User talk:Hollowww

Welcome!

Hello, Hollowww, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:Operation Unthinkable, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Operation Unthinkable

A tag has been placed on Category:Operation Unthinkable indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Hollowww, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Edit warring - Great Stand on the Ugra River

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Operation Bravo (2001)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 11:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battles of the Insurgency in the Preševo Valley

A tag has been placed on Category:Battles of the Insurgency in the Preševo Valley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Insurgency in the Preševo Valley

A tag has been placed on Category:Insurgency in the Preševo Valley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clashes around Bujanovac moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Clashes around Bujanovac. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 01:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Bosanski Brod moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle for Bosanski Brod. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and just an infobox, but no article . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Kozinka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle for Kozinka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 01:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 western Russia incursion

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 western Russia incursion indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Ivanivske moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Ivanivske, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 11:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Orlivka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Orlivka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Orlivka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Ψ Dro 00:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Hi, please discuss before creating battle articles on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. There really aren't any major engagements deserving an article of their own right now. Everything is organized as nicely as possible by a group of editors and there's probably a reason why a certain settlement doesn't have a battle article of its own. Super Ψ Dro 00:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Wadi Bu Taga

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Battle of Wadi Bu Taga, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Wadi Bu Taga moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Wadi Bu Taga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I think the main problem here is the geographical location of the battle. There does appear to be a wadi in present day Libya; A Google Books search (which, as a self-described "a absent minded critter", somewhere located in my browser history) indicates this not in fact an outright hoax, but quite possibly a minor skirmish Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second Battle of Preševo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Second Battle of Preševo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 15:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Battle of Nisibis (217), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation "Lukavac '93" (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

only an infobox does not guarantee this article an entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation "Lukavac '93" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 11:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation "Shield '94" (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

only an infobox does not guarantee this article an entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation "Shield '94" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 11:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle for Bosanski Brod (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no actual article content

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle for Bosanski Brod and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation "Lukavac '93" (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One source is link-dead and the other is the CIA, which is not exactly relable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation "Lukavac '93" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hollowww. Thank you for your work on Air Battle on Istrana. Another editor, Boleyn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add inline citations.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 05:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Urozhaine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Urozhaine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Urozhaine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Ψ Dro 12:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to remind this message I sent back in March [1]. I will seek administrative action if there's continued creation of low-quality content not fullfilling the standards of notability. See WP:COMPETENCE and WP:NOTABLE, that there is fighting in a village doesn't mean we need an article if it is not given particular attention by sources. I again ask you to first start discussions at Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine or other talk pages to see if other editors agree with the creation of a new article. Super Ψ Dro 12:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hollowww. Thank you for your work on Battle of Uadi Bu Taga. Another editor, ARandomName123, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Can you provide a full reference for citation number 2? Wright, 1983 Pages 35-36 isn't sufficient. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Serbian Chetnik Organization did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

--Joy (talk) 18:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle on the Oreške fields

Hello, Hollowww,

Thank you for creating Battle on the Oreške fields.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This appears to be a low quality machine translation full of inaccuracies

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle on the Oreške fields moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle on the Oreške fields. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle on the Oreške fields (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle on the Oreške fields and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 14:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Glina (1991) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Glina (1991). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 07:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Rosinjača forest moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Rosinjača forest. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joy (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of:Battle of Drënas

{{subst:db-reason-notice|Battle of Drënas|header=1|wp:A10 This is another name for the Battle of Llapushnik, and this was an old revision of the battle of Llapushnik made last year.}} ~~~~

Shqiptar1999 (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kosare

Hello,

Regarding your edit: You mentioned that these Yugoslav military personnel were soldiers. However, I must correct you, as two of them were Major Generals and one of them, Tibor Cerba, was even a Commander. Therefore, I find your edit pointless.

Best regards,

Azphalt Azphalt (talk) 01:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fire of Piazza Mercato moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fire of Piazza Mercato, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Italian invasion of Kosovo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Italian invasion of Kosovo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italian invasion of Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of the Fulda Gap

Hello, Hollowww. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of the Fulda Gap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bias + Errors

Based on your edits, it is quite obvious you're incredibly biased, especially when it comes to the Bosnian War. I appreciate that you take your time to make wikipedia pages, but you along with another guy have infested the battles of the Bosnian War with Republika Srpska victories, when this is obviously not what actually happened. Many of your pages also have significant errors which it baffles me on how they managed to get through Wikipedia moderation. I'd recommend actually being fair when it comes to what pages you make and making sure they aren't loaded with clear mistakes, otherwise I'll gladly try and get your account suspended. Thank you. Setergh (talk) 18:21, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've realized my mistakes too and I stopped making these types of pages. I hope more people would stop making more pages with vrs victories too. Hollowww (talk) 11:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that's good then. Thank you for responding and good luck in the future. Setergh (talk) 15:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Valjevo

The article Battle of Valjevo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is loaded with errors, has no proper sources (which are news pages and even contradict each other such as source 1 saying the Serbian pilot fled while source 3 saying he didn't) and seems to be quite biased.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Rosinjača forest (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Melmann was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor(s) largely failed to address the initial WP:DRAFTIFY reasons.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Rosinjača forest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Melmann 14:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Operation Bravo (2001)

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Operation Bravo (2001), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clashes around Bujanovac

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clashes around Bujanovac, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Ivanivske

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Ivanivske, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Robotyne (2024)

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Robotyne (2024), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation "Shield '94" (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs a few more citations. Address the citation needed notices and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Operation "Shield '94" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Operation Bravo (2001)

Hello, Hollowww. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Operation Bravo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Wadi Bu Taga

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Wadi Bu Taga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Ivanivske

Hello, Hollowww. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Ivanivske".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Robotyne (2024)

Hello, Hollowww. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Robotyne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle for Bosanski Brod

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle for Bosanski Brod, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle on the Oreške fields has been accepted

Battle on the Oreške fields, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Operation "Lukavac '93"

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Operation "Lukavac '93", a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Skirmish at Topusko

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Skirmish at Topusko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battles of Kabash and Koriša

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battles of Kabash and Koriša, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Attack on Ješkovo

Hello, Hollowww. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Attack on Ješkovo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dečan operation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dečan operation, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dečan operation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Rogovë for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Rogovë, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Rogovë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Branko Pantelić for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Branko Pantelić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branko Pantelić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mztourist (talk) 08:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Hrasnica (1992) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Hrasnica (1992) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Hrasnica (1992) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]