This is an archive of past discussions with Felipe Menegaz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I had forgotten this, so I does not search. As my time is short and I'm involved in other matters, I can not do the research right now. Reegards; Felipe( talk )15:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will be happy to give the article a review. I'll give it a first pass tomorrow before I head out of town for the weekend. One thing that does immediately jump out is that you've probably over-cited the article. For instance, there is no need to use four citations for a statement as simple as "The BOC's President, Carlos Arthur Nuzman, and then mayor of Rio de Janeiro, César Maia, approved the choice, making Rio de Janeiro the Brazilian postulant city to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics." That isn't a criteria against a GA nom, so I won't worry about it in a review, but I do find that all of the citation numbers detract from the readability a little. Anyway, I'll mark myself as reviewing, and will have my thoughts for you tomorrow. Cheers, Resolute21:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed the article, and left my comments here. Only some very minor concerns at this point, and I expect I will be passing it next week. Regards, Resolute15:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I personally would remove them, but at the same time, it isn't something that I'll worry too much about when I do my second review... I will try to do that tonight, as I really only have the time right now (at work) to monitor for vandalism. Resolute16:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! As far as a FA nom goes, I'd say to hold off until after the host city is selected. There may well be concern about the stability of this article given how close the vote is. Personally, I would pare down the citations a bit as well. As mentioned above, three or four citations for a simple statement breaks the text and hampers readability. That would be an issue for some reviewiers at FAC. Tony1 has several good self use guides for prose quality, and a peer review might be of assistance - though in my experience good PRs are hard to find. The biggest challenge you will face is the technical quality of the prose, and given that is one of my weaknesses, I can't help you much there. Good luck! Resolute00:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please help update St. Peter and Paul Rocks and Fernando de Noronha
Hi, I see that you are involved with WP Brazil, and I've asked a few members if could you help in cleaning up the red-links and missing citations in these 2 articles? Your help in translating the references is needed, and due to recent events, these articles are very important. Thanks much! --Funandtrvl (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for File:Felipe Menegaz.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Felipe Menegaz.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
The article now contains one sentence regarding the match's action: Despite being two goals down at half-time, Brazil won the match 3–2, with Lúcio scoring the winning goal six minutes from full-time.
Hi Felipe! I would like your opinion on two articles that I am currently watching: Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago and Pedro II. On the first, there is a user who is insisting in renaming the article to Saint Peter and Saint Paul rocks, even though the official sources (i.e. the Brazilian Government and the Brazilian Navy) name it an archipelago (note: after 1998 when it started to be permanently occupied the Brazilian Government changed the name from "Penedos de São Pedro e São Paulo" to "Arquipélago de São Pedro e São Paulo").
The second article has to do mainly with the infobox picture of Emperor Pedro II. The User:Lecen has literally taken ownership of the article (he has made great improvements though), and won't allow anyone to change it. Regarding the picture, it is a low quality image depicting the Emperor in normal civilian clothing. There are many pictures of Pedro II in regalia or uniform, in higher quality, and more suitable for a Monarch.
P.S.: I have 'stolen' your old signature (the one with the Brazilian flag), since you don't seem to be using it anymore. ;) Hope that's ok. Limongi (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Felipe Menegaz. You have new messages at Limongi's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
x 2
Talkback
Hello, Felipe Menegaz. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yes, that change would help this article become a list. Though I would say that as a list of all bidding cities, I'd prefer to see the scope changed to reflect that it discusses all bidding cities as well. Cheers, 1 Resolute17:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given the backlog at GAN, if I review more articles, I will probably start with ones that have been waiting longest. Perhaps once I am finished with an article I am working to take to FAC, I will pick up more GA reviews, but it may be a little while. cheers, Resolute03:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1965).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1966).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1969).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1975).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1985).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (2000).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (2005).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (2005).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari05:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I was sleepy, hurried, and didn't read closely. (I may have to forfeit my proofreader's license.) So, the thank you still stands, and I wish you good luck at FLC. Finetooth (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}