User talk:HP1Pigtail

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, HP1Pigtail, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 00:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HP1Pigtail, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HP1Pigtail! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Feelings (Aliki book)

Hello, HP1Pigtail,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Feelings (Aliki book) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feelings (Aliki book) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Legacypac (talk) 02:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've gone and added information to your article, Feelings (Aliki book). It's one that I know is quite popular in my library. If you ever need help with sources for articles, let me know. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Lonesome Stranger

The article The Lonesome Stranger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article has been written in a confusing manner and lacks notability criteria. The article also doesn't cite any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abishe (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Old Yeller (song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Yeller (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Yeller (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HindWiki^Connect 02:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Old Yeller (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Erik Blegvad

Hi, I'm Abishe. HP1Pigtail, thanks for creating Erik Blegvad!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello HP1Pigtail: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 09:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 09:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One-Stop Fun Shop

Hello, HP1Pigtail. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, One-Stop Fun Shop, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of One-Stop Fun Shop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One-Stop Fun Shop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-Stop Fun Shop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coin945 (talk) 08:05, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Dicklyon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Complementary colors have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dicklyon (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disney's Greatest Hits for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney's Greatest Hits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney's Greatest Hits until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

James Earl Carer Junior listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect James Earl Carer Junior. Since you had some involvement with the James Earl Carer Junior redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PRehse (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Boniface

Hello, HP1Pigtail. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, William Boniface, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want William Boniface to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Adventures of Max the Minnow

Hello, HP1Pigtail. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Adventures of Max the Minnow, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Friends of a Feather

Hello, HP1Pigtail. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Friends of a Feather, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ten Little Dinosaurs

Hello, HP1Pigtail. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ten Little Dinosaurs, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Adventures of Max the Minnow

Hello, HP1Pigtail,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Adventures of Max the Minnow should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Max the Minnow .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ten Little Dinosaurs

Hello, HP1Pigtail,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ten Little Dinosaurs should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Little Dinosaurs (2nd nomination).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Friends of a Feather

Hello, HP1Pigtail,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Friends of a Feather should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends of a Feather .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLPPROD

Welcome to Wikipedia! In order to remove a WP:BLPPROD as you did on William Boniface you need to add a reliable source which supports some claim about the person. A reliable source is something published using strong editorial control, in this case something like a newspaper or magazine with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. I would suggest that you find three reliable sources that have at least two or three paragraphs discussing the person. This is needed to pass Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and if they are not present it is very likely that, even if the BLPPROD is removed, that the article will be considered for deletion at Artcles for Deletion.

I also notice that you have been creating articles on his books which do not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for books. Please make sure that any article you create passed Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion based on notability and have enough reliable sources to verify the content. Thank you. (Please follow the blue links. These terms have a specific meaning on Wikipedia and the links provide more details.)

Jbh ^Talk 01:18, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valeri Gorbachev

The article Valeri Gorbachev has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mar11 (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Valeri Gorbachev, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This was explained to you nicely in a prior section. Jbh ^Talk 06:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did at William Boniface. This is now the third time you have removed a WP:BLPPROD without adding a reliable source to the article. Wikipedia has very high standards for biographies of living people. The minimum that is required is that the biography have a reliable source supporting at least one claim in the article. Removing the tag will not prevent the article from being deleted if such a source is not added. It will, however, result in your ability to edit Wikipedia being suspended. Jbh ^Talk 04:10, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lentil (book) - moved to Draft:Lentil (book)

Hi HP1Pigtail, Greetings. Pls note that your creation page Lentil (book) has been moved to Draft:Lentil (book) page. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent/third party reliable source for verification to gauge nobility criteria is met. Pls see reliable source - WP:RS, verification - WP:V, and notability WP:N. For webcite - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Disney's Fantasia characters, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not restore original research that was originally inserted by the vandal IPs that were the reason why the page was semi-protected in the first place without discussing on the talkpage to gain consensus first.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Simple Simon (1935 film)

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. HP1Pigtail, thanks for creating Simple Simon (1935 film)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 70 Favorite Children's Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

James Knox Polk Hall

Please be aware that there was a discussion on Talk:James K. Polk in which it ws decided not to link to JKP Hall in the hatnote. There would have to be a discussion in order to change this so please don't dd the hatnote again without building consensus.--Wehwalt (talk) 08:45, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lentil (book)

Hello, HP1Pigtail. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lentil (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arthur Kleiner

The article Arthur Kleiner has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro (talk) 05:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Little Old Lady Who Was Not Afraid of Anything

The article The Little Old Lady Who Was Not Afraid of Anything has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and so no claim of notability. Book reviews and sales figures would be appropriate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Old Lady Who Was Not Afraid of Anything moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Little Old Lady Who Was Not Afraid of Anything, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 04:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lentil (book)

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lentil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 16:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HP1Pigtail. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Little Old Lady Who Was Not Afraid of Anything

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Little Old Lady Who Was Not Afraid of Anything".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arthur Kleiner

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Arthur Kleiner.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:52, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No More Water in the Tub! moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, No More Water in the Tub!, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 17:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joaquin Garay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joaquin Garay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquin Garay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 11:42, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draft

Hi there! I moved your new article to draftspace because it doesn't have any references. Please add some book reviews or other independent reliable sources talking about the book. You'll find the draft at Draft:The Little Mouse, the Red Ripe Strawberry, and the Big Hungry Bear. Thank you! Mcampany (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Nihonjoe. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Song of the South, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bye Bye Birdie (1995 film)

The article Bye Bye Birdie (1995 film) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 16:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please do not recreate articles that have previously been deleted or redirected as the result of an AfD discussion, as you did at Ten Little Dinosaurs, unless you have addressed the issues raised in the AfD discussion. In this case, you failed to provide any citations for the article, and thus did not establish that it meets notability guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've ignored this, and proceeded to create unsourced articles at 70 Favorite Children's Songs and Ernest Troost. Providing sources for claims is necessary on Wikipedia, and if you don't recognize this you may lose your editing privileges. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bye Bye Birdie (1995 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bye Bye Birdie (1995 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bye Bye Birdie (1995 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 20:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bye Bye Birdie (1995 film)

In regard to this edit, who is Elliot Lawrence, and why did you assign all of Chynna Phillips's songs in "Bye Bye Birdie" to him? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ernest Troost

The article Ernest Troost has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. {{u|wylie39}} {Talk} 20:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 70 Favorite Children's Songs by Janice Kapp Perry

The article 70 Favorite Children's Songs by Janice Kapp Perry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable compilation album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BFDIBebble (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above block will remain in place until you show that you are willing to engage with constructive criticism from other editors and that you are willing to comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to the best of your ability. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HP1Pigtail. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ST47 (talk) 03:51, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Little Mouse, the Red Ripe Strawberry, and the Big Hungry Bear

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Little Mouse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Linnea in Monet's Garden

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Linnea in Monet's Garden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ernest Troost

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ernest Troost".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:No More Water in the Tub!

Hello, HP1Pigtail. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "No More Water in the Tub!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]