User talk:Founderofthecity1234

Problems with upload of File:4MyCiTy.png

Thanks for uploading File:4MyCiTy.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image source

the image source is from the 4MyCiTy website https://img1.wsimg.com/isteam/ip/0d9ec67d-9560-4817-88cd-a89136ba15a3/logo1%20PNG-cfcfe68.png/:/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25/rs=w:1186,h:1000,cg:true Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 22:54, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in 4MyCiTy. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please explain, how is it not standard? Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:4MyCiTy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:4MyCiTy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 09:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete our page. Please fix 159.250.103.13 (talk) 13:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References fail WP:ORGCRIT. Also needs help with WP:REFBOMBing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4MyCiTy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Elizabeth_House

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Feeding_America

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Philabundance

Look at these 3 wiki pages, they also do not meet the same guidelines you presented above in your statement, should I flag these as not meeting wiki standards? the reference articles are all similar to those in the draft article i wrote. you need to be fair and consistent across the board. Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 16:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for why. Ominateu (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Founderofthecity1234! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello Founderofthecity1234. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Founderofthecity1234. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Founderofthecity1234|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for any edits to this page. my point of view is neutral. Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now, that's an interesting claim. In the deleted article, you wrote: Focuses on improving hunger within our communities..., ...through our advanced composting technologies.. If you're not affiliated with the organization, who exactly does "our" refer to there? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that's how it is listed in their website most of which I copied and pasted, this organization is doing amazing work and there are several articles written about them and they have alot of awards. Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying and pasting text from other sources is a copyright violation, and that's not acceptable either. But on this page, you also asked Why did you delete our page. Please fix. Are you claiming you copied and pasted that from somewhere, too? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am writing the article based on information published in all the linked sources. from what i saw this is how all wiki pages are done. I don't understand why you are targeting my work. the page was created based on researched facts. focus on the page not what i am saying in a chat. the page meets all wiki guidelines based on how other pages are written for similar organizations. instead of targeting me why don't you help with the edits on the page that you think i did incorrectly. isn't that what the wiki community is supposed to do? Founderofthecity1234 (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find it odd that an IP address would comment above and say "our page" in addition to the classic signs of UPE. We cannot keep entertaining a submission without a COI disclosure when everything points to having a COI. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See also WP:COI. User has denied paid editing, but edits indicate WP:COI. External links should also be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4MyCiTy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Submitting wihtout improvement. This cannot be reviewed until it is cleaned up based on the comments of previous reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4MyCiTy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.audacy.com/todays1019/latest/spotlight-on-maryland-is-on-4mycity, https://4mycity.us/our-focus, https://www.guidestar.org/profile/shared/391a4297-e53d-42b0-822a-d31dba011d6f. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:4MyCiTy may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4MyCiTy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (April 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: In addition to the likely COI with no disclosure, you have submitted without improvement.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4MyCiTy (May 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Shadow311 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement was made since this was last submitted.

Shadow311 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:4MyCiTy

Hello, Founderofthecity1234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:4MyCiTy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:4MyCiTy

Hello, Founderofthecity1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "4MyCiTy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]