Jump to content

User talk:PEPSI697

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Whacked with a trout!

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Recently malfunctioned by not checking the diffs and misread the edit summaries when reverting bad faith edits

PEPSI697 (talk) 10:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page South Geelong railway station, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heya fellow patroller on duty! Hats off to you for reverting Pretty Hate Machine almost one second after the disruptive edit was made. Happen to drop by your userpage to discover you joined a few months ago and already accumulated 4500 edits.. (while I joined almost 2 years ago and haven't even made it to 100!) Scuffedsherm (talk) 11:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for leaving this topic on my talk page. Thank you for noticing my edit counts. Yes, I have nearly 5,000 edits in just 5 months of editing Wikipedia. I've been doing a lot of work and patrolling with bad faith edits. Some editors on Wikipedia may be lucky to accumulate 4,000+ edits in under 5 months. Some people may have their edits slowly growing from about the past few years. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 11:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Do you have any tips on conducting patrols? I find myself with multiple tabs cross-checking revision differences and was wondering if there's any other way to do so? Scuffedsherm (talk) 11:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, there is. It's called "recent changes" and you can filter it to "likely bad faith" or "very likely bad faith". To view recent changes, click to the menu bar or sidebar (next to the Wikipedia logo) and then click "recent changes". PEPSI697 (💬📝) 12:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whacked with another trout!

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Made a typo in the edit summary when reverting at Hush (TV series), at this diff here. Was mean't to say "mean't to be capitalised" at the end of the summary

PEPSI697 (💬📝) 21:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About user warnings

[edit]

Hey, when you reverted vandalism on 9/11: The Twin Towers, you didn't leave a warning on User talk:Ilikekids12043. Thought I'd give you a heads-up. Keep up the good work! Grumpylawnchair (talk) 00:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, I didn't even realise that I didn't leave a message on their talk page. I thought I did but I think I forgot to leave a message on their talk page. Again, thanks for letting me know this. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 00:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all. Nice to see another neurodivergent person on here, honestly. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 00:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you strike through my warning and leave the same warning yourself? APK hi :-) (talk) 09:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At second glance, we must've tried reverting the vandalism at the same time because I thought my rollback went through. APK hi :-) (talk) 09:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry about that, I coincidentally rollbacked the IP's edit at the same time as you. The reason why I strike your message because I thought you were actually leaving the message even though you weren't the contributor who reverted it. It was a mistake, again, sorry about striking your comment. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 09:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Squall

[edit]

The content was mostly about the US, hence. There is often US-centric on en.wiki 2402:E280:3D1D:563:5C26:4BCC:12AF:E31E (talk) 07:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bye 2402:E280:3D1D:563:5C26:4BCC:12AF:E31E (talk) 07:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Having another look at the article, correct that the content was mostly about the U.S., I think I may of made a mistake. It didn't appear constructive to me so that's why I reverted your revisions. You can keep the changed content you've added. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 07:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking as a long-time watcher of the article, I just reverted all their edits there wholesale. Graham87 (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

[edit]

I am a reliable source mate. Stop deleting my stuff 😖😔 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:DD2D:B300:1993:3B8A:3684:E481 (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I reverted your edit was because you didn't provide a reliable source. Even if you provide facts, it still needs to be supported by reliable sources so it could be verified. However, if you want to add a Twitch citation, Twitch and every other social media sites are not reliable sources. I left a note on your talk page explaining why I've reverted it. I would recommend you to see Wikipedia policies WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:SOCIALMEDIA and WP:V. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬📝) 23:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]