User talk:IcedChocolate

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2022 NBA Finals, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filbasket 2022 (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Filbasket 2022 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Filbasket 2022, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IcedChocolate! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Sergecross73 msg me 16:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The citation clearly says 20. If it actually was 30 then you could at least try to provide proof. Otherwise it just becomes disruptive vandalism, which can lead to a block. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 23:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The official announcement and The instagram post clearly states 30. How is an article by some batsh1t media more reliable than the official announcement on the official site? This dude is either trolling or high. IcedChocolate (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss simple disputes like this on the talk page and assume good faith while you do it. Sergecross73 msg me 11:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does seems to be 30 in total prior to several being disqualified from advancing in the playoff stage, which has 20. But why couldn't you add a citation that clearly stated this upon the first revert? The WP:BURDEN is on you to cite new claims. And read WP:PRIMARY for why third-party citations take priority over self-published announcements. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And so the total number of teams participating is 30. Bro cant count. IcedChocolate (talk) 03:04, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a two way street. You completely failed to explain this in any capacity, choosing to edit war instead. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. You need to be able to be civil and work with others. If you don't cut it out with all these unconstructive "bro can't count" and "guy is trolling" type comments, you're going to end up with your account temporarily blocked. This is your second warning to assume good faith of other editors. Sergecross73 msg me 10:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2022 NBA Finals. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 06:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this edit is entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. We don't write like we're pretending to be sportscasters giving their post-game analysis. Wikipedia is not the place to give personal editorials with informal wording like that. Please stop. Sergecross73 msg me 11:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Interaction with 'hostile' editor

Hello, and thank you for your assistance in reverting egregious edits on Choi Sung-bong. But I would like to address how you responded to the editor. Despite the inappropriate location, wording, and aggressive edit summaries of the user, they did present a source and were here to contribute to the wikipedia. Yes their edits needed reverting, but dropping a vandalism UWT on their talk page with no further communication was not an optimal course of action. I would suggest that their edits did not constitute vandalism but rather ill-advised first edits on the wikipedia. Because they were dismissed as vandals, they felt attacked and ignored. Remember to assume good faith when dealing with new users. I would suggest the next time a similar edit occurs revert the edit and refer to their talk page, and take the time to write out something guiding them to BLP guidelines and wikipedia standards on Neutral Point-of-View. Instruct them on how identify reliable sources as relevant to BLP and if appropriate, to make a new section regarding a controversy, especially if the claims are easily accessible or even confirmed by the subject. What's done is done, but please try to see the best in willing-to-contribute editors going forward. Thank you for your time. GabberFlasted (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rutgers University—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Andethyst (talk) 14:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Islamic Terrorism, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Harry Maguire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Egghead06 (talk) 06:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2022 FIFA World Cup, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The International 2022 (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The article needs to be updated. The event already happened but it omits the results of the event and should be in past tense.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The International 2022 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ESL One Genting 2022

Hello, IcedChocolate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ESL One Genting 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ESL One Genting 2022

Hello, IcedChocolate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "ESL One Genting 2022".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The International 2022

Hello, IcedChocolate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The International 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The International 2022

Hello, IcedChocolate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The International 2022".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]