User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 10
 | This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_10. |
Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 archives.
If I deleted your article, it is possible for me to restore it. Please post a message for reconsideration of the deletion. and you can read Why was my page deleted?
please add your talk at the bottom of the page:
Biographies of Living persons solution?: Projectification
[edit]As someone who commented on the BLP workshop I created, please review this proposal to see if it is something that the community would support.
Harsh constructive criticism is very welcome!
Better to figure out the potential objections now. I am looking to remedy any potential objections by the community.
Thanks. Okip (formerly Ikip) 03:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- I responded to your comments, thanks for taking the time to hash this out. I look forward to your further response. Okip (formerly Ikip) 09:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sophie Wu. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Wu. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the help
[edit]I wasn't sure what I was doing (as I got an error message when I first tried to add my citations to the cosmic cloud/dust article), so thanks for checking things out and making sure they were as they were supposed to be. I guess you have to manually add a reference section to an article before you can cite facts with in-text numbered-superscript references (like i tried to do and hopefully succeeded)? re: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Interstellar_cloud&oldid=343333135 --Δζ (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm sorry to bother you, but on that same page, Interstellar Cloud, I had another issue. I tried to link citation three to an abstract of a cited journal (the Nature one) but it comes out as an internal wikipedia link and I'm not sure how to fix that. The text is fine (I think), its just that the title of the article in the ref links to a nonexistant wikipedia page rather than the intended Nature webpage containing the free abstract. If you feel like it, could you fix this? Also, could you let me know how you cite webpages? On the citation you cleaned up for me earlier on the same page, interstellar cloud, you changed my bare url to a better MLA-style cite using wiki markup. I've been coppying the markup for new cites, but is there some generator that you used or something that makes it easier, i.e. where you can just insert the various items (author, title, volume, et cet) and pop out the wiki-style markup? Thanks for the help.--Δζ (talk) 14:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Graeme,
you are receiving this message as you voted in VOTE 2 at the recent Community de-Adminship 'Proposal Finalization' Poll. Unfortunately, there is a hitch regarding the "none" vote that can theoretically affect all votes.
1) Background of VOTE 2:
In a working example of CDA; ater the 'discussion and polling phase' is over, if the "rule of thumb" baseline percentage for Support votes has been reached, the bureaucrats can start to decide whether to desysop an admin, based in part on the evidence of the prior debate. This 'baseline' has now been slightly-adjusted to 65% (from 70%) per VOTE 1. VOTE 2 was asking if there is a ballpark area where the community consensus is so strong, that the bureaucrats should consider desysopping 'automatically'. This 'threshold' was set at 80%, and could change pending agreement on the VOTE 2 results.
This was VOTE 2;
- Do you prefer a 'desysop threshold' of 80% or 90%, or having none at all?
- As a "rule of thumb", the Bureaucrats will automatically de-sysop the Administrator standing under CDA if the percentage reaches this 'threshold'. Currently it is 80% (per proposal 5.4).
- Please vote "80" or "90", or "None", giving a second preference if you have one.
This is the VOTE 2 question without any ambiguity;
- Do you prefer a "rule of thumb" 'auto-desysop' percentage of 80%, 90%, or "none"?
- Where "none" means that there is no need for a point where the bureaucrats can automatically desysop.
- Please vote "80" or "90", or "None", giving a second preference if you have one.
2) What was wrong with VOTE 2?
Since the poll, it has been suggested that ambiguity in the term "none at all" could have affected some of the votes. Consequently there has been no consensus over what percentage to settle on, or how to create a new compromise percentage. The poll results are summarised here.
3) How to help:
Directly below this querying message, please can you;
- Clarify what you meant if you voted "none".
- In cases where the question was genuinely misunderstood, change your initial vote if you wish to (please explain the ambiguity, and don't forget to leave a second choice if you have one).
- Please do nothing if you interpreted the question correctly (or just confirm this if you wish), as this query cannot be a new vote.
I realise that many of you clarified your meaning after your initial vote, but the only realistic way to move forward is to be as inclusive as possible in this vote query. Sorry for the inconvenience,
Matt Lewis (talk) 14:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- WEll I could not find my vote on this issue, I would have voted none as in the new improved meaning of the question, so I need do nothing. What I thought none meant, was leave it up to the Bureaucrats to decide. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination for Mark Sparnon
[edit]Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Sparnon, an article you proposed for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 18:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Nice to see you signed up :)
|
Congratulations in becoming a contestant in the
Unreferenced Biographies of You will be given further instructions soon. Questions? Good luck! | |||||||||||||||||||
Okip BLP Contest 01:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Furneaux group
[edit]I have a copy of one hundred islands - the flora of the outer furneaux - and am likely to some rather drastic changes to the article - if you want to offer your salient advice or whatever before it happens - here is your chance... I basically have spent over 2 years admonishing indonesian project low english ips to not add meaningless unalpha lists of things - and am planning to do some radical things with the article - which offends me as it is - seeing you are a predominant ed at the current version thought the least you need is the option to plead for its current odd state or be warned it will be changing - cheers SatuSuro 06:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Havent made up my mind - was thinking of a list of islands might be more apporptiate (I often wonder where my negs of when I used to fly across tassie in the last century (so it feels) between queenie (sic) and hobart ever went :( ) It was a regular service in the mid 70's and if the winds were dickie at queenie they used to land at strahan instead :( SatuSuro 08:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Yeah the only one I have is the King River mouth and Mount Huxley/Lake Burbury during the Canberra fires in early 2002 up at the moment in commons - its gonna take a long time - its the getting the old steam powered scanners valves flushed out and the brain oiled and in gear for long nights of scanning and ignoring wp :) SatuSuro 09:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
As other editors have pointed out, there has been several intentional moves in this request for comment:
- Arguing that change is inevitable. As anyone who has tried to change policy here knows, change is never inevitable.
- In closing Phase I, only one position is advocated, marginalizing or ignoring all other positions.
- Repeated attempts to silence editors, particularly me. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Ikip and Wikipedia:An#Page_ban_for_Ikip_from_the_BLP_RFC
- Attrition, having the argument drag out so long, and editors get so tired of the discussion, that editors will either:
- drop out of the discussion, or
- accept a proposal which if originally proposed, would get wide spread opposition.
The end result is that editors who support radical, disruptive change, control the conversation, and less involved editors think that they only have a narrow list of choices, and !vote to accept bitey proposals which will only further hurt wikipedia growth and bite newcomers. Compromise means that both sides give up something.
I would possibly support this proposal if it includes strong WP:BEFORE language, to help protect new editors contributions, as the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people#WP:BEFORE proposal, which has 19 supports, advocates.
As the creator of WP:Contest and as someone who is advocating bots on Wikipedia:Bot requests I know there are less disruptive and WP:BITE alternatives available.
I would strongly encourage you to reconsider your position. Okip 12:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- See also Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Biographies_of_living_people#Consensus_is_forming:_an_alternative_view_and_table_summary_of_all_positions Which completely supports the idea that this is a false consensus. Okip 14:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would like to note that an editor accused me of canvassing by writing the above, which I simply don't understand.[1] Here is my response.[2] Okip 17:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
The rules of the contest have been changed significantly since you signed up. Please check out the new page and its subpages. Any input as to how to improve any part of it would be greatly welcomed. J04n(talk page) 02:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 21:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Supertouch (talk) 21:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Why was this deleted? As you can see from the following disambig, the Pirate Party of Canada is a legitimate organization that falls under the Pirate Party International umbrella, and should be treated as such, not a club with no notability. Why not allow our political party the same respect as the other ones list in the disambig? Or shall I have to deem you anti-Canadian? (>O_o)> Something X <(^_^<) 22:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, please do throw the article at User:Something_X/Pirate_Party_Of_Canada. Also, I present to you two independent newspapers/articles that have stories on us.
Monico Limited
[edit]Sorry about that -- I must have been looking at an old version when I hit it with the CSD template or something :-/ Those two links definitely show some significance, so thanks for catching my slip and removing the CSD. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 07:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- No problems, I try to rescue stuff on the CSD queue! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
== Article To Be Used On/Reason For Upload: == http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Calliandra_surinamensis stub addition http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nnoddy&redirect=no Hi Graham I sent you the pic Thanks--Nnoddy (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
BioTek Logo
[edit]Hi Graeme - thanks for uploading the BioTek logo. I have 2 other pics that need to be uploaded, both from the same source as the BioTek logo. Any chance I can get you to upload those as well? One is a product shot, and the other is a pic of their building.
Thanks-- ChereGriffin (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Graeme - first, thanks for the speedy response! To clarify your response, the product and building images should be uploaded as public domain?
Thanks ==ChereGriffin (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. Just want to inform you that the article which you deleted has been recreated by the same editor. Amsaim (talk) 12:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Cambridge School, Doha, Qatar
[edit]Hello Graeme. I see you declined my speedy deletion nomination of The Cambridge School, Doha, Qatar, but you gave no reason. I wonder if you would tell me what your reason was? The article contains substantial verbatim copies of material from pages which are clearly labelled with notices such as "All contents copyright © Taleb Group. All rights reserved", so I should have thought it was an unambiguous copyright violation. If not, I should be very grateful if you could explain why not. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Please restore Interpretations of Genesis
[edit]HI. I think you deleted Interpretations of Genesis. Would you mind restoring it for a bit? We are in the middle of a lengthy discussion at Talk:Genesis creation myth about the organization of Genesis-related articles. Can we see where that discussion goes for a week or so? I dont mind it getting deleted eventually if that is the consensus, but it is useful during the course of the discussion. Thanks. --Noleander (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
[edit]Message added 13:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 13:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
| Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Fetchcomms's talk page. |
| You can remove this notice at any time by removing this code. fetchcomms☛ 19:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC) |
You declined the copyvio CSD stating "speedy delete declined, may be based on Wikipedia article, but not so similar as to be a copyvio"[3], however you seemed to have misunderstood my tagging. Both his user space version, and the "live" article (which he copied from his user space) are copyvio from the Smashing Pumpkin's bio, with just the names and basic details changed.[4]. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 13:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- That lyrics freak article is a copy and slight derivative of the Wikipedia article on Smashing Pumpkins, so cc-by-sa-3.0 applies. User:ScreamingRage01/NextSeptember just needs to attribute the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- The lyrics freak page does not say that, but it does have a copyright notice. Are you certain it is a copy of Wikipedia, and not the other way around? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well I think you should be tagging the Smashing Pumpkins page if you think it is a copy vio, but speedy delete only applies in unequivocal cases, here there is doubt, so it should be listed at copyright problems instead. I would suspect lyrics freak of the copy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- The lyrics freak page does not say that, but it does have a copyright notice. Are you certain it is a copy of Wikipedia, and not the other way around? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Siddharth Katragadda
[edit]I tried to create a page on Siddharth Katragadda and was speedy deleted by you since it matched text on my website http://siddharthkatragadda.com. I have since donated the website to wikipedia. Please release my page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skatraga (talk • contribs) 23:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
This article is indeed a copyright violation, see this diff which is the first edit of the article, this text comes from http://www.ulkumen.net/ so this whole article has been created from copyrighted content and has to be cleaned.--Kimdime (talk) 10:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Note that I already had a problem with another admin regarding copyvio on en:wikipedia. It seems that here you are really fast and never make a look on discussions pages when a copyright violation is detected. I had to put back the template 2 times on this article because you and another user removed it. This is not acceptable, one should be helped in his copyvio fight, not reverted by an admin--Kimdime (talk) 10:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- The current version was not a violation, I have deleted old versions, and left the stub now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well the current version wasn't a violation because an editor unaware of copyright rules decided to remove my tag and stubify the article, thing that can clearly be seen in the history you deleted. By the way, I don't understand why you replaced the article with a stub that you didn't write. In order to respect the licence, you should credit the authors of this stub. One simple thing you could have done is avoiding to delete the version of Themfromspace which created this stub and to credit the others authors adding their name into the discussion page.--Kimdime (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Look at the history, Themfromspace is credited, I have to delete everything before I can restore. That stub was the only copy free of tags or copyvio. I am not credited in the history. Only in the delete actions. Do believe that any other content came from anyone else? If you really think it worth while I can put the deleted history on talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- This is my mistake, sorry for that, I mixed your names. Regarding the others editors, Themfromspace stated that he took this stub from older versions see [5] so I guess yes, others editors have to be credited. Regards--Kimdime (talk) 12:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I've done it myself with the list provided by Themfromspace, end of the problem!--Kimdime (talk) 12:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Look at the history, Themfromspace is credited, I have to delete everything before I can restore. That stub was the only copy free of tags or copyvio. I am not credited in the history. Only in the delete actions. Do believe that any other content came from anyone else? If you really think it worth while I can put the deleted history on talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well the current version wasn't a violation because an editor unaware of copyright rules decided to remove my tag and stubify the article, thing that can clearly be seen in the history you deleted. By the way, I don't understand why you replaced the article with a stub that you didn't write. In order to respect the licence, you should credit the authors of this stub. One simple thing you could have done is avoiding to delete the version of Themfromspace which created this stub and to credit the others authors adding their name into the discussion page.--Kimdime (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- The current version was not a violation, I have deleted old versions, and left the stub now. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cnngo logo 220x90.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Cnngo logo 220x90.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BMFormula300px.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BMFormula300px.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wild Pockets logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Wild Pockets logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page.
- If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
BLP sticky prod
[edit]Hi Graeme Bartlett/archive 10 ! The template workshop has now split off most of the long threads purely on policy to a new discussion page so that policy can be established while technical development of the template can continue in its own space. When the template functions are finalised, the policy bits can be merged into them. If you intend to continue to contribute your ideas to the development of the template or its policy of use, and we hope you will, please consider either adding your name to the list of workshop members, or joining in with the policy discussions on the new page. --Kudpung (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Since you closed the section here or rather, a bot has, can you go ahead and delete the rest of the images listed there?— Dædαlus Contribs 05:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Selahattin Ulkumen
[edit]You have deleted almost the entire content of the Selahattin Ulkumen page and you cite copyvio. The source of the contents were clearly indicated so I dont understand your point!!! I am the owner of the www.ulkumen.net site so there is no violation whatsoever. I am trying not to take this personally but you make it very difficult. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aulkumen (talk • contribs) 06:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
As per your request, I added the ref to CC-BY-SA-3.0 to the start page of www.ulkumen.net Now please do the necessary to revert the wiki reference to its original version. prism (talk) 20:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]Hi friend! and thanks for helping me, I read the criteria and it meets all except one: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.. I mean, people understand who Dahmer is with or without the pic. but with this pic, we show him looking different, because in YouTube they say in Wikipedia is totally diferent, and I thought it would be great to have him with glasses and without moustache, like he was at trial. What do you think? --SouthAmerican (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've uploaded it, can you check my spelling mistakes in the explanation of the picture? (on the article of Jeffrey Dahmer). --SouthAmerican (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, without your help, it couldn't have been possible. Accept a cookie from me. --SouthAmerican (talk) 01:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Mostly with me?
[edit]How could you argue that? The user taunted and insulted Malik on his own talk page, and a few others in different locations. How is that mostly me?— Dædαlus Contribs 05:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Jerdesz1.jpg
[edit]You posted to the page: You are going to have to show that you own copyright on a photo of yourself. Normally the photographer will own copyright.
I am the photographer, not the girl. Also I'm not inclined to provide free photos of much higher resolution because pageant pages are vandalized and photos stolen often. I may change the photo to a slightly higher resolution, but I complied with the requirements and you received the email required in the instructions from me. You can identify this email because it contains my name, address, phone and was sent from a domain that you may privately use as a challenge and response to confirm that it really is me. Based on my other pictures contributed, it should be obvious that it's my picture.
Additionally I'd like a private message before I turn in a sock puppet and vandal. I have read all information so don't just give me a link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elite194 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: deletion of 
[edit].jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
Hi, I see you've deleted the above image on the grounds that it was tagged NC. I don't know if it was or not, but I think this is a bit harsh - considering it was taken at Wikimania, and that I was given no time to contact the photographer. (Was any attempt made by anyone else to contact her?) At the very least, could you provide me with the image AND the description, so I can find the original on Flickr? Cormaggio is learning 07:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've got in touch with the photographer, and will let you know if she agrees to do that. Cormaggio is learning 08:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Rockers ...
[edit]Rockers ... thanks.
I did not know what to do with it.
What the feck does some school kid from the Phillipines know about British subcultures of the 1960s, nevermind "Bodgies and Widgies" for God's sake, and why the hell is throwing his weight about on a grownups website!!!
Cheap foreign labour? --Triton Rocker (talk) 07:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
About me
[edit]You see, I had just come out of a long Wikibreak last week, and so I may still not be used to this kind of problems. Sorry for whatever I did, I'm doing my best to not to do anything wrong. I hope you will understand.
Hello Graeme Bartlett, Narutolovehinata5 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Picture Deletion
Hi Graeme
I take it I did something wrong with a pic I uploaded
Can you help?
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Steven1969/The_Silver_Star_Families_of_America
Steven1969 (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi there. SIO Mumbra has been tagged for a G11 speedy for just over 24 hours now. Given you made a note on the talk page, I just thought I'd ask whether you could deal with it as an admin. Thanks! -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 13:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Sine Waves
[edit]Hi Graeme Concerning the Mathematics of Sine Waves and the New Discovery about it.... There really is a lot of info so it was published on http://www.junkyardinnovations.com/ User m —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpanzou (talk • contribs) 13:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion of Infolona
[edit]Hi Grame, Im constantly improving my article to try to get it passed through the A7 Criteria. Im stating the website/company and founders importance. Please assist me to avoid future deletion. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanmayajain (talk • contribs) 06:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I made some changes to the article regarding infolona. How do i get a second opinion if you do not let me move it back to infolona. Can i move it back now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanmayajain (talk • contribs) 06:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
The user blanked the page, it's a standard g7. Why decline it? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Solvay Indupa
[edit]Is making caustic soda really an assertion of notability? It's not saying they invented it, it's saying they're one of many companies which manufacture it.
- A factory that can do the things they do is significant, so its a claim of importance. Ultimately the company may not be notable though. so use prod or AFD. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- It can manufacture sodium hydroxide? I never saw that appearing in WP:ORG. "assertion of notability" = something which may pass the relevant notability guideline. Ironholds (talk) 23:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is not just that it also has plenty of google hits including trade mags, and government sites, so it would pass WP:N. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Then put that as your argument, not something that doesn't appear in a single notability guideline. Having a valid argument for keeping a BLP, say, is good. Choosing to replace that argument with "has pretty hair" when declining a speedy is not. Ironholds (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- It is not just that it also has plenty of google hits including trade mags, and government sites, so it would pass WP:N. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- It can manufacture sodium hydroxide? I never saw that appearing in WP:ORG. "assertion of notability" = something which may pass the relevant notability guideline. Ironholds (talk) 23:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- An additional point; google hits is irrelevant for CSD. Why? Because CSD is based on whether or not the article indicates some basis for notability. Adding those valid and relevant google bits to the article and declining the speedy, fine. Declining the speedy based on something other than the content of the article is not. Ironholds (talk) 23:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- If the topic looks notable based on non article content then I may decline the speedy delete. In this case I thought content already was sufficient to keep that article, but there was more support outside too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Copyvio cleanup
[edit]Hi, could you please cleanup the copyvio from the history of this page ? First diff and the 3 versions which follow. Thanks--Kimdime (talk) 23:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- TXS!--Kimdime (talk) 13:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm not aware of any NFL team with those colors/logos, so the rationale for deletion seems sketchy. This looks like a shot from the stands of a high school game. The upload seems legit to me. — BQZip01 — talk 06:09, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well it was a duplicate of another file, which is still around at File:Carlsbad vs artesia 2.jpg. I did not delete that one. The upload was not in question. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ah. Thanks! — BQZip01 — talk 23:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Annotated on the deletion notes now. — BQZip01 — talk 02:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ah. Thanks! — BQZip01 — talk 23:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Can you please be specific on why you declined the SD tag, so I can learn and better tag articles. CTJF83 chat 18:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Two things: the article claimed this: "made a great impact upon the community of South Lake Tahoe" (though that seems to have changed in later editions) and it had 2 newspaper references already, so there was some sort of claim already. 2 newspapers comes close to the WP:N standard. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Card_Hub_logo.png)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Card_Hub_logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Messages
[edit]Please don't post them to my userpage, as you did here.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, It was totally unintentional. I must have been confused with which part of your signature to click, not that it is too complex! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oh! Hrm. I'll try and fix that. I was wondering how two people could have the same error.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Category moves
[edit]Hello. I got your message the other day about the college football season category deletions/moves that I nominated. You suggested that I update all the relevant articles with the new category before the old one is deleted, but User:Cydebot has made these necessary changes automatically; see 1881 Michigan Wolverines football team. I want to make more change to the college football season categories. Specifically, "College" needs to be removed from all seasons between 1906 and 1955 as it is redundant given IAAUS/NCAA in those category names. Plus, college shouldn't be capitalized there even if it wasn't redundant. Will User:Cydebot make similar updates for these categories as well? Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- They are all gone now anyway, thanks for answering! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Lohan, Lindsay AOL.jpg
[edit]If possible how do I get a free license for Image:Lohan, Lindsay AOL.jpg? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travismullins1996 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Smokey91820
[edit]reply on deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
The name of North-West Frontier Province was changed to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. I made the move but some mistake occurred and talk did not move. Can you please check and fix it. Thanks. AlphaGamma1991 (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted articles
[edit]Hi Graeme Bartlett,
I copied the text of the following articles from my website and some images taken by myself to Wikipedia in order to offer an added value to the community of the work I've done. Can you please re-activate both links? The corresponding links I added below.
Do you need any additional information? It is ok for me to have the work under the license Wikipedia uses.
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Heiliggeistkirche_(Munich)
http://www.danielnoha.de/categories/cm/heiliggeist.html
http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Trinity_Church_(Munich)
http://www.danielnoha.de/categories/cm/dreifaltigkeitskirche.html
Hope that helps. Best regards & don't hesitate to contact me. Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusselmann (talk • contribs) 05:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey ...
[edit]I don't immediately seen an SPI, and was wondering if you can comment here on the unblock request. Cheers. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Seasemeseads
[edit]I see you undid your block. You may be interested in WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx.—Kww(talk) 03:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Evolution Finance logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Evolution Finance logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Sticky prods
[edit]Hi. You participated earlier in the sticky prod workshop. The sticky prods are now in use, but there are still a few points of contention.
There are now a few proposals on the table to conclude the process.
I encourage your input, whatever it might be. Thanks. Maurreen (talk) 16:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Marilyn Clement
[edit]Hi. You might be interested to know that Marilyn Clement is up for AfD. You didn't get a note automatically as you were not the original author but you did expand it from a one line speedy deletion candidate to a short stub so I thought maybe you might want to comment on the AfD. BTW, The original author just got himself indefinitely blocked for being an obnoxious, POV pushing bozo so I guess it is "your article" now. ;-) --DanielRigal (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Image at Commons
[edit]The log on File:A004.jpg states that it is available at Commons, but I haven't been able to find it. Can you provide a link to me? bahamut0013wordsdeeds 00:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Great, thanks! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 00:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Bank talk pages
[edit]You're right, sometimes the history of blank talkpages has something relevant. For this reason I checked it. In my opinion the history of Talk:Sabae, Fukui did not contain anything relevant. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 06:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- It did have a photo request, and a removal, suggestion request satisfied. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 07:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion of Samsung YP-S3JAB/XAA
[edit]Can you please specify why this article is not worth for deletion.--Arshan abbas 06:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
ThanX a lot for clearing--Arshan abbas 07:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
WP:REFUND
[edit]Thanks for helping me out with the deleted articles. I would like to point out though that I was not contesting any PRODs. I asked to have them userfied. Dismas|(talk) 07:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! Dismas|(talk) 08:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Whoa
[edit]Whoops! (Oh by the way, hi!) Well I just userfied a familiar-looking "HOODYWOOD RECORDS" when I realized that
- you had already declined a similar request (at requests for undeletion).
- I had already declined a similar request
- and I had already closed a deletion discussion on it (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoodywood Records)
If you have any objections to the userfication, you have my full permission to undo it. Had I seen your request earlier I would have followed suit. Take good care, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- That is not a problem, as I offered to userfy it too. Now I know it is done. The user just asked why it was deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good! Sorry for creating all this ruckus. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for the message, and sorry for the mess, I don't know very much about these license things. I've re-uploaded the image under the ShareAlike 3.0 license, but the warning seems still present on the page... This image comes from a website, and the webmaster gave me permision by e-mail to port it on Wikipedia. If I made a mistake, could you please help me and correct it ? I'd like to use this image for the René Guénon article. Thank you ! - TwoHorned User_talk:TwoHorned 22:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
