Jump to content

User talk:DavidAnstiss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, DavidAnstiss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orchis provincialis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iris munzii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RHS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emma Cleasby for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Cleasby, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Cleasby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dais cotinifolia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ornamental.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demosthenesia

[edit]

Thanks for your work on these. Although Wikipedians generally prefer "Greek politician" (without the "a") in infoboxes and in some columns, we're generally expecting "Demosthenes, a Greek politician" in normal text. - Dank (push to talk) 21:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it just looks weird without the "a" !!! Hence, why I added it DavidAnstiss (talk) 22:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense. I just added it to Demosthenesia. - Dank (push to talk) 22:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Eigia
added a link pointing to Greek
Ellisiophyllum
added a link pointing to John Ellis
List of plant genera named for people (D–J)
added a link pointing to Eberlanzia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed errorsDavidAnstiss (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galpinia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transvaal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a disambiguation page, but explanation page. DavidAnstiss (talk) 09:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of plant genera named for people (D–J), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanseniella.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oswald Heer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heeria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Decorsella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed by another user. DavidAnstiss (talk) 12:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jean Vincent Félix Lamouroux
added a link pointing to Lamourouxia
Fixed already by another editor. DavidAnstiss (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kuhlmanniodendron
added a link pointing to Dendron
Was the correct link !

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Majidea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Kirk and Daniel Oliver.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Victor Naudin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parodiodendron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulnerable.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Portmanteau vs. compound

[edit]

"A portmanteau also differs from a compound, which does not involve the truncation of parts of the stems of the blended words." Wikipedia

"compound. A name or epithet that combines elements derived from two or more Greek or Latin words; a regular compound is one in which a noun or adjective in a non-final position appears as a modified stem (Art. 60.10) (see also pseudocompound)." International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICBN)

"pseudocompound. A name or epithet that combines elements derived from two or more Greek or Latin words and in which a noun or adjective in a non-final position appears as a word with a case ending, not as a modified stem (Rec. 60G.1(b)) (see also compound)." ICBN Nomen ambiguum (talk) 18:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that. DavidAnstiss (talk) 23:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pombalia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Otto Sendtner
added a link pointing to Annual
Raveniopsis
added a link pointing to Henry Allan Gleason

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sacleuxia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cryptolepis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help

[edit]

Hello! I was reviewing Heterotis (plant) at NPP and noticed that taxonbox is about a fish, not a plant. But I failed to correct it as it's out of my league) Could you please help me with it and point out to the guidelines that would teach me deal with automatic taxoboxes? Thank you in advance! Less Unless (talk) 18:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sibbaldia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Altai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tessmanniacanthus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acanthus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Tyleropappus
added a link pointing to Calea
Ungeria
added a link pointing to Vulnerable

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iris graeberiana

[edit]

Hey there! I noticed you made some changes to the Iris graeberiana page based on the WP:Plants taxon template. I was thinking about changing the section heading 'Native' to 'Distribution' per the plant template and other plant pages I've seen but wanted to get your thoughts first, as I'm still a seedling editor. Thank you! Eucalyptusmint (talk) 16:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, for the note. The iris article was one of my first plant-based articles for wiki - so I was still learning when I wrote that one. Should have spotted the native heading - I use Distribution and habitat as a main heading and then Range and Habitat as subheadings now !! But you can edit how you wish I will 'monitor' from the watchlist ! Keep editing and learning, best way to do it.DavidAnstiss (talk) 17:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds great, thank you so much! Eucalyptusmint (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of plant genera named for people (A–C)‎

[edit]

Great work on these lists, and the corresponding articles ... much appreciated! I've just added a source ... if you're interested in taking info from it for these lists or for other articles, and if you'd like help with the German, I'll be happy to translate (if you tell me which entries you want translated). - Dank (push to talk) 03:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finishing up the dates. I've added a note to the list's talk page ... no reply yet. Let me know if this new info isn't something you're interested in. - Dank (push to talk) 16:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Content you added to the above article as well as People's Dispensary for Sick Animals appears to have been copied from https://watermark.silverchair.com/hkt101.pdf, which is not released under a compatible license. CreativeCommonsAttributionNon-Commercial License is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lauterborniella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EOL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas Mawson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mawsonia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gnomoniaceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diplodina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of plant genera named for people (K–P), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Isidro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Hi @DavidAnstiss

Thanks for your thanks on updating the Oxford herbarium :)

I was told to update the wikipages with the news of the new department that has taken over the Hebarium: Draft:Department of Biology, University of Oxford

I don't know how to use Wikipedia and I'm new to it, but I'm trying to update information by creating a new page to link to, as I was asked. I wondered if you have any advice on getting things published? You seemed like a frequent Wiki user so I thought I would ask.

48jkb35m (talk) 16:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 48jkb35m, I found that as a new user, the best way of creating new pages ie plant species, genus and so on is to find a similar existing article (dealing with the same type of details) and then copy those details into the draft article and edit to suit, while adding new bits and pieces (with the appropriate references and such).
Looking at your draft; seems initially good.
I would keep this up to date. Wiki hates future news. Remember it is primarily an Encyclopedia - so stuff that happens in 2025 does not exist or may never happen. So, mention the construction but not the move!
Try to not use the main biology ref too much - this looks too much like using one source, another of wiki editors bugbears and hates!
Re - Notable staff (could be put into columns) {{Div col}}
placed at the start (of the list) and {{Div col end}}
at the end - would improve the look and format.
Personal note, I never used drafts - I just wrote the article and moved it into wiki space and edited when problems arose.
If you need help with that, would be happy to explain how to do that. DavidAnstiss (talk) 16:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DavidAnstiss This is really helpful thank you. I was having trouble doing the columns thing, but I will give it a shot.
If theres a way to use the copy of this article and move it into the wiki space that would be handy to know. I'm coming up against very little assistance when trying to get this article published, despite being subjective and important news. 48jkb35m (talk) 08:35, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just did it myself.

It is now live and it should link in with other articles. Make sure there is enough other articles linking to it (wiki hates 'orphans' - an article that does not have many links to and from it. Then it should be fine. Will do a tidy up on the talk page. Well done first article written!!!

Regards

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dumontiaceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dumontia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bruchiaceae
added a link pointing to Wilsoniella
Faboideae
added a link pointing to Pullenia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plastique Tiara

[edit]

As a note, the redirect at Plastique Tiara has been *locked* due to an AFD for a prior version of this article and attempted recreation. Plastique Tiara (drag queen) should be moved to Plastique Tiara if the new version should be kept. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Drag Race, please participate. Hopefully we can discuss it there before an AFD for the article is created. Presuming it survives, we can add it to templates, etc.Naraht (talk) 17:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plastique Tiara

[edit]

I'll be happy to answer any questions you have.Naraht (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, I am very annoyed. I spent ages (many hours and days, thinking) on that article for it to be wiped out in one (frankly racist) move, without anyone informing me! Plus (why the hell) would I keep a 'draft' as I thought 'things' were kept on wiki. DavidAnstiss (talk) 21:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Racist, it *isn't*. I guarantee the administrator who deleted it doesn't care and likely doesn't have a *clue* what ancestry Plastique Tiara has. It *is* a (long term) effect that the original article for Plastique was created when the only thing that she was notable for was being on RPDR 11. Agreed, you got side-swiped by the prior history, which was ugly enough that anyone trying to recreate it would have hit it. Any references that you have, add them to the discussion on Talk:Plastique Tiara, showing notability *is* the sword that can cut through this, *and* if we can show notability, then we may be able to convince that administrator to restore the article. It is actually fairly difficult to have something *completely* removed without the ability of retrieval.
So honestly the next step is showing notability, take a look at the references that I added to the discussion and keep going...Naraht (talk) 23:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of plant genera named for people (D–J), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haroldia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent block

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DavidAnstiss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I use a sign in (with secure password) BT-Wi-Fi connection DavidAnstiss (talk) 19:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've given you temporary IP block exemption, which should help deal with random blocks that come up on shared IPs. If it turns out to be a long-term problem, you can request IPBE for a longer period. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lichens

[edit]

Hi David: I notice that you've recently worked on a few articles relating to lichens. A small group of us have recently started a lichen task force. If you're interested, please consider joining us! We could use all the help we can get. ;) MeegsC (talk) 09:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MeegsC, I am not fond of joining small groups, as normally someone annoys me such as Esculenta recent attitude!

See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:DavidAnstiss#FYI for a circle argument that goes no where because of not understanding or refusing to acknowledge facts.

I will still work on articles but DO not want to be associated with him. Petty maybe but I do this as a hobby not to get annoyed.DavidAnstiss (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diaporthomycetidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fluminicola.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Geobalanus oblongifolius. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I originally was trying to 'move' the article (as I have previously done before) but since the named article already existed. I thought it was better to 'copy and paste' across. I apologise for that decision. I had only 'copy and pasted' that article. 10:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Diploschistaceae

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Diploschistaceae indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

From doi:10.1639/0007-2745-123.2.127 (available here): "Recently, Kraichak et al. (2018) proposed to divide Graphidaceae into four families, Diploschistaceae, Fissurinaceae, Graphidaceae s.str. and Thelotremataceae, based on the approach of temporal banding which attempts to harmonize rank-based taxa through their evolutionary age. This approach has been rejected, for various reasons (Lücking 2019): (1) by using a single criterion, the temporal banding approach does not properly reflect evolutionary histories across the different kingdoms of life and not even between closely related clades; (2) taxon sampling in Graphidaceae was incomplete and early diverging lineages such as subfamily Redonographoideae and several orphaned lineages in subfamily Graphidoideae, which would have resulted in additional families, were either omitted or ignored, such as Platythecium; (3) while Fissurinaceae, Graphidaceae and Thelotremataceae represent natural taxa, the family Diploschistaceae merged three unrelated groups that do not form a supported clade in other phylogenetic studies and hence represents a highly artificial taxon; (4) the proposed classification has little information content with regard to phenotypic variation and disparity and the reinstated families Graphidaceae and Thelotremataceae have little in common with the traditionally separated families under these names, making any effort to reinstate these families to preserve their use futile. In the present paper, we therefore continue to use Graphidaceae in the sense of Lücking et al. (2017a), which is also supported by our updated family-wide phylogenetic analysis, which contradicts the topology obtained by Kraichak et al. (2018)." Esculenta (talk) 15:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Wijayawardene et al. 2022" = cite journal |display-authors=6 |last1=Wijayawardene |first1=N.N. |last2=Hyde |first2=K.D. |last3=Dai |first3=D.Q. |last4=Sánchez-García |first4=M. |last5=Goto |first5=B.T. |last6=Saxena |first6=R.K. |last7=Erdoğdu |first7=M. |last8=Selçuk |first8=F. |last9=Rajeshkumar |first9=K.C. |last10=Aptroot |first10=A. |last11=Błaszkowski |first11=J. |last12=Boonyuen |first12=N. |last13=da Silva |first13=G. |last14=de Souza |first14=F.A. |last15=Dong |first15=W. |last16=Ertz |first16=D. |last17=Haelewaters |first17=D. |last18=Jones |first18=E.B. |last19=Karunarathna |first19=S.C. |last20=Kirk |first20=P.M. |last21=Kukwa |first21=M. |last22=Kumla |first22=J. |last23=Leontyev |first23=D.V. |last24=Lumbsch |first24=H.T. |last25=Maharachchikumbura |first25=S.S.N. |last26=Marguno |first26=F. |last27=Martínez-Rodríguez |first27=P. |last28=Mešić |first28=A. |last29=Monteiro |first29=J.S. |last30=Oehl |first30=F. |last31=Pawłowska |first31=J. |last32=Pem |first32=D. |last33=Pfliegler |first33=W.P. |last34=Phillips |first34=A.J.L. |last35=Pošta |first35=A. |last36=He |first36=M.Q. |last37=Li |first37=J.X. |last38=Raza |first38=M. |last39=Sruthi |first39=O.P. |last40=Suetrong |first40=S. |last41=Suwannarach |first41=N. |last42=Tedersoo |first42=L. |last43=Thiyagaraja |first43=V. |last44=Tibpromma |first44=S. |last45=Tkalčec |first45=Z. |last46=Tokarev |first46=Y.S. |last47=Wanasinghe |first47=D.N. |last48=Wijesundara |first48=D.S.A. |last49=Wimalaseana |first49=S.D.M.K. |last50=Madrid |first50=H. |last51=Zhang |first51=G.Q. |last52=Gao |first52=Y. |last53=Sánchez-Castro |first53=I. |last54=Tang |first54=L.Z. |last55=Stadler |first55=M. |last56=Yurkov |first56=A. |last57=Thines |first57=M. |year=2022 |title=Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021 |journal=Mycosphere |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=53–453 [160] |doi=10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2 |s2cid=249054641 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358798332 at Page 70 and NOTE how many authors (including HT Lumbsch author of many species) ! Not just one opinion. Dated 2021 not 3 years out of date

Plus https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Graphidales also accepts the Order and the families plus other articles ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790321003134 ) accept the order and the 5 families. Also other research sites accept such as https://biotanz.landcareresearch.co.nz/scientific-names/cd6a12cc-65f3-472f-84bc-ed9c7c54c149. The fact that COL doesn't accept does shows that they are to be used as a guide not as a definitive authority. DavidAnstiss (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That the Graphidales are an accepted order is not what is discussed here. The https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790321003134 you mention does not accept all of these families, just the Gomphillaceae (and there is no dispute about that family being accepted). Using Wikispecies as a source, I could argue equally validly (i.e. not validly – WikiSpecies shouldn't be used as a source) that it does not accept the subfamilies as families, see https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Graphidaceae. I can equally argue that since Wijayawardene et al. (2020, 2022) doesn't even address Lücking's well-reasoned objections, that they should not be used as a source for classifications where the temporal banding approach was used. Esculenta (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"type species" vs. "type_species"

[edit]

Hi, just to note that although |type species= does work in taxoboxes, and so is technically correct, it's better to use |type_species= for consistency (and the first form is flagged in the error-tracking category). Peter coxhead (talk) 08:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Coniothyrium has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) is not a compatible license. — Diannaa (talk) 14:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed some copyright content from User:DavidAnstiss/Coniothyriaceae. Please don't add copyright material copied from other websites to Wikipedia. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words. This includes material in draftspace and userspace. — Diannaa (talk) 16:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Curvularia senegalensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty file

[edit]

List of Erysiphe species. Xx236 (talk) 10:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Doassansiopsis has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

R. linoides

[edit]

I noticed that you created this article and have made almost the edits to it. (I found it because it had a typo that put it on a page that I periodically check, which lists articles with certain errors.) Anyway, after fixing the typo I italicized the article title, and then realized that it should be titled "Radiola linoides". But when I tried to rename it, I couldn't because there was already an article with that name – and that one is a redirect to "Radiola (plant)" – but it has much less information than the article you created. Do you know of a way to get everything into one article (preferably called "Radiola linoides" and in italics)? As far as I can tell, it may require administrative rights and may take a while because it's not a high priority, but if you know a way, feel free to do so. Ira Leviton (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, about the name ! I had created the article in my user space with "Radiola linoides" as the name but when I tried to move it into user space I couldn't do so! As there was a previous redirect from that name. So I will have to wait until that redirected name space is deleted and then I (or another editor) can rename the article. I forgot to italicize the name when I was renaming the article. Also apology for the typo error. Hopefully it won't be too long before the name issue is resolved. DavidAnstiss (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to get the ball rolling on it by asking at the Teahouse. Maybe somebody there will know how to do it or can get an administrator involved.
Otherwise, it might take forever.  And no worries about the small errors – it gives me something to do.! Ira Leviton (talk) 19:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, wait – it looks like it's all done already. Ira Leviton (talk) 20:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed all the notifications when I logged in this afternoon, that it had been moved to "Radiola linoides" ! Was so pleased that it had happened so quickly!!DavidAnstiss (talk) 21:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello DavidAnstiss! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Talk:Asterostomella, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://dothideomycetes.org/asterinales/asterinaceae/asterostomella/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Asterostomella saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Esculenta (talk) 15:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosa roxburghii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gene sequencing.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amphisphaeriales

[edit]

Hi David: You've tagged Amphisphaeriales as a lichen order, but I'm not seeing that any of the families in that order are currently tagged to show that they contain lichens. Can you please help and let me which ones should be tagged as lichen families – and which of the genera in those families contain lichens so that they can be tagged appropriately as well? Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 11:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was a 'copy and paste' error, I normally create articles using a former article as a template and work around that before 'uploading' from my user area. I was looking myself if it was on the lichen list and no. So I will remove later, (heading out to work now!).DavidAnstiss (talk) 09:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Leucaena salvadorensis. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   — Diannaa (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:DavidAnstiss/Iris pskemensis

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:DavidAnstiss/Iris pskemensis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/74410?locale=en and https://wiki.irises.org/Spec/SpecPskemensis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 02:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hedlundia anglica

[edit]

Leaving a note in case the editor is unblocked.

Selene Wamucii is an unreliable source for plants (AI generated text?). In this instance a British and Irish endemic is obviously not going to be used as a medicinal plant in the Himalayas, India and Nepal. And it's a stretch to describe is as being used as an ornamental plant - I've seem it in the collection of whitebeams as Ness Botanic Gardens, and it might turn up in council plantings of native plants. (The RHS database has no sources for the species.) Lavateraguy (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DavidAnstiss&oldid=1211937222"