Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
Example: "I installed bitcoin software, downloaded the bitcoin blockchain, and received 1 bitcoin after giving my bitcoin address to my employer. I received 0.03 bitcoins as a tip. Maybe I'll sell my bitcoins on a bitcoin exchange."
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Bitcoin was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 1 October 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Other talk page banners
Material from Bitcoin was split to Bitcoin network on 26 May 2013. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
Merged articles
Bitcoin Core was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 20 July 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Bitcoin. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Namecoin was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 December 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Bitcoin. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Bitcoinj was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 December 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Bitcoin. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Bitcoin Foundation was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 December 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Bitcoin. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2017, when it received 15,026,561 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report17 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Alessia Pannone (September 14, 2023). "Bitcoin on Wikipedia: record number of views in anticipation of the ETF". en.cryptonomist.ch. Retrieved September 15, 2023. On 8 September, the Wikipedia page dedicated to Bitcoin recorded a total of 7,830 views, marking the peak in daily views for 2023.
Murtuza Merchant (September 14, 2023). "Why Bitcoin Wikipedia Page Traffic Just Hit 2023 Peak". msn.com. Retrieved September 15, 2023. Bitcoin's (CRYPTO: BTC) Wikipedia page recently saw an unprecedented surge in its daily traffic.
DISHITA MALVANIA (October 31, 2023). "Bitcoin Wikipedia Page Views Soar Amid Ongoing Rally". cryptotimes.io. Retrieved October 31, 2023. Bitcoin's wikipedia page recently experienced a sharp increase in the number of people visiting it, reaching its highest level since mid-2022.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
These are not considered reliable sources per Wikipedia's standards unfortunately. Please provide an academic paper, a book, or an article from a mainstream media. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 10:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
S. Bistarelli, I. Mercanti and F. Santini, "An Analysis of Non-standard Bitcoin Transactions," 2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT), Zug, Switzerland, 2018, pp. 93-96, doi: 10.1109/CVCBT.2018.00016.
Since the concept of a 'redeem script' is not explained in the article (or even mentioned), introducing it to this article based on such flimsy sources would make the article even more messy and confusing than it already is. Our goal is not to pile-on technical jargon, it is to provide context to readers. Grayfell (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Tannmauser, yes these are reliable sources. But we should first define what a "redeem script" is. It might be too detailed for this general article. You might want to look at expanding Bitcoin protocol instead as that article delves more into technical details. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We do have the white paper release date in the article. I dont see a field in the infobox for the whitepaper release date. So your request was not done Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I am not sure it is notable enough for its own article, but could maybe add one sentence to this article. Kinda also a bit of WP:TRIVIA, so not sure if DUE here either. Just a suggestion. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
is is too technical, starting from the second sentence. it basically is completely unintelligible if you do not already know abut crypto Finnigami (talk) 05:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Schoolboy error. Should read "Based on a free-market ideology, bitcoin was invented in 2008 by Satoshi Nakamoto, an unknown person or persons unknown." Covtom (talk) 13:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A455bcd9 -- your undo of the revision sates that the revision is irrelevant to use in payments. I disagree. The points mentioned are directly related to payments. (1) It will no longer be mandatory for merchants to accept BTC -- directly related to payments and the previous sentence stating it was previously mandatory; (2) no longer accepting tax payments in bitcoin -- this is also directly a use for payments; (3) discontinuing its involvement in the Chivo wallet -- again, the most important wallet in El Salvador and directly used for payments.
WP:UNDUE. This is the article about bitcoin. Not Bitcoin in El Salvador (where you added the same paragraph and it's great: thanks for doing so). The 3 points are not minor and irrelevant here in the bitcoin articles. Taxes and Chivo were not mentioned before. So their disappearance has no reasons to be mentioned either. The legal requirement to accept BTC was mentioned but we said it was in practice not applied, so again: irrelevant. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 19:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough on the other two, makes sense put like that, thanks. However, the legal requirement should still be added since it is officially being removed, even if as some small note...perhaps something like:
I removed "despite being legally required to". Better than the note because I don't know if El Salvador has already officially enacted the new law. So far I think it's just news announcement of the IMF deal. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the removal, sounds like PR from the IMF. I read the IMF announcement on the the IMF website yesterday and there seemed to be no actual commitments from El Salvador to implement this and it was worded in a hopeful manner. Given that El Salvador went on to buy a large amount of bitcoin just after the announcement said Reuters, we might also infer that this was telling a different story. There was also a fortune piece, but I dont have a paid account for this. As Antoine said, this is all too speculative and undue for the article at this time, but could be good for the Bitcoin in El Salvador article nor are we going to get off into speculation of actual use of bitcoin in relation to this. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can use reader view to bypass, depending on your device. Not sure how I could share that article with you. However, El Salvadorian officials have commented on this. Around the purchasing/not there are mixed messages, but the shuttering of Chivo (not appropriate for this article) and the move to make acceptance optional are confirmed. ILoveFinance (talk) 03:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For clarity to my above comment, it will still be considered legal tender as far as any announcements have gone, just made optional for businesses (except for acceptance for taxes -- have not seen El Salvadorian officials confirm or deny this particular point yet). And as to the point of being made optional, A455bcd9 already modified the text accordingly! ILoveFinance (talk) 03:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ILoveFinance What would be worth mentioning in the article is if we find new data about the actual use in the country: how many people own btc? How many businesses accept it? How many people use btc monthly? Etc. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I saw a more recent stat that an estimated 12% of the population owns some BTC. Need to find it again, will see if RS. Will post stats and RS here if I find them then we can figure out how to integrate (if makes sense). ILoveFinance (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=logo}
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Bowler the Carmine | talk 18:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#James Howells regarding James Howells missing Bitcoin (see coverage) on how and where to cover this topic. Thank you. CNC (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)