User talk:DavidAnstiss/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with DavidAnstiss. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - ... (up to 100) |
(January 2016 - December 2017)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taochi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Done
Reference errors on 22 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Iris taochia page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iris subbiflora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filaments. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Iris timofejewii
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Iris timofejewii at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Iris timofejewii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 13:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Iris acutiloba
A tag has been placed on Iris acutiloba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, in case your extensive work on that large page disappears without a trace, that I have taken a back-up copy. Best wishes, Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, I think I was tired last night but wanted to finally upload the article. I thought that some-thing or some-one would auto-correct the user article mistake ! I do work on the article off-line in Libra Office, so would not have lost everything. ! DavidAnstiss (talk) 17:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Iris timofejewii
On 21 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iris timofejewii, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iris timofejewii is a rare and endangered iris threatened by overgrazing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iris timofejewii. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Iris timofejewii), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WormTT(talk) 09:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Iris atrofusca at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Added the article to the nomination list DavidAnstiss (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Iris atrofusca
Hello! Your submission of Iris atrofusca at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi David - having just tweaked your DYK hook and inserted a reference, and only then spotted that you've already used it elsewhere in the article. Would you mind if I left it's removal to you, as I'm running out of time at this end? I hope you think the change is acceptable by calling it 'a black iris', but not exactly suggesting that that's its formal common name. Parkywiki (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- I am very happy about the name change, if it gets a DKY nomination ! I have altered the ref into a ref name=jalad and added another ref about bees and pollinators (which would have been a better DYK! ) . This I found a couple of days ago while researching for Iris atropurpurea. Typical ! DavidAnstiss (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Iris atrofusca
On 6 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iris atrofusca, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flowers of Iris atrofusca are so dark that in Jordan it is often called a "black iris"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iris atrofusca. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Iris atrofusca), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iris atropurpurea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stratification. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iris barnumiae subsp. demawendica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baden Baden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Iris cedreti(i)
Please see my comments at Talk:Iris cedretii. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Suggestion
DYK nomination of Iris cedretii
Hello! Your submission of Iris cedretii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ch (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC) That is, could you confirm for the sake of QPQ that you have had fewer than five DYK's accepted? I can see only two here on the Talk Page, but just want to make sure! ch (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- I have had 3 DYK's nominations which were all were successful ! Iris perrieri, Iris timofejewii and Iris atrofusca DavidAnstiss (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- DavidAnstiss, it's been over two weeks since Yoninah posted the above request. It is important that you stop by your nomination very soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- A prep promoter declined to promote the hook because it only told part of the story. I read through the article again and suggested a different hook. Frankly, I found inconsistencies between what you wrote in the article and what was written in the sources you cited. The DYK project is very particular about accuracy and verification of the hook fact vis a vis the source. Yoninah (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for changing the hook. I think I just liked the hook with ski resorts as it was 'catchy'. I will try to make sure if I do any other DKY's that they are better sourced. Note, I have just started writing the Iris haynei (Gilboa Iris) article, since you have an interest in Israeli articles. DavidAnstiss (talk) 10:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- A prep promoter declined to promote the hook because it only told part of the story. I read through the article again and suggested a different hook. Frankly, I found inconsistencies between what you wrote in the article and what was written in the sources you cited. The DYK project is very particular about accuracy and verification of the hook fact vis a vis the source. Yoninah (talk) 19:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- DavidAnstiss, it's been over two weeks since Yoninah posted the above request. It is important that you stop by your nomination very soon. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Category:Flora of Turkestan has been nominated for discussion
Category:Flora of Turkestan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 18:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Iris grossheimii, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Degradation, Red Book and Rare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:05, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Iris cedreti
On 9 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iris cedreti, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that no official conservation measures are in place to protect the critically endangered Iris cedreti, endemic to Lebanon? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Iris cedreti), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, DavidAnstiss. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 22 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Iris spuria page, your edit caused a DOI error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Removed source
As I explained in the edit summary, this is a predatory open access journal. The publisher is on Beall's list. It's a Nigerian publisher of journals which have low to no editorial standards, hence often include junk science. Check my Talk for more details. Guy (Help!) 22:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- You removed more than one source not just the journal !! The Handbook source is an actual book !!! Not Nigerian also the American source is a American Society on Irises which uses wiki language ALSO not Nigerian !! That is what I am questioning the removal !!! DavidAnstiss (talk) 23:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 17 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Dennstaedtia page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Plant common names
Hello David,
Thanks for your edit to Darwinia. (You changed the common name for Darwinia citriodora.) Do you have a reference for that? The Darwinia citriodora page gives the common name "lemon-scented darwinia" because that's what's used in the references for that article. Whilst I don't think common names are a big deal, I do think the common name given in the list of darwinias should match the common name on the respective pages. What do you think? Please feel free to add the "lemon-scented myrtle" as an alternative common name to "lemon-scented darwinia" to the Darwinia citriodora page if you can give a reference for it. (I've not read of darwinias being referred to as "myrtles", although it is mentioned in the ANBG reference. "Lemon-scented myrtle" is usually reserved for Backhousia citriodora.) Otherwise, perhaps you might revert your edit? Gderrin (talk) 07:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Have added the other common name to Darwinia citriodora used by the Australian Plant Society. Had originally googled "darwinia scented myrtle" and several had come up for darwinia citridora - hence the change. Agree, some common names are very confusing with different countries have their own name for plants. But some people hate the latin names so think it is best to list them all to cover all angles.DavidAnstiss (talk) 11:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Reference errors on 22 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Mizuna page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 2 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Gladiolus page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 10 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Simon Dunn page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed error DavidAnstiss (talk) 19:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Softwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chipboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Palustris. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, DavidAnstiss. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)