User talk:HCPUNXKID

Welcome!

Hello, HCPUNXKID, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--John (talk) 18:39, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your sources when you change dates of historic events, as you did in El Aaiún. Your edit has been reverted since you gave no explanation or reference for the edit. -kotra (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomatic missions of Saharawi

Thank you for your contributions to this article. I did find earlier a website that said there were Saharawi missions in Madagascar and India, but then I found something else that said India no longer recognised the Saharoud government, so I presume there is no presence in New Delhi.

I recall back in the 1990s there was an embassy or some kind of mission in Hanoi. Do you know anything about it?

On some of your more recent edits:

I am pretty sure there is no mission in Dili. The website you used as a source only mentioned that the Ambassador presented his credentials. Most ambassadors to Timor Leste are usually resident elsewhere, typically Jakarta or Canberra.
Speaking of which, I live in Canberra, and I am certain there is no Sahrawi office or delegation here.
If you wish to contribute in future, could I ask that you follow the same formatting as we use in all the other articles? We do not list types of missions separately. We group missions according to specific continents. We do not list cross-accreditations etc.

Thanks! Kransky (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!. I have no idea of that Sahrawi delegation in Hanoi you mention, I will search about it. In the case of India & Madagascar, both countries suspended relations with the SADR in 2000 & 2005, so the Sahrawi embassy in New Delhi was closed. I dunno if there's still a General delegation there. In the case of Timor Leste, I think there's a non-resident embassador (Timorese foreign affairs page ain't updated since 2004). Perhaps he lives in Australia, because he's also the representative for Australia & New Zealand (see the link[1]). Perhaps the General Delegation is in Melbourne,Perth or other major Australian city. The problem is that Australia dont have official diplomatic relations with the SADR. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

If you can find details about Hanoi, include it, but I suspect there has been a global shift away from recognising SADC.

The Diplomatic Missions by Country (DMBC) articles are only intended to list diplomatic missions (as their names imply), and not non-resident accreditations or honorary consulates. There is also a consistent format that we follow in terms of what information we include and how we present it. You can visit the other 180+ articles and see how this consistency is applied Kransky (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand there is a consistent format to be used at the DMBC pages, but that cannot be an obstacle to bring as more info as we can (This is suppossed to be a encyclopedia, ain't it?). Also, the case of the SADR (as for example, the case of Palestine) is special, as it's a limited-recognition state, so it's not equal as, for example, Morocco or Algeria. P.D. I finally find that the Australia & New Zealand general delegation is based in Sidney.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but just because you have found a novel fact does not warrent its inclusion in Wikipedia (see WP:INDISCRIMINATE). Nor is it appropriate to propose a totally new style - the Wikipedia:Manual of Style expressly forbids edit-warring over styles. If you want to become involved with DMBC articles, may I suggest you first look at how these 180+ articles are developed together before proposing something revolutionary to the broader community.

Do you have evidence of a SADC presence in Sydney? I could only find the Australian Western Sahara Association (awsa.org.au), which is an advocacy group and does not claim to speak on behalf of the SADC government-in-exile, or have any other quasi-diplomatic status.

So, why does consistency matter? To demonstrate that all countries, irrespective of how well recognised or powerful they are, are treated equally in being represented on Wikipedia. Consider consistency as a means of protection, as equality and "one-rule-for-all" principles has helped prevent conflicts emerging by people claiming a certain article should not be included, or included in a different way. Kransky (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC) Kransky (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, If you ask me to not change or delete info, I ask you for being more careful & not deleting references (for example the reference of the SADR embassy in South Africa).--HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting the formatting to this article. It is true that we encourage editors to cite sources, however if they have linked the page to a reliable primary source (such as the website of the country's foreign ministry where all their missions are listed) then this is not really necessary. In the SADR case because a comprehensive official list does not exist, we need to find other sources to confirm our facts and be accountable to them. As it is, I have searched for a SADC presence in Australia, and having not found anything, any mention of a SADC in Australia would definitely need some form of citation.

And thank you again for ceasing your bold edits to the rest of the articles. To get a consensus could you contact some of the editors and ask them what they think? I will see what the general mood is before casting my vote Kransky (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomatic missions - flags

Could I ask you to propose bold ideas first, on one or two articles first? T think you may have a reasonably good idea, but lets think it through first (I think it is more appropriate to refer to multilateral organisations by their formal names, not acronoms). Other editors may have a contrary view. Could you please revert back all the articles except one, and then seek a consensus from other established editors? Some editors are listed here: Category talk:Lists of diplomatic missions by sending country Kransky (talk) 15:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User Warnings

HCPUNXKID, As a consequence of you reversion of List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, and your decision not to provide a source proving Australia hosts a SADR diplomatic mission (or to provide a reason why a source was unnecessary), unfortunately I have been compelled to place a warning template on your talk page. Could you please provide evidence that Australia hosts a SADR mission? I have also flagged a warning template on your decision to change the formatting of the article without seeking consensus, when I have on two occasions raised this concern with you directly. Please refer to the General Principles of Wikipedia:Manual of Style.

Kransky (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As cited above, thank you for your cooperation. If this does not go ahead, could you please revert back all the changes you made? Kransky (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initiation of dispute resolution procedures

Evidently we cannot agree to what goes into this article, and I note a previous editor also had issues with your edits. This is no great drama - good faith disputes are a common occurance in Wikipedia, and there are processes in place to resolve them.

My argument is that you have not yet provided what I consider is reliable evidence that the SADC government has an official presence in a number of countries, particuarly countries which do not recognise the SADC's sovereignty in Western Sahara. Indeed I have actively searched for anything that could corraborate your claims, but I have found nothing, although I stand corrected on the SADC having a presence in Addis Ababa (I am still uncertain about the authority of the website that claims SADC missions in New York and Geneva, but I will let that slide).

You have repeatedly told me to refer to sources (like this website) which you claim proves your point, but I cannot see any evidence that the persons mentioned run are "general delegations", or even if they have any form of legitimacy within the SADC.

If you consider other DMBC articles are insufficiently referenced, your efforts to improve those articles by finding references or adding "citation required" annotations would be appreciated. Just because one article is not to-the-letter consistent with a policy doesn't justify the elimination of that policy.

I understand your keen interest in the rights of the Sawahari people, as you specify on your user page, but I do not believe their cause is advanced by misrepresenting particular persons as "general delegations", no matter how well meaning the intent. In recognising your good faith, might I also politely ask you review what exactly Vandalism is before making such accusations.

Consequently I will revert the article back, but I am happy to direct this dispute to a third party to have it resolved if you still want to press the issue. Since the crux of our disagreement is over your reference material, might I suggest the matter be directed to the Reliable Sources noticeboard? Alternatively Wikipedia:Third opinion could be another option. Any thoughts?

I will post this message on both our talk pages, and the article talk page. As indicated earlier please lets debate this on just one board. Kransky (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (HCPUNXKID)

Hello, HCPUNXKID. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/HCPUNXKID, where you may want to participate. Kransky (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

Thanks I would definitely be happy to help you--and I'd like to point out how much I appreciate your effort on Western Sahara-related articles--but I'm not sure how much I could help you. Honestly, the best thing I could do is probably stay out of it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on Legal status of Western Sahara

Please stop You cannot have an edit war on this page; it will result in some kind of block or ban. Please seek an admin at WP:AN to intervene. He can protect, mediate, etc. Please see WP:DISPUTE. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Can you show me proof the Western Sahara War started in 1975 and Spain didn't participate in the war? B-Machine (talk) 14:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You got it wrong. The armed struggle did start in 1973 when the Polisario Front fought against the Spanish, three years before their pullout. B-Machine (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bouchraya Hammoudi Bayoun

The article Bouchraya Hammoudi Bayoun has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The-Pope (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdelkader Taleb Omar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Abdelkader Taleb Omar, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Abdelkader Taleb Oumar. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Abdelkader Taleb Oumar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Abdelkader Taleb Omar. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara lists of positions

Regarding multiple issues, edits, etc. with this content I posted in Template talk:Western Sahara lists of positions. I don't know if you check this page (or the Template edit history where I also posted a link to there), that's why I post here. Please go on the talk so that we can discuss the issues. Alinor (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied there, please review and respond. Alinor (talk) 09:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Western Sahara & Arab world protests

This is the last time I'm going to say this. There is no relation whats so ever to the current protests. Why are you so desperate to add it in? It doesn't matter if its similar and no one has probably heard of that little protest. The current protests started in Tunisia on December 18 and it spread from there so any protest that happened before doesn't belong on the page. By claiming it started on October, you are contradicting the article. Notice you are the only one trying to add it. There are plenty reasons on the talk page.TL565 (talk) 15:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you blind? The argument is right in front of you. Look, I know you live there and are desperate to make the WS look like it made an impact but that still does not mean you can add incorrect info to the page. Unless you can find protests in the WS that happened after December 18, feel free to add it in. If you make the same edits again it will be regarded as spam. Everyone else seems to agree.TL565 (talk) 18:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Owner of the page? Ask yourself that. I have people on my side, you don't. Nobody but you believes the protests started before the proper date. In that case, you might as well add all the protests that happened decades before because they are similar. Its not sacred its fact. What are you trying accomplish anyway? So far, nobody agrees with you. Why don't you add something about protests happening in WS now? I hear protests just started this month. Anyway I'm done with you. Don't comment on my page again.TL565 (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --I agree these protests were in no way instigational or influential to the protests in Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt etc and therefore not relevant whatsoever, one person claiming it to be does not make it so, there is absolutely no factual proof/evidence of it being related to any of the other protests, like TL565 stated, if we are to include it we might as well include countless of other protests that predate the ones that started in Tunisia on December 18Kapoon129 (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Embajada Saharaui en Montevideo

Me alegró tu mensaje y saber también, que haya mas usuarios como vos editando en páginas relacionadas al pueblo saharaui y a la RASD. Te cuento que he tenido problemas con un usuario que, además de revertir mis ediciones en el artículo sobre el Sahara Occidental (Western Sahara), me acusa de vandalismo, simplemente porque agrego información de una fuente distinta (de la ONU misma) a la que él defiende (y que además es incorrecta). Te invito a que leas el artículo: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Western_Sahara y su página de discusión: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Western_Sahara, para que te enteres del altercado que tengo con el usuario http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Yusuf_ibn_Tashfin. Éste usuario también se empeña en querer imponer su punto de vista (el marroquí) en artículos de la Wiki en español, bajo el nombre de http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Texufin, con el cual ha sido bloqueado varias veces ya, por tener problemas con otros editores. Espero puedas ayudarme a aportar para mejorar éste artículo también, añadiendo fuentes fidedignas y neutrales como lógicamente debe ser. Un cordial saludo. MauriManya (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article 2011 Libyan uprising, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No sources describe Abdul Fatah Younis as leading the uprising. Pontificalibus (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Pontificalibus's talk page.
Message added 14:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

March 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010–2011 Middle East and North Africa protests. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:52, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010–2011 Sahrawi protests. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – TL565 (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Muboshgu's talk page.
Message added 20:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Spanish userboxes

Your userpage is entirely in Spanish - while on the English wikipedia, do you not think it would be appropriate to use English userboxes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smart30 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you are right, I had to change them, but I had not much time, and sincerely I am not sure on how to do it. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll try.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 19:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPoV on Western Sahara related articles

Hello,

I think that you should read WP:IRS, especially paragraph 4.2.

A primary source can't be reliable, except if it is used as a source to show the position/declaration of one of the involved actors. You can't use SPS or MAP excepting to cite Polisario and Moroccan gov's declarations and positions, neither can be reliable a blog or a website which shows a clear position in favor of one of the two sides.

Omar-Toons (talk) 19:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Given your regular appearances on various administrators' noticeboards recently with a number of editors complaining about your combative editing style, article ownership and possible POV concerns, and the fact that you've continued edit warring despite being told at ANI not to (your edit history is shocking), I've blocked your account for 48 hours. I very strongly suggest that you take a much more cautious approach to editing when your block expires, otherwise you can expect to receive longer blocks in future. EyeSerene^talk 10:22, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at EyeSerene's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Administrators_noticeboard/Incidents concerning you

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TL565 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at 2010–2011 Sahrawi protests

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The discussion of this case is at WP:ANI#User:HCPUNXKID. EdJohnston (talk) 19:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official language of the Sahrawi republic

On the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic a recurring issue going back over years is that some editors insist on including Spanish in the info box. This would be fine if Spanish was an official language but it is not: Constitution - Article 4:La langue arabe est la langue nationale officielle.[Trans: The Arab language is the national official language (no Spanish!)]. I am dropping you a note here because you previously edited this article and not many people are bothered with it so perhaps you could participate and help put down these attempts to include inaccurate information...Thanks. 109.76.199.226 (talk) 09:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category sorting

Since "Saharawi democracy activists" is a subcategory of "Saharawi people", there's no need to include both the master category and the sub; just one or the other would be fine. Cheers, Khazar (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sahrawi protests

Last year's protests ended in early November, with just a couple of fights at a high school thereafter. This year's protests began in late February after commentators and later Polisario figures observed that the Arab Spring was something that Sahrawis were watching closely and taking to heart. Considering the gap in between protests in early November and late February and the change in the political conditions of the region, I think it's absolutely appropriate to split the protests into two articles. -Kudzu1 (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree strongly. Your appreciation is based wether on your personal opinion or in the personal opinion of a unique non-neutral source, as it is the Moroccan director of Dahkla music festival, wich is not a reliable source (also, he dont say that the Dahkla events where the start of something new, he only said that he believed that they were influenced by the Arab Spring. Much people also think that the Arab Spring was influenced by the Gdeim Izik camp, so who influence who?). I repeat, there are not evidences to split the article in two parts. If you use the argument of the decline of violence and protest in the gap between late 2010 and early 2011, same thing should be done for example with Yemen (since January 2011 there had been ups & downs on the level of protest until the current unrest) and so on with other countries. Please, lets try to be neutral, fair and avoid double-standarts. Regards.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oubi Buchraya Bachir

The article Oubi Buchraya Bachir has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Oddbodz (talk) 21:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Oddbodz's talk page.
Message added 20:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Oddbodz (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SADR

Dear HCPUNXKID

I have no double standards with regard to the SADR and the other unrecognized states you mentioned. Indeed, I'm not sure if I have worked on the list of recognizing states of the states you mentioned. I was just adding that most of the early states the recognized the SADR were communist or "third worldist" states and that one of the causes, I think, that successive US presidents backed Morocco. One can say they were right or wrong to do so, but I think showing what type of states backed the SADR gives the reader a better illustration of how the western Sahara conflict fit in with the larger ideological conflict between pro-western and third worldist and communist states during the late 1970s and 1980s.

I have been thinking that including the types of states that recognized the State of Palestine, Republic of China etc. would indeed also illustrate these (still ongoing) ideological conflicts, but I haven't had much time to devote to large scale Wikipedia projects lately as I have been on the cusp of graduating from college and attempting (perhaps futilely) to enter a graduate program in political science...a stressful and time consuming process.

While I have this opportunity, could you tell me something about how the Western Sahara issue is perceived in Spain? I perceive that it is still a sensitive issue, but its ideological and political significance to domestic Spanish audiences seems unclear from what I have read online.

Sincerely Jonathan--Dudeman5685 (talk) 02:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Zemla Intifada, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Sahrawi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tifariti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dima, Basque Country and Bedia

Agounit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

Bir Lehlou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

Zug, Western Sahara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basque Country

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic

I have reopened the debate for you here. Please explain in Talk:List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic why this article should list entries you describe as being diplomatic missions. Kransky (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Legal status of Western Sahara, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Terra and AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited Legal status of Western Sahara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MAP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Foreign relations of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Daily Star and AFP

International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to El Heraldo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sahrawi national football team

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sahrawi national football team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sahrawi national football team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahrawi national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahrawi national football team (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Sahrawi Football Federation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mariem Hassan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to El Mundo, Cáceres, Newcastle and Native

Deseos (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Debut and Independence intifada

Mariem Hassan con Leyoad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amazon

Shouka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bass

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. When you recently edited Toubou Front for the Salvation of Libya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

International Union of Socialist Youth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Young Social Democrats

added a link pointing to Executive

Toubou Front for the Salvation of Libya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Libyan Army

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Mahfoud Ali Beiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPLA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Western Sahara

I would like to express my appretiation regarding your work on Western Sahara War articles - it is a really blessed thing, somebody is finally doing a serious job on it. I did begin to organize it, but it has been pretty hard task for me alone, especially considering the conflict wasn't on my top priorities list. Keep on.Greyshark09 (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your comments, it's good to see that some people appretiate the Western Sahara War work. I agree that it's a difficult task, as there's not so much information on the issue, and sometimes it's contradictory or disputed, so every effort to made the articles better is welcomed. Regards, --HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. When you recently edited Battles of La Güera and Tichla (1975), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battles of La Güera and Tichla (1975) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

Muhammad (name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

Sahrawi people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Sahrawi people's talk page.
Message added 21:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dzlinker (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2011–present Libyan factional fighting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Egyptian, PANA, Eritrean and Courier Mail

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011–present Libyan factional fighting, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daily Star and Basin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Former members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Drone and Derna

2011–present Libyan factional fighting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Iranian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Death of Muammar Gaddafi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Egyptian

United Nations General Assembly resolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moroccan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamdi Lembarki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Independence Intifada and Sahrawi

Movement for the Liberation of Saguia el Hamra and Wadi el Dhahab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spanish

Muhammad Bassiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

Territorial police force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indigenous

Wilaya (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sahrawi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011–present Libyan factional fighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Revenge of the Spit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timberland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Yellow Snow EP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Yellow Snow EP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Yellow Snow EP until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 00:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to Reality (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carol Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aliyen kentaoui.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aliyen kentaoui.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed Lakhrif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFD Nominations

I've reverted your AFD nominations from this morning - Acid Rain (album) and the like. You appeared to be nominating these articles and using a closed AFD, instead of creating a new AFD. If you wish to nominate these articles for deletion, you'll want to follow the steps at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 18:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Spit No Evil

Hello, HCPUNXKID,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Spit No Evil should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spit No Evil .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, — Ṟ Ṉ™ 06:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oubi Buchraya Bachir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Excellency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of African films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Zone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Spit no evil front.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Spit no evil front.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sahrawi National Union Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indigenous

Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Opposition

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tplfs-flag.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Tplfs-flag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SSLP 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:SSLP 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conceyu Xoven, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages León and Viana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

National Assembly (Nicaragua) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Independent Liberal Party

Social Democratic Party (East Timor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orange

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dikwankwetla Party of South Africa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Free State

United Christian Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orange

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011–present Libyan factional fighting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–present Libyan factional fighting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–present Libyan factional fighting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EllsworthSK (talk) 21:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2011–present Libyan factional fighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IED (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamdi Lembarki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gerona

International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to El Marsa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Guera 2006-framed.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:La Guera 2006-framed.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

El Aaiún (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to El Mundo

Tifariti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carmona

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Laguera view.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Laguera view.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 17:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amgala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moroccan

Jan Zumbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Katanga

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Your addition to File:Sahara wall of shame south end.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited El Cid, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alfonso VI and Sancho II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POV in Bay of Biscay

You have added a POV template to the Bay of Biscay article, but you haven't explained why you think there is a bias. You will need to start a new section on the article's talk page to discuss this, otherwise the template will be removed. Bazonka (talk) 16:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan civil war

Hey. I just wanted to explain *why* I am reverting your edits. It is not because I agree or disagree with them, it is because they are potentially controversial (as they have all been added before and were contended then as well) and thus they need to be discussed on the talk page, and a consensus reached before adding them into the article, per wikipedia convention. Instead of simply reverting my edit, could you please talk about it on the article talk page, so that multiple editors can state their views, and we can come to consensus? Thanks! Jeancey (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't really matter what the sources say at this point, because there are plenty of reliable sources for both points of view. It is a contentious edit, therefore protocol dictates that the article is reverted to the state prior to the edit, and a discussion takes place. I would ask you to please self revert your edit and move it to the talk page. Unilaterally making controversial changes to a high profile article is not a good thing. Please discuss on the articles talk page, and do not re add the information until a discussion can take place. Jeancey (talk) 17:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am well aware of what wikipedia is. There are reliable sources for both sides of the argument. Saying your sources are better or more reliable than other, equally reliable sources, and calling them "so-called rebels" can be seen as pushing a point of view. When the discussion takes place, I would suggest refraining from such point of view comments and wording, as many who might take your side would side against you because of it. Jeancey (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a member of wikiproject Libya. The flag that is displayed is controlled by the Flag template, which is a wikipedia wide template that I have no direct control over. I was a member of wikiproject Libya when the flag was still the solid green flag. I did not change it, there was a discussion on the flag template (which I had no part it) and it was changed. I can no more control the flag than I could control any other countries flag. Jeancey (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add the POV template, but keep in mind, that if you add the template, you must then open a discussion about it on the talk page. That is how the template works, it is there to indicate that the article may or may not be biased in one direction, and that the person who placed it there explained on the talk page why they think the article is POV. If you do not open a talk page discussion about it, it very well could be removed. Jeancey (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Laredo, Cantabria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Laredo, Dakhla and Escalante

Western Sahara War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indigenous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MAHFUD ALI BEIBA3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MAHFUD ALI BEIBA3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MAHFUD ALI BEIBA3.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MAHFUD ALI BEIBA3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Abdelkader Taleb Omar.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abdelkader Taleb Omar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Emboirik, embajador saharahui.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Emboirik, embajador saharahui.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:24, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Brahim dahane.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brahim dahane.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.diagonalperiodico.net/movimientos/sahara-occidental-la-situacion-es-critica-jovenes-quieren-la-guerra.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 23:06, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:ARTifariti 2008 El Muro de la Vergüenza.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ARTifariti 2008 El Muro de la Vergüenza.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ninja Dianna (Talk) 20:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Emmette Hernandez Coleman's talk page.
Message added 23:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail me

See sig 18:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Coat of arms of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic

I would like to request that you not revert it till you've had a chance to have that talk with Justin. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 19:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Coat of arms of Western Sahara. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 23:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, HCPUNXKID. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 03:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic flags

I've reverted your edit since, it seems to me, you're comparing apples and oranges. You are welcome to take your case to the talk page. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for a personal attack. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HCPUNXKID (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wow, simply incredible, the ip user had vandalized my page twice (see my user page history) and Im the one blocked. I recognize that my message had very bad language, but what can I do when that user continue to vandalize my user page without any response?. Im not gonna get mad about it, but this is non-sense.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That was pretty disgusting. If you can't see a problem with your vitriolic response to petty vandalism, then I'm not sure that unblocking you would be helpful. Kuru (talk) 23:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free media (File:CRV bandera.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CRV bandera.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re Nigerian Civil War

I said this in the edit summary but I wanted to share here too: I removed Benin from the belligerents list a few months ago because, having existed for only a few hours, it wasn't really more than the proclamation of a single man, and it surely ceased to exist before it could use its name in any meaningful way. Please discuss on the talk page. Thanks. :) --Golbez (talk) 16:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tragedy: The Story of Queensbridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Havoc (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Logo 77.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Logo 77.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Belize udp flag.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Belize udp flag.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Pup flag.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Pup flag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:02, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfoz de Burgos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Montes de Oca and Arlanza

Sahrawi peseta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Free Zone

Vinnie Paz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Usher

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of POV tag

You seem like somebody who's been around long enough to know better than to remove a POV tag without even an edit summary, as you did here. Regardless of your intent, marking the edit as minor was particularly misleading; per WP:MINOR, " A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute", which self-evidently isn't the case for a POV tag. I do appreciate your attention to the article, though. -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Land Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Left and Galicia

Sierra de la Demanda (comarca) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Contreras and La Rioja

Órbigo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Esla

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Iranian support for South Yemen

Here is the relevant quote from the source that amply supports the edit: "Moreover, many Herakis accuse Mr Hadi’s government of slandering their movement by accusing it of ties to Iran. While such accusations were at first widely discounted by Western diplomats, some Herakis acknowledge that some factions get support from Iran but say it is exaggerated by their opponents to distract attention from local grievances." Please stop reverting.Fotoriety (talk) 11:43, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend that both tags be removed. The vague tag is not needed because as the page clearly says "Iran (some factions)", it is not vague in any way but rather specific. As for the citation tag: how can you say "as with that source we cannot state that the South Yemen Movement is supported by Iran" when south Yemenis themselves have admitted this? So if you cannot respond to these 2 points adequately then i will remove your tags.Fotoriety (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so that's what you meant by vague. OK, sorry, i agree with your logic in that regard. However, you have not convinced me why the citation tag is needed. So would you like to try again?Fotoriety (talk) 15:11, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with your citation explanation because the citation tag is misleading to readers. A citation tag is for unsourced claims only. It isn't for vague claims. The sourced claim clearly says that Iran is helping the South. I think the citation tag should be removed in order to not mislead readers into thinking no source is given. If you would like to encourage more detailed sources then please find a better tag that targets that demand.Fotoriety (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Nicely said.Fotoriety (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic is THE official language in SADR (Art. 3: Arabic language is the official national language - SADR Constitution).

Art. 3: "Arabic language is the official national language" (SADR Constitution). End of. Frenchmalawi (talk) 01:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

?--HCPUNXKID (talk) 01:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Santander and Jaén province

Quintana del Pidio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cardinal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mis logo 2013.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mis logo 2013.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Pan-Africanist Student Movement of Azania

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pan-Africanist Student Movement of Azania, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Ivanvector (talk) 19:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Democratic People's Party (Turkey) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Orange

Democratic Society Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Democratic People's Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR and "Facebook"

Laying down a few points:

Facebook isn't being used as a "source". As far as I know, Mark Zuckerberg isn't releasing information on the conflict. Facebook is a publisher of sources, not a source itself.
There is local agreement to allow limited use of partisan media in battle articles—particularly SOHR's death tolls, as they are the most detailed ones released.

It's not a perfect solution (I was initially opposed to it myself and still have reservations), but there really isn't one as far as covering this war is concerned. I would recommend taking this up with User:EkoGraf, who is the main compiler of casualties, if you really want to argue. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You totally misunderstood me. There WAS consensus, it was something like 6-7 editors who were in support of the move to include it as a source while just one or two were against it but backed down at the end. That's why I said most. Editor Lothar also told you that there is an agreement among editors of the Syrian civil war articles to use it as a source. The posts are not posts by individuals (which Wikipedia does not condone), they are posts by the organisation SOHR as their OFFICIAL english version statements/updates on events in the conflict and is their official Facebook page which is being used by highly credible and reliable media. That info (from the posts) is directly used by the mainstream media like BBC news, Guardian, Telegraph, Reuters, AFP, AP, etc. That proves its reliability. A few more editors over the years spoke out about their reservation on using it (like you) and it was discussed at the main civil war article many times, but a general consensus in the end was always to include the info. If you have a problem with it please start up a discussion on the issue at the main Syrian civil war articles talk page so others could be included. EkoGraf (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, it was agreed by consensus among editors of the Syrian civil war to use it as a source because they are official posts and not posts by individual persons. It wasn't just my sole decision as you are making it out to be, it was the decision of more than half a dozen editors. And it was decided by consensus that SOHR facebook posts would be exempt from the rule you are constantly pointing to. In essence you are going against consensus. If you don't like it than please start a discussion on the main Syrian civil war page so other editors can be also included to voice their opinions and please don't engage in edit war. EkoGraf (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And P.S. I am actually of the opinion that Russia Today and Press TV should be used on Wikipedia as well, but most pro-Western editors, which make up the bulk of the English Wikipedia community, don't regard them as reliable so they are excluded. That's in my opinion a non-neutral attitude, while Wikipedia should allegedly be advocating neutrality. EkoGraf (talk) 15:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lobby? Contradict? What? Sorry my friend I really have no idea what you are talking about, you not making a lot of sense. Seems you are trying to make me out something I'm not and your hostile tone seems to be in clear defiance of Wikipedia's guideline on civility. If you got a problem than go and explain it at the main Syrian civil war article, otherwise please don't talk to me, unless you want to talk reasonably with the aim of reaching a compromise, and not just edit war and push your own POV. As for Russia Today and Press TV, I expressed my personal opinion, because I have a right to free thinking, however I am able to exclude my personal feelings from my work/editing on Wikipedia and stick to a neutral POV (which Wikipedia requires) even though others are not able to. That's not contradiction, that's following the rules even if you don't like them. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I am not seeing a reason why you removed the main SOHR site that I put up as a source this time. It has nothing to do with Facebook so your previous reasons that you put out are not applicable in this case since its not a social media site. So please refrain. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 12:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, as long as SOHR is attributed and only used when news sources are not available, it's fine. It's reliable enough that "The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights is commonly used as a standalone source for news and statistics". Please stop removing them, unless you can replace them with reliable news sources (meaning not RT, PressTV, SANA, etc.)--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the source yesterday but you reverted again even without looking. As for the claim thing, I am more comfortable with opposition claim. Although I don't see a reason for the notice at all since the credibility of SOHR is well established, but whatever. EkoGraf (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never said they were not connected with the opposition. They are an opposition activist group. However, their credibility and reliability has been proven to be high. If you would read just a fraction of the news articles about SOHR itself you would see that the opposition itself hates SOHR. Why? Because they have bothered to document and report not just civilian fatalities in the conflict but also rebel fighters and even government soldiers killed. Plus they have also extensivaly reserched and reported on not just government war crimes but rebel war crimes as well. Thus showing a high level of neutrality, which has earned them the anger of other opposition activist groups (who only count civilians and report on government war crimes exlusivaly) but it has also earned them a great deal of respect from international media for their non-biased position on all reporting. And my personal respect as well. I for one was heavily against using Libyan opposition sources during that countries civil war because of the high probability of propaganda warfare, however SOHR has showed time and again that, even though they are against Assad, they are there for the truth, not just the info that could benefit the opposition. EkoGraf (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's your personal POV my man, with which the BBC, Reuters, AFP, AP, MSNBC, etc. as well as virtually all the editors on the Syrian war articles, who are using SOHR as a source, don't agree with. Try reading some of these articles to get some insight before forming an opinion [3][4][5] In any case, we resolved our issue for now so nothing more to discuss. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 23:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Damascus offensive (2013). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fresneda de la Sierra Tirón (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indigenous

List of terrorist incidents, January–June 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletions

Rather than knee-jerk deleting something, WP:VERIFIABILITY states you should add "a citation needed tag as an interim step". The footnotes also recommends you should ask on the talk page. That we we can avoid undoing each others work. Pass a Method talk 23:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nabil Qaouk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muammar Gaddafi's awards

Hello there HCPUNXKID! I just wanted to say thank you for your recent work on adding the awards of Muammar Gaddafi to his Wikipedia page. However, I wondered if it would be worth (depending on how much longer you intend to make this section), splitting off this section to create its own separate article. Over at the Nelson Mandela page, we faced a similar situation, and decided to create List of awards and honours bestowed upon Nelson Mandela as a result. Perhaps we should do the same with Gaddafi ? Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, there is no need to split this section off just yet, but if it gets any longer, then this will have to be a distinct possibility. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is now being discussed over at Talk:Muammar Gaddafi, if you would like to contribute. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Mujica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telesur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fatah al-Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Qusair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious, Calm down?

Hi, I'm not exactly sure what your point was with those comments. Did you mean that the IP adding unsourced derogatory material to a BLP was suspicious or my removal was? Or did you mean the subect of the article was a suspicious character? Either way your "calm down" directive to me was just odd. I was and remain very calm. Could you enlighten me? What were you trying to convey? Capitalismojo (talk) 12:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. I don't think I was "accusing someone of giving unreliable sources". I made a general statement that BLP articles require RS for controversial statements. I think it is safe to say that accusing the subject of being in the pay of Saudi or Qatari governments is inappropriate if not true and well sourced. Several IP editors had added content to the article to that effect without refs. It seemed reasonable to place a bland statement of policy on the talkpage. Thanks again for your note. Capitalismojo (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmed al-Assir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qusayr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VisualEditor

Thank you so much for trying out the new VisualEditor! The transition can be a little challenging to those of us who know something about Wiki markup already. :) If you insert some of the familiar Wikimarkup code (like [[]] or {{}}), the VisualEditor thinks you are trying to type these things and puts "<nowiki>" tags around it. To actually achieve the same effects, you just need to use the link, template and other icons in the VisualEditor itself. (For more detail, please see Wikipedia:VisualEditor/User guide and the Wikipedia:VisualEditor/FAQ.)

If you have feedback about your experience or encounter anything that looks like a bug, please let us know at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thanks! --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Arbitration case declined

This is a courtesy notice to inform you that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been declined. Please see the Arbitrators' opinions for potential suggestions on moving forward.

For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ²¹ 16:20, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The template map of syria

Stop using outdated source and your own speculation to edit the map,everything on the map was put with reliable sources Alhanuty (talk) 16:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC) Another editor has said that a reliable has been used and calls you to check the edit history .Alhanuty (talk) 17:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RasKass EatOrDie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RasKass EatOrDie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:RENAMO logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:RENAMO logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Flag of Morocco 1912 1915.svg.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Morocco 1912 1915.svg.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Tifariti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages America and Sahrawi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Maaloula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ASALA flag.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ASALA flag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASALA flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASALA flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Blurred Lines 20:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First and Third Republics of South Korea

As you are the one making the change in the infobox description, you are supposed to bring citation to support it.

Also, there's insufficient consensus to call Republic of Korea a U.S. satellite state (client state would be more accurate). There's wide consensus for Soviet satellite states, but our article on the subject shows that there isn't enough information on United States counterparts. If I object to the edits, you should bring this into the talk page of the article, and not change it until then. Abstractematics (talk) 17:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free Territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unrecognized state (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

South Vietnam

Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at Talk:South Vietnam/Archive 1#"Client state of the United States".
Message added 03:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castilian people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Rioja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Dammaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hammer and sickle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANSA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

fights on the 80th military base.

I'm accused of vandalism by User:Johnsy88 about the 80th brigade military base. You have participated to the edition of the Battle of Aleppo (2012–13). Could you testify or give your opinion, please? Thanks Tienouchou (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tienouchou When a user reverts an edit to a WP article citing "13:17, 12 November 2013‎ Tienouchou (talk | contribs)‎ . . (226,959 bytes) (+212)‎ . . (Undid revision 581309781 by Johnsy88 (talk) pro-regime propaganda)" this is a clear breach of the NPOV rule firstly and also potential move towards edit warring. I would suggest you read WP:POV, WP:WQT and WP:EW Johnsy88 (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV/johnsy88 talk page post

Firstly i would like to make you aware of the WP:NPOV policy that editors of WP must follow. At present you are making numerous edits to the page Battle of Aleppo (2012–13) as per Battle of Aleppo (2012–13): Revision history. Your WP userpage User:HCPUNXKID clearly states that your edits on such controversial issues as the syrian conflict may be brought under the spotlight. This is due to the fact that on this userpage you list some of the following user tag beliefs - "This user is opposed to the House of Saud.""This user does not support the United Nations.""This user believes the US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Pakistan are the world's main sponsor states of terror.""This user supports the will of the Kurdish people for an independent Kurdish state.""This user opposes all forms of Islamism and Islamofascism, but is not opposed to Islam as a religion."" All of these user tags could raise questions towards your suitability to make edits on pages such as "Battle of Aleppo (2012–13)" due to the fact that the organisations (previously mentioned) in your user profile user tags are involved at present either politically or militarily in the aforementioned conflict. This can/will be construed by certain editors as a direct violation of the WP:NPOV policy. I would like to state furthermore that this is simply being brought to your attention and that if you wish you may maintain the Status quo however adhering to the above mentioned points and understanding WP:NPOV will help to not only reduce edit warring but also set an example to other users.

Also many thanks for your previous post on my talkpage. As per WP:TALK guidelines "There is reasonable allowance for speculation, suggestion, and personal knowledge on talk pages, with a view to prompting further investigation," I am quite within my right to reply to any comment that directly mentions my edits on WP. I would please ask that in future you advise users such as Tienouchou wishing to consult on matters concerning his objections to WP:VAN to refrain from directly naming users unless he wishes to draw attention to such a matter directly resulting in replies from X WP users/escalation to WP:AN/I . Thank you for your cooperation on this issue Johnsy88 (talk) 09:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POSTED FROM TALKPAGE User talk:Johnsy88

You are editing a page which relates to all the the previously mentioned user tags on your profile. This will be deemed as controversial and will be brought up as WP:POV if taken the wrong way by any user they will report this as such and the obvious consequences will follow. THIS IS NOT AN ATTACK ON YOUR BELIEFS which apparently you believe it is. This is a factually based observation which you have taken the wrong way.

2nd: My post about POV was in relation to the edits made on the Battle of Allepo article and its relation to your user boxes. Not towards your user page directly nor your talk page.

3rd: I am not a "fascist" nor have i made accusations in any form and by carefully reading the grammar and context of my message on your talk page you will see this

4th: If you have an issue with my username or feel that i am in breach of POV then i would suggest you report it through the correct channels.

I am not here to WAR with you in any way nor start tit for tat arguments. I am simply pointing out a fact and trying to help you. If you decided to take my advice or not is up to you but i would ask that you remove your comment from my talk page that i am a "former British Army soldier, most edits on fascism-related articles, and using 88 (what means in far-right circles HH-Heil Hitler) in your nick. That smells like some ultra ideology instead of apolitical" as this is a personal attack and if it is not removed i will raise this issue with the admins. If you feel that i am a fascist then look at my youtube page under "the holocaust" and decide for yourself. Johnsy88 (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hala Misrati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hardball

Italo-Turkish War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Troop carrier

Syrian Kurdistan campaign (2012–present) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The National

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Syrian civil war detailed map‎

Good afternoon! I am writing to you because I can see that you are a normal party which objectively examines news and edits only when there are sound arguments. But you see, what they do Sopher99 and Alhanuty. They distort the facts and change the map as they want and even do not hide the fact that they are all his changes were in favor of the opposition.37.52.27.151 (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I know, but sadly, there's not much we can do about their vandalism and POV-pushing. I've had personally bring Sopher99 case to the administrators board, but with no results. Perhaps if several users made a common denounce of their attitude on the administrators board, we can gain, but Im not optimistic about it. Sincerely, and its sad to say this, I think since a year ago or more that some users had permission from some administrators to do things that if they were make by other users would be banned and severely punished. I dont know if its because they are friends, because they follow common objectives or what, but its a serious setback to Wikipedia's credibility...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I will help you find the participants to help write a collective complaint to the list of participants. And by the way user Alhanuty flagrantly violated the rule 1RR.

Here's the proof:

1 [6]
2 [7]

37.55.208.23 (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern al-Ghouta Suburb. and Aleppo

Good day! You can not edit data accuracy:

Abbadah,Deir Salman and Oteibah under the control of the army!

Alhanuty used source of opposition based on a video clip from YouTube militants. Not one of the neutral reliable sources have not confirmed. is not a reliable source http://eaworldview.com/2013/11/syria-forecast-battles-east-ghouta-near-damascus/#ghouta

bahariya and qasimiya militants were captured but were repulsed army!

The Syrian troops repelled the rebels' attack against military positions and checkpoints at the towns of Baharieh, Al Qasimieh, and Qaria al-Shamieh area in the Eastern al-Ghouta Suburb.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-11/25/c_132916523.htm http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/827477.shtml#.UpNBuqA5S61 http://newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2013/11/25/176--100-rebels-killed-in-bid-to-break-Syrian-troops-siege-.html

Breaking News Network correspondent to Damascus and its countryside has confirmed that army units confronted an offensive launched by hundreds of militants against towns of al-Bahariya, al-Qasemiah and Deir Salman in Eastern Ghouta.

According to our reporter, the rumor of gunmen’s control over these towns is completely false. http://breakingnews.sy/en/article/29649.html

And Babbila contolled Army!

In the southern countryside of Damascus, around 400 armed rebels have reportedly turned themselves in to the Syrian troops, who have stormed the town of Babbila Sunday, according to al- Mayadeen TV. http://english.eastday.com/e/131118/u1a7781161.html http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-11/18/c_125716083.htm http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2013-11/18/content_30627827.htm http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/825630/Syrian-troops-besiege-strategic-town-amid-fierce-fights.aspx http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90777/8458579.html http://english.sina.com/world/2013/1117/647017.html http://en.ce.cn/World/Middleeast/201311/18/t20131118_1763603.shtml For earlier thanks! 37.53.150.34 (talk) 08:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but dont post all this here, but in the map or article's talk page.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 18:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aleppo province

These five villages: Rasm Bakrou, Rasm as Safa, Jalaghim, Kafr Akkar, Rasm Ukrayrish, Sopher99 changed to the rebel-controlled on the basis of his imagination. Since the source on the basis of which he changed them are not mentioned in those villages.http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2013/Nov-25/238839-syria-rebels-press-advance-around-damascus-aleppo-activists.ashx#axzz2lGvTgDRI

This blatant vandalism can appeal to the administrator about it and you support another participant who is struggling with his vandalism.37.53.150.34 (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I said previously, I'll gladly testify if someone bring that user to the administrators board, but Im not gonna be the one reporting him, as I've done that before, with no success. I suggest you to contact more users who are fed up with Sopher99 behaviour (POV-pushing, manipulation of reliable sources, use of unreliable sources, breach of WP rules, etc...) in order to get a more powerful position against his blatant vandalism.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring reports

Hi, HCPUNXKID, there are two usual ways of filing a report at AN3. One is to follow the instructions at the top of the page. The other is to use Twinkle. It looks to me like you used Twinkle (not sure) but didn't fill out all the fields in the box. Take a look at other reports, and you'll see what's missing from yours. You don't have page links for the page at issue. You don't have user links for the user being reported. Some of the other missing parts aren't as necessary in a report on a page subject to WP:1RR restrictions, but your initial comment should make clear that this is a 1RR violation on a page subject to general sanctions. (Those other parts would be needed if you were reporting a normal 3RR violation, such as a diff of the 3RR warning, and a diff to a discussion of the dispute.)

Hopefully, that helps. Let me know if you have any specific questions.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You've broken 1RR with your last revert at Template:Syrian civil war detailed map. Please self-revert or expect a report at WP:AN3. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Rif Dimashq offensive

I agree about the blog. I agree in principal about Wikipedia policy on Facebook as source, although in this case we have official posts by SOHR on their official page and not posts made by unknown individuals. And SOHR's credibility and reliability has already been well established. And you have multiple editors who use SOHR Facebook as a source, with only you having a problem with this. However, I am willing to compromise, in the sense I am willing to give up on using SOHR Facebook posts as a source, if we use news reports by SOHR via their official Arabic site (a non-Facebook source). And you can not argue its an unreliable source since we have almost every major news outlet citing SOHR as a source in its reports and they have even written articles exclusively on the credibility and reliability of SOHR, praising it. EkoGraf (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will repeat, the reliable news sites like Reuters, AFP, AP, Guardian, Telegraph, etc have all written whole articles on the reliability of SOHR praising it, even some calling it an authoritative source. That in itself gives credibility and reliability to SOHR. 90 percent of the information coming out of Syria that the reliable news sites report they report based on reports by SOHR. I, in my personal opinion, also agree that it is unfair that Press TV or RT are excluded as unreliable sources, because I think both sides POV need to be presented. If this was the case of the opposition LCC or the opposition SHRN I would highly doubt their reliability, but SOHR has shown that it follows a middle ground of neutrality. In any case, I already said I'm giving up on the FB issue. EkoGraf (talk) 18:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The other one calls itself SHRN, Syrian Human Rights Network, and it is most definitely unreliable. It even criticizes SOHR because SOHR decided to count government fighters killed in the war as well and not just civilians and rebels, which the Network thinks is counter-revolutionary and not in their best interest. EkoGraf (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring report

See here. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 02:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice and sanctions notification

Sorry for the belated notice. As per the report at WP:ANEW,

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Template:Syrian civil war detailed map. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Please feel free to appeal using {{unblock}}, but you may have an uphill climb to convince another admin that you won't be disruptive again. (Note to any admin reviewing an {{unblock}}: regardless of WP:SCWGS, please feel free to unblock if you feel a creditable case has been made.)

Furthermore, As a result of a community discussion, long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Syrian civil war, broadly construed, have been acknowledged. The community has therefore enacted broad editing restrictions, described at WP:SCWGS and below.

Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length, bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict, bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics, restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor shall be given a warning with a link to this decision and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the decision. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at WP:SCWGS. —Darkwind (talk) 03:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HCPUNXKID (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A range of reasons and irregularities: *Irregularities: **First, the user who reported me didnt use the common tag (subst:an3-notice). **Second, the administrator who blocked me lasted nearly 11 hours to inform me that I have been blocked. **Third, the administrator who blocked me claimed that I have been blocked for "edit warring". I've just read the article and I dont see that I fit on any of the categories of edit-warring (0RR, 1RR, 3RR). Also, I had not option to defend myself on the issue. Hope now I can... *Reasons: **The administrator who blocked me claimed that I did not seek discussion. Mmmm, curiously, I was the only one not only giving a reliable source of my changes on the template map, but also stating the source and quoting it on the talk section of the template. While I have that reliable source backing my claim, the other user(s) have...their own personal views (as they dont have presented a single source backing their claims). Of course, I will revert that edit ASAP (as the other user lasted 4 days to revert since my block, with no sources and as a minor edit), as I have a source and he dont. I hope I dont get blocked again for that, as far as I remember, WP editing is based on giving sources, am I wrong?. Also, I found difficult discussing with someone whose reaction when you post in his talk page trying to discuss something is to simply delete the message and told you to, quote: "fuck off" (I wonder if the administrator who blocked me found this kind of behaviour "extremely telling", and if this can be denounced and reported). Or do I have to turn the other cheek? **I consider the block extension as disproportionate, as the block policy states that blocks should not be used as a punishment, and I think that in my case I have been punished (note the administrator's sentence, quote: "Given your previous record of edit warring, I have blocked you for 1 week"). It's me, or the extension of the block had been used by this administrator as a punishment only based on my historial?. Also, I had to affirm (although this perhaps will act against my position) that I found this administrator's attitude very unprofessional, both for the lack of advice, discussion and correct & clear argumentation on the block. WP deserves better administrators. HCPUNXKID (talk) 23:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only as your block has expired. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 23:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan López de Padilla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hidalgo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration

It was defined by religion that's my reason. But youre right, and after reviewing the analysis bit I added, Perhaps just anti-balaka militia?(Lihaas (talk) 22:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

Self-revert(Lihaas (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Ali Mustafa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Army of the Holy War - Arab Liberation Army

Hello,

On the article about the Army of the Holy War, you changed an emblem to a flag in the infobox [8]. Per the same reasonning, should this mean in the article about the Arab Liberation Army we should replace the emblem by the flag of the Arab League ? Pluto2012 (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think so. I removed the emblem because usually emblems are not used in war/battle infoxes, while flags are usually added. The case of the article about the Arab Liberation Army is different, as there the infobox is a war faction infobox, where the adding of logo, flag, shoulder sleeve, etc... is welcomed. But I saw that there is a MB flag, so I will add it to the infobox. Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also think we need more info about the use of the Arab League (AL) flag by the ALA (I know the AL organized the ALA, but that doesnt means automatically that the group used the AL flag).--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HCPUNXKID,

I am not familiar with these infoboxes.

I have read a lot of books talking about the ALA but I have never read anything about any flag as well as I have never seen any picture of it.

On the other side, the ALA was established, equiped and paid by the AL and it was fighting in the name of the AL. If they used any, it should have been that one (but without source...)

In any case, if the infobox allows "emblems", the question is solved.

Kind Regards, Pluto2012 (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One source tag

Hi HCPUNXKID, I've been removing the one source tags you've recently added to some Syrian village articles. For the most part these articles are just stubs consisting of a few non-controversial sentences (population and location) and a one source tag is not appropriate. Please stop adding them to these types of articles unless they contain more information that require more sources. Thank you. --Al Ameer (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are contesting whether or not the subjects are notable that's a different issue and there's a different tag for it. Generally speaking, any populated place is significant enough to warrant its own article even if there are a few available English language sources out there. These articles are stubs and could always be expanded. You're taking the "one-source" part too literally. For an article that just mentions a village's location and population (two non-controversial sentences) we don't need another source, although if another could be found that would be great. The purpose of the tag is to make sure we don't have articles with a bunch of information (controversial or otherwise) dependent on one source. As for the dead links, unfortunately that has been a frustrating issue for the past year, but I have the archived links for many of the articles in Aleppo Governorate which I will add promptly. For those where there are no apparent archives, we should add a "deadlink" tag next to the citation.

Also, I am an administrator, but if you'd like to seek another's advice on this issue feel free. --Al Ameer (talk) 20:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Death and state funeral of Nelson Mandela

On 12 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Death and state funeral of Nelson Mandela, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sign language interpreter for the state memorial service of Nelson Mandela made meaningless hand gestures that did not reflect established signs? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yarmouk camp fighting (December 2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Akhbar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ghuraba al-Sham

Hello, you added tags to the Ghuraba al-Sham (jihadist group) article back in November. I left a message on the talk page there, but I did not receive a response. Why has the neutrality of the article been disputed? If you could let me know why you think the article is not neutral, it can be resolved.David O. Johnson (talk) 04:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Supportkurds

Listen, I will repeat the three things I told you while making the edits. First, they are reporting on a non-kurdish issue that doesn't involve them. Second, you need consensus and proof if you want to mark a source as unreliable. And third, and most importantly, the texts in the sources are quotes from SOHR reports which are considered reliable. So they are not making any claims on their own behalf or of their own making. They are relaying SOHR reports which have been accepted by the Wikipedia community as reliable. EkoGraf (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What I am saying is that the reports that they are quoting (SOHR reports) are the ones that are reliable. The claims that Supportkurds possible makes of their own volition may or may not be biased, I don't know, I didn't look them up. But back to the main issue, they are quoting the SOHR reports which have been accepted by the Wikipedia community.

And to answer your question why I'm not using direct SOHR reports. SOHR reports in three ways. They have their Arabic version site which is updated regularly, their English version site which is not updated so regularly and their English version site via their official Facebook news page which they update regularly. Since you, despite the objections of many of the Syrian war editors, have declared the SOHR Facebook posts unusable, even though they are official posts and not posts made by unchecked individuals, that leaves us with the SOHR Arabic regularly updated site and the English non-regularly updated site. I managed to find and replace some of the Facebook sources you removed with sources from the Arabic site. However, due to that being an Arabic-speaking site and we are editing on the English Wikipedia it would be best to use English-speaking sources. Also, the Arabic-speaking sites library of past reports isn't sorted in the best reading order (which makes it really hard to find the older sources) while Supportkurds quotes the reports by a chronological timeline/dates. EkoGraf (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you still have reservations and wish, as a compromise, I can over time try and find more of the Arabic-written reports and as much as I find them I gradually replace the Supportkurds. EkoGraf (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I got your reply just now. The point is, it doesn't matter if its an activist and non-journalistic site. They are quoting/posting SOHR english reports, not making up their own claims. But again, as a compromise, I am asking that only temporarily they remain until over time (because it will take some time due to the large SOHR archive) I gradually replace them with the Arabic reports. Ok? EkoGraf (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated sources

HCPUNXKID you can stop using outdated sources because some people will also be edited using outdated sources and map will turn to trash. And that would not provoke this situation I revert you made changes. I ask you to treat with understanding my words. Hanibal911 (talk) 08:44, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barcaxx1980: Is google map enough as a source to add the villages to the syrian map? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barcaxx1980 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The capitals of Syrian provinces

How to understand this information? Syrian forces control 13 out of 14 Syrian provincial capitals and most of the main roads.The Independent Hanibal911 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Armed Islamic Group of Algeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hijackings

Black Liberation Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hijackings

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Per WP:SIGLINK, your signature "must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page" - as far as I can tell, yours currently does not. Please change it to conform to the guidelines - all you need to do is add a link to one of those three pages somewhere in your signature. Thanks, ₆an⁶sh₆ 00:36, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you figured it out; sorry I couldn't help, as I was asleep. Cheers, ₆an⁶sh₆ 20:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al Dumayr

I think we should change the city Al Dumayr because he is under the control of the army but he was marked as a city in which a truce based on dubious source Foreign Affairs associated with the pro opposition websites Zaman Alwsl and Khamakar press. But not one reliable source has not confirmed this information. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Shaykh Saad and Adwan

Another editor EllsworthSK is engaged in vandalism he changed Al-Shaykh Saad and Adwan her based on comment to photo in pro opposition group in Facebook. It is not permissible. Hanibal911 (talk) 13:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Syria map

You seem to be fixated on me and not on the a problem twice the size, barcax's edits.

And guess what, no-one but you (and me originally) has a problem with adding villages using wikimapia and general map.

We can either

A. Remove both Barcaxx's edits and my edits

B. Keep both Barcaxx's edits and my edits, but leave it at that and not add villages with wikimapia, twitter, ect

C. Keep both Barcaxx's and my edits, and continue to allow the construction of villages using wikimapia and twitter

I am quite fine with any one of the three. Sopher99 (talk) 17:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see your going with option C then... if that's really what you want. Sopher99 (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Raqqa

Pro government militias intensified in the city Raqqa. This confirms pro opposition source. Syria Newsdesk Hanibal911 (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Syria map

If Aonline doesn't self-revert his reversion of the towns I removed, I am going to assume this is just a wild goose game against me, and you really don't care whether or not a town or villages is source.

Once again, I am completely fine with you removing those villages I added with wikimapia, granted Barcaxx's villages and towns he added without a proper source are removed as well. Sopher99 (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maan massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hatay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jewish Anti-Zionist League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate use of Template:Refimprove

The information on this template clearly says: When to use

This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. This template should be used only for articles where there are some, but insufficient, inline citations to support the material currently in the article. Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material, even if all the material is supported by a single citation.

That was obviously not the case with the ADL article. And as was demonstrated, finding sources for the 3 citation needed tasks was trivial and the editor who added them took less than 20 minutes to do so, finding the first in 32 seconds. You should have either ignored it, fixed the problem, or posted to the talk page and asked if someone else could. Hopefully you will next time you find an article with 92 citations and 3 fact tags. Dougweller (talk) 06:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1 revert rule

You broke the 1 revert rule on the Battle of Aleppo (2012–present). second of all I did not use twitter as a source. Lastly there is a discussion on the talkpage. I will report you if you don't revert within 15 minutes. Sopher99 (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You only started the discussion when I reverted your unsustained tag...--HC PUNXKID 16:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I began the discussion before your second revert. I posted on the talkpage at 16:39, you made the second revert at 16:49. Sopher99 (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Aleppo (2012–present)

I assume you know the article about the Syrian civil war are under AE sanctions. After all, you were notified in 2013. Yet on the talk page of Battle of Aleppo (2012–present) you have called another user a vandal, please refrain from this as it is a personal attack, which is sanctionable. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jdeydeh

Per two new pro-opposition maps [9] and [10], based on opposition sources Jdeydeh is government-held. Based on this and the fact that there has been no fighting reported in that Christian district for a year and a half now this warrants a change to red I think. EkoGraf (talk) 09:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. The Army today captured the Al-Ma'amel area between Aziza and Al-Shekh Sa'eed [11][12]. And I believe only the northern part of Hanano should be contested, not the whole district. EkoGraf (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New development, Army has regained control of areas in Aziza [13] (southern edge of the map). EkoGraf (talk) 12:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template Syrian civil war detailed map

I need your advice. What can be done that would put an end to the vandalism the editor Jafar Saeed which edits the map without specifying sources. His actions can be classified as vandalism because his actions are harmful.her her her I also think that his actions may violate the 1RR rule. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Svoboda (political party). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please stop edit warring and adhere to WP:3RR Львівське (говорити) 14:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel better by posting this in my talk page...OK, but dont try to act like "Oh, I have good faith and I tried to warn him", that's not credible due to you attitude. Im not the one who's removing content based on reliable sources, but you. And by the way, Im not gonna act like you by removing this message, I've got nothing to hide, not as others...--HC PUNXKID 18:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Military objects

How do you think is it worth to add on the map this military objects "Panorama" Army Base and Police Academy because according to this source the territory on which they are located is under the control of the army. Hanibal911 (talk) 08:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deir ez zor map

Yes,al thayeem is gov controlled,but al shulah is rebel controlled.24.0.210.152 (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hizbullah hijaz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hizbullah hijaz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Aleppo map

A user edited Baloura to contested (from government-held) and Sheikh Lufti to rebel-held (from contested) while none of the provided sources indicated Baloura has become contested and we have no source saying rebels took full control of Sheikh Lufti. The user made an assumption that because the rebels attacked Aziza than they must have captured Sheikh Lufti, which is considered Original Research by Wikipedia and is not allowed. So I would kindly urge you to revert the southeastern front situation to back as it was (Baloura red/government held and Sheikh Lufti contested). Also, same goes for Al-Waffa, we have confirmation of fighting around the intelligence building and palace of justice (north of Waffa), but not in Waffa itself. The user used youtube videos as a basis to make Waffa contested. Youtube video can not be used per Wikipedia policy and are forbiden. So that should also go back to red. The area northwest of Waffa should remain contested. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 15:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I just noticed that Hanano was also marked as contested, despite that no more fighting has been reported there since the rebel attack on the barracks was repelled a few days ago per an opposition source [14]. So that also should go back to red. So in essence, that user's whole edit should be reverted back to Sopher's version. EkoGraf (talk) 15:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Donetsk People's Republic, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. [15] Refrain from personal attacks such as accusations of "POV-pushing, misinterpretation, lies and vandalism" or YOU will be reported. This is your only warning in light of your history of this disruptive behavior. Львівське (говорити) 20:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the article talk page

Do you think you could discuss your views on the article talk page? You may believe that the leaflets were a hoax. I do not see how you can possibly be right. They really did exist and really were distributed.

I do not know for certain who produced and distributed the leaflets. My guess is that they were produced on a standard office printer/photocopier. Most office workers in the city had the capability. The arguments in the Guardian article are mildly interesting, but not conclusive. Remember, "Donetsk People's Republic" consists of a bunch of people who have normal jobs aided by "green men" and volunteers from across the border. The writer for the Guardian seems to think that they would have professional printers like a government department in England - that is not a realistic attitude.

The leaflets may have been produced by people from the "Donetsk People's Republic". They did not necessarily have authorisation - it is not clear whether all the building seizures are centrally planned either - some are.

The leaflets may have been produced as "black propaganda" by the Government, or somebody else. The English were very good at black propaganda during World War II.

Either way, the leaflets were real. You may have your beliefs about them, but Wikipedia has to be based on reliable sources and have a neutral point of view.--Toddy1 (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deir ez-Zor Governorate

I think we should remove these towns (Al-Siyal, Al-Susat and Marashdah) in the province of Deir ez-Zor near the town of Abu Kamal.her Because they were added on basis of data from the pro opposition source.Syria Deeply Hanibal911 (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Zabadani

Do you think whether to change the status the city of al-Zabadani and neighboring towns because reliable sources claim that this city is the last stronghold of the rebels in the area but even in this city gunmen began to surrender Syrian army.The Australian The Times Hanibal911 (talk) 16:05, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You were right when said that we need to wait a bit and the situation becomes clearer. And here confirmation your words. Rebels in the Syrian town of Zabadani have surrendered after intense fighting with regime troops, losing their last stronghold along Lebanon's border.Al Jazeera Hanibal911 (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think it may be worth noting that the city Madaya is near the town of Zabadani under army control. Because the source says that the city had previously route opposition supply to nearby rural Damascus.Miami Herald ABC News The Washington Times Or whether it is due to the fact that army and rebels in this city concluded a truce. Hanibal911 (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Jabiyah

Could you help me fix the error because the editor Sopher noted village of Al-Jabiyah as contested although its source not mention of this village and also a reliable source only said about clashes on the hill Tal al-Jabiyeh The Daily Star Hanibal911 (talk) 20:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Army base Brigade 61

Military base was changing without confirmation from reliable sources.her The only evidence of capture base the amateur video the rebels and data from EAWorld the pro opposition source but other pro opposition source Arab Chronicle claims that clashes are continuing. Hanibal911 (talk) 07:38, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sopher99

At the moment, I think that issue has been partly solved. But if Sopher will continue such actions then we must to request the administrators to ban for him editing all articles about the war in Syria. Since his actions are harmful and distort the real situation in consequence of which the card does not reflect the real situation. Hanibal911 (talk) 17:28, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amensnober91

Editor Amensnober91 vandal who has not once been blocked for violation of rules 1RR and he again continues to violate this rule. We need to notify administrators about his actions. Here's the proof of violation the 1RR rules:

He also provokes war of editors. Hanibal911 (talk) 16:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hanano barracks area in Aleppo

I would ask that you please color the Hanano barracks area fully red, since an opposition source here [16] confirmed the attack on the barracks area had been repelled. User Moester is ignoring the source and refusing to make the edit. EkoGraf (talk) 16:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nab'ain

Maybe we should change the city of Nab'ain on contested because the source says that there are clashes in the city.Al Monitor Hanibal911 (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar company in Raqqa

Pro opposition source Arab Chronicle said that soldiers from millitary base brigade 17 took back the sugar company north to Raqqa from ISIS. But I can not find this facility on the map you can help me find him. Hanibal911 (talk) 10:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Aleppo map

Since I see that you also edit this map then you can to do perform some changes according to the some new data. Regime Forces progress in Sheik Najar raea and captured a number of militants. Clashes continue between Regime Forces and Armed Opposition Groups in Dowar Alborj in Allyramon area in north Aleppo and Regime Forces progress in the region.Hawar News also here the confirmation from SOHR and another source that the army advances in Sheik Najar and Owaija and North-East Aleppo. And also the Arqoub and industrial zone on the northern side of the city, also was captured by the army.The Wall Street Journal And here map from pro opposition source displays the army advances in the north part the city of Aleppo.Arab Chronicle Hanibal911 (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ashrafeih in the city of Aleppo under the Regime’s control.Hawarnews Hanibal911 (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, last non-Twitter, non-Facebook, non-neutral opposition sources put the northern part of Ramouseh (which the map shows) under Army control per SOHR [17] which stated they recaptured its highway, and a non-SOHR source [18] said they were consolidating their control over the district. So it should go red. EkoGraf (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al Waer

Under the terms of the agreement between the Syrian government and rebels the government forces take over all rebels districts in Homs city and Al Waer district in western Homs city. Al Jazeera Hanibal911 (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tafas

Pro opposition source SOHR claims that several soldiers the Syrian troops were killed and injured by islamic bombardment on the eastern side of Tafas town. May be us worth noting the city of Tafas as contested. Hanibal911 (talk) 15:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iusy-new-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iusy-new-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FiSahara LOGO ALTA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FiSahara LOGO ALTA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Handarat camp and prison SE area under SAA

Handarat camp and prison SE area under SAA http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2014/May-22/257379-syrian-troops-reach-besieged-prison-in-aleppo.ashx Can you please edit the Aleppo map? Can you show me how to edit the maps within the Template of Cities and Towns in Syrian Civil war? Regards Ariskar (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hamdeen Sabahi.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hamdeen Sabahi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:05, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MAS-IPSP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MAS-IPSP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rif Damashq

On this map, the city of Duma must noted as a besieged of the government troops this confirms Al Jazeera. Hanibal911 (talk) 07:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Moadamyeh under control of the syrian troops but the rebels fled the city and located on its the outskirts. Source said that the residential area at the other end of the border is Moadamiya, a Damascus suburb where reconciliation was reached a few weeks ago and gunmen are still around.Al Monitor So you can mark it on the map under army control.map Hanibal911 (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Shahil

Here coordinates the town of Al-Shahil which I added on the map. But here the coordinates other town of Al-Shahil which already have on map and is under control ISIS. Hanibal911 (talk) 16:40, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aleppo province

Here map of villages and areas which Syrian troops with the support of NDF reported taken.her Hey buddy since I bad know Arabic you may help me to understand what the villages marked on this map. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the map from the pro opposition source that displays the situation in Syria on the beginning of June! This data are confirmed in this source on which referenced Joshua Landis renowned expert but also a supporter of the Syrian opposition.I Affairs Canada Hanibal911 (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another map from the opposition source which show how now according to the opposition looks situation in the Syria. Hanibal911 (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dpp-malawi-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dpp-malawi-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Hasakah

Kurdish forces withdraw from locations in Syria’s Hasakah.Ara News Hanibal911 (talk) 15:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SWAPO logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SWAPO logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

al-Shurah, Deir Ezzor, Syria

Cheers! This argument has resurfaced, of course. Lend a hand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boredwhytekid (talk • contribs) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many of Your Edits to the Iraq Template Are Very Unreliable

The source you used for claiming Al-Garma is under ISIS control is undated and thus unreliable. Western media has also acknowledged that clashes are still continuing in Tal Afar.[19]. Iraqi sources have also claimed that Saqlawiyah is back under government control.[20][21] Please be neutral.JoetheMoe25 (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archicivilians map

You probably forgot that we can not use anti-government sources to display the progress of all rebels. But since the source of archicivilians it is the anti-government source its data may be biased, even if it concerns the army clashes against ISIS. So I recommend you revert your edits relatively of Hama province and Homs province. Because the rebel source is not a reliable source to display success Syrian rebels and other opponents of the government including ISIS militants. Hanibal911 (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But if you think that we can use data from the source archicivilians to display success of ISIS then we can also use this pro-opposition source to display the army advances.here fullscreen version this map Hanibal911 (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Zayyat

Syrian troops have regained control of the village Sheikh Zayyat.souece source source You do not know where this village? Or maybe this village is south of Aleppo near the Shaykh Saeed area. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misraba

You can on this map Rif Damashq the city of Misraba near the city of Douma to note under control of ISIS.source Hanibal911 (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Suggest You Adjust Your Attitude and Maintain Good Faith

To not include the Iraq sources is indeed not neutral. I laugh at the fact that you didn't double-check your date and that you think all sources affiliated with the Iraqi government are unreliable. Some Iraqi sources, such as what I sourced, are independent, as noted for example in the National Iraq News Agency article. The template is still not neutral and needs to be properly updated and sourced.JoetheMoe25 (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it

Stop vandalising the Iraqi template, it is not a strategy game for you to add or remove what you think fits your fantasy Jumada (talk) 10:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mid’a

Mid’a in Easte Ghouta has been reported for days by SOHR to be in the midst of fighting between rebels and ISIS [22]. A new color for their clashes in that area should be added. EkoGraf (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, SOHR has reported the rebels pushed them out. EkoGraf (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pdki logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pdki logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Aleppo map

Sometimes you have edited this map.Battle of Aleppo map So you can update this map again on based of this map Hanibal911 (talk) 13:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Durruti-muerto.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Durruti-muerto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Durruti-muerto.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Durruti-muerto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deir ez Zoar

I provided a link, coming from the same source about the Al-Ward oil field, which states it is being held by a rebel unit. Also, the town of Al-Mari'iyah was previously reported to be contested by the Army and rebels before the ISIS advances in the province. Mind you, the source (the Institute) has in the past expressed pro-opposition language so it should be treated as such. EkoGraf (talk) 00:50, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rumeilan oil fields

Rumeilan oil fields in Hasakah province still submit to the control of the Kurdish forces of YPG and pro-regime forces in the area. But i cant find it is oil field on the map maybe you can help me find him and i marked this oil field to the map. This confirmed the pro opposition source. source Hanibal911 (talk) 07:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NUPO new logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NUPO new logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're not...

... trying to vote twice in the AfD discussion by any chance [23]? Volunteer Marek 04:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Khodakovsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vostok Battalion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zone 5 Military Museum, Danang

If you have an issue with the Category: Communist Propaganda you should discuss it on the talk page rather than repeatedly deleting it. You obviously haven't been to the museum, or perhaps any political/history museum in Vietnam and so maybe you don't know that they are all propaganda perpetuating the Vietnamese Comunist party's version of Vietnamese history. I will post some of the captions on the talk page and revert the category. Mztourist (talk) 03:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have referred this to Dispute Resolution Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Zone 5 Military Museum, Danang Mztourist (talk) 03:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zone 5 Military Museum, Danang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Military museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

East of Svitlodarsk

Wrt File:East Ukraine conflict.svg, the area east of svitlodarsk is under control of rebels according to ukraine military. https://twitter.com/NSDC_ua/status/515068255049093120 Obviously east of Svitlodarsk includes Luhans'ke. Please change the colour of Luhans'ke to red. That is important because it shows debalsteve is under seige, and it was the case for more than a week according to NSDC. Lotsaprob (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fyodor Berezin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Zone 5 Military Museum, Danang. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 13:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerónimo Merino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lerma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your recent editing history at 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reported at WP:3RR

I reported you here. My very best wishes (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Europe sanctions alert

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--Bbb23 (talk) 02:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3

A complaint about you was filed here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#HCPUNXKID reported by My very best wishes (Result: ). The edit history shows that you broke WP:3RR on November 3. I think it might be closed with no further action if you will promise not to make any controversial changes to the article without first getting consensus on the talk page. Your recent statement at User talk:Iryna Harpy suggests that you think it would be harmless to add the word 'alleged' to articles and also that you are entitled to add the 'NPOV' tag if you want to. Such changes are just another way to continue an edit war, and you won't escape consequences if you try that. So I'll wait to see if you'll agree to my offer above. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Free Donbass

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Free Donbass. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Donetsk People's Republic. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Donetsk People's Republic – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:41, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban from the Ukraine-Russia troubles per WP:ARBEE

Please see the discussion at WP:AN3 (permalink). You are banned from the topic of Ukraine and any Russian topics connected to Ukraine, broadly construed, for six months. This covers both political and military matters and applies on all pages of Wikipedia including talk and noticeboards. The ban can be appealed to me or at WP:Arbitration enforcement or to Arbcom via WP:ARCA. The ban expires on 7 May 2015. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Free Donbass

The article Free Donbass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:GNG, specifically WP:FAILN. It isn't a political party, but some sort of organisation of parties(?) or alliance of parties after the Donbass election farce. Given that it's unclear as to its significance, and within an unrecognised state, it's WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Considering that the author of the article was sanctioned and blocked from editing any Eastern European related subject for 6 months (WP:ARBEE), the rationale for creating it is in his head, so there aren't even any further lines of investigation for other editors. If they become notable at some point in the future (WP:CRYSTAL), a relevant can be created from scratch.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HCPUNXKID reported by User:RGloucester (Result: ). Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 00:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violation -- attempting to edit Free Donbass through proxies

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.

You are under a topic ban from Ukraine and Russian topics connected to Ukraine, broadly construed. I'm sure you realize that political organizations that are active within the internationally recognized territory of Ukraine are covered by your ban. Free Donbass is such an organization, since it exists in what Wikipedia refers to as eastern Ukraine. So your efforts to get others to proxy for you in contesting the proposed deletion of Free Donbass are ruled out by ban from Ukraine:

I'm issuing a one-week block as an arbitration enforcement, since your ban was under WP:ARBEE which is an Arbcom case. You can appeal the block to me, to WP:AE or to the Arbitration committee. If you feel that the limits of your ban are unclear then it would be a simple matter to extend it to cover all of WP:ARBEE. I'd rather not take that step yet, hoping that you will understand what the limits are. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Free Donbass logo flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Free Donbass logo flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RCP-US flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RCP-US flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Aleppo map

Wanted to ask you if you could updated the Battle of Aleppo map. The necessary changes along with the sources I posted are here [27]. Thanks in advance, cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 21:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (شعارات جماعة أنصار بيت المقدس 3).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (شعارات جماعة أنصار بيت المقدس 3).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Consenso popular logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Consenso popular logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RussianUkraine banner 2-200x200p1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RussianUkraine banner 2-200x200p1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

We had a bit of a fight on a talk page once, but I realise you're a good guy, so hope there are no bad feelings. FunkMonk (talk) 02:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zaid

Zaid Benjamin,is a journalist for Al-Hurra Channel,similiar to Elijah Magnier.Alhanuty (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC) the developments in Tal Abyad and Ain Essa are occuring very very fast.Alhanuty (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

Thanks for those database label edits on the Iraq map. That's going to make future editing easier, as those objects will be more easily identifiable. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emeti Yakuf.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emeti Yakuf.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Syria .svg maps

I don't know if you can help me, because i belive to be the only person with this problem. I wanted to update the .svg maps for Syria, lets say for Aleppo town. But the problem is, whatever program i use (inkscape or Adobe ilustrator) when i open the .svg file, it looks likes this, and i think it shouldn't look like this. DuckZz (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey DuckZz, in order to edit .svg maps and other ones in WP, some other user recommend me to download Inkscape, wich is a pro editor for vectorial graphics. Its a bit complicated at first (I still only made few changes in the maps with it, as I still dont control it well), but its a good option. Hope that could help you!.--HC PUNXKID 22:47, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking to explain how to edit the.svg. It's just weird that i get this image after i open it in inkscape, it looks weird and i want to know if it's the same for you DuckZz (talk) 23:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I dont have that problem while editing with Inkscape, so I cannot help u...--HC PUNXKID 23:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 18 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to M113 armored personnel carrier may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{flag|Greece}}: Over 2,500 (1,800+ M113A1/A2 APC, 256 M106A1/A2, 280+ M901A1/A2 ITV, 198 M577A2, 50 M113A1 MEDEVAC, 460
2015/06/hezbollah-brigades-flaunts-us-equipment-in-anbar-operation.php|author=[[Bill Roggio]]] & Kaled Weiss|publisher=[[Long War Journal]]|date=25 June 2015|accessdate=14 July 2015}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to M1 Abrams may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

2015/06/hezbollah-brigades-flaunts-us-equipment-in-anbar-operation.php|author=[[Bill Roggio]]] & Kaled Weiss|publisher=[[Long War Journal]]|date=25 June 2015|accessdate=14 July 2015}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring without discussing

Hello. You inserted an edit on Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. When someone undid your edit, you immediately restored it without any discussion until after you were again reverted. I consider this to be edit warring. Please do not continue to do this or I will ask for another impartial administrator's opinion on if further steps for remediation are necessary given your history. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Magog the Ogre, you should better review the talk pages before talking, or you could end up saying untrue things, as in this case. I've tried to discuss the issue on the talk page (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Cities_and_towns_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War#Suluk.2C_pro-Kurdish_bias_.26_double_standards, it seems that Im not the only user who denies double standard bias), but it seems that some users prefer POV-pushing over editing with proper citations, as I did in the Suluk case. Feel free to do what you want, but Im not gonna accept the revert of an edition properly & correctly sourced according to WP rules.--HC PUNXKID 14:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Khirbat Zammalah

Hello!

When you added places on the map earlier today you must have misplaced Khirbat Zammalah. I don´t think it´s located on the turkish side of the border just west of Afrin. Please fix. Have a nice day! Rhocagil (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of proposed state mergers

Hi HCPUNXKID. Please stop adding bogus entried to the List of proposed state mergers. Valid entries are those for which we have evidence that aurothities/ governments/etc have at one or other stage approached each other about such a union. A proposal by Obama for the US to merge with Canada counst for nothing if the proposal is not presented to Canada and Canada actaully agrees to contemplate it. Anything else is hogwash. The opinions of others that you find in blogs, opinion pieces in the media etc, do not count. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 09:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So why are you writing to me about the "Union of Sovereign States"? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. The entry that made me write to the author was a different one (Yugoslavia), which I removed. When I looked up the diff to write to the author I came across your edit and saw "A serious project proposed by Slobodan Milošević in 1992", which is in fact part of the previous entry. So I wrote to the wrong author - you. My apologies for that. As for your inclusion of the Union of Sovereign States - which I did not remove -, I am not too sure whether it can be called a merger. I will open a discussion on the talk page. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Union of Sovereign States

Hi, please have a look at the discussion evolving here. Your opinion would be appreciated. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to update Aleppo map

You need to update the svg map of Aleppo. Al-Nusra, along with other jihadi and islamist rebels, have attacked YPG positions in Sheikh Masqoud, and have been pushed back to the critical highway that ios the rebel supply route into Aleppo. Sources: https://twitter.com/sayed_ridha/status/648107893087055872/photo/1 https://twitter.com/sayed_ridha/status/648173813587247104/photo/1 https://twitter.com/markito0171/status/648153538560983040

You need to update the svg map to reflect the fact that the highway is in essence cut off. This is a major strategic development that warrants a new revision of the map. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of proposed state mergers: Taking your behaviour to the attention of administrators

Hi, HCPUNXKID. I am taking the matter to the attention of an adminsitrator to seek opinion on what steps I should take further. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 00:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You need to go to Talk:List of proposed state mergers and put forward your case there. Reverting against consensus will eventually end up with you being blocked. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CambridgeBayWeather: Er, yes, HCPUNXKID finally took his 'case' to the relevant talk page a few days later. I've only just encountered it. WP:ASPERSIONS and a diatribe is not making a case in any reasonable editor's lexicon. The ongoing levels of abusive language and assumption of bad faith (as well as 'cabals') by HCPUNXKID is designed to be coercive and divisive: the antithesis of collaborative, civil and productive editing. It's simply a perpetuation of unacceptable behaviour for which this editor has been blocked and topic banned time and time again. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Manners Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maori. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YBS logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YBS logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tall Dadin

Hi! Please fix the coordinates for your edit of Tall Dadin. I´m pretty sure it´s not located just east of Nubl and Zahraa. Regards Rhocagil (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in Libya

Dear HCPUNXKID..I have already written the list of the cities of Libya by population, but ليبي صح distorted the list later only to make his hometown Al Bayda the fourth instead of the eighth!!! (original list is shown on the List's talk page). I have doubts myself with list, and expressed some of them in the sentence on the top of the list, but this is the only reliable source I found about these figures, since it had been depended on governmental data, and the government of Libya is unable to make another census because of the ongoing war there. Would remind if If I restored the original list, after fixing some red links?!--Maher27777 (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:FSB escudo.jpg

Can I use it for [28]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Braganza (talk • contribs) 16:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latakia

al-Mutillah (also called Daghmashliyyah) taken by SAA.SOHR and Pro opposition source confirmed that the Samakufah under SAA.source 95.135.205.133 (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 31 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Proryv.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Proryv.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --PanchoS (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:SACP flag.gif

Thanks for uploading File:SACP flag.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --PanchoS (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Uy mpp flag.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Uy mpp flag.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --PanchoS (talk) 06:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:National alliance-US flag.gif

Thanks for uploading File:National alliance-US flag.gif. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --PanchoS (talk) 06:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MQM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MQM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RCP-US flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RCP-US flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amal logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amal logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:West Papua coat of arms.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West Papua coat of arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anri Khagush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abkhazian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Etim tip logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Etim tip logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Emboirik, embajador saharahui.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Emboirik, embajador saharahui.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Liwa al-Fatemiyoun.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Liwa al-Fatemiyoun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Revolution of 1934

added links pointing to CNT, UGT and Diego Hidalgo

Second Spanish Republic

added a link pointing to Battle of Belchite

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahrar al-Najran

I have removed the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://atimes.com/2015/10/how-saudi-arabias-aggressive-foreign-policy-is-playing-against-itself, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Russian Turkestan coat image016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Russian Turkestan coat image016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ARF flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ARF flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AINDF logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AINDF logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HCPUNXKID. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Riau Archipelago

You tagged the Riau Archipelago#Social change section as vague, which it was. I have added some detail, while striving to maintain a neutral perspective. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look and see if it needs more tweaking. If it does, a quick comment on its talk page, Talk:Riau Archipelago, would get my attention, and potentially allow other editors to weigh in if they get there first. Oh, by the way, it's helpful to add an edit summary along the lines of "tagged as vague" when making such as edit. Take care. --Bejnar (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rohingya Solidarity Organization (emblem).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rohingya Solidarity Organization (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asaib-ahl-alhaq logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asaib-ahl-alhaq logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Conspiracy of Fire Nuclei LOGO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conspiracy of Fire Nuclei LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:APC South Africa logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:APC South Africa logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NP South africa flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NP South africa flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UDM South Africa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UDM South Africa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PartylogofinalimageJuly02 AITUP.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PartylogofinalimageJuly02 AITUP.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMP South Africa flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMP South Africa flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iusy-new-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iusy-new-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:African National Congress Youth League logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:African National Congress Youth League logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HCPUNXKID. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:25 To Life Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:25 To Life Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:25 To Life Logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:25 To Life Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Флаг-ПКП-200x133.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Флаг-ПКП-200x133.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pflp logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pflp logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Partido-Colorado.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Partido-Colorado.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:HCPUNXKID|<font color="Purple">HC</font>]][[User_talk:HCPUNXKID|<font color="Gold">PUNX</font>]]<font color="Purple">KID</font>

: HC PUNXKID

to

[[User:HCPUNXKID|<span style="color:Purple">HC</span>]][[User talk:HCPUNXKID|<span style="color: Gold">PUNX</span>]]<span style="color: Purple">KID</span>

: HC PUNXKID

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PCU LOGO 91.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PCU LOGO 91.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PS Uruguay logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PS Uruguay logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On tagging with "by whom"

In Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) you marked the phrase, "The movement has been described" with a "by whom" tag, when that line had a reliable source that gave that exact description. WP:WEASEL says, "views that are properly attributed to a reliable source may use similar expressions, if they accurately represent the opinions of the source." (emphasis in original) The line was pulled directly from the cited source, so this particular instance is not an example of weasel words. Please be careful when tagging such phrases in the future. Thank you. -- Hi Ev 18:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Qamishli Sootoro logo flag.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Qamishli Sootoro logo flag.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GANA-bandera.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GANA-bandera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Banned Sahrawi human rights organizations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Banned Sahrawi human rights organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HCPUNXKID. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Islamic-umma-logo-300x250.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islamic-umma-logo-300x250.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Simbolo-NCB-completo1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Simbolo-NCB-completo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FLN Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FLN Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pac sa flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pac sa flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tupamaros venezuela logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tupamaros venezuela logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AFP flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AFP flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo partido panameñista twitter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo partido panameñista twitter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ARNO logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ARNO logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Folkebevmodeulogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Folkebevmodeulogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Khalistan-Zindabad-Force.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khalistan-Zindabad-Force.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artifariti2010 PaulaAlvarez.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Artifariti2010 PaulaAlvarez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chadema logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chadema logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ALD-flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ALD-flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1312626938 proriv.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1312626938 proriv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azapo flag.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azapo flag.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Usurped URL

I've used the url-status=usurped parameter on an edit you made: your edit at JEM; my fix there. This is a nice option recently added to standard ref parameters - the URL history is still available, but only by editing or viewing the wiki source. If you've used other mebriefing refs, then you might want to consider marking them as url-status=usurped; maybe ask for help at a Wikipedia bots page if you (or others) did many. Luckily, web.archive.org already had a valid backup. Boud (talk) 00:12, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Inkatha Freedom Party flag.gif

The file File:Inkatha Freedom Party flag.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DFLP-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DFLP-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Revolutionary Organization 17 November.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revolutionary Organization 17 November.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Swedish national socialist party flag.gif

The file File:Swedish national socialist party flag.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mis logo 1943.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mis logo 1943.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Temple of the Six Banyan Trees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specimen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ABC Lesotho logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ABC Lesotho logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DC Lesotho logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DC Lesotho logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Don Quixote (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peseta

Lady of Elche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peseta

Álvaro de Bazán, 1st Marquess of Santa Cruz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Peseta

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Plpf-sc flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Plpf-sc flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Third World Center logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Third World Center logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:People's United Party (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:People's United Party (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 20:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important information

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 10:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

You know how to use edit summaries, blanking sourced material at Three Percenters isn't good, worse without an explanation

Doug Weller talk 13:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding original research

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Please do not add terms without reliable references stating them like you have here.[29]. Resapp (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chadema bendera.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chadema bendera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 01:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khanasor Expedition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ak+logo+nyt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ak+logo+nyt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 08:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the discussions above, after all these years you are still struggling with sources

Discussions at RSN have repeatedly said that allsides.com and mediabiasfactcheck are at best dubious sources, the latter being an amateur website, not sure about the former. And your link to allsides.com clearly said "Confidence Level:Low or Initial Rating" which makes it useless even if it were a reliable source. Doug Weller talk 16:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me that you are closely watching my edits, huh?. Let me guess, Huffington Post or Mother Jones are reliable sources in comparison... And finally, I will continue struggling with the blatant, obvious bias in an increasing number of WP articles.--HC PUNXKID 17:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 20:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PSP Lebanon logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PSP Lebanon logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 04:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Democratic Party of Kosovo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martiros Saryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dram.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pdki logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pdki logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jp aunshinrikyo logo flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jp aunshinrikyo logo flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --The Navigators (talk) 01:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nayim Alal- Nar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nayim Alal- Nar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DursunKaratas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DursunKaratas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Khaleej libya sirt logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khaleej libya sirt logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MAIB logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MAIB logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NDP Ghana logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NDP Ghana logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HNP flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HNP flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HNP-logo Wapen01-120.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HNP-logo Wapen01-120.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-mayadeen logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-mayadeen logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logonuevoespacio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logonuevoespacio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nuevo espacio bandera.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nuevo espacio bandera.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vertiente1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vertiente1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dogun logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dogun logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Durruti

Greetings. Could you, please, clarify the inscription on the Durruti monument in León? Does it read "Hálito Durruti" or "Hálito, Durruti"? Thanks in advance. -The Gnome (talk) 15:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Molirena flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Molirena flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 15:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for the area of Covid-19

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bassiri June 1970.jpg

The file File:Bassiri June 1970.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File replaced with a copyright-free, File:Mohamed Bassiri in Egypt (cropped) (cropped).png on commons, removing the replaceability condition

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MakhzenHuman (talk) 19:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bassiri June 1970.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bassiri June 1970.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LANC logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LANC logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pcmlv logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pcmlv logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FSB escudo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FSB escudo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 05:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RFD logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RFD logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Campaign of Gipuzkoa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Ortega.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fretilin.logo.3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fretilin.logo.3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Firestar464. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Would you mind citing said source? Firestar464 (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please update Cities and towns during the Russo-Ukrainian War before changing the map, with a properly formatted reference. URLs in edit summaries are insufficient as references on Wikipedia. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 11:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 11:43, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map. An ANI report is next. This is a very sensitive issue and sourcing is critically important. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 11:46, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357 ^Talk: I dont understand your behaviour. I aint added unsourced content, and there are several sources stating all the major cities in Sumy oblast are encircled by the russians. Even more, the source are the Ukrainian regional authorities. So please think again before making such accusations.--HC PUNXKID 11:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect about edit summaries being sufficient as citations. You need to read the module's documentation, specifically this section which states:

Every element on the map should be verifiable. Information on towns (description of control & sources) can be found by clicking on the town dot on the map. Notice the caption of the map which says: "Hold cursor over location to display name; click to go to sources &/or status description.

Those links go to Cities and towns during the Russo-Ukrainian War, where readers can verify the content. Putting URLs in edit summaries does not update that page, and therefore the content you are adding cannot be verified. I am now the second editor to explain this to you, and instead of simply doing it correctly, you have insisted on wasting everyone's time by edit-warring over it at the height of the conflict, potentially causing confusion for readers as you are putting the list out of sync with the map. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 12:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357 ^Talk: OK, so you are deleting reliable sources (because we all agree that the sources I gave are reliable, isn't it?) just because of a shape defect, not because it was unreliable or partisan. I truly can't understand this, even when yesterday I saw other users adding info without any type of source. But I know, dont look at other editors work, blah, blah, blah. This is why people leave WP, logically.--HC PUNXKID 12:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have requirements for sourcing, and other editors not following them is not an excuse for an experienced editor such as yourself. It really isn't that hard, just do it right. I noticed you've previously been banned from editing Eastern Europe articles, which means I can take you directly to WP:AE if you continue, and I will. I really would prefer not to do that. These procedures have been honed over many years with the Syrian Civil War map. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 12:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357 ^Talk: Perhaps we live in different dimensions, as I have been editing Syrian civil war detailed map for years and I never ever seen that procedures...--HC PUNXKID 12:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now you know. You are welcome to read the documentation for that, too... and the edit notice tells you to read it before editing that map. Wikipedia requires inline citations. These procedures were established because edit summaries ARE NOT inline citations. From the first paragraph of WP:CS: "Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space." The simple fact is the reader cannot check where the information is coming from when you edit this way, which is a problem. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 12:18, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tartan357 ^Talk: Could you please tell me if it should be like this in order to edit in the map?: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cities_and_towns_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#Sumy_Oblast. Thanks. --HC PUNXKID 12:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's great. Thank you. :) ― Tartan357 ^Talk 12:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about your contribution to the map of the Ukrainian-russian war

Hello, I am a journalist for a French newspaper called Le Parisien and would like to know if we could chat by email or phone about the way you help mapping the Ukrainian-Russian war. This can obviously be anonymous. My email: valexandre @ leparisien.fr 213.152.9.2 (talk) 15:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 02:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RussianUkraine banner 2-200x200p1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RussianUkraine banner 2-200x200p1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Velykyi Burluk

Hi. I'm having trouble verifying your edit to Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War. In short, I don't see mention of Velykyi Burluk in the source, nor anything in the sections on Kharkiv which suggests its occupation. Please could you double-check the URL and, if it is correct, use the quote= parameter to make this easier for those who can't read Ukrainian to verify? (Note as well that the URL changes as you scroll down the page, which may be what's causing this issue.) —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding an additional reference. I am now highly confident that the changing URL as you scroll down Suspilne's pages is the reason the first URL (and at least one other you have used, specifically for Dobra Krynytsia) was incorrect – so watch out for that in future.

Since I have brought up Dobra Krynytsia, note that you can fill the table on the 'Control of cities' page (as opposed to adding a URL to the changelog of the detailed map module, despite the rules for editing the map) even if there is no English Wikipedia page for the settlement: you may leave columns blank for others to fill, or you can search on Ukrainian Wikipedia (which in my experience has always had a page for the settlement) and use an {{Interlanguage link}} – although I appreciate that this latter option is more difficult if you are not used to working with Cyrillic. —AlphaMikeOmega (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shevchenkove, Brovary Raion, Kyiv Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shevchenkove, Brovary Raion, Kyiv Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PAP logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PAP logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Control of cities during the Russo-Ukrainian War, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ISW and Delfi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NCP newlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NCP newlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nsrp flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nsrp flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mis logo sfondgiallo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mis logo sfondgiallo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nationalist-party-of-canada.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nationalist-party-of-canada.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics alert: gender

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 09:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Institutionalized.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Institutionalized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PUDEMO flag.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PUDEMO flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AQMI logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AQMI logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMDH LogoEN.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMDH LogoEN.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Watan Afghanistan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Watan Afghanistan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Glitterbeat Records

Hello, HCPUNXKID. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glitterbeat Records, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Escudo Tifariti.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Escudo Tifariti.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sahara-press-service.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sahara-press-service.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sahrawi National Council logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sahrawi National Council logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nfoe-logo2010.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nfoe-logo2010.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Al-aqsa aamb.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Al-aqsa aamb.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo NOSW.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo NOSW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mcp flag 3.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mcp flag 3.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tragedy Khadafi - Thug Matrix 2 (2006).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tragedy Khadafi - Thug Matrix 2 (2006).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blood ballads.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blood ballads.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ONLF logo3.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ONLF logo3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mariem Hassan con Leyoad

The article Mariem Hassan con Leyoad has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.