User talk:ChaseKiwi

Paul Graham (computer programmer)'s hierarchy of disagreement.
Please try to stay in the top three sections of this pyramid in interactions
See also Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

Perhaps the last word on the Pink & White Terraces debate

Dear ChaseKiwi, unexpectedly, new evidence surfaces which enables strong empirical testing of every claim on the White Terrace location over 1886-2024. The manuscript is in review in an OA journal as preferred and a preprint is on ESSOAR at https://essopenarchive.org/users/559489/articles/939404-one-plate-to-find-them Counterrev11 (talk) 01:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Noted ChaseKiwi (talk) 06:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Dear ChaseKiwi, that paper is now published. We have a new paper in review covering the surprising abscence of sinter. As well, I'm updating the altimetry and wish to build in your work. Are you still positing the subsidence in the Rotomahana Basin 1886-2024 at 1-2 m? Regards, Rex 2403:4800:2835:3E85:B15A:AEEB:146B:B80A (talk) 03:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

I will of course be interested in further notification of original research. Others appear to have given prominence to the work you mention in the article Pink and White Terraces. If my sense check note on Lake Rotomahana could be replaced in due course by an up to date external source that reviews the evidence base that will better address matter of conjecture issues around subsidence, that will be better for the wikipedia community as I think you have misconstrued my note. The change of 2m I mentioned is not specific to Lake Rotomahana which could easily have differential subsidence/inflation to the rift trend on theoretical grounds as for example magma chambers might be nearby.ChaseKiwi (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I am taking up this matter of subsidence as part of a general altimetry review. There are some odd numbers to reconcile. I'll advise progress. Counterrev11 (talk) 00:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

nope

re the lake assessment - please revert my edit - not sure what happened - thanks for your notification JarrahTree 06:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

RIPChaseKiwi (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, ChaseKiwi!

Happy New Year!

ChaseKiwi,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Mikenorton (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

2014 Eketāhuna earthquake

Hi an hour ago there was a news report that linked last night's earthquake in Eketāhuna to the one in 2014, saying that it its possible (but hard to tell) that it's an aftershock of the 2014 earthquake. Do you think the article for the 2014 earthquake should include this? ―Panamitsu (talk) 01:48, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

No. That is news report rubbish. ChaseKiwi (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Alright good I checked with you then. ―Panamitsu (talk) 02:08, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes - there exist definitions of aftershock in that sense that should have been complied with.

For your potential personal interest the area under Eketāhuna had a new minor cluster of small pre-shocks in locality that I had noted while debugging a NZ specific version of a 3D display web app of json formatted earthquake event data streamed data that had only existed for 2 weeks. That project resulted from beginning of January frustration with poor data display by Iceland Met Office web site of its recent earthquakes, as a higher quality website displaying same data announced it was about to go off line. The Iceland work resulted in ability to better display a summary of NZ recent seismic data from Geonet than Geonet currently does, for example showing well the subducting slab. ChaseKiwi (talk) 03:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Very interesting work you're doing. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Oh I've just remembered that for a while I've been meaning to ask you if it's possible that you can review the seismology part of the article December 2010 Christchurch earthquake (it's a few paragraphs) as I'm planning on making a good article nomination but don't actually understand any of that seismology/geology/whatever it's called stuff -- I'm only really interested in the things that happen above ground. But no worries if you don't feel like it. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Done, with no claim to being a seismologist or geologist either. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Very much appreciated. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)