Jump to content

User talk:Jaydayal/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

November 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Piyoush. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sa Re Ga Ma Pa L'il Champs 2017 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Piyoush (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page, please check. --G (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Actually, Shreyan is the winner as the other one is from re-audition. That edit we feel is disruptive. You can still keep the

references. Please understand this point. Thank you. Piyoush (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, can you please provide a reference for what you are telling? Thanks. —G (talk) 13:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I am talking about this reference. I put it in Shreyan's winning status. Piyoush (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Your own reference says The boy from Midnapore, West Bengal Shreyan Bhattacharya has emerged as the winner along with Anjali Gaikwad. . I think you are being too possessive about the article and unreasonable in your discussion. What I am going to do is leave the discussion and leave the content as per your liking. But I am going to leave the edit request open for another editor to come by, you should not hat it saying the request is vandalism. --G (talk) 06:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:British Jews

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:British Jews. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Church of Satan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Church of Satan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Historically, Gateshead

Thank you for your opinion and good faith on the Gateshead talk G. It may be a small matter, but I believe it looks like puffery... Anyway just in case you do not see my reply, here is my reply to your 3rd opinion: From my pov the other events in the lead are also 'historical,' as they have 'historical' documentation... It may look fair or desirable (just like it may look fair, desirable and equally valid if something else got the prefix), but with respect, the question is, is it neutral? Do you think you have answered the question on neutrality? Example, for the sake of neutrality, which era gets the historical prefix? Giving one era a prefix historically here looks like puffery. They are all historical documents, they cant all have the prefix as that would be redundant? There is no cited reference to prefix one with the term over another. Like I said I will go with whatever is said here, however I do believe it needs a puffery term template, or some template. Barkleave09 (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Barkleave09, thanks for your comments. Wikipedia article are for global readers. They have to be fairly simple to read, and read/written in the way non-legal articles are presented. That one adjective does not carry as much weight in that sentence as I believe you are considering. It should be readable and convey a reasonable message to the reader. Its usage does not bring a sense of exclusivity to my mind, its repeated usage for all three will ruin readability. This is my thought-process. My opinion is just that -- my opinion -- of course it is based out of some reasoning from my end -- but it is not binding on anyone. Thanks! --G (talk) 10:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fatima

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fatima. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Bible and violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Bible and violence. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017–18 Iranian protests

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017–18 Iranian protests. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 07:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your edits at We or Our Nationhood Defined are continuing to be a problem. Please read reliable sources and add content written by them, not your personal opinions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
I did not remove any reference nor put any opinion, you probably missed them in the reference. Please go through them again. If you can substantiate your point I would appreciate it. Thank you. --G (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Well take the first edit where you replaced a specific event in 2006 by a timeless "RSS maintains". You added a citation, but there were plenty of citations already for 2006. Why did you remove this information? There was no edit summary or talk page post explaining it. As far as I am concerned, this is a WP:POV edit. If you doing this kind of thing, the ARBIPA sanctions will apply. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Did you wonder that if the disowning came in 2006, how did Noorani criticize it in 2000? I summarized what was there in existing reference in less spicy language... not altering the claims of Noorani spread with handpicked two word phrases. The article will get no where if you want to decide on every word yourself. If you present your suggestions clearly than a threat, perhaps I can collaborate. Do you know he wrote more than two books? But only these two are notable. May I also request you to avoid repeating ARBIPA with each comment, I read it when you posted first. --G (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Because the mention that it is a translation has been mentioned in earlier reference itself. Noorani actually responded to them (with what ever 1978 incident he refers) in his 2000 book. The 2006 is yet another press conference briefing, and the headline of the article isn't the best summary each time, and you know it. One way can also be: 2006 'dis-owning' as per news headline remains and the actual message that their basis of disowning is because 1. It was a translation not original work 2. The ideas changed over time... is stated. Not giving it full space but the statement of translation is completely absent from the article today. If it pleases you I can provide old Marathi text reference too (apart from the 4 English reference that you can verify) , but Marathi reference is not useful in English, besides this is covered in existing reference. --G (talk) 14:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
@Kautilya3: I hope edits from existing reference is perfectly fine with you? --G (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Here is my concern once again spelled out in clarity based on the existing references, I see OR in the existing article and want to use summary closer to source to improve the article:

There is nothing special about 2006 except that the interview by TOI was done in that year. Vaidya's response did not have anything specific about 2006, he mentions that the stand has has never been different since 1940. In 1993 book by Ritu Kohli or a report by Balbir Punj in 2002 states the book was based on Rashtra Mimansa. Rakesh Sinha does not say he revealed anything. It is wikipedia editor's original research to attach special significance to '2006' or to state that Rakesh Sinha 'revealed' something. And Lastly, how could Noorani book from 2000 be presented as a specific counter-response to a report published much later in 2006? --G (talk) 06:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

I have made non-contentious edits. No reference is dropped. There is no original work added. Noorani's remark is completely intact, not a letter is changed. I have significantly improved reference by adding details and merging repeated references also. --G (talk) 07:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Gbohoadgwwian (your user name is very hard to spell), thanks for the detailed explanations. I have been caught up with other matters on Wikipedia. But please be assured that I will eventually come back to review your edits and modify them if necessary. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, no worries about time. I will keep off this article until your review so that I don't pile up on the changes. --G (talk) 10:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Knights of Columbus. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christianity in Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christianity in Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Satanic Temple

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Satanic Temple. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:How Long, Not Long

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:How Long, Not Long. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Polyandry

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Polyandry. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Racism in the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Racism in the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Faith healing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Faith healing. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Watch your steps

Whatever merit you could have obtained by reinstating the deleted content was spoilt by the snide remarks in your edit summaries. Any passing admin that sees such remarks could hold you responsible for personal attacks. You have been informed about the ARBIPA sanctions.

And, yes, I take ownership of the whole Wikipedia. And I am not the one with the agendas here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

I gave my analysis when removing that sentence. On the other hand you removed other sourced statement without one. Like last time I am open to discuss and never in rush, your pov can stay while discussion takes place. If some new information comes that is not as per your pov it does not mean other editor has agenda. I perceive your overall tone, from multiple messages, to be condescending and sometimes indicative of a sense of superiority/inferiority. --G (talk) 09:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
I think you may be heading towards problems at the Modi article also. I'm not looking to see why you were notified of the ARBIPA sanctions regime but I do notice that you are fairly new here. You're getting into scraps with some long-term respected contributors and it may be wise no to revert them without prior discussion because, although no-one is always correct, the chances are much higher that they are correct than that you are. - Sitush (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
But I am making small edits, with source, putting fair edit summary, backing off in case of revert, opening talk page section, explaining my point, waiting for few days. Wikipedia should be fair to all. I can revert, but the intent there is annoying. I felt there is no response to the specific point I made in talk page. Maybe they can care to explain more clearly than revert second time? --G (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

I think there is progress there. G (talk) 09:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Recent Assembly Elections in India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Recent Assembly Elections in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions reminder

Hi Gian, I am afraid I have to remind you once again about ARBIPA sanctions. The discussion at Talk:Shivaji constitutes stonewalling and bad faith presentation of sources to push a POV.

  • You have started this section yourself labelling it with "as used by Shivaji in the 17th century". However, pretty much none of your comments relate to Shivaji or the 17th century.
  • You have cited Arshia Sattar's book review (which is not exactly a "journal article") to support the position that Shivaji meant "Hindu self-rule". However Sattar prefixes her sentence with "In Maharashtra today", clearly not Shivaji's meaning. You haven't pointed out where she made any claims about what Shivaji meant.
  • Meckenzie Brown's journal article only makes vague references to religion and Hindu order, but doesn't say anything explicitly about what "Hindavi Swarajya" meant. Drawing any conclusions from this involves WP:SYNTHESIS.
  • Finally, you have started shooting down Pagadi's book as a "Government publication", whereas it is published by Navajivan Trust, a Gandhian organisation founded by Gandhi himself to promote Hind Swaraj, whereas it is published by National Book Trust, an autonomous organisation.

On the whole, I don't see you paying any good faith attention to what is clearly an important issue. If this kind of WP:STONEWALLING continues much longer, you will end up at WP:ARE. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

And, this behaviour was also replicated in the ongoing GA Review. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Kautilya3, I think Jonathansammy, you and I had extensive discussion on article talk page. Thanks for reaching out, I am also feeling like you are doing original research by trying to synthesize meaning of a phrase by retro-fitting meaning of individual words from disparate context. To respond once again to some points you bring here, let me say I have provided journal sources that discuss Shivaji and the phrase directly. I provided the short quotes too. You mentioned that Pagadi book is by National Book Trust, why do you say now it is Navjivan Trust? --Gian (talk) 11:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
I am slow, I am having difficulty with edit conflicts. NBT website clearly indicates it is under Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt of India. Regardless, please confirm if you want to stick with Hindavi-meant-'India' in 17th century by Shivaji according to it? Because your following comment says it means a language. Earlier you said it means Hindi, then Hindustani. All that I am saying is stick to high quality source that talks directly of the entire phrase directly as used by Shivaji. I do not want to take this to wp:are and I am doing good reading and contributing positively in the ga contributions. --Gian (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Setumadhavrao Pagadi is a highly acclaimed source.[1] So is Wilfred Cantwell Smith. Smith said, quite explicitly, that Hindavi Swarajya did not mean a "Hindu Raj". You are ignoring these statements repeatedly. It is quite obvious to any right-thinking person that Shivaji deliberately used Hindavi so as to be inclusive of both Hindus and Muslims. He could just as well have used "Hindu Swarajya" if that is what he meant. It is quite ridiculous to portray him as a Hindu nationalist. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about the mistake with the "National Book Trust". The fact that it is managed by HRD doesn't mean a thing. Every central government university/institution is managed by HRD. They are not labelled as "government organisations". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
A Publication with Govt of India in the logo itself is different from saying Delhi University is aided by Govt. Anyways, so Pagadi, in English, translates Hindavi as 'India', but you presented another sources saying it is a language, so what is it according to you? You also gave different interpretation of Swarajya as homeland instead of hom rule. So, please frame a complete meaning of "Hindavi Swarajya", if I may hazard a guess it is "Homeland of people speaking in Hindustani language", which was already there, so what was Shivaji trying to achieve? I believe the meaning of a phrase should not be re-constructed from component words in different context. Do you realize you are the one importing 20th century term into 17th century when you are talking about Hindu Nationalist? Mackenzie's analysis in the religious background is detailed and apt, it is a peer reviewed journal article. The religious conflict is also mentioned by John F. Richards, who is a scholar in this field. Why would Afzal Khan choose to "profaned the shrine of Bhawani at Tuljapur as well as several other major Hindu shrines in Maharashtra" to provoke Shivaji? Some scholars have already commented and we may not ignore them all and reconstruct the whole meaning from original research. --Gian (talk) 17:31, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Copied this discussion on talk page of article. --Gian (talk) 03:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

It is fine to ask questions, but you can't invent your own answers and put them into Wikipedia. It has been admitted that some scholars interpret it as "Hindu self-rule". That is as far as we can go on Wikipedia. You are welcome to go and submit journal articles with your views, but you can't submit them here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

I am afraid I do not get your intention here. I have been collaborating nicely but you seem to want to play the big brother continuously. --Gian (talk) 12:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ K. Venkateshwarlu, A slice of Marathi history, The Hindu, 9 May 2011.

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

2016 Indian Line of Control strike

Seems your closure of the deletion talk for 2016 Indian Line of Control strike was reverted by an editor who thought it would be more proper that an un-involved administrator should close the deletion discussion. I think it would be best that you simply cast your keep opinion per wp:gng (that you expressed) on the discussion page and leave it to an administrator to close it. EkoGraf (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

It is acceptable to me if any user wants an admin closure. I will add my comment as you suggest. Thanks. --Gian (talk) 06:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
No problem. :) EkoGraf (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hyperion (tree)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hyperion (tree). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Yato Dharma Tato Jaya at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Yato Dharma Tato Jaya

On 15 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yato Dharma Tato Jaya, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the motto of the Supreme Court of India is Yato Dharma Tato Jaya – "There is no victory without justice"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yato Dharma Tato Jaya. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Yato Dharma Tato Jaya), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jaydayal. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Did you know.
Message added 09:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blanchard's transsexualism typology

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blanchard's transsexualism typology. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Hedgewar Smruti Mandir

On 20 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hedgewar Smruti Mandir, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hedgewar Smruti Mandir is a memorial to K. B. Hedgewar, the founder of the Hindutva organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hedgewar Smruti Mandir. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hedgewar Smruti Mandir), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Hedgewar Smruti Mandir) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Hedgewar Smruti Mandir, Gbohoadgwwian!

Wikipedia editor Nizil Shah just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page had been already passed in DYK. Good Work. Keep it up.

To reply, leave a comment on Nizil Shah's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nizil (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Nizil. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 02:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Parkala Massacre

On 24 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Parkala Massacre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that former Indian prime minister P. V. Narasimha Rao called the Parkala Massacre the "Jallianwala Bagh of the south", referring to the 1919 British slaughter of hundreds of people at a peaceful protest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Parkala Massacre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Parkala Massacre), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Hedgewar Smruti Mandir

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Hedgewar Smruti Mandir has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: wonderful! Thank you! Gian ❯❯ Talk 04:00, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Gian

Hi Gian,

As seen on your profile, you seem to be an expert of indology.

Would you like to add value to Sharmila Thackeray. I just recently created it and it is marked for speedy deletion. Accesscrawl (talk) 05:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Accesscrawl (talk) 05:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I have removed the speedy deletion nomination because it is not unambiguously not-notable or promotional. Someone may afd. The article is not in good shape, do you not have more references? Please feel free to add marathi references if they are there, it is not best but acceptable on English wikipedia. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 06:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution. Accesscrawl (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC) Accesscrawl (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

You are welcome. Your signature is probably duplicating your user name, you can fix it in your "Preferences" if that is the case. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 07:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 22:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: thank you. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 01:14, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Martyrs of Marriage

Hi Gian,

As you mentioned I've created a draft. What happens next? Draft:Martyrs of Marriage Accesscrawl (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

@Accesscrawl: I have placed the draft template on your draft, when you are ready (the article is not ready yet) then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" --Gian ❯❯ Talk 04:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
That was mighty fast, some admin approved it alright? --Gian ❯❯ Talk 05:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Noah's Ark

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noah's Ark. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political views of American academics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christian ethics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christian ethics. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

C. Rajagopalachari

See Talk:C. Rajagopalachari. I've left a note in GA Review section. TryKid (talk) 11:36, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I have provided my next set of comments. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 07:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parkala Massacre

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parkala Massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parkala Massacre

The article Parkala Massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Parkala Massacre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 18:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parkala Massacre

The article Parkala Massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parkala Massacre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 12:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Catrìona, this was my first GA! Gian ❯❯ Talk 11:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome! Catrìona (talk) 13:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:TerraCycle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:TerraCycle. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sugar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Gian It is regarding the RSS page edit.

Hi Gian i put 'Unregistered' there because i didnt think i should create a separate section on the validity of the organisation. But if you think that it requires a separate section on the validity and registration of the organisation i could create one. I am not really aware of the quality standards of the wikipedia but in any case if this violates the standards of quality content i would be happy to create another section related to the topic. I think it is important to point to the fact that a 92 yr old organisation that identifies itself with religious nationalism boasting of 5 million members isnt even registered under any NGO registration or Indian Law.

Thanks Talk —Preceding undated comment added 21:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anesthesiologist

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anesthesiologist. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Kazi Nazrul Islam/GA3

I wasn't sure whether you'd seen the nominator's post on the review asking for an update. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding and apologies, I was busy in real life. I am checking this now, will update shortly. --Jaydayal (talk) 03:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of cognitive biases

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of cognitive biases. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hedgewar Smruti Mandir

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hedgewar Smruti Mandir you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lordgilman -- Lordgilman (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hedgewar Smruti Mandir

The article Hedgewar Smruti Mandir you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hedgewar Smruti Mandir for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lordgilman -- Lordgilman (talk) 20:41, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jaydayal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter January 2019

Hello,
CIS-A2K has published their newsletter for the month of January 2019. The edition includes details about these topics:

From A2K
  • Mini MediaWiki Training, Theni
  • Marathi Language Fortnight Workshops (2019)
  • Wikisource training Bengaluru, Bengaluru
  • Marathi Wikipedia Workshop & 1lib1ref session at Goa University
  • Collaboration with Punjabi poet Balram
From Community
  • TWLCon (2019 India)
Upcoming events
  • Project Tiger Community Consultation
  • Gujarati Wikisource Workshop, Ahmedabad
  • Train the Trainer program

Please read the complete newsletter here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscribe this newsletter, click here. using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Om Purnamadah

Hello, Jaydayal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Om Purnamadah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for updating. I am not intending to spend much time here so it is okay to have it deleted. --Jaydayal (talk) 13:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

New message from Winged Blades of Godric

Hello, Jaydayal. You have new messages at Talk:The Tashkent Files.
Message added 16:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

∯WBGconverse 16:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

New message from Winged Blades of Godric

Hello, Jaydayal. You have new messages at Talk:Parkala Massacre.
Message added 16:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

∯WBGconverse 16:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

New message from Winged Blades of Godric

Hello, Jaydayal. You have new messages at Vanamonde93's talk page.
Message added 16:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

∯WBGconverse 16:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Noting that, absent any reply within the next 48 hours, I will be proceeding for an individual GAR. ∯WBGconverse 16:36, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
WBG I think you drudged up my entire edit history. If you are pointing at me that I claimed to have made 26 GAN, I don't think so. Could you tell on what ground article should never have qualified GA? 4 paragraphs is not a criteria. There is no deadline here as I understand. If you want to bully you might as well do it in 48 mins I don't like the tone or your approach in the matter, you seem motivated to cause annoyance, absolutely unfriendly way for a first interaction I must say. So, on what ground should it never have qualified for GA, please respond with guildeline/policy, thank you. --Jaydayal (talk) 01:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Jaydayal. Godric left you a talkback message for the discussion at my talk page, but since you've ignored that and responded here, let's now try to keep it here. Length is not a GA criterion. GA criterion 3, however, is "Broad in its coverage", and criteria 3A (which is the 3A mentioned at Godric's talk page) is "addresses the main aspects of the topic". These are less demanding than the "comprehensive" criterion at FAC, but they still require a degree of detail. A four paragraph article, no matter how well written and well sourced, simply cannot supply it for anything other than a very small and specific topic, and that's the problem here. This isn't a criticism of you personally; I've written many articles that are considerably longer, but which I'm not going to send to GAN, because they are simply not detailed enough. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for the response. I tried to find all possible sources for the incident. I think I was able to go over most of them that were available online and two of them offline from a nearby library. I would be happy to know any leads on how this can be improved further. I don't know what else to offer? --01:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Winged can still respond herself. My future response might be along this line: Wikipedia is fun time for me, expect me not to spend a lot of time or argument`ing here. Do what is best but stop personal attacks, it is silly, doesn't harm me but brings disrepute to our common cause Wikipedia. The best put off for a new editor can be this, without new editors, its no progress, in my view. --Jaydayal (talk) 01:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
"I don't know what else to offer?" That's precisely my point; you don't have to offer anything else. There are topics that cannot be brought to GA status given the current state of the source material, because the sources do not contain enough detail. That's just the nature of the topic, and not a shortcoming of the writer. Of the 70-odd articles that I have written from scratch, only 11 are GAs (and one is an FL). Very few of the others will ever reach that status. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:52, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Winged, I would request you to respond somewhere, on article talk page, on your page, on my page, on vanamonde93 page. But stop imposing your idea 'before' giving me some response? Isn't that a reasonable ask? I would prefer we do not split the discussion on four places. Lets restrict it to article talk page. Thank you. I may be unavailable on Wiki for long time, I edit very infrequently, if we can discuss probably I can present my side too. Feel free to make a choice, I dislike this hostile attitude. --Jaydayal (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

I did not drudge up your entire edit history. Coming across your revert over the Tashkent Files, I clicked over your u/p and thus, saw the sole GA icon, pointing to the article. That you edit infrequently and might be inactive for a long span of time does not mean that your preferred version stays for all the while. Editorial behavior like your's can be weaponized to game the system and hence, we typically allow for a reasonable time-span of reply, before moving on. That's not bullying. I have pointed you to the policy for what should have been a GA-failure, over my t/p. I did not attack you personally, over anywhere and believe that you are editing in good-faith and wish to improve the encyclopedia. Also, argumentation is a key part of any academic/quasi-academic discourse. Additionally, echo whatever V93 said. ∯WBGconverse 14:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
You are not 'discussing' by any standard, what you are doing is badgering me, with choicest hateful/provocative comments. --Jaydayal (talk) 04:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

∯WBGconverse 05:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Winged, I may be wrong, but I think I have got this before, and if I am not wrong you are expected to check before re-pasting this message on a user talk page. Nevertheless, thank you, I will go over the links once again since you are prompting me to. I may need some time, I hope no 48h deadlines like you gave me elsewhere. --Jaydayal (talk) 06:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter February 2019

Hello,
CIS-A2K has published their newsletter for the month of February 2019. The edition includes details about these topics:

From A2K
  • Bagha Purana meet-up
  • Online session on quality improvement Wikimedia session at Tata Trust's Vikas Anvesh Foundation, Pune
  • Wikisource workshop in Garware College of Commerce, Pune
  • Mini-MWT at VVIT (Feb 2019)
  • Gujarati Wikisource Workshop
  • Kannada Wiki SVG translation workshop
  • Wiki-workshop at AU Delhi

Please read the complete newsletter here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscribe this newsletter, click here. using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter March 2019

Hello,
CIS-A2K has published their newsletter for the month of March 2019. The edition includes details about these topics:

From A2K
  • Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon
  • Wiki Awareness Program at Jhanduke
  • Content donation sessions with authors
  • SVG Translation Workshop at KBC
  • Wikipedia Workshop at KBP Engineering College
  • Work-plan submission

Please read the complete newsletter here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscribe this newsletter, click here. using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Good-Article Reassesment

Parkala Massacre, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ∯WBGconverse 06:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, Jaydayal. Following your report against Winged Blades of Godric at WP:AN3, I have taken a look at the article Vivek Agnihotri and its talkpage. I'm concerned by your dismissal of reliable sources, as for example here, and also by your tendentious editing of the article itself. Please note that you are mistaken if you think "balance" in a BLP requires that criticism and positive commentary should weigh equally, as your edit summary here seems to suggest. Wikipedia goes by reliable secondary sources, and does not introduce "balance" against these sources by what the subject of the article himself says in a tweet. It's misuse of the source Deccan Chronicle to pick out a quote by Agnihotri himself while ignoring the context and thrust of the Deccan Chronicle article you refer to. Please stop your tendentious editing or you may be topic banned from the article. (I know you are a a newish user, so please, to understand me more clearly, follow the blue links in my message, to see for instance what "topic banned" means.) Bishonen | talk 11:14, 20 May 2019 (UTC).

Bishonen Okay, if you say so, one more editor, I will revisit this, follow your reasoning with the links that you have provided and think about your feedback. Do you see that he is misrepresenting source on other point? --Jaydayal (talk) 11:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I'd rather not dig into all the editing of the article and talkpage to try to find what you may be referring to. Please give details, preferably diffs, if you know how to create them. (If you don't, please see the simple instructions at Wikipedia:Simple diff and link guide.) Bishonen | talk 11:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC).
Never mind, I think I just saw what you mean: where you say "Where does he say he was "persecuted because of being a Hindu", it is not in the source you quote", at the bottom of the talkpage right now. That's it, isn't it? You're the one who is misrepresenting the source. It's very clearly implied in the source that V claims to be persecuted because of being a Hindu. It doesn't have to be word for word the same! It's you who are misreading. And then you end your comment with insults: "Are you truly so incompetent and biased?" This is highly improper talkpage behaviour. You are fast approaching a topic ban. I have to go out now, so you won't get any more responses for an hour or two, but please let me see more reasonable conduct when I return. By the way, what does your comment "one more editor" mean? Bishonen | talk 11:40, 20 May 2019 (UTC).
One more editor means that, one editor apart from winged. He abused me constantly for quite long before I gave him in kind, if you can't see that and don't care to see it, ... You aren't my moral compass, I live by my own principled and don't take bullying (winged definitely did, you, I give benefit of doubt) lightly. Wiki ain't my life. If you have even a little impartiality you would take upon yourself to dig up before passing judgements about my conduct, they are not in isolation, there is a counter party. Dig a few weeks backs to Fuck off, incompetent and more. I stay out from wiki for weeks or months at times so I don't mind you skipping 2h. I don't agree about your reinterpretation of what one article indicates, it is putting words into his mouth, he could very well say that if he wanted to say that, to exclude what he said and write what you think he meant is original research, this is my understanding. You may or may not agree with my thinking but that doesn't change the simple thing that I don't see why someone wants to reinterpret one line instead of just attributing it to the person and let the reader decide. The reinterpretation is changing the meaning, putting the subject in bad light, BLP requires us to err on the side of caution. My interpretation of BLP. Wrong or right, I will take your opinions but not your judgements, at best you can probably indefinitely ban me from Wiki, and I don't see why I should be bullied by it. Now, if you may speak without further admonitions, you may, otherwise please stay away. --Jaydayal (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
I'm not your moral compass, indeed. However, I am an uninvolved administrator warning you that you may be topic banned from a particular subject. That's what I've come to your page for. Since you disinvite me, I won't be back here unless/until I come to sanction you, for instance by a topic ban. Bishonen | talk 16:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC).
I can say safely you have a poor way of interacting with strangers. I get that you have been bestowed the powers to sanction me from editing this website. I also took your warning seriously. You only repeated what I particularly told you not to and ignored what I implored you to take up. --Jaydayal (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Talk page guidelines

Hi, just wanted to make sure that you are aware of WP:OWNTALK. Although archiving is preferred, users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages. If someone removes your comment from their talk page and you persist in reverting, it can be considered disruptive editing. Schazjmd (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes, Bishonen pointed the guidelines to me. I wasn't aware of that guideline before. --Jaydayal (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Vivek article

I agree. I always add citation. But I noticed that Vivek's article had and still has a lot of trivial information--the dissonance at CBFC re that Kashir movie (which that OpIndia link does not even mention to my surprise). In this case, it's Vivek's entry and the section on his "career"--and a discussion o one ofthe many movies CBFC reviews. Just because something was controversial doesn't mean that it should be there on his page. Scenecontra (talk) 10:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

@Scenecontra: yes it has some trivial info, you are also right that something that was controversial does not merit inclusion on that count alone. You can approach this from a different perspective, why not find other information from good sources about him and add them. Eventually it gets condensed as per due weight. At that point more important stuff survives over less important stuff. Best is if we can take due weight into account from edit 0, day 0, but sometimes new references come and that requires reassessment of the topic. On this specific subject I read multiple reference and I was confused, some sources praise him for upholding freedom of speech some note otherwise. I was so confused I just left the content untouched for someone more knowledgeable to deal with or until I review it once again and get a better understanding. --Jaydayal (talk) 10:53, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Citizenship Amendment Act; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop templat`ing me. You made an edit, I objected, you simply reinserted -- I did explain myself. This is not following BRD. By no means is this edit war, you should know better. The burden is on you to demonstrate something unusual should be included. Not on me to prove why your thoughts need no inclusion -- because there is no direct evident to include it! You need a consensus to put it in, not the other way round. --Jaydayal (talk) 09:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)


Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh

Your revision of my edit was pointless as i have clearly read and stated with link that RSS was not banned by britishers was first banned by indian government in 1948 after the assassination of MK Gandhi Ahmedfalah7711 (talk)Ahmedfalah7711 —Preceding undated comment added 09:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry, there have been four users in good standing who have suggested you to stop re-inserting that text. So stop doing it. Please share the references that you have and suggest why it is valid to override existing references and content. The long standing content has references and has been vetted by several editors earlier with associated discussions on talk page. --Jaydayal (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Jaydayal! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter January 2021

Hello,
CIS-A2K has published their newsletter for the month of January 2021. The edition includes details about these topics:

  • Online meeting of Punjabi Wikimedians
  • Marathi language fortnight
  • Online workshop for active citizen groups
  • Lingua Libre workshop for Marathi community
  • Online book release event with Solapur University
  • Punjabi Books Re-licensing
  • Research needs assessment
  • Wikipedia 20th anniversary celebration edit-a-thon
  • Wikimedia Wikimeet India 2021 updates

Please read the complete newsletter here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscribe this newsletter, click here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter February 2021

Hello,
CIS-A2K has published their newsletter for the month of February 2021. The edition includes details about these topics:

  • Wikimedia Wikimeet India 2021
  • Online Meeting with Punjabi Wikimedians
  • Marathi Language Day
  • Wikisource Audiobooks workshop
  • 2021-22 Proposal Needs Assessment
  • CIS-A2K Team changes
  • Research Needs Assessment
  • Gender gap case study
  • International Mother Language Day

Please read the complete newsletter here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscribe this newsletter, click here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 11:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

CIS - A2K Newsletter January 2022

Dear Wikimedian,

Hope you are doing well. As the continuation of the CIS-A2K Newsletter, here is the newsletter for the month of January 2022.

This is the first edition of 2022 year. In this edition, you can read about:

  • Launching of WikiProject Rivers with Tarun Bharat Sangh
  • Launching of WikiProject Sangli Biodiversity with Birdsong
  • Progress report

Please find the newsletter here. Thank you MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Nitesh Gill (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter February 2022

Dear Wikimedian,

Hope you are doing well. As you know CIS-A2K updated the communities every month about their previous work through the Newsletter. This message is about February 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned our conducted events, ongoing events and upcoming events.

Conducted events
Ongoing events
Upcoming Events

Please find the Newsletter link here. Thank you MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter March 2022

Dear Wikimedians,

Hope you are doing well. As you know CIS-A2K updated the communities every month about their previous work through the Newsletter. This message is about March 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned our conducted events and ongoing events.

Conducted events
Ongoing events

Please find the Newsletter link here. Thank you Nitesh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter April 2022

Dear Wikimedians,

I hope you are doing well. As you know CIS-A2K updated the communities every month about their previous work through the Newsletter. This message is about April 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned our conducted events, ongoing events and upcoming events.

Conducted events
Ongoing events
Upcoming event

Please find the Newsletter link here. Thank you Nitesh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter May 2022

Dear Wikimedians,

I hope you are doing well. As you know CIS-A2K updated the communities every month about their previous work through the Newsletter. This message is about May 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned our conducted events, and ongoing and upcoming events.

Conducted events
Ongoing events
Upcoming event

Please find the Newsletter link here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscibe this newsletter, click here.

Thank you Nitesh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 12:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter June 2022

Dear Wikimedian,

Hope you are doing well. As you know CIS-A2K updated the communities every month about their previous work through the Newsletter. This message is about June 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned A2K's conducted events.

Conducted events

Please find the Newsletter link here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscibe this newsletter, click here.

Thank you Nitesh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter July 2022

Dear Wikimedians,

Hope everything is fine. As CIS-A2K update the communities every month about their previous work via the Newsletter. Through this message, A2K shares its July 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned A2K's conducted events.

Conducted events
Ongoing events
  • Partnerships with Goa University, authors and language organisations
Upcoming events

Please find the Newsletter link here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscibe this newsletter, click here.

Thank you Nitesh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter August 2022


Really sorry for sending it in English.

Dear Wikimedian,

Hope everything is fine. As CIS-A2K update the communities every month about their previous work via the Newsletter. Through this message, A2K shares its August 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned A2K's conducted events.

Conducted events
Ongoing events
  • Impact report
Upcoming events

Please find the Newsletter link here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscibe this newsletter, click here.

Thank you Nitesh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 06:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

CIS-A2K Newsletter September 2022


Apologies for sending it in English, feel free to translate it into your language.

Dear Wikimedians,

Hope everything is well. Here is the CIS-A2K's for the month of September Newsletter, a few conducted events are updated in it. Through this message, A2K shares its September 2022 Newsletter. In this newsletter, we have mentioned A2K's conducted events.

Conducted events

Please find the Newsletter link here.
If you want to subscribe/unsubscibe this newsletter, click here.

Thank you MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

On behalf of User:Nitesh (CIS-A2K)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jaydayal/Archive_1&oldid=1126420047"