User talk:EBPCarpio

Welcome!

Hi EBPCarpio! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Throast (talk | contribs) 13:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Megan Young, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Throast (talk | contribs) 13:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nelia Sancho moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nelia Sancho, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 02:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to Carpio appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Nythar^T^.^C 02:39, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I added people that has existing Wikipedia pages. I won't add any names that are inexistent in Wiki anymore. EBPCarpio (talk) 02:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sheryl Cruz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 14:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bugang River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cold Spring. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Yeah. Thank you! EBPCarpio (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan D. Tan (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan D. Tan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EBPCarpio! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan D. Tan (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite reliable sources. I hope that it is not a surprise to anyone that sources that publish articles titled "most outstanding mayor award" or "5 female celebs in love with town and city mayors" aren't well-suited for Wikipedia. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan D. Tan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 18:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article created

Hi -- I created Draft:Celia Díaz-Laurel for you. Your edit was originally disallowed by a (now-resolved) bug in a filter. You should be able to edit it without problems going forward. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Thanks but I have already submitted a new one with the page name Draft:Celia Díaz Laurel. It has more info than what I've entered on that. I have already submitted the draft for review. I think the problem has been resolved when I tried it again. Sorry. EBPCarpio (talk) 11:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celia Díaz Laurel has been accepted

Celia Díaz Laurel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 08:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! EBPCarpio (talk) 08:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jovit Baldivino

On 13 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jovit Baldivino, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 09:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Second Ladies and Gentlemen of the Philippines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Ladies and Gentlemen of the Philippines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Ladies and Gentlemen of the Philippines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I don't understand why it has been nominated for deletion. There's no other article or page that lists and features the Second Ladies and Gentlemen of the country. There's a First Ladies and Gentlemen of the Philippines, and there should be one for the Second Ladies and Gentlemen too. You're a Filipino. And you should also know how relevant that page is.

We can all just improve the page. That page shouldn't be deleted. Thanks. EBPCarpio (talk) 17:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"There is no "Second Gentleman" role unlike the First Lady/Gentleman (host of Malacanang role). Its merely an alternate neologistic term for vice president spouse."

If that's it. Then they should be called Spouses of the Vice Presidents of the Philippines. It's unlike the US were they're called Second Ladies and Second Gentlemen. EBPCarpio (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello EBPCarpio! Your additions to Pandan, Antique have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you. I really thought that is enough as there are no other websites that states the history of my town. I'll try editing it again when I receive the digital file I requested from a town councilor, it sure will be a better source. EBPCarpio (talk) 22:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pandan Bay (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://news.mongabay.com/2021/04/philippine-province-builds-on-lessons-learned-to-grow-ecotourism-industry/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Pandan Bay may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 09:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josefa Edralin (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Geni.com is not a reliable source. Subject is notable but needs reliable references for verification.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josefa Edralin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 11:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pandan Bay (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pandan Bay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Lin-ay kang Antique. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EBPCarpio/sandbox

A tag has been placed on EBPCarpio/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lin-ay kang Antique moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lin-ay kang Antique, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josefa Quetulio Edralin (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Other than being the mother of the former president, Ferdinand Marcos, there is not much within this draft that indicates the notability of her as a person independently of her son's or family's reputation. Do add more details about her life and we see if the draft can be evaluated otherwise.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josefa Quetulio Edralin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nelia Sancho

The article Nelia Sancho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional, Sources are obits. BEFORE showed nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 10:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Josefa Edralin

Hello, EBPCarpio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josefa Edralin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lin-ay kang Antique

Hello, EBPCarpio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lin-ay kang Antique, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pandan Bay

Hello, EBPCarpio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pandan Bay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mayor of Pandan, Antique

Hello, EBPCarpio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mayor of Pandan, Antique, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Josefa Quetulio Edralin

Hello, EBPCarpio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josefa Quetulio Edralin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pandan Bay

Hello, EBPCarpio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pandan Bay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mayor of Pandan, Antique

Hello, EBPCarpio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mayor of Pandan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of barangays in Antique (province)

Hello, EBPCarpio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of barangays in Antique (province), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]