User talk:Digital Biju

September 2024

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kathmandu. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Per WP:ELNO, a link to a (much shorter) Britannica article is not a useful one: the site should not merely repeat information that is already or should be in the article. Belbury (talk) 10:07, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to New York Post. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 06:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Hypnosis. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Cassiopeia talk 06:35, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Digital Biju, pls stop adding unnecessary external links to the articles as Wikipedia is not a collective of links/spam or advertisement/promotion. If you continuedly doing this, you will be blocked. Cassiopeia talk 06:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 06:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]