User talk:Pankajdoharey
Welcome!
|
December 2016
[edit]
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gilgit-Baltistan seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Note
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--NeilN talk to me 06:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Disputed Territory
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Disputed Territory, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
RSS
[edit]Do you consider 'Unregistered" to be worthy of going right in the first sentence? Is it so vital or informative to readers? What if it is registered or not registered... the reader will bogged with so many qualifications right there, what do you think? --Gian ❯❯ Talk 13:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Gian i put 'Unregistered' there because i didnt think i should create a separate section on the validity of the organisation. But if you think that it requires a separate section on the validity and registration of the organisation i could create one. I am not really aware of the quality standards of the wikipedia but in any case if this violates the standards of quality content i would be happy to create another section related to the topic.
Thanks Talk
- I think it is not important information. Perhaps it can be said somewhere in the body of the article where it will fit in. I don't think it deserves a separate section also. I will see if I can cleanup the article, it is full of disconnected narration put side by side. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 10:04, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Talk I understand your point, surely that is also not an issue. But i think it is an important information from the context that a political organisation that claims to have 5 million members isnt even registered under any law. Nor keeps a registration of its members. Even religious organisations like churches keep a registration list and trusts are usually registered under Societies act in India. Only those organisations evading taxes or auditing dont register themselves. Thus it really becomes an important information. PankajD ❯❯Talk 6:08 Sep 2018 (IST)
- Yes, you are also right in your view. What I and others are saying is that this may not be needed right at the top or in any detail, just find a suitable spot in the body of the article and fit it in two three words. When I get time I will try to cleanup this article and if possible consider the addition that you are proposing. If you want to add it back yourself I would suggest you make your proposal, where you want to add it in "change xx to yy format" on the article talk page. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 13:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Your signature is missing hyperlinks, you have to change it in Preferences > Signature. Try out few times you will get it. --Gian ❯❯ Talk 13:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2021
[edit] Thanks for contributing to the article Doshi. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 01:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)