User talk:Himeshlala

Himeshlala, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Himeshlala! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2018 Mumbai Open – Singles

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Himeshlala, thanks for creating 2018 Mumbai Open – Singles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2018 Mumbai Open – Doubles

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Himeshlala, thanks for creating 2018 Mumbai Open – Doubles!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to all articles you create and please do not add red-linked categories. Thanks for your work on this article and others.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2006 Richard Luton Properties Canberra International – Singles

The article 2006 Richard Luton Properties Canberra International – Singles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Himeshlala. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Australian Open – Main Draw Wildcard Entries moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Australian Open – Main Draw Wildcard Entries, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:47, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Moving articles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Rebecca Šramková a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Rebecca Šrámková. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 08:46, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:TOYOTA Thailand Open 2019-Screen Shot 2019-01-21 at 8.24.57 PM.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:TOYOTA Thailand Open 2019-Screen Shot 2019-01-21 at 8.24.57 PM.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Moving articles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Bangalore Open a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into WTA Indian Open. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 15:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 French Open – Women's Singles Qualifying moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 French Open – Women's Singles Qualifying, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robin Anderson (tennis)

The article Robin Anderson (tennis) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kb03 (talk) 13:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robin Anderson (tennis)

The article Robin Anderson (tennis) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 22:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Singles Qualifying moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019 Wimbledon Championships – Women's Singles Qualifying, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:27, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019 US Open – Women's Singles Qualifying

Hello, Himeshlala,

Thanks for creating 2019 US Open – Women's Singles Qualifying! I edit here too, under the username Path slopu and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please try to add some references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 12:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing templates from articles?

Why are you removing maintenance templates? [1][2]? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:28, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT COPY

"DO NOT COPY" is a basic concept in academia. The content you added here at Sushant Singh Rajput was copied from this source. This is unacceptable. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. Consider this your only warning. The next time you liberally copy or even closely paraphrase copyrighted material like this, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to be able to distinguish between useful content and gossip, since much of the content you added involves speculation about the subject's romantic entanglements and things of that nature. We also probably don't need to know the color of the cloth used to hang himself, but that's just you indiscriminately copying content, I guess. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And this--what the hell does "misbehaving" mean? Instead of copying copying copying, maybe try to impart some actual information, rather than meaningless euphemistic language. If he was accused of sexual harassment, then call it sexual harassment, not "misbehaving", which could mean anything from running stop lights to shoplifting saris, to talking in school, to cheating on a spouse. And even then, Wikipedia is not a rumour mill, we only care about noteworthy information and endeavor to present a neutal point of view. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No

If you want to move something, move it, or get consensus for it to move. See WP:MOVE. Please do not just copy and paste, obliterating the entire history. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nirupama Sanjeev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Hanley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tennis Spanish Open / WTA Madrid Open

I have seen sources that call the Madrid event of 1996 the inaugural event, so I'm not convinced the two tournaments should be merged. And if they are it can't be a simple cut and paste, it must follow wikipedia merge requirements. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020 Advantage Cars Prague Open – Women's Doubles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2020 Advantage Cars Prague Open – Women's Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AviationFreak💬 03:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Open – Wildcards moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Australian Open – Wildcards, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2021 Gippsland Trophy – Singles

Hello, Himeshlala,

Thank you for creating 2021 Gippsland Trophy – Singles.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Can you supply references re it being a new competition and for the drawing of names

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 09:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some strange tennis page moves

Please do not arbitrarily move tennis articles to new names. Tennis Project has had to move several back with administrative help. Lumping things together is not proper unless the tournament themselves lump the entire history together. The Nuremberg Cup is completely different than the Bad Homburg Open. bad Homburg has not maintained the history. Same with the Polish Open, Katowice, Warsaw, and Gdynia Opens. We've had to move them back. At the very least make a proper move request so other can help determine if the move is just. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Varvara-Gracheva-tennis-player-20217-18882189 2026911490874397 2015430931294750427 n.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Varvara-Gracheva-tennis-player-20217-18882189 2026911490874397 2015430931294750427 n.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://oursmagazine.fr/culture-russe/sportifs/varvara-gracheva/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rosalie-van-der-Hoek-tennis-player-1484166 644104912313106 653659691 n.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rosalie-van-der-Hoek-tennis-player-1484166 644104912313106 653659691 n.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/rosalievdhoek/photos/ms.c.eJw9y9EJAEEIA9GODqOJrv03tixyfj6YSRLGttPVVfHlGB4IWK6VTEavp~;ffPr3GOno2~_Pr9QV3rZhZs.bps.a.644104225646508/644104912313106/?type=3&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Erin-Routliffe-NZ-Tennis-1621392390680.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Erin-Routliffe-NZ-Tennis-1621392390680.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/women-in-sport/125181800/erin-routliffe-continues-tough-battle-climb-up-tennis-rankings-in-a-post-covid-world. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again please don't move events because you think they are the same

Some of your moves you've done because you think they are the same when they are not. You must show that the champions lists continue per the new event. If they do, and you can source it, that's a different story. Otherwise they are treated as separate tournaments. The sources I'm seeing say it will be the "1st edition of the WTA Poland Open." And the "Winners Open" in Romania says it is a brand new tournament also. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:07, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ameritech Cup. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I'm having to fix more and more of your page moves and redirects and it's getting old fast! Just because you "think" tournaments are related doesn't mean they are. I have mentioned this twice already on your talk page nicely. This time it's a formal warning. Don't keep merging tournaments together without some valid sources. pretty much if the new tournament does not use the history of the old event, they aren't the same. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WTA 500 tournaments

Template:WTA 500 tournaments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WTA 1000 tournaments

Template:WTA 1000 tournaments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Australian Open – Wildcards

Hello, Himeshlala. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Australian Open – Wildcards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Australian Open – Wildcards

Hello, Himeshlala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Australian Open – Wildcards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving tournaments

This is going to be a final warning because I see User:Fyunck(click) has warned you before about the same thing. Please don't just merge all information from a long-existing article at Nana Trophy into Tunis Open just because the tournaments are held in the same country. That makes no sense. They are completely different tournaments, held at different times and under different tiers on their respective circuits. You cannot just merge them all into a Tunisia Open article title which firstly none of the tournaments even go by. If a new tournament is announced, please create a new article for that tournament, not just merge into an existing article where there is no relationship. Thanks. Adamtt9 (talk) 12:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Adamtt9. You have already been informed by Fyunck(click) on three separate occasions to be careful when merging tournament articles. Yet without any communication or explanation you continue to incorrectly merge tournament articles, not only Nana Trophy into Tunis Open, but also Guadalajara Open into Mexican Open (tennis). These are completely separate tournaments which should not be merged. Next time please use the Requested moves option so that other editors can review the proposed merge before it is done. If you continue to incorrectly move / merge tournament articles without any prior consultation this can lead to you being reported with a request to have you blocked from moving / merging tennis tournament articles.--Wolbo (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving tournaments Again!

All the sources I see say the ATX Open tennis event is the inaugural tournament and not the same as on from a decade ago. You have been warned of these moves by multiple editors. Just because it's in the same city as a previous event means nothing. If it skipped a year I could see this, especially with the pandemic fiasco of tournament changes. If the tournament incorporates the past winners in its history that would be a different story, but it looks like that will not happen. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I now count at least five warnings about moving tennis tournament articles which this editor has ignored. Perhaps it is time for a request at ANI to block the editor from moving / merging articles? --Wolbo (talk) 00:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Himeshlala, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. When you do things that others disagree with, you have to be able to discuss your differences with other editors in order to come to a consensus. When you continue to do those same things without achieving a consensus first, like continuing to move tournament articles after being warned several times not to do so, this is disruptive. One of the signs of disruptive editing is repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits. I don't see that you have ever used your talk page, so I have no confidence that you will be receptive to these concerns moving forward. As such, I am indefinitely blocking you. Indefinite does not mean infinite, this block will simply last until you acknowledge the warnings of your fellow editors and promise to be collaborative in the future by discussing differences as they arise. To be unblocked, simply use the {{unblock}} template and an admin will review what you have to say, and if you need some assistance with this please review the guide to appealing blocks. I really hope you are responsive to this and can be a considerate editor in the future. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]