User talk:Bluethricecreamman/Archives/ 1

Please be a little less trigger happy with reverting

I noticed that you reverted my grammar edit to Death of Nex Benedict of all things, before putting it back.

Please be a little less trigger happy with the reverting. You also, in a 24 hour period, twice reverted my addition about pouring water, which violates the 1RR protection. I'm not looking to do anything punitive at this time, but if this type of behavior continues, I will be forced to.

In the meantime, I think it would be right for you to self-revert your water pouring revert, just as you did with the to/and, so I don't have to pursue further action. Peter L Griffin (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

@Peter L Griffin at this point, let's just put in a report for edit warring. I'm setting up a report. You can add in your own diffs of my edit warring.

Let the admins sort this one out. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Alrighty. I'm not sure how you expect this to go, since you have made double reverts (violating 1RR) whereas all of your diffs pertaining to me are single reverts, or normal edits without any reverting. Peter L Griffin (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Casey Fiesler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey Fiesler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Fiesler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GuardianH (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Uncommitted's 2024 results in the notable campaigns section to include results of primaries after Super Tuesday.

My edit "Uncommitted has since earned delegates in Massachusetts, Hawaii, Missouri, Rhode Island, and Kentucky" was reverted without discussion. I agree that the info box table contains the same information within a comprehensive table that I updated on the page. However, some people are not going to be drawn to the table when looking for an individual state narrative. We should support multiple learning modalities for something as important as months of progress by the uncommitted movement. Many people will likely only read a narrative and not search through tabular data. I believe this information about delegates gained since Super Tuesday is important to be in a narrative format. Smobes (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

... i mean, go ahead. im not gonna editwar, but like, the table is there.

if i dont revert, someone else probably will in a few months or a year. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition

Hello, Sawerchessread. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, in this revert, you restored content that, according to both Wikipedia policy (WP:NOCONSENSUS) and admin feedback following a failed RFC, should be removed from the article. Additionally, you did so without providing an edit summary. This is not the first time you have made a controversial revert without providing an edit summary, as you did previously here. 916crdshn (talk) 07:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for the first revert, should have provided an edit summary.

Second revert, by WP:BRD, a bold deletion of long-standing fact by editor was reverted.

In the future, if you have an issue with an edit, put the information in the talk space. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

First Message Ever, Let it be archived i guess

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Sherlock (software) seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition

Hello, Sawerchessread. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Philly Palestine Coalition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

NP. I think i abandoned it. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 02:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work at TESCREAL. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bluethricecreamman. Thank you for your work on Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice article!!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you...

@User:Sawerchessread, for looking in at the Pamela Paul article, and I hope you continue to do so. [I recognised your name there as a longstanding WP participant—perhaps through our watching the Rowling Talk page (?).]

I appreciate in all contexts your effort to keep us editting NPOV, and otherwise compliant with WP policy and guideline articles supporting accuracy and balance. (In this description I would include WP:VERIFY and WP:OR, significantly.)

I would note—with no sense of offense, rather, an eye for irony—that recent action at that article, perhaps resulting from my drumbeating that others keep watch there, led to protection of Pamela Paul, with consequence that the former POV/OR editor (red letter and one-time, but registered) is allowed still to edit, but I (retired and no longer registered) am disallowed.

That is, the direct but simplistic administrative solution to that brewing but nevertheless still only potential for edit warring had as its impact removal of one trying to safeguard the article with regard to WP:NPOV, WP:VER, WP:OR, etc.!

I can certainly redeem time otherwise, but I still favour not being sidelined, and so being part of a dyamic, editorial, non-administrative solution. (Unfortunately, for reasons of organisational security, our working via registration is no longer an option.)

Cheers, and thank you again. 98.206.30.195 (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

thank you for your work. I'm somewhat new at this and have only started editting the past 6-7 months.

I think this page is regularly the target of IP editors, some of whom had less noble intentions than you.

I have my eye on it though, as do others. Apologies for interrupting your work. If you want, use the WP:EDITREQUEST and I'll try to handle it for you. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas War has been accepted

Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 08:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Existential risk studies

Hello, how are you?

Given your interest in TESCREAL, I suppose you might also be interested in this topic of existential risk studies, which I have decided to make. If you do have an interest to take a look, it is in my [drafts]. I have also submitted the article to review, a process which I have zero experience with. Feel free to give any advice or proposition of change.

Bye. JoaquimCebuano (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

hey. ill take a look.

idk the exact details but WP:CANVASSING

may discourage asking for folks who happen to agree with you often from approving work.

ill still take a look but im not the most knowledgeable about most existential risk philosophies, just happened to have noticed TESCREAL had been deleted and thought that it seemed egregious that it had been removed like that. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 06:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I didnt know this rule. The article was still in my drafts that moment, so it would more about suggestions. But it was quite a fast process of approval anyway, just a few minutes. JoaquimCebuano (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Move discussion for "Ashkenazi genius" or whatever it's called

Do you want to start an (open-ended?) move discussion for Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence, now that the deletion discussion is over? IIRC you mentioned an interest in changing the article title during the AfD.

I have some experience with move discussions under my belt now ;)

— Jruderman (talk) 09:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Done. started a section. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:1RR at Genocide of indigenous peoples

Hi; at topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

You have made two reverts within a 24 hour period:

1. 13:21, 6 August 2024
2. 20:28, 5 August 2024

Please self-revert 13:21, 6 August 2024 to bring yourself back into compliance with this restriction. BilledMammal (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

12:44, 7 August 2024 seems like another 1RR violation, coming less than 24 hours after your 13:21, 6 August 2024 revert - please self-revert again. BilledMammal (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

No. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

I really don't want to have to take you to AE over this, but if your only response is "no" I don't have much choice - can you at least explain why you feel a revert is not required? BilledMammal (talk) 23:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

They don't count a revert then self-revert as a revert in editwarring. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

The self-revert (13:51, 6 August 2024) doesn't count, but the initial revert (13:21, 6 August 2024) can, particularly when it is on the same content.

You've reinstated this content four times now, three of them in less than 48 hours; I think it would be in your best interests to self revert. BilledMammal (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

No. If you want to intimidate, you're failing. If you want to report, get it over with already. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Bluethricecreamman. Thank you.

1R

Fyi, the 1R rule only applies to the AI/IP material. Selfstudier (talk) 15:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence

On 13 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that researchers estimated that training the model for ChatGPT used the equivalent energy footprint of "driving 123 gasoline-powered passenger vehicles for a year"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:List of BL dramas

Hello, I'm the creator of Draft:List of BL dramas that you recently declined. Thank you for your comment, but I still find myself wondering why the article falls under WP:NOTDIRECTORY when directory lists like List of teen dramas exist. BL/Boys' love is a genre that falls under the category of LGBT works whose related lists can be found plenty in Wikipedia, and the existence of BL is covered by reliable sources which can be seen in its main article Yaoi. I'm hoping to receive input on whether if I can improve the article for future resubmission. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@HypeBoy ah.. Ok, maybe declining was a mistake.

I didn't fully read the WP:NLIST and WP:NOTADIRECTORY. If you submit again, ill accept.

Im still a probationary AFC reviewer and got review powers last month, apologies! Bluethricecreamman (talk) 00:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@Bluethricecreamman: I see, no worries! I just resubmitted the draft article, I'm hoping you can accept the submission, please. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topics alert for all page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them.

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 16:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Referral from the Artibration Enforcement noticeboard regarding behavior in Palestine-Israel articles and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks,

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 17:52, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

"Context"?

Yes, I was blocked from the Imane Khelif article for a WP:MEDRS and WP:BLP violation. When I appealed, the reviewing admin suggested opening a thread at WT:MEDRS to clarify the underlying policy issue - perhaps they felt the issue wasn't straightforward and required community discussion? Anyway, I followed their advice and started a thread at WP:MEDRS. By adding unnecessary "context" (the issue is of general interest, not specific to me), I'm concerned you're hindering the discussion and making it seem like "there's no policy issue here, just an angry user complaining about their block". Gitz (talk) (contribs) 16:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Armand Duplantis on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas war

On 21 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas war, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that queer pro-Palestinian protesters faced off against the 2024 Philadelphia Pride drumline? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas War. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas war), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Tang Williams

Hello, Bluethricecreamman,

I'm just wondering why you put your comment at the top of this discussion instead of the bottom. I was going to move it but thought it would be better if I asked you about it. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

whoops. fixed. sorry! Bluethricecreamman (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox Wikipedia user on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Assassin's Creed Shadows on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Histogram on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

		A can of Moxie for you
		Thriley has given you a refreshing Moxie! Moxie is soft drink flavored with gentian root extract created around 1876 as a patent medicine called "Moxie Nerve Food." It is the origin of the word "moxie", a noun meaning energy, determination, and spunk. Thank you for creating Political text messaging. Cheers!

Thriley (talk) 18:13, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Islamic Action Front on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Formal warning on WP:BATTLEGROUND conduct

Do not cast aspersions or make unsupported allegations, even at WP:AE. The expected standard is Every user is expected to interact with others civilly, calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation, and that is even more important in WP:CTOPS. This warning is a result of this AE report. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

References

This was a cool find[1]. What search engine did you use to find references to the UNHR report? Did you just use google scholar? VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 16:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

@Vice regent yeah google scholar. i have to open up the article though and check which journal it was and if it wasnt some junk journal Bluethricecreamman (talk) 16:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2024 University of Pennsylvania pro-Palestine Encampment

Hello, Bluethricecreamman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 University of Pennsylvania pro-Palestine Encampment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Help with vandalism

Hello @Bluethricecreamman I've noticed your work on some pages that are currently the subject of or close to becoming an edit war, I've also noticed the same but don't know nearly as much about editing Wiki (and am not an extended user anywho) but I'd like to report users I feel are continuously engaging in vandalism of pages. Is there anyway to do this? Currently the Arb-com method seems to be the only thing and I struggle to follow how it works honestly? Galdrack (talk) 12:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

report vandalism to WP:AIV

if you want help go message an admin’s talk page. i think @ScottishFinnishRadish is pretty active in patrolling this area Bluethricecreamman (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@Bluethricecreamman thanks I reached out about one event though wanted to bring something to your attention too since you included me in the conversation too. In my opinion neither user is behaving very well but IMO the work done on that page has been so poorly sourced it feels like vandalism itself? I'd like to know your input before getting involved. Galdrack (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

talk to an admin. I am not that much more experienced than these "bad" users.

See @ScottishFinnishRadish Bluethricecreamman (talk) 17:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

@Bluethricecreamman thanks I didn't want to overwhelm the one person. Galdrack (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

My advice: do edits to other pages besides these until you are WP:ECR allowed.

I started off doing edits to high conflict pages, but was told off for it when I didn't have EC. Instead worked on sprucing up pages for professors and on AI related pages for a bit until I had ECR. I still take breaks from high conflict areas too. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

@Bluethricecreamman Yea what I've been trying the past few months the problem I've had is a lot of these articles haven't been clear they're related and the rules on the site being as they are it's hard to figure out how to determine if they're related. Like don't get me wrong I can understand the interpretation it's related but I feel it's being abused in some circumstances to restrict edits from users too, to me the warning I've received recently weren't clearly under the ruling at all but semi.

I appreciate your input in the posts by the way, thanks. Galdrack (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Re. ANI

Do not post possible connections between Wikipedia users and external profiles, per the WP:OUTING policy. Please contact the Arbitration Committee about your concerns. —Ingenuity (t • c) 22:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Political text messaging in the United States

On 21 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Political text messaging in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Americans received nearly 15 billion political text messages in 2022? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Political text messaging. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Political text messaging in the United States), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)