User talk:Jjj1238/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jjj1238, for the period June 2019–May 2020. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Barnstar!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your swift action against vandalism on the Template:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries infobox. I’ve been working to undo vandalism on pages related to the election, and it can sometimes feel like an uphill battle. We need all the help we can get! Tartan357 (talk) 23:50, 29 April 2020 (UTC) |
Bug or coincidence?
Did you edit the 2020 Green Party presidential primaries to change a section close tag from withdrawn to withdrew? I'm only asking because I had added a couple close brackets and made that change as well, so I was/am very confused about the edit history. I'm just hoping it's a coincidence that we made the same edit at the same time (and I either just didn't hit publish, or closed the window before I realized there was an edit conflict), and not that somehow an edit that I made (that you might know nothing about) somehow shows as you having made it. Orville1974 (talk) 05:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was on the 2020 United States presidential election article and saw there was an issue with the Green Party section so that instead of just the candidates being transcluded from the 2020 Green Party presidential primaries article, the candidates, debates, timeline, and perhaps the rest of the article were all being included on the the 2020 U.S. presidential election page. I noticed this, went to the Green Party primary article, and saw that the the section start tag said withdrew while the section close tag said withdrawn, so I switched it to match. If you were making that same exact edit at the same exact time then that is quite funny lol. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 06:27, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Haha, I was, in response to a request on the WP:HD by another editor trying to get the 2020 Presidential article to look right. I hopped over to the Presidential article, took a look under the hood, made a few tweaks, realized the issue, popped open a new window to edit the Green party article, and thought I saved my changes. So I was very confused when I went back to the Green Party history and didn't see my edit, even though the problem was fixed. Then I saw the most recent edit was exactly what I did, but it was your name, and panicked a little, thinking there might be a bug (with horrible implications). So I am very happy (and relieved) that WP is attributing edits correctly. Whew. Thank you! Orville1974 (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- No worries! { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 07:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Haha, I was, in response to a request on the WP:HD by another editor trying to get the 2020 Presidential article to look right. I hopped over to the Presidential article, took a look under the hood, made a few tweaks, realized the issue, popped open a new window to edit the Green party article, and thought I saved my changes. So I was very confused when I went back to the Green Party history and didn't see my edit, even though the problem was fixed. Then I saw the most recent edit was exactly what I did, but it was your name, and panicked a little, thinking there might be a bug (with horrible implications). So I am very happy (and relieved) that WP is attributing edits correctly. Whew. Thank you! Orville1974 (talk) 07:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Just though you should know that....
you are using spoilers wrong. What you describes on The Bachelorette (season 15) are not spoilers at all, they pure unconfirmed speculations (see WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL). Wikipedia contains spoilers, but speculations are not permitted on Wikipedia. — YoungForever(talk) 20:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Eurovision Newsletter for June 2019
→ Issue 48 ←
Headlines
| |||||
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows | |||||
Number of articles | Unassessed articles | Good articles | A-class articles | Featured articles | Number of members |
7263 | 33 | 54 | 1 | 5 | 109 |
• HOME • TALK • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • |
- Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
About Sofía Aragón
Hi Sofía request me to edit his info, the changes that i have made in her page are the information that she give me, i dont know much about wikipedia editors usage, could you please help me? thank you
- That is not allowed on Wikipedia. Ms. Aragón cannot play a part in editing her article as this violates WP:COI, and you also cannot edit if you were instructed by her to. Additionally, every piece of information added on Wikipedia must be contributed to a published reliable source, which you cited none of. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 19:19, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for answer, there still wrong information in her article, could you can take parts of the new information to correct the current one, thank you --200.194.41.53 (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Anton Vaino and state of birth
Given that Anton Vaino is a Russian diplomat and civil servant, it does seem important that his article mentions that he was born in the predecessor state to the state he now serves. Although Estonia continued to de iure exist, the de facto regime, that is, Soviet Union, was not only firmly in place, but Vaino's grandfather was Estonia's communist leader at around the time Vaino was born (!!). Obscuring this fact for legal matters makes the article prone to misunderstanding by someone not familiar with the topic. (Such as, why would someone from a Western style democracy, which one learns after clicking the link that Estonia is, "defect" to Russia? If you want to popularise the fact that Estonian SSR was not legally recognized, then it's the article on Estonian SSR that details that, not the article on Estonia.) Eykeklos Omnia (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a conversation for here. It is WikiProject Estonia policy, and I am just going along with what the WikiProject prefers. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Technically speaking, the Anton Vaino article shouldn't even be in the Estonia project, since he is a Russian civil servant. Anyway, díky za péči o Wikipedii, pěknou neděli! Eykeklos Omnia (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hispanic and Latino Americans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Delgado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Reverse latest edit by DerekHistorian on Camila Cabello Wikipedia page.
DerekHistorian sources: "She has mentioned that her family is Mexican but born in Cuba."
Camila and her mother were both born in Cuba; but, her mom marry Alejandro who's from Mexico. Camila and her mother are Cubans. That edit and explanation makes nonsense. EditorsHelp101 (talk) 18:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jófríður Ákadóttir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pascal Pinon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Dominican Republic 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barahona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1998 establishments in Angola
A tag has been placed on Category:1998 establishments in Angola requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
On the chance you didn't see my update re publishers/sponsors
Slight update of your cmt to conform? Humanengr (talk) 05:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jjj1238/Archive 7,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Check [Camila Cabello Personal life section]
People keep editing her "personal life" section and making it look like a gossip section. Example: "Many people feel that it is fake, citing such things as the fact that there was a story published about their “steamy“ encounter at the VMAs before the VMAs even happened." Thank, you! JulieSanz (talk) 03:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Television personalities from Florida requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jjj1238/Archive 7,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Eurovision Song Contest 2020: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 18:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Miss Universe 2019
I need your help recreating the Miss Universe 2019 contestants article, some were deleted because the creator was blocked. I have created two already, and I'll create four more.
Can you recreate:
- Ako Kamo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Alfïya Ersayın (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Helene Abildsnes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Inés López (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ketlin Lottermann (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Thank you! Triila73 (talk) 23:27, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Bachelor in Paradise (TV series)
Hi, I see you added the summary for all the season 6 contestants on the Bachelor in Paradise (TV series) page. I don't know why Clay and Nicole aren't listed on that final page since they made it to the part where people decide if they want to propose or not. 98.230.196.188 (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- The section is for couples that remained a couple through the end of filming or rekindled their relationship after filming. Clay and Nicole broke up during filming. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 19:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jjj1238/Archive 7,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Klobuchar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Klobučar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I have reverted your edit (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Lilliana&oldid=922240390) because you have deleted that she is Chinese-Indonesian, not Indonesian as is. Her parents are Chinese immigrants. Thus, she is Chinese-Indonesian. These are duly provided with sources and references. You also tagged your edit as "minor fixes" yet you have changed her nationality, without providing sources and references to refute the already established one backed with sources and references? Does that constitute only a "minor" edit?
I agree with some of your edits, but not on this one. And certainly I don't agree with your edit tagged as "minor" when you changed her nationality without any reason and further references, from the already duly established one backed by sources and references.
I acknowledge that you have been quite a seasoned contributor on Wikipedia, thus I am quite puzzled why you right away changed an already established information backed with sources and references, an important detail such as nationality, and then tag it as "minor fix?"
Bizarre and quite puzzling. Certainly not a "minor fix."
Migsmigss (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Migsmigss: Please understand that nationality and ethnicity are not the same thing. The lede should not include their ethnicity unless they are notable for something having to do with that specific ethnic group (Section 3 of lead section in a biography: Context (location or nationality) – not ethnicity, Indonesian is Lilliana's nationality, Chinese is her ethnicity). To give you an example, Selena Gomez is an American musician, she just happens to be of Mexican descent. She is not a Mexican-American musician because her contributions to music have not had anything to do with her Mexican ancestry, and she does not have an established career specifically in Mexico. It is the same thing with Lilliana. She is an Indonesian of Chinese descent. Her modeling/pageant career has nothing to do with her Chinese ancestry, and she does not have an established career specifically in China. Her Chinese heritage should be referenced in the article, but not as her nationality. I hope this helps your confusion. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 23:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying, Jjj1238. I take your reply but it does not resolve the issue, which you have commenced. Her nationality, as defined by jus sanguinis and her birthplace, is Chinese-Indonesian, not simply Indonesian. The sources and references provided also support said information. Now:
1. You have tagged your edit as "minor fix" but you right away deleted information on nationality, an important detail on any Wikipedia page/article on people, without any valid reason and/or any credible sources/references to support your action, and refute the previously provided information backed by legitimate sources and references? Please explain.
2. Besides deleting the nationality, you tagged your specific edit as "minor fix" but you did not indicate that it is a minor edit. There is a confusion there. Which is it? Why describe it as "minor fix" when you did not tag it as "minor edit;" otherwise, if you wanted to tag it as minor edit, why described it (redundantly) as "minor fix" -- but well, it wouldn't be minor in my opinion since again, you deleted and changed the subject's nationality without any valid reason backed by sources and references to refute the previously already established information?
3. Why not "Chinese-Indonesian" when we allow other people who have careers in one specific country or region to be established, for example, as "Spanish-Filipino" Enrique Iglesias, or "Timothee Chalamet" who is French-American (still a debate over there), and other subjects of note?
If this is the case, then should we require more sources/references on the legitimate nationalities of subjects, for example their birth certificates, passport(s), etc?
4 Following this, should we establish a difference between, for example, a. French-American and b. of both French and American citizenship?
For example, Catriona Gray, she is established to be "Filipino-Australian," should we then be more specific and establish that she is of dual Filipino and Australian citizenship? We can do that. I think it would be more specific. As, even the definition of "Filipino-Australian" on Wikipedia does not describe Catriona:
"Filipino Australians (Filipino: Pilipino-Australyano) are Australians of Filipino ancestry. Filipino-Australians are the fifth-largest subgroup of the Overseas Filipinos. According to the 2016 census, there are over 232,386 Filipino Australians."
They can be interpreted as Australians who live in Australia but can be full Filipino in ancestry, which is not Catriona, of course.
5. Thus, coming from these discussions, should we, finally, be more specific and include nationality or nationalities, and ethnicity or ethnicities?
Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Jjj1238. I've re-posted our conversation here to the Talk:Kevin_Lilliana page. It is more appropriate that we discuss there since the subject in question is Kevin Liliana.
I will be waiting for your reply there, and will respond to your reply on said page, Talk:Kevin_Lilliana. Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 00:12, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Realised that they have vandalised the page, and have made a mess of the results. Already edited/reverted to the correct information. And also added most current photo of titleholder most appropriate. Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Helena Meraai
Hello, Jjj1238
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Helena Meraai, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helena Meraai.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 19:11, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Jae-yoon Lee
Help me, User:MigsMigss have accuse me of vandalism for the Jae-yoon Lee article. User: MigsMigss have restored Category:Canadian Male actors and Category:South Korean Male actors because they are both container categories and Container categories cannot be used for articles only subcategories. I did explain my edit and User:MigsMigss have restored them and my explanation is invalid. The user has warned me for a possible block. I know I am not making vandalism nor my disruptive edits. So could go to article titled Jae-yoon Lee and restore my edit to my version and talk to User:MigsMigss to please do not use Category:Canadian Male actors and Category:South Korean Male actors because they are both container categories but not for articles. Talk to User:MigsMigss for more details on container categories. Thanks. 2001:569:7C07:2600:34C3:F496:71FB:7EC3 (talk) 08:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
This has been resolved. The edits are there. Please provide description for your non-minor edits, or tag them as minor if you think they are minor. You have also made changes to my talk page [here] and reverted my edits on my own talk page [here], when I already told you that I have moved our discussion, more aptly, to the Lee Jae-yoon talk page [here].
Your edits are welcome but please observe propriety and respectful practices in contributing. You have also asked for this user's help, but can't reply amiably to our discussion? What is it that you want to achieve? I have responded to you in a well-meaning manner and have understood your points, but continue with these unnecessary actions, like not resolving the issue directly with me and instead resorting to discussing it on another user's talk page, and I will deem it unacceptable and an attack on my right as contributor and editor. Discuss and resolve things with me properly, as the editorial issue is between us. Thanks.
Also, I am not quite sure how to proceed with his, but as I've looked into this contributor, users [23.16.167.50] and [2001:569:7c07:2600:34c3:f496:71fb:7ec3] as shown on the article's [Edit history] may likely be one and the same, as they have both responded to my edit queries, like one single person? Should we look into this as possible sock puppetry? I am quite unsure how to proceed.
Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 09:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Are you prepared to actually follow the guidelines? "The name of a flag's political entity should appear adjacent to the first use of the flag, as no reader is familiar with every flag, and many flags differ only in minor details." Now imagine what that template looks like if you did. Drmies (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Miss Universe 2019 Notes Removal
Hi, Jjj1238. In your Miss Universe 2019 edit here, you described it as "notes section was removed through consensus", which consensus is this? Was this discussed on the Miss Universe 2019 talk page? If not, please direct me to the said discussion and eventual establishment of consensus. I seem to be unable to locate such discussion and consensus, and the page it's on. Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 17:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
ZettieWonder is back...
They are now adding Antigua & Barbuda and Bonaire to the list of delegates with no sources. I tried undoing the edits, but she keeps reverting them back. This user has vandalized the page numerous times. Perhaps they need to be blocked? You know better than I do of what should be done. Thanks. Rahu22 (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Rahu22: Have you warned them? I recommend you begin using Twinkle. It will allow you to send users prewritten warnings with just the click of a button. Every time this user vandalizes the page, send them a higher level warning (I believe there are five levels, and I already gave them a level one warning a few days ago), once they vandalize the article past the final warning, I would submit a report to the administrators' noticeboard so administrators can look at the case. If the user has been committing vandalism and continued after the final warning, they will likely be blocked by an admin. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 20:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jjj1238: They won't heed any warnings. It's not worth it. I'm actually considering leaving Wikipedia, as it's just becoming too stressful for me. I trust that you and the other editors have this well in hand. Thanks anyway. Rahu22 (talk) 20:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Rahu22: Well if that's your decision I can't stop you, but just saying that if a user doesn't listen to warnings that is what blocking is used for. Most vandals do not listen to warnings, which is when you resort to blocks. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Guatemala & Hungary
Why did you revert the edits for these countries? From what I could see, they had reliable third party sources which confirmed they have withdrawn. Rahu22 (talk) 17:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Rahu22: User:Elitematterman reverted them not me. The source for Guatemala was not definite and was simply speculating Guatemala might not compete, while the source for Hungary was just an Instagram post which is not reliable. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:31, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
None of this is true, because I checked on all of it. Rahu22 (talk) 17:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes it is, here is the edit. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Miss Universe
please do not revert on Miss Universe because it's correct is the use the word "The contest is the largest pageant in the world in terms of live TV coverage" but not use the word "world's largest".
RESOLVED: December 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Eleni Foureira, you may be blocked from editing. Please provide reliable sources (RS) if you wish to change/edit the nationality and/or citizenship of subjects in articles. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Migsmigss: Excuse me? Please don't act like you know more about this issue than I do. This page has been protected NUMEROUS times because of Greek nationalist trolls who refuse to accept her as Greek. Foureira has said numerous times she solely sees herself as Greek, and there is a whole section regarding her Greek nationality yet Albanian ethnicity. Not to mention, being born in one country yet raised in another does not mean your nationality will be your birth country for your entire life. Additionally, Wikipedia's sole criteria is not citizenship, especially considering Foureira's career is entirely in Greece and has never existed in Albania. She is a Greek of Albanian descent. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:MOS/BIO: Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- "Excuse me? Please don't act like you know more about this issue than I do." — Wow, such words. You may please refer to the Albanian nationality law:
"Albanian nationality law is based on a mixture of the principles of Jus sanguinis and Jus soli. In other words, both place of birth and Albanian parentage are relevant for determining whether a person is an Albanian citizen."
Also, please respond with propriety. We do not need unnecessary and unbecoming condescension here on Wikipedia. Continue doing so and I would be required to seek escalation on this on your uncivility. Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 18:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Migsmigss: You are ignoring the Wikipedia policy. Albanian nationality law has NOTHING to do with this. Once again, per WP:MOS/BIO: Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability. Any previous nationalities Foureira may have held are completely irrelevant. She is a Greek singer with her career entirely in Greece. I hope you are aware that right now you are protecting the edits of vandals. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- "Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality..." —Yes, have read and am in agreement. But we are not talking about any of these (ethnicity, religion, or sexuality), but her nationality. She is born in Albania and grew up in Greece, thus she is Greek-Albanian. Who is talking about ethnicity? Not myself. Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 18:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Migsmigss: So would you have preferred it if I left that part out and just included Previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability? You are blatantly ignoring policy here. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- "Previous nationalities..." —Are there reliable sources that can confirm she did let go of her right as a natural-born Albanian, legally, under international and citizenship laws? Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Migsmigss: The opening paragraph should usually provide context for the activities that made the person notable. In most modern-day cases this will be the country of which the person is a citizen, national or permanent resident. Please refer to activities that made the person notable and most cases (not all). She is notable for her career in the Greek music industry, is a naturalized Greek citizen, has no connection to the Albanian music industry, and refused to even admit she was born in Albania for years into her career until the press dug it up and exposed her. I'm honestly shocked that you're even debating this issue. As has been said, the article was protected numerous times because of nationalist trolls with numerous seasoned editors having to constantly revert these Albanian edits, and I expect this from them, but you are a Wikipedia editor who I expect to follow policy. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- The clarification is noted, and the edit will be reverted. Again, I am all for open discussion, with propriety and civility, not with such words as "Excuse me? Please don't act like you know more about this issue than I do" which is truly unbecoming of a Wikipedia editor. Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 18:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Migsmigss: Sorry if that was rude, but I don't take kindly to receiving a level three disruptive editing warning from an editor I've worked with before simply because I was undoing vandalism that they didn't realize was vandalism. A simple "hey what was this edit?" would have sufficed fine. I'm happy we could clear this issue up though. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Noted, and apology accepted. Would also be more cautious in effecting warnings moving forward. I am all for open discussion, and am quite sensitive to nationality and citizenship topics, as I don't want anyone misrepresented, especially those from the minorities. I am always, and all ways, for equality.
All right, enough of my rant. Thank you for clearing this up with me; looking forward to more open-minded discussions and collaborative work in the future. Have a good day.
Migsmigss (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Not proper nouns
You are correct, jobs are not proper nouns. However, they are all job titles, which should be capitalized. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 06:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- @HeartGlow30797: No, they should not be. WP:Job titles. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 06:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Big Brother 19 (American season) houseguests for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother 19 (American season) houseguests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 1 (American season) houseguests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Argentine emigrants to Kosovo
A tag has been placed on Category:Argentine emigrants to Kosovo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:21, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Kosovan people of Argentine descent
A tag has been placed on Category:Kosovan people of Argentine descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Kosovan people of South American descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:23, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
John Cena
Why you remove the word of superstar? Tell me NikoUMS (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Standard alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- MrX 🖋 18:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Starting Wikipedia page aerial artist Tjaša Dobravec
Hello,
I am new on Wikipedia and I am searching somebody that could make the Wikipedia page of my partner, professional aerial artist Tjaša Dobravec. I have already written most of the text and listed up the references, and now I am searching a Wikipedia volunteer that could check and publish it. Can you or do you know somebody that could help me?
Thanks in advance and kind regards from Slovenia, Roel
Tjaša Dobravec Tjaša Dobravec (born November 28, 1994) is a Slovene professional aerial artist, poledancer, circus artist, trainer and choreographer. She performs in tv shows, on events and in circus productions all over the world. As a poledancer she competes in the pole art discipline. She is a self learner specialised in pole, fly pole and aerial spiral, all in her typical contemporary style. Accomplishments Slovenija Ima Talent In December 2018 Tjaša Dobravec won the TV show Slovenija Ima Talent. In the first round of Slovenia's Got talent she performed an act on pole. Thereafter she won the semi-final with an act on fly pole. In the final of Slovenija Ima Talent she brought a magical act on the aerial spiral and won the tv show after being selected as superfinalist. [1] Pole Theme Israel Tjaša Dobravec chose Pole Theme Israel in October 2019 as her very first pole competition in the Elite category. She won the competition with a contemporary pole act and was honored as overall winner at the pole art competition in Tel Aviv, Israel. [2] [3] [4] Festival Mondial du Cirque de Demain In February 2020 Tjaša Dobravec was among the participants of 41st edition of the prestigious Festival Mondial du Cirque de Demain in Paris, France. She was the very first contender from Slovenia at this festival, that is known in the world as 'the Olympic Games of modern circus art'. Tjaša Dobravec performed a contemporary act on aerial spiral and won two thropies: the Trophy Yao Jinguo of the national Circus school of China and the Trophy Bretagne Circus. <ref>https://www.cirquededemain.paris/en/presentation/history/festival/45/<ref>
You appear to have been around long enough to know better than to add an unsourced DOB for a living person with a vague comment in the edit summary about sourcing. Please take WP:BLP much more seriously. Toddst1 (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Toddst1: As I said, the article did source the birthdate. The URL included in the source was just outdated and needed to be replaced. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 20:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- We don't cite our sources by inserting hidden comments in an article. You really should know better and you are expected to be editing better. Consider a this a final warning. Toddst1 (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- We also should not put references in infoboxes when the information is readily available elsewhere. I don't appreciate this tone that you are using, please remain civil and respect other editors. You removed a birthdate because you believed it was unsourced but the issue was that the URL was broken (and I fixed it), that is all that happened here. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 21:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- We don't cite our sources by inserting hidden comments in an article. You really should know better and you are expected to be editing better. Consider a this a final warning. Toddst1 (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Talk page references
References
- ^ https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slovenija_ima_talent
- ^ https://www.si21.com/Sport/Tjasa_Dobravec_/
- ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJrNj-lZV8I
- ^ iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpoletheme%2Fposts%2F2490498687894348&width=500" width="500" height="236" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe