User talk:Jolielover

Undid my removal

Hello, regarding your reinstatement of content to https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Julian_Radcliffe. I removed the content because it was inaccurate, slanderous, and possibly libellous. I was certainly not attempting to censor anything. Please may you reinstate my editions to the article this immediately? Thank you for your help.

@Jctm29052000: thank you so much for your message; I have gone through the article, summarized some points and removed those irrelevant to the article or not mentioned in the source the text was cited with. I hope the article is fine now, let me know if anything is incorrect or a violation to any of Wikipedia's policies. Thanks! jolielover♥talk 13:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undid my removal

Hey, You reverted my removal of the coordinates in Delhi Private School, Dubai. Did you read my comment in the summary where I stated:

Coordinates lead to the wrong school with a similar name. (As reported on Discord)

If my removal was wrong, then I accept the revert. But if you thought it was vandalism, could you then be so kind to check it, and then remove the coordinates again? Thank you.

- Kind regards, Rodejong ^💬 Talk ^✉️ Email ^📝 Edits ^👀 Auth → 15:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I responded on Discord - you removed the coordinates on the wrong article. The coordinates on Delhi Private School, Dubai are correct, the school stands there today. The coordinates on DPS Academy were wrong, somebody mistakenly put in the coordinates of the former school due to their similar names, which resulted in the two entirely different schools having the same coordinates despite being in different locations. Though I removed the coordinates, it somehow still shows on the article on the infobox map which was my issue, and I'm still unsure of how to fix that. Jolielover (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ammakandakara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation error fix

First of all, I appreciate you fixing the mistake on that edit. What was the incorrect parameter I used if I may ask so I don't make a mistake in the future? Tonkarooson • (📭|Edits). 05:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! The problem was in the archive-date parameter, as the timestamps didn't match (the link was archived on November 12 yet archive-date stated November 11). Wikipedia follows UTC time so while it may have been November 11 for you, it was Nov 12 in UTC time hence the error. The date parameter was also incorrect, "date=11/08/24" causing the template error as it doesn't accept this value, likely because of time discrepancies as it can also be interpreted as August 11, 2024. I switched it to "date= 8 November 2024" so in the future I'd recommend writing dates as such. Hope this helps! Jolielover (talk) 06:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You never officially recieved...

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jolielover! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! charlotte ^👸♥📱 23:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! :) jolielover♥talk 08:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are u a bot bruh?

Like how did u stumbled across Astro Warna? 2001:4458:C005:B360:7DF5:FCD5:5959:8C8 (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very much real lol, I was patrolling Special:RecentChanges when I found the article. jolielover♥talk 08:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Quandale Dingle

Hello, Jolielover

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Quandale Dingle, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 6 § Quandale Dingle.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about TikTok Rizz Party

Hello, Jolielover

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect TikTok Rizz Party, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 6 § TikTok Rizz Party.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Culture of Dubai

I am not going to object to your PROD because the article is in a woeful state, and keeping it doesn't serve anybody's interests. But I want to note that the claim of a lack of notability is not tenable. We have any number of "Culture of X" articles involving smaller cities. A quick search shows any number of sources discussing the topic, including a handful of scholarly sources. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comment. While I agree that articles of the nature are typically notable, the potential content on Culture of Dubai would have a massive, if not entire, overlap with the Culture of the United Arab Emirates article since the entire country has the same culture (imo because the population is rather small and concentrated). I acknowledge that this is not true for most countries, such as India, where each state has massively different culture and traditions, but it isn't true for Dubai and every other emirate in the country. As someone who lives here, the extent of the culture in the emirate is already covered in the country article and most sources I see repeat the same thing.

I'm fairly new to Wikipedia so apologies if I'm wrong and thanks for reaching out to me! :) jolielover♥talk 17:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively the article can be redirected to the culture of the UAE article jolielover♥talk 17:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting is a reasonable solution for the moment, because, as noted, the current content is very poor. However, if the topic is actually independently notable - and I believe it is likely to be - a redlink may be preferable, as it can encourage page creation. See WP:REDLINK. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haliey Welch

Please allow this discussion to conclude before changing this; that won't be until Dec 14th at the earliest. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, I misunderstood. I will revert all my edits, thanks for informing me. jolielover♥talk 16:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does my alt text not appear?

Why does the alt text I wrote for the Game Center logo (on the Game Center page) not display? 122.106.83.151 (talk) 04:22, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You used the wrong parameter - for the infobox used on the page, Template:Infobox online service, "alt" is not a valid parameter. I changed it to "logo_alt" which should work! Check out WP:ALT for more info if needed :) jolielover♥talk 09:18, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Still getting the hang of it. 122.106.83.151 (talk) 22:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Haliey Welch

Hello! Your submission of Haliey Welch at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've reviewed the article for close paraphrasing and I believe there is none - I removed the redundant rug pull note and a citation defining it as it's probably not necessary on the page. I hope the article is fine now! jolielover♥talk 02:40, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+rollback

Hi Jolielover,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! jolielover♥talk 08:54, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please stop nominating article for false information. This is actually copied from the YouTube article, only small part from this article was spited. But you falsely said it was copied from YouTube moderation. We should improve this article rather then deleting it. RealStranger43286 (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I didn't realise that - however, given that the offensive content in YouTube page and Youtube moderation page are very similar, I don't think they need to be separate articles (esp since they're copypasted from eachother). I agree that the content should be split from YouTube since it is far too long, however it should only be split into one article, probably titled YouTube controversies or something similar.

I think Offensiveness in Youtube should be redirect to YouTube moderation - which should be renamed YouTube controversies - and then paraphrasing and fixing up content on the page & cutting down majority of what is on the YouTube page. I'll try to chip in if possible! jolielover♥talk 13:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Just so you're aware, it's a complete waste of time to template LTAs. Remsense ‥ 论 05:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, apologies for that. jolielover♥talk 05:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of my article regarding Adam Cohen

This a real person with proper consent and does not infringe any copyright restrictions. It is not an autobiography as that is not myself. Why did you take down my article? MarlinsFan24 (talk) 08:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, the page was deleted under G11 of Criteria for speedy deletion, for being exclusively promotional and needing to be entirely rewritten to serve encyclopedic value. In addition, there is no indication of notability for the person said page was about. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and cannot predict whether an individual will become notable in the future. If they do, feel free to recreate the page will reliable sources. Ultimately, Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and content deemed to violate this can and will be deleted. Thanks, jolielover♥talk 08:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was I promoting? dont mean to come off pushy, lol happy holidays MarlinsFan24 (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the page, given there is no notability of the person as of yet. Happy holidays to you too! jolielover♥talk 09:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Ok, I'm sorry if I've left the previous topic here. I got confused.

This on my talk page was not an appropriate warning. You misunderstood, I was reverting the vandalism because it was simply not appropriate for the lede. See the talk page discussion that someone else left on that article. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was the previous message about? You sent me that prior to me leaving that warning on your talk page, I'm still confused? Anyway, as for that warning, the edits don't appear to be vandalism; per Wikipedia:Vandalism, "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. For example, edit warring over how exactly to present encyclopedic content is not vandalism." I sent that edit-warring notice to both users involved (you and IP) for you guys to discuss on the talk page and reach a consensus. Thanks, jolielover♥talk 09:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Caffey family murders

Hello! Your submission of Caffey family murders at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas. Thanks for being a great RC patroller and being on the Wikipedia project with us for exactly 2 months today. Also congratulations for getting the Rollback and Pending changes reviewer rights recently. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 06:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! :) jolielover♥talk 08:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of my page

First of all, why has my page been removed by you. And second of all, I would like the contents of my page back. I want to contest this removal but I am unable to do that on the page because it has been deleted already. How is some random US Veteran relevant to be in an encyclopaedia but not a social media figure? He is a real person who is rapidly growing online and for some reason you agree to remove it from the platform? His name is BlazYT and he is a youtuber known by 4.7M people unlike your random article about some US Veteran. This is completely biased so can you please review it and if not I will get your administrative permissions removed, mark my word.

Thank you, Jake. JakeTheShibaInu (talk) 05:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I marked the page for speedy deletion under criteria A7 - no indication of importance. Under the notability criteria for people, they are considered notable if there are multiple secondary sources which are reliable. I could not find such for your article. A subscriber count is typically not an indicator for notability. There are plenty of YouTubers with a page with less subscribers, and YouTubers without with more - it again depends on everything I've mentioned above. See the notability criteria for people for further information. The page was ultimately deleted by administrator Shirt58, who considered moving the article into a draft but ultimately did not as he saw "zero chance this would be accepted at present". If you want, you can request on his talk page for him to bring the article back into a draftspace for you to work on it, but I'd highly encourage you to read the policies and guidelines I've linked above before pursuing this. Thanks, jolielover♥talk 06:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Am I able to retrieve the aritcle, it's unfinished hence why you are even bringing up any of these reasons for deletion. JakeTheShibaInu (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind ignore this JakeTheShibaInu (talk) 06:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Gaboro

On 26 December 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gaboro, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 18:27, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Everest windows are in administration

they are trading illegally. The public need to know. Revert the changes bot bot 2A00:23C6:5704:3001:3D02:ADD6:B91E:1E06 (talk) 07:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this information can be added to the page provided there are enough secondary reliable sources to support the claims. Adding an inappropriate external link for one star reviews is not appropriate and will be reverted. Thanks, jolielover♥talk 07:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paula Chambers not ceo.

Look at companies House

Company https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02540020

Anglian windows using there terrible name

They have been ripping people off sine early 60's with phoenix companies to write off debts

Update this misleading wiki shite bot bot 2A00:23C6:5704:3001:3D02:ADD6:B91E:1E06 (talk) 07:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

ow are you? @Jolielover i would ask you if you can help me to create page abou this topic Qatarijournalist (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Black Versace dress of Angelina Jolie

Hi! I noticed that you nominated the article Black Versace dress of Angelina Jolie for Good article status. You do not appear to have made significant edits to the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. Current practice is that only editors who have significantly contributed to the article are able to nominate it (see the nomination instructions). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. Thank you. czar 17:19, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! jolielover♥talk 19:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a proper citation?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0E3zJHvx0c 2600:6C44:76F0:B3A0:C8CB:D89A:F750:6A3 (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! As per WP:RSPYT, in general no, YouTube is not a reliable source. Many videos on YouTube do not meet the standards of a reliable source and have concerns about copyright. If it is a YouTube video from a verified organization or company, please try to find an article instead as it is much preferred. The video you have linked is not available for me to view so I am unable to see if it may be considered for inclusion. Thanks, jolielover♥talk 06:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelina Jolie wearing Marc Bouwer 2004.jpg

Hey, sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the image is a press agency photo, so it fails Wikipedia:Non-free_content#UUI7 automatically and can't be used. I found this out the hard way myself on exactly the same article a few years ago now (File:White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie.jpg had to be deleted for the same reason). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, should I tag it for CSD?

On a similar note, several other pages on Template:Red carpet fashion like Blue Prada dress of Lupita Nyong'o, Black Versace dress of Angelina Jolie, and Swarovski crystal mesh Armani Privé gown also appear to be press agency photos (though I am not 100% sure); would those images need to be deleted too? And how would I be able to obtain an image for the article otherwise? Thank you so much, jolielover♥talk 10:13, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]