User talk:Kasperquickly

Welcome!

Hello, Kasperquickly, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 09:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm 344agg21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Piranha Bytes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jayhawker6 (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i have literally added a source are you delusional? @jayhawker6 Kasperquickly (talk) 13:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I am. I made a stupid mistake and I apologize. jayhawker6 (talk) 02:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also feel free to remove the warning jayhawker6 (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. Sorry if I raged out on you a bit haha @Jayhawker6 Kasperquickly (talk) 11:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

I noticed that someone removed your posts here without alerting you to what was going on - see above for an explanation. 57.140.16.1 (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Synorem. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Elder abuse—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Synorem (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Welcome!

Hi Kasperquickly! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Palestine/Israel conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to Palestine/Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to your being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 12:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

Don't open closed discussions again without a lot more experience of what is likely to be posted. It wastes people's time. Step hen 08:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And read wp:talk and wp:not as these will explain why your comments were removed.Slatersteven (talk) 14:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fallout (American TV series), you may be blocked from editing. You've been slowly edit warring against multiple editors recarding Tim Caine for a week now. It's time to stop. The sources were always there at the franchise article. -- ferret (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're still doing this. It's very likely a block is in your future if you can't stop. Fallout (series) lists both creators, with sources. -- ferret (talk) 23:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Robert Hur. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#2024 Israeli strikes on Yemen, you may be blocked from editing. PrinceofPunjab^TALK 06:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah wikipedia definetly does a neutral point of view. saying otherwise should be grounds to an immediate and harsh ban @PrinceofPunjab Kasperquickly (talk) 13:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kasperquickly This is your third such warning. If you violated WP:NPOV one more time, you'll be given a warning one last time and only after violation after that will result in an immediate ban. PrinceofPunjab^TALK 13:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

kek, you sound like my the hallway monitor from my middle school. I think you're of the same age too, lel @PrinceofPunjab Kasperquickly (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. PrinceofPunjab^TALK 14:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no personnel attacks, you're just the type of janitors that have destroyed this website. People have been building this encyclopedia for more than a decade, and then you show up in circa 2010-2015 and destroy it with your politics, regarded views and annoying personalities. @PrinceofPunjab Kasperquickly (talk) 14:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PrinceofPunjab^TALK 14:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 15:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t add cn tags to material in the lead sourced in the article

See MOS:CITELEAD Doug Weller talk 19:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russian Empire census, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kazakh, Karakalpak and Kyrgyz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Polyamorph (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Third Red Scare

Hello, Kasperquickly

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mason7512 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Third Red Scare, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10 § Third Red Scare.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mason7512}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mason7512 (talk) 23:58, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked for one month from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You must stop the trolling and POV pushing. Cullen328 (talk) 03:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]