Jump to content

User talk:SunriseInBrooklyn/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

Stop nominating articles for GA and FA

Until you can properly articulate to me that you understand the community preferences for GA and FA nomination procedures, please stop nominating articles for these reviews. You don't seem to understand what sort of content should be nominated as pointed out to you by BlueMoonset, an example of which would be here. You are creating more work for people, and I'm already seriously concerned that you may not have the level of competency required to edit at Wikipedia constructively. For example, I'm aware of your lengthy history of creating hundreds of random portals that wind up getting deleted. Based on this alone, I can't even fathom what you find rewarding about editing at Wikipedia, since about 20% of your edits have been deleted. That's not a strong record. I'm also concerned that despite claiming to be a native English speaker, when you interact with other users like you did here, you seem to respond with incoherent statements. There are other linguistic problems, like creating non-parallel categories for males and women, rather than for males and females as is typically the way things are done. Anyhow, please stop nominating articles for GA and FA, and I strongly advise you to bring the quality of your edits up. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb, before nominating these articles, these articles need meet the GA criteria and bring the quality of my edits up? -- Happypillsjr ✉ 16:04, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't know what you are asking me. Please don't nominate any more articles for GA or FA review, and make better editing choices. Editing Wikipedia is not a right, it is a privilege and any edits that are problematic and require other editors to repair will be considered disruptive, and you may likely wind up sanctioned to protect the encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
@Cyphoidbomb and Happypillsjr: I see this issue has come up again. Happy, as an extension of this, please don't review any other articles just yet, either. I have just left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation#New York City Subway stations in Brooklyn to be nominated for FL status saying why you should refrain from doing this stuff right now. It's great that you want to help out, but I'd recommend that a mentor help you improve your first quality article before you perform any more nominations or reviews. epicgenius (talk) 01:15, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Female gangsta rappers

Hi. Did you want to delete Category:Female gangsta rappers, because you have an incomplete CFD nomination? If so, you can just add {{db-author}} to it to request speedy deletion. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Non-binary gender by occupation has been nominated for discussion

Category:Non-binary gender by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. gnu57 15:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Peter Onorati. Please see WP:BLPCAT for more information. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

@User:SuperMarioMan, this person really does has an italian descent, from both of his parents.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 14:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Portal:London transport

Hello Happypillsjr. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Portal:London transport, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Big Little Lies (TV series) into Draft:Big Little Lies (season 1). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Jujubee

Since you suggested Jujubee (drag queen) for this month's WP:RPDR collaboration of the month, I wonder if you're aware of any content gaps or other ways to improve the current article. If so, feel free to post on the article's talk page. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Capcom task force

A tag has been placed on Category:Capcom task force requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:52, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Brooke Lynn Hytes at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Lynsey De Paul.

I am 99% sure that one of her first jobs was to design the album cover for The Pipkins debut album “Gimme Dat Ding” featuring a pair of clowns and signed discreetly by “Lynsey”. Captain Lethargy (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Women music articles

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Women music articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Women in music articles by importance

A tag has been placed on Category:Women in music articles by importance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Brooke Lynn Hytes

Hello! Your submission of Brooke Lynn Hytes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:lightblue" > [[User:Happypillsjr|<font color="hotpink">'''Happypillsjr'''</font>]] [[User talk:Happypillsjr|<font color="Red">'''<big>✉</big>'''</font>]]</span> : Happypillsjr ✉

to

<span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:lightblue" > [[User:Happypillsjr|<b style="color:hotpink">Happypillsjr</b>]] [[User talk:Happypillsjr|<big style="color:Red">'''✉'''</big>]]</span> : Happypillsjr ✉

—Anomalocaris (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:12th-century women composers

A tag has been placed on Category:12th-century women composers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Transgender and transsexual women by nationality has been nominated for discussion

Category:Transgender and transsexual women by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:20th-century Swedish women musicians

A tag has been placed on Category:20th-century Swedish women musicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Little Lies (season 1) (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Big Little Lies (TV series) instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As this is just 97% the same as Big Little Lies (TV series)it is not a new article. If you think the content should be split just discus first on Talk:Big Little Lies (TV series) and if no objection then just decide if you want to Be bold.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Happypillsjr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

GA reviewing

Hi, Happy, you reviewed 1 (New York City Subway service) at GAN, and it's fantastic that you want to be involved with GA reviewing, but the review was a little short. Little detail was given, and it was passed without any response from editors. I've done a few GA reviews, but before I did my first, I asked for advice from an experienced GA reviewer. I asked Ritchie333, and it was really useful just getting the pointers from him on interpreting the GA criteria and how to properly use tools like earwig's copyvio detector. There's other users at the list of Good article mentors that you can ask for some help like this.

I've also added comments to the review you did; these are written in my style of reviewing. Everyone does it differently, and I wouldn't necessarily recommend using it. If you familiarize yourself with the criteria, completing GA reviews can be done however works for you.

Thank you again for showing interest in these projects! Kingsif (talk) 18:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi again - continuing discussion from over at GAN here, before it gets off-topic. If there's any C- or B-class articles you're interested in (you recently suggested nominating a list for FL, but perhaps we can start a bit lower), something you've been editing recently, we can try a mentorship where you can ask me questions on improving it for A- or GA- criteria? Kingsif (talk) 20:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kingsif: Trying a mentorship would be a good idea.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 20:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, do you have any articles you've been working on? If you pick one, I'll know where to look for your edits and can make suggestions and prompts. Kingsif (talk) 20:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kingsif: I would say articles that relates to the New York City Subway but M (New York City Subway service) and L (New York City Subway service) are the examples.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 20:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Cool, I've taken a look at the L line, do you have any questions about what can be done next to improve it? Kingsif (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kingsif: No questions yet but at hope this would be B-Class article.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 21:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hmm, I might call it C-class, but even though it's got a decent amount of content, a lot of this doesn't have a clear reference. For most Wikiprojects, an article must be well-cited to be B-class. Have you tried looking for sources? Kingsif (talk) 22:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kingsif: Still trying to find some but I was too busy on the M line article.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 00:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kingsif: I think found one. https://gothamist.com/news/a-century-ago-nyc-didnt-even-have-an-l-train-to-complain-about

That looks good, have you checked that the source is reliable? The article also says "As Peter Derrick explains in his 2001 book Tunneling to the Future" - could you find this book online, perhaps? Kingsif (talk) 23:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kingsif: reliable? and I say the book online and saw the preview.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 15:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Yes, sources should be judged for their reliability. This one looks ok, but I would familiarize yourself with WP:RS, as well. Kingsif (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

User space pages

Hi, you created a page called sandbox3 in mainspace, because you forgot to include the colon (:) after User in the title. I couldn't move it to your userspace as sandbox3 because you already have a page named that, so I moved it to your userspace as User:Happypillsjr/sandbox3a. Schazjmd (talk) 01:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Little Lies (season 1) (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdaniels5757 was:
See previous rejection and comments.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:WikiProject Women music has been nominated for discussion

Category:WikiProject Women music, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 19:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Little Lies (season 2) (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Big Little Lies (season 2). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is a request to spin out an article, a form of splitting. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun out, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun out. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.) Articles on the seasons have already been redirected to the series article. Any discussion of accepting an article on a season should be at the series article, Talk:Big Little Lies (TV series). Do not resubmit this draft without such discussion.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice at the Teahouse. If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement again, it may be Rejected, or may be nominated for deletion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 07:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:History of PATH

Hello, Happypillsjr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of PATH".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


I'm very glad you've kept working on this--it's going to be an excellent article. DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ama Lou (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Also note that YouTube isn't a reliable source for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 09:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ama Lou (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:MUSICIAN
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of PATH has been accepted

History of PATH, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ Alex Noble - talk 08:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

GA reviews

Hi again, Happy. I can see on the Bx12 (New York City bus) GAN review page that you've not responded to my prompts, nor did you ever start to make an attempt to review it. I'm sorry to say this, Happy, but I think that the GA procedure isn't for you right now. You don't seem to understand the criteria, but nominate lots of articles and then open reviews for others that are either arbitrarily passed or left empty. I've tried to help you out, but you either question my suggestions or ignore them. I'm sure you're trying your best, but maybe it would be better if you just watch the process without nominating or reviewing anything. Kingsif (talk) 03:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

@Kingsif:, hey just answered your question in the nomination. Sorry I was busy creating an article.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 03:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
You spent a month creating an article? And couldn't take two minutes to respond to a ping or check a page on your watchlist? I don't mean to sound rude, but that also doesn't sound invested enough in doing a review - I sometimes take my time with them, but it's a bit rude to leave the article's nominee hanging indefinitely. Kingsif (talk) 03:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@Kingsif: Maybe you're right that is rude to leave the nomination hanging, but I should've to multitask at the same time.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 03:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand that last part, Happy, are you saying you shouldn't be expected to multitask? If you can't, it's not wise to open reviews when you're working on something else. This review, especially, you opened almost as soon as I had just finished up doing the Sunset Park review that you abandoned... Kingsif (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@Kingsif: Right and I shouldn't abandon on the Sunset Park review-- Happypillsjr ✉ 03:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gentrification into Draft:Gentrification of New York City. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:American women memoirists has been nominated for merging

Category:American women memoirists, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 21:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SunriseInBrooklyn/Archive_8&oldid=1146004786"