User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 80
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jo-Jo Eumerus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 75 | ← | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | → | Archive 84 |
Happy New Year
|
Happy New Year! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
Happy New Year, Jo-Jo Eumerus!
Jo-Jo Eumerus,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 20:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Recent edits to Mount Aniakchak
Hi, I would like to notify you that your expansion of Mount Aniakchak was recently undone by another editor, if you aren't aware about it yet. Apparently consensus from a discussion is needed before one can improve/expand an article which is plain absurd.
I'll probably work on bringing back some content from old revisons back so he doesn't make noise. The two sections that are misssing from the current revisions are Human history and Surprise Lake which I'll see if I can add on, though I haven't research deep enough to see if they're even worthy of mention. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Upon reading the article, both topics are already inside the article, seems like nothing important in the old revision is missing. So now I don't even know what's with Dicklyon's "throw out an article and replace it with a new one" Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Dora says I was "straight up disruptive", but I think my edit was in line with WP:BRD; I reverted your bold edits as questionable, so we should discuss. I know what expansion is, and that's not what this looked like. It looked like you threw out what was there, replaced it with a new stub, and then started expanding that. Maybe I missed some plan that led to that approach. Let me know what's going on. Dicklyon (talk) 00:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Actually the history seems confused. What looks like your first edit there replaced about 16 kB with about 2.5 kB but is listed as +2.5 kB. What am I missing? Dicklyon (talk) 00:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I see that revision, Dicklyon, you have a point. I'd question Eumerus's edit on that as well. But I don't believe restoring pre-Eumerus expansion would be an improvement of the article? Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Ah, some page deletion and undeletion also went on. Mysterious (to me). I won't bother you more about this, but it would do me good to understand what the process is here, in case I see something like this again. Dicklyon (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks for clarifying. The "starting draft" edit summary was also vague of a reason for the major changes. I would've understood if that rang a bell Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon and Dora the Axe-plorer: Sorry for not being clear with the edit reasons - what I did was to write up a new text in my userspace, then copy it over the main article. The delete and undelete was to merge the history of the userspace sandbox over - sometimes I need to check when I added a certain citation or sentence, and for that I need the history of the userspace page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds like you did exactly what I objected to. You totally threw out an article and recreated it from scratch. I think that's seldom OK, certainly not without discussion. Dicklyon (talk) 06:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- It is generally OK to rewrite an article as part of an expansion, so as long as a) you aren't overriding some established content preference or b) arbitrarily delete content or c) violating some other policy. As I can see, this version has very little information not in the expanded one, and that information is either unsourced or can/will be readded later. I see no evidence of a pre-existing consensus for this version anywhere nor any other way it is better. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- That sounds like you did exactly what I objected to. You totally threw out an article and recreated it from scratch. I think that's seldom OK, certainly not without discussion. Dicklyon (talk) 06:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon and Dora the Axe-plorer: Sorry for not being clear with the edit reasons - what I did was to write up a new text in my userspace, then copy it over the main article. The delete and undelete was to merge the history of the userspace sandbox over - sometimes I need to check when I added a certain citation or sentence, and for that I need the history of the userspace page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Mount Aniakchak
- added a link pointing to Black Peak
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Mount Churchill
- added links pointing to Copper River and First Nations
- Mount Aniakchak
- added a link pointing to Black Peak
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 12:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Spicy (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Mount Aniakchak
- added a link pointing to Kikai
- Mount Churchill
- added a link pointing to Talus
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mount Churchill
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Churchill you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of Guallatiri
Hello, I think the admin-edit protection is not necessary since the disruption was limited to autoconfirmed users. The protection levels should be lowered to ExtendedConfirmed levels. Other headers in high-visibility noticeboards do fine with just ExtCon.
I intend to make edits to shorten the amount of text. Thanks, Ca talk to me! 13:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Greetings, the template is currently template-editor protected, not full. I am tepid at applying ECP to anything b/c I think this setting is overapplied, but it's mostly a philosophical thing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Since we aim
to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing
, I think the protection level should be decreased unless there are disruption at lower levels. I think it is unlikely that Extended Confirmed editors would disrupt the header, and constructive editors may wish to make changes. Ca talk to me! 14:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)- On the other hand, Wikipedia:Protection policy#Other cases (pertains to ECP) has
High-risk templates can be extended-confirmed protected at administrator discretion when template protection would be too restrictive and semi-protection would be ineffective to stop widespread disruption
. Filed the deprotection request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)- I have downgraded to ec-protection. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to both of you 👍 Ca talk to me! 02:46, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have downgraded to ec-protection. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 15:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- On the other hand, Wikipedia:Protection policy#Other cases (pertains to ECP) has
- Since we aim
DYK for Protector Shoal
On 19 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Protector Shoal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that pumices erupted by the Protector Shoal volcano in 1962 floated to Australia and South America? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Protector Shoal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Protector Shoal), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Huequi
On 21 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Huequi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 2.5-metre-tall (8.2 ft) white rock spires grow at the volcano Huequi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Huequi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Huequi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WaggersTALK 00:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Re: CITEVAR
I've noticed a number of editors, often coders, preferring the style you use.[1] Do you personally prefer it because it keeps the content area clean and tidy, or is there another reason? Just wondering if I should start using this style. Viriditas (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Two reasons. One, it doesn't mix the references and article text. Two, it displays the page numbers in an useful fashion. The drawback is that it even experienced editors often have problems adding content to articles in this style, which is why you often see ref additions like the ones to K2-18b. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible FPC candidates
Some might need work on their file descriptions. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Needs a comparison with Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Musician Seamounts
Hi, Noted your talk reversion which is fine by me. Just a note that in preparing a better geologically relevant map I have identified a few further minor coordinate and name changes/alternatives in Marine Gazetteer and should complete this update within a day. ChaseKiwi (talk) 11:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Would you mind restoring this to my userspace? I'm going to be looking at B5 franchise content that has been lost through imprecise cleanup of multiple articles, and getting the original revisions of this back would help. Alternatively, just undeleting the previous versions under the current redirect would be fine--I don't anticipate bringing the index article back in any form. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 05:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like all of the content, save for some minor format and order changes, is at [2]. The only text added later is
Novels
Dark Genesis – The Birth of the Psi Corps -
Deadly Relations – Bester Ascendant -
Final Reckoning – The Fate of Bester -
Legions of Fire – Armies of Light and Dark -
Legions of Fire – The Long Night of Centauri Prime -
Legions of Fire – Out of the Darkness -
The Passing of the Techno-Mages – Summoning Light -
To Dream in the City of Sorrows -
which was added by Morriswa. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Well... that's better than nothing, and thank you for that. If possible, I'd rather work in past revisions than archive.org, which is painfully slow. Are you opposed to putting the content back under the redirect? I'd be happy to have it back with the redirect fully protected if that would reassure you that neither I nor any rogue members of the B5 task force are going to do anything untoward to the redirect. Jclemens (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Eh, undeleted it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Jclemens (talk) 06:03, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Eh, undeleted it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heishibeihu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slab.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism
The article Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism for comments about the article, and Talk:Rodwell–Hoskins mechanism/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of L'OrfeoGreco -- L'OrfeoGreco (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg) |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Miller Range, Antarctica - Meteorite (2).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 19:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Misti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 20:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pamatan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mount Hudson
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mount Hudson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mount Hudson
The article Mount Hudson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mount Hudson for comments about the article, and Talk:Mount Hudson/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mount Churchill
The article Mount Churchill you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mount Churchill and Talk:Mount Churchill/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Hycean planet
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hycean planet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Volcán Aucanquilcha, Chile, 2016-02-10, DD 11.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 00:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of Mount Churchill
The article Mount Churchill you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mount Churchill for comments about the article, and Talk:Mount Churchill/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 1257 Samalas eruption
- added a link pointing to Plague
- Hycean planet
- added a link pointing to Free energy
- Lake Mojave
- added a link pointing to Fault
- Misti
- added a link pointing to Fuji
- Pairique volcanic complex
- added a link pointing to Mantle
- Pichu Pichu
- added a link pointing to Spring
- Seal Nunataks
- added a link pointing to Dyke
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Trou au Natron caldera satellite photo.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
|
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Géiseres del Tatio, Atacama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 03-05 HDR.JPG, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 12:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
|
Guallatiri at TFA?
I've got Guallatiri listed as the April 19 TFA. No need to do anything if this works for you. Let me know if there's anything I can do. - Dank (push to talk) 02:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Mmm, is it normal that new FAs show up on the TFA queue so quickly? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Other way around ... all three TFA coords give newer FAs a slightly higher probability of running, I think. Any objection to running this one?- Dank (push to talk) 13:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not really, but I wonder if that means that older FAs get neglected. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Other way around ... all three TFA coords give newer FAs a slightly higher probability of running, I think. Any objection to running this one?- Dank (push to talk) 13:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
TFA
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you today for Mount Berlin, "about a volcano in Antarctica, and the only one in Marie Byrd Land with ongoing geothermal activity. In the past, especially before about 10,000 years, a number of volcanic eruptions have taken place there and have dispersed tephra across Antarctica. The volcano partly developed under ice and features ice-volcanic landforms."! - I just was in volcanic areas on La Palma and took photos (see "places"), - perhaps you could identify features better in image descriptions than I could ("yellow rocks")? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Today I am happy about a singer on the Main page (at least for the first hours), after TFA the same day last year. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks to Seiji Ozawa. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)b
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 00:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
DYK for Pamatan
On 15 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pamatan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pamatan is an undiscovered city on Lombok that was destroyed by the 1257 Samalas eruption? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pamatan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pamatan), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- El Negrillar
- added a link pointing to Fractional crystallization
- Misti
- added a link pointing to Fuji
- Mount Okmok
- added a link pointing to Sinter
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Mount Hudson
On 16 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mount Hudson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the volcano Mount Hudson repeatedly depopulated parts of South America? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mount Hudson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mount Hudson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:43, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Question regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Byrd
Hi Jo-Jo. Would you be willing to restore the page history of Louis Byrd and create a redirect that points to List of mayors of Lynwood, California? The table there has short biographies on each of the mayors from that municipalities, and I think that copying the content from the now-deleted article into the table would be useful. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pichu Pichu
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pichu Pichu you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
The article Misti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Misti for comments about the article, and Talk:Misti/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 09:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pichu Pichu
The article Pichu Pichu you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pichu Pichu and Talk:Pichu Pichu/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pichu Pichu
The article Pichu Pichu you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pichu Pichu for comments about the article, and Talk:Pichu Pichu/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)