:58, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still adding unsourced beauty pageant stuff

You were reverted by another editor for this recent edit. Are you able to understand that whatever you add to an article must be referenced? ☆ Bri (talk) 17:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kenneth Saclote (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll add sources next time when I edit, sorry for editing without putting any sources.

Decline reason:

User is unresponsive. Yamla (talk) 10:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you not add sources up to now? Or respond to your talk page comments? PhilKnight (talk) 13:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sissie Luo

The article Sissie Luo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violation of WP:BLP1E policy – only claim of notability is related to a single pageant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]