This is an archive of past discussions with User:Eddie891. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Technical news
Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
Question from Anwar369sadat (07:47, 13 October 2023)
Hi, I want to create pages for some of living legends but they are not familiar with Wikipedia. to start this first I want to creat a page for myself, not a legend but want to understand the process. can you help and guide me how to do it --Anwar369sadat (talk) 07:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
if the subject does, I would begin by creating a draft through the articles for creation project. If you navigate to that link, there will be a blue button that says "Click here to start a new article". Click it! And you can create a draft page start writing your article, and submit it for review when it is 'done'.
For help with this, I would recommend reading this page, and looking at existing articles on similar topics to see how they are written. The Wikipedia Adventure is an interactive guide to the *basics* of editing, and if you have any further questions, feel free to ask them here or at the teahouse! There are a lot of friendly editors happy to help you out. You can also experiment with editing on the draft you create (in step 2) without any major repercussions, or at the sandbox. One of the best ways to learn how to edit is by doing it! We're here to help you through the inevitable mistakes
Hello Eddie891 (talk·contribs). I have an email set in my preferences but, if you’re like me, the familiar tools are easiest. You can send the scans outside WP to wiki@dants.ftml.net. It isn’t a secret but I’d rather not post it on the board. Thanks for your help. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 03:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
See discussion a couple sections above. When an established user asks in good faith I'm generally pretty amenable to reopening discussion. If it means consensus can be found quicker, it saves the broader site a lot of time/effort (as opposed to DRV). Eddie891TalkWork11:42, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Just saw that now. Don't know about the 'good faith' bit, but's it's your call. Thanks for the reply. Cheers - wolf14:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
I get what you're saying, and I obviously wouldn't have made the closure if I didn't think it was correct, but there's no harm in reopening. Eddie891TalkWork15:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of roles in the British Army
I mean, sure. I can't see how any consensus besides keep or no consensus could have been found, but happy to let someone else close. It's worth noting that several of the !keep voters felt the list met notability criteria, and others alluded to why they felt the list fulfilled a valid purpose to be a stand alone list. Just because you disagree with them doesn't mean they are inherently not policy based. However, happy to see what another closer thinks. Eddie891TalkWork02:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Pointing to MOS does not satisfy N. An inclusionist admin claiming that they "don't see there's a problem with it" is not a policy-based argument. Someone else saying "These articles are common" is not a reasoned argument, either. Only one person thought the subject passed NLIST and they are mistaken. The editing community expects better from a closing admin than counting !votes on an equal basis; a bot does that. I'm trying to work the NPP backlog which is the only reason I got involved in this. Chris Troutman (talk)13:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the NPP backlog, and I’m sorry to hear you’re disappointed. That is certainly never my aim. However, you’re also misrepresenting the nature of the !votes. Necrothesp in a subsequent comment explicitly stated what's relevant at AfD is the notability of the topic — this, to me, is a direct invocation of NLIST with the implication that they have considered and feel the article meets that, as are !voters who said ‘per X’. We are also not in the business of discounting comments based on whether someone is an inclusionist (or not) last I checked. If we were, I would have to ask whether your record means any delete comments should be discounted (it doesn't). Eddie891TalkWork14:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I started looking for free images before you had uploaded a fair use one. Yours was certainly better quality. --GRuban (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
@GRuban: That one you uploaded kind of looks like the same one from the bowl.com website, except lower quality - doesn't it? If it is, what is done in this situation? BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Louise Fulton headshot.jpg and https://bowl.com/usbc-hall-of-fame/hall-of-famers/louise-fulton ... it does look as if the first was cropped from the second, doesn't it? Well, if we knew for sure that second image was published in the US without copyright notice before 1978, it would also be public domain, and we should certainly use the better quality image. Honestly, if the newspaper image were even a complete copy, I'd use it; the newspapers.com scanner isn't the best we could wish for. But as is, there is some chance only the cropped version was published. Want to email bowl.com and ask them where their image came from? 90% chance they either won't answer or don't even know themselves ... but that does leave a 10% chance they'll say! https://bowl.com/usbc-hall-of-fame/information does say "If you have any questions in the meantime, please contact Dave Schroeder at dave.schroeder@bowl.com." so it's a real person which is somewhat encouraging. --GRuban (talk) 18:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
The project may meet the notability guidelines (such as WP:GNG) now, yes, though that is not a guarantee. You'd have to look at the coverage it has gotten. Eddie891TalkWork15:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 24 December 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2023. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello Eddie891:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
What a fine piece of work, again. I'm looking at it, hoping to aid with the FA. Here's something I can't easily tweak or explain in an edit summary--a few things that are connected. I think "controversial by some" can easily do without the "some", if I understand it correctly: there was plenty, right? Plus I think "controversial" is pretty black and white: it's there or it's not, though it can be major or minor. A bigger things, for me, is the quoted "homoerotic overtones", which is of course a modern evaluation since that language didn't really exist. In other words, I think it needs attribution, or the statement should be made in a different way. Does that make sense to you? Drmies (talk) 16:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Re: "culminating hour". I have to dig into the sourcing. Kaplan's citations don't include it (*angry face*) and Reynold's don't give enough context Eddie891TalkWork18:40, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Works for me! What a nice collection of articles you've been building. Ha, I'm on the other side, if you like; I've been working on Sidney Lanier, who was not as great a poet, but he was a fan of Leaves of Grass though he probably despised Whitman's classless ideas about democracy. Drmies (talk) 20:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
@Drmies: I found the source of the quote. Turns out it has been shortened and is from Whitman's friend John Johnston, who writes:
"Two hundred callers came and paid homage to "The Good Gray Poet," Walt afterwards told me it was "the culminating hour of his life,
Johnston doesn't even bother to close the quote, so it's hard to tell where his writing begins and ends, or even what's being quoted. I'm not sure what to do with this, but think I will remove it from the lead at the least. Need to think more about the best way to add context... Eddie891TalkWork21:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Shoot, I hope I'm not making you go through all the source material... I know how that feels. But thank you for your diligence. Drmies (talk) 21:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
@Drmies, no apologies at all! The source material needs digging, and your questions have led me to find a couple more mistakes in the scholarly record to put into the article. Eddie891TalkWork18:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia has strict guidelines against self-promotion or conflict of interest. I believe It’s generally discouraged to add information about own designs. However in terms of adding factual information to articles in Wikipedia, how do I add missing information to devices I've designed? Or do I inform others who could do this? Lefthandesign (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
@Lefthandesign, you are correct on your first point. The best thing to do would be to find reliable sources that discuss the missing information. Next, I would recommend post on the talk page of the article they want to change with your proposed changes and citations to reliable sources. You can then flag them with the {{edit COI}} template, or post a note at the COI noticeboard, so that they can be peer reviewed. Does that make sense/sound like what you're looking for? Happy to expand if you need clarification. Eddie891TalkWork00:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
Miscellaneous
The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. Your latest in particular was a model. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Hi, @Adammaurer, and thanks for your your work so far! If you feel a warning has been resolved, you can feel free to remove the warning. In this case, I went ahead and did it for you, in this edit. If you look at the revision in the edit, you can see how some of the sources you added were still in the format of bare urls- a form that is not is when you use a citation template like {{cite web}}. Basically, you want there to be more information (ie author, publication, date of publication) so that if the URL ever goes down, someone can access it again. Another tool you can use for fixing broken links is a site like archive.today or web.archive.org, which stores copies of webpages forever. So, for instance, I was able to access this source (which you had removed) at this link. See this edit for an example of how to cite that. Removing a source should only be done as a last resort. Best wishes, Eddie891TalkWork14:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, @Adammaurer, the formatting of that citation looks good! And your choice to change the phrasing is good. One point is the sentence you added to the article is super similar to the sentence of the citation ("David Braine was instrumental in helping the Hokies join the long sought-after Atlantic Coast Conference"). Because of copyright policies, Wikipedia has to be written in our own words. Can you think of any ways to rephrase this sentence? Eddie891TalkWork15:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Thanks for everything you do at WP:RX, and especially for your most recent valuable (and massive!) help there! ——Serial13:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
PS: I'm hanging on to the book until it's due (early December), so if you need any other pages or any pages re-scanned, just let me know. Eddie891TalkWork16:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Boulez
Hi there, you kindly made some comments on the Pierre Boulez page a while back. I've now nominated it for FA, if you happen to have time to stop by...Dmass (talk) 07:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Time to say thank you for improving article quality in November! - Vacation pictures offered if you click on songs, and my story today is a DYK hook from 13 years ago OTD: about the great music at one of my churches. Mozart's Requiem to come on Sunday, coupled with Arvo Pärt's Da pacem Domine, - I guess you might come if it was a bit closer. Perhaps watch the video of our last production, our first on yt, ever. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I'd be happy to. I've got a six-hour train ride up to WikiConference North America tomorrow, so will try to take a look at it then. Eddie891TalkWork14:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Not an issue. If I do another one of these individual game articles, I will give a lot of attention to the question of jargon. But right now I don't have a game in mind. Wehwalt (talk) 23:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Oh-rainworld-guy, good question! That would definitely be considered a major edit. You should only use the 'minor edit' button when making really small changes, such as fixing a typo or changing a couple words. Here's an example of such an edit, where the user removed 'has'. Compare that to the edit immediately before it, which added new information, and a reference, and was not marked as 'minor'. Hope that helps! Eddie891TalkWork14:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
Arbitration
Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
On 18 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article T. K. Jones, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that T. K. Jones thought that a nuclear war was survivable if "there are enough shovels to go around"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/T. K. Jones. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, T. K. Jones), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk·contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you today for the timely Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, introduced: "One of the most famous editorials of all time, I think this article is comprehensive and otherwise meets the FA criteria. A nice Christmastime theme, if nothing else."! - My wishes - with a timely DYK (sometimes it works) - in today's story, and more to come if you keep reading. Silent Night. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Question from Saurabhgarg01 (12:56, 24 December 2023)
Hi Eddie, Thank you for being my mentor. I would request you, if you can guide me the parameters to review while suggesting an edit. Once again thank you and looking forward forward to support you in all your endeavour. --Saurabhgarg01 (talk) 12:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Saurabhgarg01, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "suggesting an edit". There are many different forms and edit can take, from writing a new article to fixing a minor typo. Could you clarify what you are hoping to work on? Best, Eddie891TalkWork13:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
A solstice greeting
❄️Happy holidays!❄️
Hi Eddie! I'd like to wish you a splendid solstice season as we wrap up the year. Here is an artwork, made individually for you, to celebrate. It was great to meet you in Toronto! Take care, and thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia better!Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk
Solstice Celebration for Eddie891, 2023, DALL·E 3.
Hi Eddie, I'll plan to be active many years and am now a monthly donor after giving annually for several years. I've written a lot of refereed technical papers with refs, so I don't expect to have much trouble here.
But I do have a problem that I set up this new account today, but now I see MDNNM is also alive, with the same email address attached. Since that one has no content attached, can you kill that account and leave this one? I don't see a delete account feature available to me anywhere, so maybe I'm just missing it?
Hi @MarkDSF! It's great to hear that you plan to contribute more. There is unfortunately no way to delete an account once it has been registered, but you should be fine just not editing on the other one, and it will be left inactive. If you want, you can disable email on that other account. Does that help? Eddie891TalkWork16:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
yes, that's what I'll do. all this started when I saw you blocked all the TMUS IP addresses, and we are FWA customers of them on Wi-Fi. Since there are millions of such accounts, perhaps WP would consider sending out a general advisory on how to fix that problem, as I also had to delete and reinstall my phone app, to make it drop the blocked account MarkDSF (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 23
New year, new scripts. Welcome to the 23rd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering around 39% of our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. That’s right, we haven’t published in two years! Can you believe it? Did you miss us?
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
User:Alexander Davronov/HistoryHelper has now become stable with some bugfixes and features such as automatically highlighting potentially uncivil edit summaries and automatically pinging all the users selected.
To a lesser extent, the same goes for User:PrimeHunter/Search sort.js. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
Aaron Liu: Watchlyst Greybar Unsin is a rewrite of Ais's Watchlist Notifier with modern APIs and several new features such as not displaying watchlist items marked as seen (hence the name), not bolding diffs of unseen watchlist elements which doesn’t work properly anyways, displaying the rendered edit summary, proper display of log and creation actions and more links.
Alexis Jazz: Factotum is a spiritual successor to reply-link with a host of extra features like section adding, link rewriting, regular expressions and more.
User:Aveaoz/AutoMobileRedirect: This script will automatically redirect MobileFrontend (en.m.wikipedia) to normal Wikipedia. Unlike existing scripts, this one will actually check if your browser is mobile or not through its secret agent string, so you can stay logged in on mobile! Hooray screen estate!
Deputy is a first-of-its-kind copyright cleanup toolkit. It overrides the interface for Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations for easy case processing. It also includes the functionality of the following (also new) scripts:
User:Elominius/gadget/diff arrow keys allows navigation between diffs with the arrow keys. It also has a version that requires holding Ctrl with the arrow key.
Frequently link to Wikipedia on your websites yet find generating CC-BY credits to be such a hassle? Say no more! User:Luke10.27/attribute will automatically do it for ya and copy the credit to yer clipboard.
User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft, a spiritual successor (i.e. fork) to Evad37's script, with a few bugs solved, and a host of extra features like check-boxes for choosing draftification reasons, multi-contributor notification, and appropriate warnings based on last edit time.
/CopyCodeBlock: one of the most important operations for any scripter and script-user is to copy and paste. This script adds a copy button in the top right of every code block (not to be confused with <code>) that will, well, copy it to your clipboard!
m:User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/AceForLuaDebugConsole.js adds the Ace editor (a.k.a. the editor you see when editing JS, CSS and Lua on Wikimedia wikis) to the Lua debug console. "In my opinion, whoever designed it to be a plain <textarea> needs to seriously reconsider their decision."
GANReviewTool quickly and easily closes good article nominations.
ReviewStatus displays whether or not a mainspace page is marked as reviewed.
SpeciesHelper tries to add the correct speciesbox, category, taxonbar, and stub template to species articles.
User:Opencooper/svgReplace and Tol's fork replaces all rasterized SVGs with their original SVG codes for your loading pleasures. Tell us which one is better!
ArticleInfo displays page information at the top of the page, directly below the title.
/HeaderIcons takes away the Vector 2022 user dropdown and replaces it with all of the icons within, top level, right next to the Watchlist. One less click away! There's also an alternate version that uses text links instead of icons.
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email), Epicgenius (talk·contribs·email), and Frostly (talk·contribs·email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
Request to restore deleted article for Fsn (file manager)
You recently deleted this article because you determined that File System Navigator was not notable. I believe it is notable and should be restored. I say this because it appeared in Jurassic Park, and was a rare glimpse at real computer software in a very popular film. As such, it shaped countless viewers' perceptions of computing and "hacking". I realize that Notability_(software) does not list cultural impact as a reason for notability, but it does state that there may be exceptions, and I would suggest this qualifies. This article supports my claim of cultural impact. If this is not sufficient, I can find additional sources. Thanks for your consideration. 24.20.59.206 (talk) 23:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey IP, the (albeit loose) consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fsn (file manager) was that the program was not sufficiently notable for an article. What we'd really want to see to rebut that discussion is substantial coverage in reliable sources, which the WIRED article you linked is not-- are there, for instance, any articles that give in-depth consideration to the "cultural impact" of fsn? Eddie891TalkWork15:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi @George Ho, this does seem like it could change his notability. He would no be longer a BLP1E, so I'd imagine if he received significant coverage for both of the roles he'd be notable. Eddie891TalkWork20:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no overwhelming consensus, and I wouldn't object to a "no consensus" close, but there is clearly more support for delete than redirect, if anything is to be seen as a consensus. JBW (talk) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
@JBW it doesn’t make sense to consider !votes to delete or redirect as particularly different: they’re both !votes that consider the topic to not be notable for a stand alone article. There was only one !vote to keep, which imv was well countered by subsequent well-rationaled delete !votes and comment. I think there’s a clear consensus here against notability. However, none of the delete !voters convincingly established why deletion would be preferred to redirection, which at least two !voters explicitly advocated for, so I closed as redirect instead. Eddie891TalkWork12:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hucksters.net. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Foweirp (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Your comments on my FA nomination
Thanks. I was actually able to find some more about the geology of the area, which I am going to work on today. In general, is this the kind of thing where I ought to just withdraw the nomination and resubmit later when I've made the improvements, or what? jp×g🗯️20:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
@JPxG, it depends on how long you think you will take to make the changes. If it’s a few days, no point in withdrawing, but if more on the timeframe of weeks I would withdraw and renom later. If you’re thinking of making more substantive changes, a withdrawal might be more appropriate as well. Either way, please ping me when done, I look forward to giving a full review. Eddie891TalkWork22:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
Women in Red| February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Hi Eddie, a while back you were involved in the deletion of a page about the Letterheads. While not a formal organisation, this movement is an international phenomenon approaching its 50th year in 2025, and of significance within the sign painting and lettering community.
With one of the founders, we are trying to write a detailed history and overview of what the Letterheads are, and would like to include this on Wikipedia. There are various citations that we can provide to published materials, for example Signs of the Times in 1985, and more recently in my own print and online magazine.
As a newcomer here, I would like to know what the conventions are for reinstating a page in this manner, and what guidance you can offer in terms of how we prepare and structure our submission for the entry?
We can certainly demonstrate coverage in respected national and international trade and design press; my collaborator and I will gather this evidence together. Some of it is in the form of online articles, whereas some are saved PDFs and scans from print publications. Can we present those to you via dropbox or similar?
The particular challenge with this 'organisation' is that it is less an organisation, and more of a 'movement'. (MeToo and Black Lives Matter could be comparable 'movement'-based entries on Wikipedia, although the Letterheads is not directed towards social justice, rather at keeping the craft of sign painting alive through inter-generational sharing of knowledge and skills.)
Under the Letterheads banner, there have been hundreds of events hosted around the world over the last five decades, but there has never been a central organising committee or identified/nominated leader. It is what I describe as an 'anarchic organisation' and its existence is only maintained through the voluntary efforts of people around the world. While there are volunteer-run websites, none of these are 'official', and there is no formal means of 'joining' the Letterheads, other than saying you are one, and participating in an event.
I know this is quite an anomaly, and sits outside of traditional organisational structures, but I hope the above conveys some sense of what the 'organisation' consists of. We will continue to gather our evidence/references, but here are some links to get things started, each from respected secondary sources:
Yeah, that all makes sense. Since you have somewhat of a conflict of interest, if you decide to go ahead with writing the article, you should go about drafting the article as a draft through WP:AFC so editors can independently review it. The best option for pdf scans if you want me to look over them might be to send scans/links to me over email-- we want to respect copyright, so uploading a link that anyone can view might be a bad idea. Another thought: Does the organization get mentioned in any books about sign painting? Anyways, the old deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letterheads was where the consensus to delete was actually found-- but if, as you say, there is a lot of in-depth coverage of the movement, notability may still be found. Eddie891TalkWork01:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
OK, thank you, will try to navigate the draft approach. Does this mean starting a new article from scratch, or are we able to use the deleted entry as a basis for improvement? 37.135.83.95 (talk) 09:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm reluctant to restore the deleted entry, because there is no content there sourced to reliable independent sources. In my experience, it's easier to write new sourced content than trying to find sourcing for old content. But if you disagree, I could restore the article as a draft. Eddie891TalkWork12:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
OK, Monocle and Eye Magazine referenced above are both international publications, and we will have more when we compile our final body of evidence. Happy to work on a new draft, will try to figure out how to open it. Strebormas (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
I have gathered about 30 articles and some films and wondered if I could share them with you via email for an initial assessment of their validity in making the claim of notability for the Letterheads. I do this with a link to a dropbox or google drive according to your preference, but will obviously need your email address Strebormas (talk) 10:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
Technical news
Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
Arbitration
Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
Hi, @Drafter707, that is not really the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles are intended to provide independent sources of information on notable topics. You'd want to use a different website for what you're asking about. Let me know if I can help you with editing at all! Best, Eddie891TalkWork17:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
TFA for Walt Whitman's lectures on Abraham Lincoln
I think we talked about this one for April 14 at TFA? Anyway, I've got it listed on the calendar. No need to do anything. Let me know if there's anything I can do. - Dank (push to talk) 00:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, yeah April 14 sounds good to me! I will make some time to tweak things a bit, but I think this one should be roughly good to go. Eddie891TalkWork02:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 February newsletter
The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.
Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs), Epicgenius (talk·contribs), and Frostly (talk·contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
yes, that draft, it was deleted because of lack of news links I thought. It can be rewritten in a neutral tone if necessary. but it was written exactly how I saw other food banks and similar organization pages were Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.
The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:
Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.
Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for improving quality articles in February. - The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Thank you for taking care of his articles! - Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Too many die, but Rossini music helps. Listen to that mass if you have time, at least the beginning with the rhythm that stays ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 24th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 24 December 2021. Uh-huh, we're finally covering the good ones among the rest! Aren't you excited? Remember to include a link in double brackets to the script's .js page when you install the script, so that we can see who uses the script in WhatLinksHere! The ScriptInstaller gadget automatically does this. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Making user scripts load faster by SD0001 is this month's featured script, which caches userscripts every day to eliminate the overhead caused by force-downloading the newest version of scripts every time you open a Wikipedia page. Despite being released in April 2021, our best script scouters have failed to locate it due to its omission from the US of L. For security reasons, the script only supports loading JavaScript pages.
Newly maintained scripts
After earthly attempts at improving the original have failed...
Ahecht has created a fork of SiBr4/TemplateSearch, which adds the "TP:" shortcut for "Template:" in the search box, and updated it to be compatible with Vector 2022.
AquilaFasciata/goToTopFast is a much faster fork of the classic goToTop script that also adds compatibility for Minerva and Vector 2022.
Without caching. Each script takes 400–500ms. A particularly large script takes 1.11 s! Internet download speed is 50 Mbps.With caching enabled. Each script takes just 1-2 ms to load.
Improve a script
Unfortunately, this section has remained nearly identical. Help us out here!
To a lesser extent, the same goes for PrimeHunter/Search sort. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
Dragoniez/SuppressEnterInForm stops you from accidentally submitting anything due to pressing enter while in the smaller box, and works on almost anything... except the InputBox element itself, used in subscription lists and the Signpost Crossword! Oh, the humanity!
Doǵu/Adiutor(pictured) provides a nice, integrated interface to do some twinkley tasks such as copyvio detection, CSD tagging, and viewing the most recent diff.
Eejit43 has quite the aesthetically pleasing scripts, all made in TypeScript.
/afcrc-helper is a replacement for the unmaintained Enterprisey/AFCRHS and processes Redirects for Creation and Categories for Creation requests.
/ajax-undo stops the "undo" button from taking you to another page while providing a text box to provide a reason for the revert.
/redirect-helper(pictured) adds a much better interface for editing and redirects, including categorization, for which valid categories are dictated by /redirect-helper.json.
/rmtr-helper helps process technical requested moves without being able to actually move them.
Guycn2/UserInfoPopup(pictured) adds a flyout after the watchlist star on userspace pages that displays the common information you might use about a user.
Jeeputer/editCounter, under userspace, adds a portlet link to count your edits by namespace, put them in a table, and put that table in a hardcoded subpage, all in the background.
Hilst/Scripts/sectionLinks converts all section links to use the § sign, which are known to be preferred over the ugly # by 99% of the devils I've met.
PrimeHunter/Category source.js adds portlet links to tell you where a category for an article comes from and supports those from template transclusions.
Sophivorus's MiniEdit adds some nice, li'l buttons next to paragraphs to edit their wikitext with a minimal interface.
Edit-listings
Dragoniez/ToollinkTweaks adds more and customizable links next to users in page history, logs, watchlist, recent changes, etc.
Firefly/more-block-info optimizes the display of rangeblocks in contribution pages. Doesn't work outside the English locale of any wiki, unfortunately.
NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/AjaxLoader makes paging links (e.g. older 50, 500, newest) load without refreshing and makes you realize how slow your internet actually is.
Appearance-ricing
Ahecht/RedirectID adds the redirect target to all redirects. For all the WP:NAVPOPS haters. (Do these exist?)
Dragoniez/MarkBLockedGlobal: Remember the "strike blocked usernames" gadget? Now you can use a red, dotted line to highlight rangeblocks and global locks!
Jonesey/common(pictured) has some styles to overhaul your Vector 2022 experience. It reduces padding everywhere, and makes the top bar animation faster.
Aaron Liu/V22 is a fork that narrows the sidebars instead of upheaving them, reverts the January 2024 dropdown changes, and restores the old page-link color for links that don't go outside the current wiki.
Nardog: SmartDiff is a spiritual successor to Enterprisey/fancy-diffs. It makes the page title part of links in diffs clickable, along with template and parser function calls. Unnamed parameters can be configured per template to also be linked. All links are styled based on the normal CSS classes of rendered links.
For the paranoid: Rublov/anonymize replaces your username at the top of the screen with the generic "User page" text. Remember, it is your duty to persuade everyone that editing is an honor.
/AjaxBlock provides a dialog box for easy input of reasons while blocking users.
/Selective Rollback(pictured) provides a dialog box to customize rollback edit summaries and does them without reloading the page. Seriously, why doesn't MediaWiki already do this?
/flickrsearch adds a portlet link to search for uploadable flickr images about the subject.
/randomincategory adds a portlet link when on Category pages to go to a random page in the current category.
Vghfr/EasyTemplates adds a portlet link to automatically insert some of the most common inline {{fix}} templates.
Yes, we're just doing 'em as we go now. Thanks for reading through this looong issue, if you did! I'm sure this'll send a record for the longest issue ev-ah. You may need to wait even longer for the last issue, as our reserve of old-y and goodie scripts have ran out... We encourage you to try and do some of the requests or improvement tasks. See you in Summer, hopefully!
February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award
Citation Barnstar
This award is given in recognition to Eddie891 for collecting more than 10 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:
Hi, @Christopher ChisopaIII! The first thing you should do is make sure that the artist meets our notability requirements for artists. If they do not, an article on them is likely to be deleted. I'd suggest having a look at this page for advice on drafting an article; in short, use the Article wizard to create a draft, and don't be afraid to look at existing high quality artist articles for ideas on how to format/write the page. I, of course, am here to answer any questions that may come up. Eddie891TalkWork12:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Jackdrophammer! If you click on the image you want to see, and then click the blue 'more details' button, it should take you to the file page of the image you want more information on. For instance, that page is here for the first image on Nemophilia (band). Does that help? Eddie891TalkWork12:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
In August 2023, I requested for information about Charles Chieng in the journal "Who's Who in American Colleges and Universities", 1981, Vol. 47, and you said that you had gotten a pdf from your library. Sorry I didn't see your mention, do you still have the pdf? GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk)02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
Victor Daly
I saw this article on the unassessed military history project articles list. I have assessed it as B class for military history and biography. The Milhist Bot added erroneous parameters such as "African", which I have corrected. Donner60 (talk) 02:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a look, @Donner60. I agree that the article is B-class, or thereabouts. I have not found more information on Daly that is not in the article. Eddie891TalkWork02:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Since a higher assessment would require the more formal request and review process, I could not consider a higher rating on my own motion. I suspect a rater might want some more details for a higher rating but that is only a guess. Donner60 (talk) 03:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
"These include academic journals, books, newspapers, magazines, and media with a reputation for fact checking. Social media, press releases or corporate/professional profiles do not qualify." is what the article says for citations. I was thinking of writing an article on a *VERY* new band called "tonerico" whose members are well-known but the new band isn't. Their first MV has 67k views on yt. Now, there are *no* third party sources that mention them other than their own pages so the *only* source is their official pages, should I create a page on them? do you think it has a chance of getting deleted? The article is going to be *quite* short, afterall, the band released their first album last month and it went on sale in cd format on 20th march 2024, so last month if that's relevant. I'd also like to ask if search engines like google not list articles with same name on wikipedia(but in different languages), but it's ok if you can't answer this one. --Jackdrophammer (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Jackdrophammer, if there is not independent and reliable coverage of an article topic, the article will be deleted, yes. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately), not all topics can have a Wikipedia article-- there simply isn't enough reliable information to say about them. For instance, have a read about our notability criteria for bands. I don't think this band would meet any of these criteria yet. Sorry that that may not be what you want to hear :/. Re your other question, to exclude wikipedia from your search results, you can append -wiki to your search query. Happy to answer any other questions you may have! Best, Eddie891TalkWork17:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
hello, it appears that without the unnecessary disambiguation, the Osama Said article is salted. the notability of this newly created article seems doubtful, but could you move it/unprotect Osama Said in order to move it per naming requirements? She wasafairy09:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Sorry that I missed this point. Yes, if there is a notable Osama Said, I would be happy to un-SALT, but this doesn't seem to be the case here so the point is now moot. Eddie891TalkWork17:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
I love when I see a TFA and immediately know who wrote it. Great job on an interesting and challenging topic! Hope you are doing well. DanCherek (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the note, @DanCherek! I'm well, just about fully recovered from a surgery last week and hoping to get some more serious editing in in a couple months (been quite busy irl recently). Extending the same wishes to you and yours. Eddie891TalkWork19:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the TFA, introduced: "After several months of deep diving and a couple years of tinkering, I am reasonably sure that this is the most comprehensive account that exists anywhere of Whitman's lectures."! - My story today is about a piece composed for the Second Sunday after Easter 300 years ago, and I just returned from a (long) opera about the same age. Best wishes for recovery! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I went to the Easter service at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York City just before my surgery, and the service reminded me of you and your work, Gerda. There was a haunting soprano saxophone solo which I reckon will stay with me for a while. It was beautiful to see the flowers, hear the music, and worship with several thousand others in the same building. I hope all is well. Eddie891TalkWork01:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Hello Eddie891, I have just now created this account but did some editing on Wiki around 5 years ago. I use the encyclopedia often but am retired and my usage is leisurely.
I was reading the Human Migration page. While there's a lot of good information, the page needs a major revamping. There are contradictions between the sections, the logic is weak, and there's a jumble of conflicting definitions. The result is confusion. I checked the 'talk' on this page, and found that back in 2015/17 someone else made similar points. They suggested a "Merge". I suggest a reshuffle and cutting. The topic needs to be precisely defined, logical connection between sections made, and then the links to other Wiki pages clearly specified. The way it stands now, this page tries to do everything and ends up doing nothing.
This is an important topic. Please have a look at it. I could help revise but it would mean a total reshuffle.
Thanks for you consideration on this,
Jansan72 --Jansan72 (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Jansan72, thanks for the note. Unfortunately, I don't have the bandwidth to work on this article at the moment. I'd suggest leaving a note like this on the talk page and hoping someone picks it up as your best option. Cheers, Eddie891TalkWork15:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I am looking into creating a wikipage for Ayesha Erotica and see you attempted and either you deleted it or it was deleted. Just wanted any tips or advice and if you want to help hit me up. Daneyp00 (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins
Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
Hello Eddie,
I was wondering if I can write articles on Wikipedia not only about the things that already exist but also about creative projects, like perhaps an extend character from a series that I came up with.
I will include information designed by my self on this character and introduce them to the rest of the world in my articles.
Is that an okay thing to do?
Thank you. --RiyG (talk) 19:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi @RiyG, I would say that think fictional things that haven't attracted a substantial degree of secondary commentary probably don't have a place on Wikipedia, which is intended to be a reliable, neutral encyclopedia. Eddie891TalkWork14:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.
Today's TFA, Felix M. Warburg House, was written by Vami_IV and Epicgenius, introduced: "This article is about another of the great houses that once lined Fifth Avenue in New York. Specifically, this is the mansion of Felix M. Warburg, a Jewish financier who ignored fears of anti-Semitic reprisal to his decided to build himself a big Gothic manor in the middle of New York City. Although the Warburgs no longer remain, their legacy does: the museum is now the home of the Jewish Museum (Manhattan) and the building largely survives as they left it. It's a beautiful building and I hope you will all enjoy it."! - in memory --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
today's story has a pic of a woman holding her cat, a DYK of 5 years ago - the recent pics show 2 orange tip butterflies --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Naples-eon Bismark III, you can find information pretty much anywhere you can search. Where you find good sources depends a bit on what subject area you're trying to edit, but you generally want to use sources that are peer reviewed and reputable (for instance, newspapers, journals, books). Hopefully that's helpful. If you have some more specific questions, I'd be happy to specify. Eddie891TalkWork00:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi @Mimiwriter13! Be friendly, take criticism as well as you can, and don't be afraid to make mistakes and ask questions. Just be ready to learn from them! Everything else is secondary. Eddie891TalkWork00:11, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
I wanted to edit this artical https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/.de about .de domain by adding a reference to a list of top .de websites. I added the reference but it was immediately rejected as Frost explained me in message "It might not have been your intention, but in this edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from .de, a page you have created yourself.". No idea what it is. Can you please help?
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
Sent the relevant pages. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
)--GRuban (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
Epicgenius with 1518 points
MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
Sammi Brie with 520 points
Unlimitedlead with 5 points
Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Updated scripts
Improve a script
Requested scripts
New scripts
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Bureaucrat changes
Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
voorts (submissions) and 
Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.
Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.
Newly maintained scripts
.png)
.png)
Requested scripts
SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
_at_gramancy_theatre.jpg){kind=link}
