User talk:CalvinBeza

Welcome!

Hello, CalvinBeza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! 115ash^→(☏) 13:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your recent test edits to Marquette, Michigan‎ were not constructive. It was vandalism and would have been reverted, if you had not undone it yourself. Entry of false information is not helpful. If you want to experiment or make a test edit, please use the sandbox. These pages are patrolled by robots and human editors like me. When you make an edit please leave an accurate edit summary, and not a misleading one. You can be blocked for this. Further vandalism will get you blocked from editing without further notice. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:13, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

It seems that many of your recent edits to Marquette, Michigan‎, Presbyterian Church in America, and Wisconsin are either adding a new line or reverting those edits. For example, all of the most recent 50 edits to Presbyterian Church in America are your edits, and all but six of them are just are just adding or removing a single character, which was a new line character in every edit I checked. It could well be something you are doing accidentally, but it is very unhelpful and clutters up the edit history of the article. Perhaps using the 'Show Preview' feature could help you avoid making unnecessary edits and then immediately reverting them. If you have any questions, or if there is any way I can be of assistance, you can reply here on your talk page or on my own talk page, and I will get back to you. YBG (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've notice that the insertion and deletion of new lines is much less frequent now than it was when I posted the above, but they are still occurring somewhat frequently. I'm wondering if you can explain them. I presume they are unintentional, but I'm wondering if you know what is causing them. YBG (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PC(USA) Adherents figure (December 18, 2014)

Hey. I noticed you reverted my removal of the 3 million adherents figure. This number keeps being added, but I have never seen a source for it. Even doing a fast search on the internet did not bring up any online sources. I removed it again, but I don't want to start an edit war. I would just like a reliable source for this figure, and, if possible, an explanation in the Demographics section of what the difference between an active member and an adherent is since I think that would be relevant information. Thank you. Ltwin (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First Warning

Hello, as was stated in the edit summary, you can not source information to a blog. This is against the WP:BLOGS policy. The source you continue to try to add is a blog, ie: "blogs.thearda.com". If you continue to edit war, you can be blocked. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 08:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Presbyterian Church in America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Updating ECO church number and "accessdate"

Thanks for your good faith edits to the church numbers on the ECO (denomination) page. However, you have not been updating the "accessdate" parameter. What I mean is this: every time you change the number of churches, you need to also include the date you accessed the website. Just replace the date after "accessdate =" with the most recent date you accessed the ECO website. That's it. If you fail to observe this convention, editors like YBG and me will revert your edits. We appreciate your attempts to keep Wikipedia's information up to date, and merely want to inform you about how such edits can be done in a way that complies with Wikipedia's rules and gives the most accurate information possible. Thank you for your time. Peace, --Wikibojopayne (talk) 19:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit that added two unnecessary additional references. The first was to a facebook page, which is considered much less reliable than the official denominational web page. The second added a redundant reference, it pointed to the URL as the reference that was already included. You don't need to add new references, just simply change the date after the accessdate= in the reference that is already there.

We truly do want to encourage you to continue to add up-to-date content to WP, but it is a bit frustrating when repeated requests are ignored. I added the date once or twice for you, but of course, I could not do that without actually verifying the reference myself. I presume this is what Wikibojopayne did when he most recently added the date for you. This is a lot of busy work for us when you could just add it yourself.

We would like to help you become a better editor here at WP, but it is hard to know how to help. Perhaps you could reply to our messages so that we could better understand what is going on. I promise to be friendly and not bite. YBG (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perimeter Church (Johns Creek, Georgia) (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:CalvinBeza/Perimeter Church (Johns Creek, Georgia) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, an article already was created in February 2014 at Perimeter Church (Duluth, Georgia), and shortly thereafter moved to Perimeter Church leaving a redirect behind. I went ahead and added another redirect from Perimeter Church (Johns Creek, Georgia). It appears that Duluth, Georgia and Johns Creek, Georgia are nearby suburbs of Atlanta, Georgia. None of this says anything about the notability of the church. YBG (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another suggestion -- whatever new information you have on this church, add it to the existing article, Perimeter Church. YBG (talk) 04:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello! CalvinBeza, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:37, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Presbyterian Church in America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presbytery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Independent Presbyterian Church (Memphis, Tennessee), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Albany and Southern Presbyterian Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Presbyterian Church in America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Presbyterian Church in America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ELCA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of First Presbyterian Church (Biloxi, Mississippi)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Presbyterian Church (Biloxi, Mississippi) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jbh ^Talk 11:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of First Presbyterian Church (Gulfport, Mississippi)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on First Presbyterian Church (Gulfport, Mississippi), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of fpcgulfport.org/history#sthash.YkMmR527.dpuf. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 14:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Presbyterian Church in India (Reformed)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Presbyterian Church in India (Reformed) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://blrpc.org/beliefs/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 14:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.old-delray.com/HungarianReformChurch.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:American Hungarian Reformed Church (Allen Park, Michigan) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 15:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading Copyrighted Photos

I appreciate your zeal in helping improve pages relating to Presbyterianism but it's not helpful to upload photos that are under copyright and are then subject to speedy deletion as with the photos for Covenant Presbyterian, Chicago, Park Cities Pres., and First Pres., Augusta. Photos need to be in the public domain and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. I'm currently working with individual congregations and the PCA Historical Society to obtain such photos. Also, when adding references please provide more than just the URL. There is a dropdown menu when in the editor that provides a good template where a title for the page and website can be added, hiding the url.Djkeddie (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FirstPCAUniontownAL.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FirstPCAUniontownAL.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TenthPresPhilly.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:TenthPresPhilly.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:10thpresbyterianPCA.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:10thpresbyterianPCA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:UniversityPCA.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:UniversityPCA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copying Images from the web

You cannot copy images from websites and upload them with Wikipedia without a license or source in the hopes that somebody can figure it all out for you. They are almost invariably copyrighted images. Uploading them is a copyright violation. You have been previously warned about this. If you continue to upload copyrighted images, you may be blocked. -- Whpq (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:FirstPCAAugustaGA.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:FirstPCAAugustaGA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Being a good editor

I see you have a long history of copyright violations. You seem to take photos and text from copyrighted sites and add them to Wikipedia.

Here is one more example from First Presbyterian Church (Augusta, Georgia):

Your addition: [1]
Source: [2]

Because you work mainly on church articles, I will try to appeal to you from a religous perspective: Copyright violations are a form of stealing. (The authors of the text and photographers who took the pictures would agree.) I am no religious expert, but I think stealing is a sin. I am sure you do not want to sin, right?

Helping Wikipedia is noble, wonderful, charitable, even devine. But you must write in your own words based on the sources and upload only photos you own.

So, you will not take photos and text from copyrighted sites again, right? It is my duty to say that if you do any of this again, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You just added copy pasted content again:

Your addition: [3]
Source: [4]

I am therefore indefinitely blocking you. If you wish to talk about this in order to be unblocked, please do so here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:IndependentPresbyterianMemphis.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:IndependentPresbyterianMemphis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:CalvinBeza/Perimeter Church (Johns Creek, Georgia)

Hello, CalvinBeza. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Perimeter Church (Johns Creek, Georgia)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Village Seven Presbyterian Church (Colorado Springs, Colorado)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Village Seven Presbyterian Church (Colorado Springs, Colorado) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TM 02:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]