Jump to content

User talk:Excellenc1/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

May 2020

Hello, I'm Mr.Sarcastic. I noticed that in this edit to Bandbudh Aur Budbak, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry for that. I shall make sure about your point. Thank you. Excellenc1 (talk) 14:46, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Excellenc1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chirayinkeezhu did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Dl2000 (talk) 19:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Actually I am new in Wikipedia and all what I know is adding content, editing grammatical errors and links. Thank you for your guidance. Excellenc1 (talk) 11:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Who blocked me?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks for this information. Excellenc1 (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:David Tyrrell (physician).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:David Tyrrell (physician).jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 05:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

How do I find the copyright status of an image? Excellenc1 (talk) 05:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)


Suppressed edits

Hi, Excellenc1, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! PhilKnight (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Philknight for editing my page so as to hide the personal information. I won't re-add them. Excellenc1 (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew Lapuka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrew Lapuka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I have contested the nomination. Please see Talk:Andrew Lapuka. My article is not deleted yet even after your speedy deletion notice. What do I understand by this? Excellenc1 (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing to 'understand by this'. The speedy request stays up there until (whichever comes first): someone (other than you) removes it; or an administrator comes along and either agrees with it, in which case they delete the article; or the admin disagrees with it, removes the tag, and takes whatever other steps they see fit. That's all there is to it. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garden City of Suresnes has been accepted

Garden City of Suresnes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you User:Theroadislong for the approval of my article. Excellenc1 (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 Tour de Corse has been accepted

2005 Tour de Corse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Excellenc1/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 11:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Île des Impressionnistes has been accepted

Île des Impressionnistes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graphic charter of government communication in France has been accepted

Graphic charter of government communication in France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tour Carbonnière has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tour Carbonnière. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:32, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tour Carbonnière has been accepted

Tour Carbonnière, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Theroadislong for the submission of the article. Excellenc1 (talk) 07:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Étrabonne Castle has been accepted

Étrabonne Castle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 10:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you KylieTastic for the submission of my draft. Excellenc1 (talk) 10:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ave María, Málaga has been accepted

Ave María, Málaga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tabacalera (disambiguation) has been accepted

Tabacalera (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Section for query

Hi and thanks for suggesting to add a section for my query, how and where can I do that? Goldstriker (talk) 05:54, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@Goldstriker: When you open the Teahouse, the top part of the Teahouse contains a template with has a blue button with "Ask A Question" written in it. Click the button. Put your heading in the 'Subject/Headline' section and below that, put your query. Hope I could help you :). Excellenc1 (talk) 06:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Help in editing artcles

Hello Excellenc1! I am Stobene45 and I require your help in editing some of the articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stobene45 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

@Stobene45:Welcome to my talk page. You would like to refer these articles on getting started, help pages, tutorial and general queries. You may seek guidance by asking questions in the Teahouse. Thank you! Excellenc1 (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

@Excellenc1: Thank you Excellenc1 for help, I will surely work upon it.

Personal details

Please read "The most useful piece of advice", near the top of WP:YOUNG, and please take it seriously. -- Hoary (talk) 05:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

@Hoary: But my userpage does not contain my real name, age, location (except country) and IP address. If you please let me know where have I given such info I'll do the needful. (Maybe you're talking about school's name being shown, I'll remove it.) Thank you! Excellenc1 (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Edit: Sorry I didn't notice that you had taken down the info, I thought it was me who did it. Excellenc1 (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Older versions that were still visible did provide your real name (or something looking like it); the version that was current two hours ago gave other personal information. Perhaps you are recommending the editing of Wikipedia to some of your friends. If so, thank you -- but please encourage them, too, to read WP:YOUNG. -- Hoary (talk) 07:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maxilly-sur-Saône, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint-Sauveur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

@DPL bot: I had actually source edited that, and later forgot to check the mistake, I'll surely look after it next time. Thank you! Excellenc1 (talk) 08:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tati (enterprise) has been accepted

Tati (enterprise), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Good Burger (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eternal Shadow was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn’t seem to pass WP:NCORP at the moment. Please add more references to reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eternal Shadow Talk 18:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Excellenc1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eternal Shadow Talk 18:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Lataste has been accepted

Thierry Lataste, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Can you please resend the link from which I can learn to add citations. Thank you Stobene45 (talk) 12:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

@Stobene45: This article might help you. Excellenc1📞 12:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Cap Écologie

Draft:Cap Écologie, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cap Écologie and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Cap Écologie during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 04:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

@Timtempleton: I actually wanted to delete the draft myself, I didn't know how to do that. Thank you for the MfD nomination. Excellenc1📞 04:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
I saw your deletion request and was trying to help, but screwed it up. It should be a speedy deletion user request, not an AfD. Hopefully it'll get straightened out. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 04:46, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cap Écologie (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Cap Écologie. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
@Calliopejen1: I actually wanted to delete the draft myself because an article by the same name existed. Thank you for doing the deletion. Excellenc1📞 04:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
I was pinged initially so @Calliopejen1: - it looks like the suggestion was to merge the info in the duplicate into the existing article, but the reviewer may not have seen your subsequent deletion request. Hopefully this will get straightened out. Sorry for my clumsy attempt to help. Time to go to bed.TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 04:44, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Timtempleton, I deleted a deletion request that someone created by accident. I didn't delete the draft (contrary to Excellenc1's message above). I declined the draft by suggesting that anything useful should be merged to the main article. I think everything is fine for now (?). Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
There is nothing important in my draft which can be merged to the original article. Sorry for mistaking between deletion and declining. Excellenc1📞 04:53, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
If you would like to delete your draft, you can edit it and replace everything with {{db-author}}. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
@Novem Linguae: I have added the template in the draft now, have I done it right? Excellenc1📞 11:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Yes, you did it perfect. The tag lets an admin know to delete it. In fact, an admin was very fast, they already deleted it :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Draft:La France Audacieuse

Hello friend. Thanks for your work on this draft. Please don't forget to tag them as translations by placing this on the talk page: 

{{Translated from|fr|La France audacieuse}}

. Hope that helps. Thanks again. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Novem Linguae Ok sure, thank you. Excellenc1📞 11:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: La France Audacieuse (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: La France Audacieuse has been accepted

La France Audacieuse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2004 Aquitaine regional election has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2004 Aquitaine regional election. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

I did not add inline citations because similar election articles like 2004 Île-de-France regional election, 2004 French regional elections, 2004 Auvergne regional election etc., have added the citation in external links section. Excellenc1📞 11:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Considering this comparison, would you please review and approve my draft? Excellenc1📞 12:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Aquitaine regional election (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 15:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
@Bkissin: I have added inline citations as per your suggestions in your talk page. Would you please take a look at the draft now? Excellenc1📞 15:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Upper Normandy regional election has been accepted

2004 Upper Normandy regional election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 16:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Aquitaine regional election has been accepted

2004 Aquitaine regional election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 16:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Results tables

Hello. Just to let you know, there is a template that allows easy creation of consistent results tables. I've formatted 2004 Upper Normandy regional election and 2004 Aquitaine regional election in this way. It automatically adds party colours and calculates percentages and totals for you (the latter helps spot mistakes in entering numbers as the total will be wrong if there is a transcription error). Cheers, Number 57 00:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

A couple of tips – remember to pipe the links of parties that have been renamed (in 2004 Picardy regional election you left the party name in the table as 'National Rally' instead of piping it to National Front). Also, try to make the code of the table a bit neater; this is what the Picardy one look like, making it very hard for other editors to edit, this is something like you should aim for. The issue might be using visual editor, so if you can use the normal editor (at least just for the table), that might help. Cheers, Number 57 20:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Number 57: As for tables in source edit, I did make it neater in my articles but for some reason, they change back to their original 'clustered' form. Excellenc1📞 03:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I'm guess it's because you're using visual editor. This sometimes causes issues with template coding. Cheers, Number 57 11:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

PS, I think you might have misunderstood what I meant about piping links. I meant using code like [[National Rally|National Front]] to link to the party on articles where you have to use its former name. Cheers, Number 57 07:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't realise the National Rally was its former name. I'll take care henceforth. Excellenc1📞 08:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
National Front was its former name. National Rally is the current name. Cheers, Number 57 10:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Picardy regional election has been accepted

2004 Picardy regional election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 17:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Languedoc-Roussillon regional election has been accepted

2004 Languedoc-Roussillon regional election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 17:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 Centre regional election has been accepted

2004 Centre regional election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regional Council of Île-de-France has been accepted

Regional Council of Île-de-France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Ain has been accepted

Departmental Council of Ain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Politics of Île-de-France has been accepted

Politics of Île-de-France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:51, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hélène Gassin has been accepted

Hélène Gassin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 15:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Calvados has been accepted

Departmental Council of Calvados, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Gard (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qwerfjkl were:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
―Qwerfjkltalk 07:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Lot (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qwerfjkl were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
―Qwerfjkltalk 10:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Gard has been accepted

Departmental Council of Gard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

―Qwerfjkltalk 12:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Lot (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ProClasher97 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No change since previous decline.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 14:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Lot (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AntanO 18:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Departmental Council of Lot has been accepted

Departmental Council of Lot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Good Burger (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 16:10, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Good Burger has been accepted

The Good Burger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Excellenc1/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 06:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Damien Alary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pompignan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

@DPL bot: I have fixed the issue. Excellenc1📞 06:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Departmental Council of Gironde

Hello, Excellenc1,

When you move a page from main space of the project to Draft space or User space, it's helpful if you tag the original page for speedy deletion (CSD R2). Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Ok sure, thank you. Excellenc1 (talk) 03:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Arturo Herbruger
added a link pointing to Guatemalan
Parish of Currandooly
added a link pointing to Murray County

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

DPL bot I have replaced the links. Excellenc1 (talk) 14:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Should I continue this draft?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Plant species taxoboxes

Hi, some points about creating taxoboxes for plant species using {{Speciesbox}}:

  • the required parameter is |taxon=; |name= is unnecessary unless different from the taxon name
  • {{Italic title}} isn't needed with {{Speciesbox}} (except in very, very special cases)
  • botanical authorities use the standard abbreviations given in the International Plant Names Index, which you will find at IPNI or at Plants of the World Online, for example; they do not include years, unlike zoological authorities.

As an example, have a look at Ceropegia anjanerica which I've fixed. Keep up the good work! Peter coxhead (talk) 08:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for translating fr:Hélène Gassin into English!

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Does this look bad?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to cite the plot?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is it ok if I answer queries even if I'm not a teahouse host?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Translation's title, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What should be the title?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Which part is the advert?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Does this article follow WP:NPOV?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I upload a non-free file (a movie poster) on Wikipedia?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can I use this image as 'fair use'?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Excellenc1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Will I be punished?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Query regarding Wikidata

I wanted to inquire about a notification. My article about the departmental council of aude has been connected to the wikidata item Q23782094 where data relevant to the topic can be collected. So can you put some light on this? thankyou Stobene45 (talk) 06:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Stobene45: Wikidata is a central storage for all the data in its sister projects. So the notification you received indicates that the article is now connected to Wikidata. If you visit departmental council of Aude (Q23782094), you can see all the relevant information related to that article. I hope this clears your query. Excellenc1 (talk) 07:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
@Excellenc1: yes it surely clears my query. thankyou. Stobene45 (Stobene45)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Excellenc1/Archive_1&oldid=1055509467"