User talk:GenQuest/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions with User:GenQuest. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Books & Bytes – Issue 29
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
- New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
- Wikimania
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Flag of Australia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Flag of Australia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Merge CAF Confederation Cup and CAF Cup
Hi, i will proceed with the merge of the two articles as discussed here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:CAF_Confederation_Cup
Regards, Experio2018 (talk) 11:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2016 in aviation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 in aviation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
The CAF confederation cup and the CAF cup are two different competitions
Hi there. I don't think merging these two pages was the right move. CAF recognizes these two seperate tournaments and considers the Confederation cup to be a replacement of both the cup winners cup and the old CAF cup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paypayvay (talk • contribs) 15:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 30
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
- Library Card translation
- Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Change coming to how certain templates will appear on the mobile web
Hello, I wanted to share a follow-up to an RfC you participated in from late 2016/early 2017. It was regarding making certain warning templates visible on mobile. The Readers web team has been working to improve how these templates appear on the mobile website. I shared an announcement with communities today that covers what is happening. If you have any interest, I encourage your support in giving feedback on the project page or helping update templates of this nature with some of our recommendations.
Thank you, CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 20:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, GenQuest. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2018 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December 2018 GOCE newsletter. Here is what's been happening since the August edition. Thanks to everyone who participated in the August blitz (results), which focused on Requests and the oldest backlog month. Of the twenty editors who signed up, eleven editors recorded 37 copy edits. For the September drive (results), of the twenty-three people who signed up, nineteen editors completed 294 copy edits. Our October blitz (results) focused on Requests, geography, and food and drink articles. Of the fourteen people who signed up, eleven recorded a total of 57 copy edits. For the November drive (results), twenty-two people signed up, and eighteen editors recorded 273 copy edits. This helped to bring the backlog to a six-month low of 825 articles. The December blitz will run for one week, from 16 to 22 December. Sign up now! Elections: Nominations for the Guild's coordinators for the first half of 2019 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations, so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 31
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
- OAWiki
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
GOCE 2018 Annual Report
Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report
Our 2018 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your project coordinators:
Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:CAF Confederation Cup#Merge with CAF Cup. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- What the hell you talking about, @Matthew hk:? Please explain yourself. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Special:Diff/810931526. Brio-En made a comment almost a decade ago before your thread on the possible merge, but did not express it was a vote, which you added the support wording for him, which is outside normal page formatting or unsign matter (even typo, usually are forbidden to correct for others). Special:Permalink/844111154. Right before your close, he use alternative account Brio to made another vote of support, thus, for such thread, you may ping the user, but not refactor the comment from just comment to clear vote, and it was a bad close i already talked about. Matthew hk (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- My bad. I was going through old merge requests and cleaning up. Pretty sure I read that one as 2018, not 2008. Those requests will sometimes sit for months, so April wasn't t0o far out of normal. Now, ten years is a different matter. :-) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- You added the comment in 2017, so not that possible to misread as 2018. Also, no sure about other project, but posting stuff in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Nominations for deletion and page moves, would usually generated enough discussion to close (either clear consensus of yes/no, or no consensus / clear stalemate and then cooled down thread), but that thread no one even noticed. Matthew hk (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not impossible, as that is exactly what I did. As a major contributor to the Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, I am often dealing with messages a upto a year or more old, and have to put them into an order that makes sense to the discussion. I just misread this one as it was already under a Merge sub-header. Sorry again. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
- You added the comment in 2017, so not that possible to misread as 2018. Also, no sure about other project, but posting stuff in Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Nominations for deletion and page moves, would usually generated enough discussion to close (either clear consensus of yes/no, or no consensus / clear stalemate and then cooled down thread), but that thread no one even noticed. Matthew hk (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- My bad. I was going through old merge requests and cleaning up. Pretty sure I read that one as 2018, not 2008. Those requests will sometimes sit for months, so April wasn't t0o far out of normal. Now, ten years is a different matter. :-) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:56, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Special:Diff/810931526. Brio-En made a comment almost a decade ago before your thread on the possible merge, but did not express it was a vote, which you added the support wording for him, which is outside normal page formatting or unsign matter (even typo, usually are forbidden to correct for others). Special:Permalink/844111154. Right before your close, he use alternative account Brio to made another vote of support, thus, for such thread, you may ping the user, but not refactor the comment from just comment to clear vote, and it was a bad close i already talked about. Matthew hk (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Wayne Gacy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dupe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
I would have thought that as a member of Project Kindness and as a libertarian you would have allowed me a red link in the Hope Diamond as the way that I prepare for writing new articles. But that’s what I get for thinking, I get to be wrong. Carptrash (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Caleb Shomo
Why was I blocked from making Accurate changes to an article? I am sorry for wanting Wikipedia to be a more accurate environment, but I thought that was the point of the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darthsevere (talk • contribs) 19:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- You need to cite those kind of changes that you made to the band articles. Adding "...He is also Famously Related to the great Business man and ninja Joshua Severe of Ohio and his Son Tyler Severe (neurologist)..." is just plain vandalism, which will always red-flag your account for further scrutiny around here. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
I was about to delete, when I noticed has has been an MP, so notability is not an issue; promotionalism is, of course, but I rewrote it. Could you help keep track to see it is not restored? DGG ( talk ) 01:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- @DGG: Sure. I missed that addition. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
What are you doing??
Yes, there is a request that Az-Zeeb should be merged into Achziv, but editors have not showed a great enthusiasm for it. And then you go and unilaterally move it? Bad move, Huldra (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Huldra: Not liking the pointy question. I am working from the project merge que and following protocol. The discussion regarding this merge has been open since Aug of 2017. The two articles describe the same place—pretty much a no brainer where the merge requests are concerned. The only reason it has not been done so far is due to the complexity of the merge. If you didn't want the merger to happen, then YOU should should have voiced your concern on the article talk page AND gathered consensus there to remove the merge from the que so the Merge Project members are not wasting hours on a Saturday morning working on a difficult merge only to have it arbitrarily reverted. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry that I came across "pointy", but to me this is a no-brainer: if you look at Az-Zeeb, you will see that for "current locations" we have Gesher HaZiv Sa'ar...in addition to Achziv. So how can we merge 1 article into 3? Answer: we cannot. Yeah, I should have done more to end the merge talk, but that got lost among the 7000+ articles I have on my watch list, Huldra (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Reversion of merge proposal
I reverted your merge proposal on List of named storms (Z) as no discussion was created for it. Please understand that this is an SIA article that is solely for the purpose of navigation. I am splitting the list of U-Z up to make it easier for users to find storms. It works better having the storm names larger and separated by horizontal lines (level 2) than smaller and without any lines (level 3). If you still want to merge the article, please create a discussion. NoahTalk 20:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Century
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Century. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring at Lori Loughlin
I don't know if you're trying to make a WP:POINT, but you must stop edit warring on the article Lori Loughlin. Please take a look at Template:Infobox person to see how to handle presentation of children in the infobox. Your next revert will be reported. GoLatvia (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- You will notice that I actually backed off after my second revert, you did not, and it is you who did not respect 3RR. You should probably read that guide. It seems that you are the only one trying to make a Point, as I really don't care; I was just trying to make the article better following what has become standard practice, and moved on. Apparently you can't, but it's all good on my end. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:21, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Glad it's all good. I just went by the instructions in the template along with how it's implemented in Wikipedia (as I showed examples in this edit summary). Sorry if I appeared to act as if I own the article. 22:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoLatvia (talk • contribs)
- Cool. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Glad it's all good. I just went by the instructions in the template along with how it's implemented in Wikipedia (as I showed examples in this edit summary). Sorry if I appeared to act as if I own the article. 22:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoLatvia (talk • contribs)
March GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48 requests for copyedit in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles. March Drive: The month-long March drive is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here! Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fascism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fascism. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Mergers
Thanks for carrying these out – I keep track of new requests and tag them, but I never know whether I should act on them or leave it to the proposer or interested parties.
One thing though: I think you've slipped up when merging G. M. C. Balayogi Athletic Stadium... you've left the article without a talk page, because the talk page now also redirects to the main article. Richard3120 (talk) 15:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- You're welcome @Richard3120: Acting quickly on the low-hanging fruit is a direct way to reduce the backlog, so I go for it always in that situation. Only occasionally am reverted, but at least that, too, is an answer regarding if the merge should proceed. I knock out the rest when I can, but try to encourage the proposers and debate attendees to do the tougher ones, but you know how that goes. I stay away from most of the ones in which I have participated in the discussions, however.
- I realize the problem with that article. Somehow, when doing the move without redirect, the drop-down menu changed to "Talk" from "Article". (Fat fingers on my part I suspect.) I didn't catch it til after I had created the new article. So now I'll have to transclude it or fix some other way. I'll figure something out. Thanks for the input, and the help on merging, by the way. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 12:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Assamese people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assamese people. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/China and Chinese-related articles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/China and Chinese-related articles. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Merge template code issue
Hi, GenQuest. Please see User talk:GenQuest/Merge regarding a coding issue with the cut-paste merge templates there. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Done Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me"
Please comment on Talk:Anti-German sentiment
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anti-German sentiment. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 23
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 23. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Athens Polytechnic uprising
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Athens Polytechnic uprising. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Proposed article splits
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 77.173.90.33 (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Missing content
I see you did an edit
User experience design (edit)Revision as of 18:17, 2019 April 121,659 BYTES ADDED, 1 MONTH AGO
COMPLETE THE MERGE
But it ends mid sentence. WesT (talk) 03:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure; which one? GenQuest "Talk to Me"
Please comment on Talk:List of French marquisates
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of French marquisates. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!73.32.38.72 (talk) 21:31, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of airliner shootdown incidents
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of airliner shootdown incidents. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Tal's Hill Merger Proposal
I'm so sorry to bother you with this, but Robert McClenon has said that we must have another merger proposal discussion on merging Tal's Hill into Minute Maid Park, so if you don't mind, could you please weigh in on the new discussion as to where you support or oppose such a merger? 2600:1700:D6E0:65E0:8400:D781:3985:AB45 (talk) 12:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
GOCE June newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2019. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 16 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: Our June blitz will soon be upon us; it will begin at 00:01 on 16 June (UTC) and will close at 23:59 on 22 June (UTC). The themes are "nature and the environment" and all requests. March Drive: Thanks to everyone for their work in March's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from 182 of the articles tagged in our original target months October and November 2018, and the month finished with 64 target articles remaining from November and 811 in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 22 requests for copyedit in March; the month ended with 34 requests pending. Of the 32 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the April Blitz; the blitz ran from 14 to 20 April (UTC) inclusive and the themes were Sports and Entertainment. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 04:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 267 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 605 articles. May Drive: During the May Backlog Elimination Drive, Guild copy-editors removed copyedit tags from 191 of the 192 articles tagged in our original target months of November and December 2018, and January 2019 was added on 22 May. We finished the month with 81 target articles remaining and a record low of 598 articles in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 24 requests for copyedit during the May drive, and the month ended with 35 requests pending. Of the 26 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Populism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Populism. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Copy Edit
Hello, GenQuest. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Copernican heliocentrism at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Orville1974 (talk) 20:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC) |
Please comment on Talk:Schoharie limousine crash
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Schoharie limousine crash. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:EOKA
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:EOKA. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Request at BCW (Burson Cohn & Wolfe)
Hi, GenQuest. In May, you merged the Burson-Marsteller and Cohn & Wolfe articles and moved the combined article to Burson Cohn & Wolfe. If time allows, can you consider my request to add a new infobox for the combined company to the article? As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance from others. Thank you. BCW Editor (talk) 18:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- I will gladly help with this. Give me a couple of days, currently traveling for business. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! Let me know if you have questions. BCW Editor (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bulgaria
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bulgaria. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Lindy hop today
Would you be willing to merge Lindy hop today with Lindy hop?
Vmavanti (talk) 02:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- Certainly, if consensus has been reached on the merge request. I haven't been on much lately, as I am traveling daily for business. I'll check it out as soon as I can free up some time. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 09:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you very much for merging Appakudal and Aapakudal! I saw only now your request of the translation of my talk on the dutch Wikipedia. I am sorry that I didn't saw it until now. It was the end of the schoolyear, you know, with much tests and exams. So I wasn't much on the dutch Wikipedia, and I was totally not on the english Wikipedia. Thankfully you did it without the translation. Thank you very much! Wikidrinker (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- You're quite welcome. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 11:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Max Blumenthal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Max Blumenthal. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Alt-right
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alt-right. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Constantinople
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Constantinople. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:NYC Pride March
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:NYC Pride March. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Great Famine of 1876–1878
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Great Famine of 1876–1878. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Reverted edit: book title and Roman legion nickname in "Vespasian" article (plus, non-working "Talk" link in your signature)
Your signature's link that is meant to lead to the Talk section of your User page does not function, when I click on it. This may be a failure in the operation of my browser, or otherwise be some other malfunction of my computer hardware or software. Nonetheless, it is not working for me, and so I share this information with you.
You have reverted my recent edit on the "Vespasian" article. My edit was the italicization of the nickname of a Roman legion, and the italicization of a book title.
Both of my edits conform to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, and are consistent with other usages in Wikipedia, of the same words.
The formula of Roman legion nickname italicization is clearly defined, and my edit changed the original text to match this formula (a formula which is followed properly in at least two other places in this same article, and is followed dozens of times in the specific article on the Legio X Fretensis).
My italicization of the book title is not only consistent with the Wikipedia italicization of that same book's title in other articles (as one may see, by looking its own specific article, The Twelve Caesars), it was also consistent with the usage we see in at least one other place, in the same "Vespasian" article. If your concern is that the original source of the material in that particular block quote does not italicize the title of this book, then I would reply that my change resulted in the text conforming to Wikipedia guidelines (that is, when the source of the material in a Wikipedia article block quote is written following that excerpt, the title of the work is given a style which conforms to the Wikipedia Manual of Style, regardless of how it was formatted in the original source; and to say the same thing again, perhaps more clearly, if the original source of this quote from The Twelve Caesars does not italicize the title The Twelve Caesars then we disregard that original source's style, its lack of italicization, for the sake of applying the Wikipedia standard).
So, after reviewing what I had done, I still do not understand your reasoning, for reverting my edits. Please explain why my contributions were errors. catsmoke (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Catsmoke: Sorry, it took so long to get back to you. I reverted the italicization of the Roman nickname due to Manual of Style (MoS) guidelines regarding undue emphasis using italics. The reversal of your book title italicization, unfortunately, got caught in the process and just went along for the ride. Apologies for that – I will revert.
- § Just as an explanation, the "style" of putting undue emphasis and italicizing Roman Legion nicknames was begun several years back by an editor who was banned from Wikipedia for that and similar behaviors. It was pretty much his idea to create that style, and armed with a gang of wp:sock puppets, this editor wrecked havoc on many articles, thus the banning. Unfortunately, some of these unilateral changes have taken on a life of their own—much like the proliferation of flag icons in infoboxes—and repeatedly and periodically get re-inserted into articles. Respectfully, I am not sure where this "formula" would be "clearly defined" anywhere else than the MoS, but if you can point me to different, updated information in regards to this, I would be glad to react accordingly. They are changing things around here all the time, and it's quite possible I have missed such a change. Please let me know. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:18, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- ps:If you think that it is a style worth preserving, you can bring it up at the talk page of the MoS links I provided above, and it may be discussed there and possibly changed by consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
- Thank you very much, for your complete reply. It would delight me to know the name of that renegade past-editor, to have a link to some forensic examination of his aberrant editing, or to have a link to a record of the process by which he paid the price.
- My alleged formula for italicizing Roman legion nicknames is not found in the Wikipedia Manual of Style. I was in error when I said that my edit had been a change from non-conformity into conformity. I was mistaken about there being such a formula, and I apologize for presenting this misleading idea. My notion was born of having encountered that italicization pattern in dozens of Wikipedia articles. To deceive you was not my intent. (This style of italicizing the nickname of a Roman legion does aid my comprehension of a text. Its effectiveness was one of the things that led me to be so quickly convinced of the style's authenticity.)
- On Wikipedia, our need to avoid undue emphasis rarely clashes with our need to apply italicization. (In practice, mandated italicization is neglected far more often here, than prohibited italicization is applied.) Italics do, indeed, sometimes emphasize words in print, but italics are also used for many other purposes. In the case of Roman legion nicknames, the italics do not denote emphasis, but instead they denote context (just as when they are used for book titles). Thus, although such a usage does violate the Wikipedia prohibition of novel typographical styles, it would not violate the Wikipedia prohibition of undue emphasis.
- You have edified me, by reporting on the faulty Wikipedian practice of italicizing Roman legion nicknames; by leading me to correct an improper habit that had tainted my editing; and by re-examining your reversion of my edit and agreeing that the edit's stronger part was a worthy contribution to this encyclopedia.
- I wish you the best, now and always, and I am at your service. catsmoke (talk) 02:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Valrico, Florida
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Valrico, Florida. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Ricky Nelson’s death in a plane-crash
Must disagree about removing the middle para. It makes it sound like a straightforward accident. People need to know that there were unusual aspects to the tragedy. Valetude (talk) 22:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'm OK with that, @Valetude: I'm fine either way. Just thought it a bit redundant to have that information in the main death article where details of that particular event are more primary-tier and the Ricky Nelson article too, where that info is more of an auxiliary, or secondary-tier, level. Trying to avoid the inevitable future suggestion by someone that the articles be merged, which is likely if there is too much overlap. Feel free to add back, though. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Machiavellianism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Machiavellianism. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019. June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated! June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585. Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent. September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kate Dover
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kate Dover. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Trouted
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Hi GenQuest. I think this revert is worthy of a trout. Did you happen to review this wikilink within my edit summary in detail? By reverting, Stanstead, Quebec is now the only municipality of ~3,500 across Canada that does not have its article in its proper municipal status category tree, nested within the overall national/provincial/territorial "Municipalities in..." category tree. I don't think Rich Farmbrough et al led me astray five years ago. I implemented this across Canada shortly thereafter receiving confirmation from three other editors, but postponed implementing for municipalities in Quebec due to volume (as it had ~31% of the country's municipalities) and then did not remember to swing back until now. Reconsider? Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 01:12, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sure @Hwy43: That would be fine. Like I said, I don't do much with the categories anymore, the policy inconsistencies with them have driven me away from that kind of work on Wikipedia. Carry on, my friend; carry on. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. Hwy43 (talk) 03:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:History of Christianity
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:History of Christianity. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Request for feedback on cell ag company draft?
Hello @GenQuest: I found you on the talk page for Cultured Meat. I'm working on a draft article about a company considered tangential to the cultured meat "space." I noticed that you're experienced at creating articles, and wondered if you'd be willing and able to provide feedback on my draft, here: Draft:Perfect Day (company).
I have disclosed a COI regarding the draft in keeping with Wikipedia's policy. While I've tried to use language that is as neutral as possible, the first submission was rejected for a WP:NOTADVERT issue. I've discussed it with the reviewer at their talk page and gotten feedback from one other person. The draft has since been edited slightly, but I'd still like to get others' perspectives on it before resubmitting. It's possible I'm too close to the subject, and feel I would do better to rely on unbiased opinions rather than guessing at what should be changed. Are you able to help? As a prolific article creator, I figured you'd be able to offer useful insight. Thanks in advance. BlackMaus (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- @GenQuest: Just wanted to pop back here to say thanks for taking a look and making changes at Draft:Perfect Day (company). It's now been resubmitted and is awaiting review (I didn't resubmit, though I'd planned to - in any case, I'm grateful to whomever did). Your contributions are much appreciated! BlackMaus (talk) 20:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Request at Burson Cohn & Wolfe
Hi, GenQuest. I'm following up on my request at Burson Cohn & Wolfe, which you kindly helped merge back in May. To help complete the merge, I updated my request with a draft to show exactly what I had in mind. If this looks appropriate, would you mind making the changes? If it's a lot to manage, I would be open to making the changes so long as neither you nor editor Darx9url have any objections and you both have had a chance to review. Ideally, I want to keep my contributions to Talk pages because of my conflict of interest, but I also know this is a big request. Would you mind looking here? BCW Editor (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, User:GenQuest! I have a final request to complete the merge at Burson Cohn & Wolfe. Following this request, the article should be much more clear. Thanks again for merging the articles and helping clean up the article so far! As an employee of BCW, I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which is why I'm requesting assistance from others. BCW Editor (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Manzanar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Manzanar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
Mole Day!
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Mole Day on the behalf of WikiProject Science.
|
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:International Brigades
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International Brigades. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Gobekli Tepe
Hello. Thanks for all of your hard work on Wikipedia.
I tried to add a definition (alternate translation) for Gobekli Tepe. I wasn't sure what the word portbelly implied, and I saw that "hill of the navel" was a common translation.
I got my etymology from the wictionary entry on the Turkish word, Göbek. Is it customary to link to etymologies of words back to the wictionary?
Anyways, I do not think it is an original translation or interpretation, but a legitimate etymology of a term in current usage.
I would appreciate any advice on how to proceed. I am not attached to the phrase "Hill of the Navel" but I had to look up the meaning of the word "potbelly", and some further clarification on the origin of the Turkish word would definitely be helpful to me, and possibly to others.
Thanks in advance, Nate
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nateguimondart (talk • contribs) 19:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Map projection
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Map projection. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
CN on The Colony (restaurant)
Hi, I added a cn template to The Colony (restaurant) for the mention of a Pamela Berkin. Berkin is not mentioned in the source given for this paragraph. She was added by a one-edit anon. Web search finds a Pamela Berkin who is the wife of a Mark Antil, a New York writer, and not much else. In particular, no mention of the Colony. Neither husband nor wife has a WP article.
So all in all, we have an addition
- by a one-edit anon
- with no source
- with a misleading footnote
- about a person with unestablished notability
- with no evidence supporting it in Web search
So I don't understand why you reverted my addition of "cn". --Macrakis (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oops, I now see you removed Birkin entirely. So we agree. Sorry. --Macrakis (talk) 10:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of nicknames of presidents of the United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of nicknames of presidents of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:EOKA
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:EOKA. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islands
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islands. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
GOCE December 2019 Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2019 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December 2019 GOCE newsletter, an update of Guild happenings since the September edition. Our Annual Report should be ready in late January. Election time: Nominations for the election of a new tranche of Guild coordinators to serve for the first half of 2020 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself! September Drive: Of the thirty-two editors who signed up, twenty-three editors copy edited at least one article; they completed 39 requests and removed 138 articles from the backlog, bringing the backlog to a low of 519 articles. October Blitz: This event ran from 13 to 19 October, with themes of science, technology and transport articles tagged for copy edit, and Requests. Sixteen editors helped remove 29 articles from the backlog and completed 23 requests. November Drive: Of the twenty-eight editors who signed up for this event, twenty editors completed at least one copy edit; they completed 29 requests and removed 133 articles from the backlog. Our December Blitz will run from 15 to 21 December. Sign up now! Progress report: From September to November 2019, GOCE copy editors processed 154 requests. Over the same period, the backlog of articles tagged for copy editing was reduced by 41% to an all-time low of 479 articles. Request archiving: The archiving of completed requests has now been automated. Thanks to Zhuyifei1999 and Bobbychan193, YiFeiBot is now archiving the Requests page. Archiving occurs around 24 hours after a user's signature and one of the templates {{Done}}, {{Withdrawn}} or {{Declined}} are placed below the request. The bot uses the Guild's standard "purpose codes" to determine the way it should archive each request so it's important to use the correct codes and templates. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Okamoto syndrome
Just in case you didn't know, those "commented out writer-guides" are put on most medicine articles by Doc James, such as Down syndrome, lung cancer, cystic fibrosis, etc. Any reason why they were removed? SUM1 (talk) 15:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- per MoS. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- In my opinion they are useful...Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @SUM1: @Doc James: Guys, if that is standard practice on the medical articles, I do apologize for any misunderstanding. I was going by MoS, which discourages the practice. I pretty much always kill them on sight. I can see where comment guides would be helpful while actually writing the article, much as the new article/draft templates are, but really don't see a need past that. If you want to re-instate, however, per IAR, I won't push back on it. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- It's no big deal, I'll probably only re-add them if they become necessary. It's not a major article anyway. SUM1 (talk) 20:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- @SUM1: @Doc James: Guys, if that is standard practice on the medical articles, I do apologize for any misunderstanding. I was going by MoS, which discourages the practice. I pretty much always kill them on sight. I can see where comment guides would be helpful while actually writing the article, much as the new article/draft templates are, but really don't see a need past that. If you want to re-instate, however, per IAR, I won't push back on it. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- In my opinion they are useful...Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Message from Project North Carolina
Hello Fellow North Carolina user,
I have reorganized and updated the content for the Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina. I hope it is useful to improving collaboration.
Please comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Polish–Ukrainian War. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)