User talk:AmiDaniel/Archive18
Orphaned fair use image (Image:ContribsRollback.JPG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:ContribsRollback.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof queue
[edit]Hi AmiDaniel/Betacommand/PS2pcGAMER. There's quite a queue building up for authorisation to use VandalProof. I'm hoping someone's going to be available to go through the list and grant/refuse permission as necessary. Cheers, A bit iffy 11:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Open Proxies
[edit]Well, I didn't think it was right to ask these questions on the project discussion page, so I'm asking them here. You sound like you do scans and that sort of stuff for a living. I was wondering if you could teach me how to do what you are doing. I would appreciate it greatly. --Cadet hastings 13:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Lol, no, not for a living (I wish I could make a living out of scanning OPs! :D), but it is knowledge that you generally tend to acquire if you work or study in the field of computer science and networking. I would however be glad to bring you by on the basics of it, and we could definitely use some more volunteers to help with scans. Do you have any knowledge or experience in computer networking? If not, you might read through some of the materials at v:Topic:Networking to start. I'm not sure how much time I'm going to have today and tomorrow, but if you want, you can msg me on irc.freenode.net (I'm typically on as nick "amidaniel") or we can set some other time to go through the basics. AmiDaniel (talk) 21:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Vandal Proof registration
[edit]Hello, I recently registered to use Vandal Proof. No one has done anything about letting new members use your tool, for about a week. I was hoping you could do something about it, being the creator of Vandal Proof, because there is quite a queue. Best Regards, Lemonflash(t)/(c) 22:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hallo!
[edit]Do you by any chance attend Johns Hopkins University? Chickitychina`1`1 01:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nope, sorry. AmiDaniel (talk) 01:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- No worries Mate! Chickitychina`1`1 07:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Question
[edit]You reverted three bot edits to Ohio County talk pages, including Talk:Ross County, Ohio. I added or updated all 88 county infoboxes, but missed these three "infobox needed" banners. The bot removed the banners as no longer needed, but you reverted this. Did I miss a needed infobox? I removed the banners (infobox needed) again, is that OK? Thanks, Ruhrfisch 02:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- The bot was not simply removing the templates from the talk pages, but rather moving them from the talk page to the article (an incorrect behavior which I was reverting). If a page does not need an Infoboxneeded template on its talk page, please remove it. These reverts were done blindly and en masse, so please feel free to use your judgment and undo any reversions you feel were incorrect. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Infoboxneeded?
[edit]Why should this template be deleted? It makes no sense. Timneu22 16:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't really support its deletion. It was deleted by Cyde after a bot went mad with it, and I reversed his deletion. Thinking it better that there be some discussion on the matter, I took it to TfD. See the logs. AmiDaniel (talk) 20:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Just a note of thanks. I worry that despite the best intentions, we end up all-too-willing to "pull the trigger" and delete what could be improved or should be discussed in the interest of consensus. Cyde is clearly well-intentioned, however, to be sure. --Ssbohio 18:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, AmiDaniel. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Anonymous Anonymous VP bug.PNG) was found at the following location: User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs/Version 1.3.5. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, AmiDaniel. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:MOPProblem.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs/Version 1.1.0 fixes. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, AmiDaniel. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Run time error 13.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs/Version 1.1.0 fixes. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, AmiDaniel. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Whodunit SS.JPG) was found at the following location: User:AmiDaniel/WhodunitQuery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 10:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
VP application
[edit]Not that I'm particularly bothered either way, but I'd suggest it's entirely appropriate for Betacommand to decide whether I was suitable for it given his recent desysopping for poor judgement and due to the fact he showed appalling judgement in a recent dispute involving me, see Talk:Gerry Adams for more details. One Night In Hackney303 05:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please contact Betacommand first, it is possible your being declined was a mistake. Let me know when you get a reply, and I will review your request. Prodego talk 01:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
VP
[edit]You may or may not remember me, but I was a previous user of the best vandalfighting tool to ever be released. Around last November, I inexplicably left Wikipedia. Both times I've tried to return only to find said tool to be down/broken/disabled. What's going on, and will this ever be restored to it's former glory?
Nice to be back. â¹('.'â¹)Kribbeh(âº'.')⺠16:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- We'll see if I find some time to fix and get the bot hosted. Unfortunately my time has been occupied with RL and other wiki projects, so I've not been able to get around to it. Sorry for the inconvenience. AmiDaniel (talk) 00:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof
[edit]Just to let you know, everyone is experiencing the problem of not being able to use the recent changes feature in VP. I'm beginning to think that there's probably a bug in VP, not the RSS feed. ~~Eugene2x Sign here ⺠~~ 04:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Vandal Proof
[edit]Hello,
I recently downloaded Vandal Proof as an alternative to the ever-tedious manual reverting of vandal edits. For some reason, it says:
The username you are trying to connect with is not approved for VandalProof.
Do you have any ideas why I would be receiving this error message?
Thank you,
Curran (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Please read the instructions. You must REGISTER FOR USE first. ~~Eugene2x Sign here ⺠~~ 21:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
I moved the article into the main namespace, but then going back through the history, I found you were the one who'd moved it to the project space. Could you explain why this was? A piece of copyrighted software doesn't seem to belong in the project namespace.
As well, do you think it satisfies WP:NOTE (or could, at any rate)? Blast [improve me] 15.05.07 2009 (UTC)
- It seems most definitely clear to me that the software is by no means notable. Would anyone other than those who have visited this page or its website have ever heard of it? Can you find verifiable sources who comment on the software (i.e., an article in a major publication about the software)? I think the answer is most certainly no, but if you debate this, please let me know. Additionally, the "article" is incredibly brief, providing no useful content whatsoever. It seems quite clear to me that this is nothing more than a Wikipedia tool and would be considerably better served in the project namespace, as is typically the case with all wiki tools. If you take issue with sending it to the project namespace, then the only other option would be to /dev/null. AmiDaniel (talk) 00:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't have a vested interest in keeping the article (it seems non-notable to me, as well); I just wanted to ask if you felt the same. However, as I mentioned above, it doesn't seem quite right that a copyrighted piece of software be in the project namespace (related to a project released under the GFDL). I'm not sure what the rules are for inclusion in that, but it certainly seems at any rate to require a release of copyright of some sort (GFDL, CC, etc.). Blast [improve me] 17.05.07 1238 (UTC)
- I don't see why discussing copyrighted software would somehow require some sort of release any more than it would if it were in mainspace. Image is a problem, but I don't see why we need the image at all. JoshuaZ 14:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- That WP:TOOLS need to be free is simply not the case, Blast_san. For example, we include 1-click-answers in the WP:TOOLS page, it is copywrited. I do not see how mergeing Wikipedia Widget with WP:TOOLS would be an issue. ffm âtalk 15:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't have a vested interest in keeping the article (it seems non-notable to me, as well); I just wanted to ask if you felt the same. However, as I mentioned above, it doesn't seem quite right that a copyrighted piece of software be in the project namespace (related to a project released under the GFDL). I'm not sure what the rules are for inclusion in that, but it certainly seems at any rate to require a release of copyright of some sort (GFDL, CC, etc.). Blast [improve me] 17.05.07 1238 (UTC)
VandalProof
[edit]Could ther be a possibility to link the "New User" function on VandalProof directly to their talk page to allow us (VandalProof users) to be able to use our own/other welcome templates, rather than the one currently in use which actually points a user to his/her contributions regardless is they have any....
For more information, please contact me
Booksworm Talk to me! 07:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof
[edit]When I tried to verify my name, it says "The user list is corrupt, please contact a moderator to have it repaired. I am approved, too. Userpie 15:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof Application Denial
[edit]Could you please give me a more exact reason for denying my application? The application page itself states that "In most circumstances, [...] users with fewer than 250 mainspace edits [...] will generally not be accepted." I do realize the concise meaning of that; however, it lets on to the possibility that one could be accepted without 250 mainspace edits. While I'm attempting to contest your decision (as you are the final arbiter of this, seeing how you created it), I would like to emphasize to you that all of my edits and participation in Wikipedia have been benign and that I'm attempting to slowly "work myself up" the ranks to become more helpful in the community. Obviously, if denied most tools that aid me (from what I've seen, all Windows anti-vandal tools are authorization-only), I'll never be able to do so. If you still believe my denial is warranted, could you at least point me in the direction of some ways to fight more vandalism besides what I'm doing now (happening upon random pages and seeing if something can be corrected)? Additionally, I advise (although in no way am I trying to be offensive) that you change your VP application page to more accurately reflect your acceptance process, as per the reason you left me on my talk page (that 250 mainspace edits is strictly required). --LoganK 20:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Use WP:LAVT, WP:TWINKLE, WP:IRC, and WP:RC. ffm âtalk 20:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I'd like to point out that you can vandal fight just fine without any tools; for example, I've never used any (I'm approved for VP, but as a Mac user, I can't actually use it). A shiny program just makes it easier to screw up; having a solid knowledge of the policies themselves is much better than an automated tool. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
VP
[edit]Why did you erase my VP status? I was using it correctly. Respond on my talk plz. Wikiman53 t a 01:23, 21 May 2007 (UTC) Recopied from Daniel's talk page.'
- a) I removed you, after discussion with at least two other moderators, after a (confidential) complaint was made. Upon review of your recent edits, particularily those to your talk page using {{helpme}}, it was resolved that you have shown a distinct lack of knowledge, and the moderator group has decided to remove your access as a protection measure (like how we decline new nominations for very similar situations).
- b) I, as noted in my header, post my messages here, and here only - "Please note that if I respond to your message, it will always be placed here; it may be duplicated on your talk page depending on the urgency and importance". I do not consider your message to be of paramount importance or urgency. Daniel 06:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, if you really want to know...
- I knew what personal attack templates were. I was wondering the CODES!
*I know how to edit a rfa I was wondering if you could WITHOUT a comment.
I know for example {{db-bio}} but didnt know how to say csd7 as an example. I also believe you should have TOLD ME that you did this. Personally, I think it was very rude of you guys. Also all my VP edita are relievent. But if you don't want me to, I won't help revert vandals faster. Wikiman53 t a 22:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- I knew what personal attack templates were. I was wondering the CODES!
- Ha!. Looks like I got this one right :) Daniel 06:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 21 | 21 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
GeSHi update
[edit]You seem like an admin interested in GeSHi. You might like to bookmark User:Quuxplusone/monobook.css for future copying (in whole or in part) into MediaWiki:Geshi.css. I'm updating my monobook.css irregularly, but for some languages, like C, Python, and C++, someone's going to have to redo the corresponding PHP files. I'll try to attract someone's attention if I get around to doing one. --Quuxplusone 08:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'll attempt to get done with the css what I can tomorrow. I'm also finding quite a few bugs with the GeSHI hilighting (in addition to the one you already reported on the talk page), and I'm going to do my best to try to fix them / get them fixed within the next week. AmiDaniel (talk) 10:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Check out this corrected version of "c.php". I can't test it on my own, so there are probably a few missing commas and things, but once the typos are fixed it should be a huge improvement. I'll work on the "Geshi.css" colors for it tomorrow. --Quuxplusone 08:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Inbox Alert
[edit]You have mail ~ Anthøny 02:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Got it and responded. AmiDaniel (talk) 10:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Daniel, it is a matter of utmost importance that I must speak to you privately regarding your actions here. I am beginning to feel intimidated, to the point of blocking, Anthony for stalking me, in much the same fashion as was brought up in his first failed RfA with Essjay. I ask that you remove AGK from the moderators' list until I can talk to you. Daniel 12:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Might I also have a few minutes to speak with you ~ Anthøny 16:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Proxycheck verified users list
[edit]I often scan WP:OP for open proxies and probe the hosts with nmap. I feel I have enough experience with nmap to be put on the verified users list, also surpassing the requirements for inclusion. I have over 4000 edits and 2 years' experience on-wiki. Please review my contributions and maybe give me some sample nmap output to interpret. I feel that my presence on the verified list will help clear the backlogs. Thanks, —Crazytales o.o 03:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
New mail
[edit]You've got mail ;-) «Snowolf How can I help?» 00:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
64.53.185.25
[edit]Hi AmiDaniel. You changed my block on this IP from 31 hours to indefinite. It was used for two and a half minutes and is extremely likely to be dynamic. Please reconsider changing this block to a reasonable length. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- According to the documentation provided by the ISP, WideOpenWest LLC, all of their Internet packages provide static IP allocation--as such, I think it is actually quite unlikely that this IP is dynamic. If you can find it to be otherwise, I'll gladly reverse the block; however, in cases of death threats, I feel it absolutely imperative that the user making them be denied access to edit indefinitely. We've lost many good contributors as a result of death threats, and I don't see any reason to take them lightly. If you disagree, please, by all means, take it to WP:ANI. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with the seriousness, it's the effectiveness. It's also likely it's not the only IP available to the editor, so it should probably be hard blocked instead if they are to be prevented from editing from it. I would tender a period of years, when you set the hard block. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
copyvios removed by members, not admin
[edit]- Member Quatloo is removing copyvio notices from the Sid Haig article, which is an obvious chopped version of the person's Imdb page (and one more). Member Anon also placed a copyvio on the page, and Quatloo removed it again. Article page is a copyright violation of two websites. Licensing on discussion page was fake. Strange back-and-forthing about copyright and sources on this article page, mostly involving Quatloo.66.174.92.167 03:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 22 | 28 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I ws just browsing Wikipedia:Song and came across this entry, which you deleted. Out of curiosity, what was the reason it was deleted? Also, if tere was a good reason, i'll remove it from the list, as it was deleted but is still on the song list. Thanks! (So you know, I just thought it was routine but I was confused by the reason of "Umm ... yeah.") Matt - TheFearow 21:28, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 24 | 11 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
The brilliant idea Barnstar
[edit]
|
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
| Your big idea of VandalProof was a brilliant idea! —Coastergeekperson04's talk@ 03:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC) |
A question about VP
[edit]Hello, I know that you are the creator of VP, and know everything about VP. However, how many people needs to be in the approval list before they get approved? And when will they get approved? I am waiting for myn, but it takes too long. Is anything wrong? Pro Game Master87 05:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please be patient. You will be approved eventualy. ffm âtalk 19:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Your VandalProof Application
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Metta Bubble. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have a 3RR block only a month ago, as well as other factors which indicate you may not be able to deal with vandals who confront you effectively.
Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 07:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Daniel. Actually, I was blocked over a year ago. I think you misread the date. The block itself was contested by two other admins at the time as being inappropriate. Nonetheless, I have been involved in some heated discussion at Stephen Barrett recently and am happy to abide by your decision. I would appreciate an indication of precisely how long you think I should wait before reapplying. Thanks. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 11:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for that. Glad to be on board. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 12:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
An Image with a no rationale for Fair Use
[edit]The current image, Image:Spy Kids 2.jpg is under fair use, but has no rationale. It has been tagged since June 6, 2007. The uploader has been notified, but there has been no rationale. Is it posssible for it to speedy deleted, and may I notify it in the image captions of the image's article(s)? Tyty1234 07:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Remember an old friend?
[edit]Guillen (talk · contribs) is back as Tioeliecer (talk · contribs). Though he has put poorly translated text into Plymouth Brethren as before, he hasn't crossed the line into the personal attack domain yet. I just wanted to let you know since you handled his block/ban before. --BigDT 00:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 25 | 18 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject on open proxies
[edit]I'd like to become a verified user, so that I can help out with the backlog of IPs to check. How do I apply? Thanks in advance, Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 01:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 20
[edit]Good news, everyone: Wikipedia Weekly Episode 20 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/06/19/wikipedia-weekly-20-return-of-the-podcast/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project!
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Flagged Revisions
[edit]Flagged Revisions has been losing popularity (not people not liking it, but not a lot of people discussing it). What has been happening on the developer side (are they going to implement it?, etc.) Thanks, --(Review Me) R ParlateContribs@ (Let's Go Yankees!) 01:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Development is still most definitely continuing (you can see the latest changes to it here), and so far as I'm aware we are still planning on installing it on Wikipedia--when exactly this is going to happen, I'm not sure. In any case, the extension is rapidly approaching stability, and I personally believe it satisfactory for deployment in its current state. If I had to give an ETA, I would guess around one to two months, but I cannot say that for sure. AmiDaniel (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
blocks
[edit]i saw your recent blocks due to email harassment, you might want to block this one too; Skult of Caro a sock puppet that was active earlier this year. --MichaelLinnear 00:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 26 | 25 June 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Approval for WP:OP
[edit]Was wondering if I can get approved to help with WP:OP and what I need to do besides contacting an admin. Cheers Q T C 03:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Problem with VP
[edit]I am sure you have answered this question for others and I cannot fine it. However I am getting a "user list is corrupt" message when I sign into VP. Can you help me out please? Thanks. Montco 04:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Request for expedition of checkuser request
[edit]Sounds like circular logic or something, doesn't it (a request to expedite a request?)? Anyhow, someone (User:Antandrus) advised I contact a clerk to see why this checkuser request hasn't been acted on yet. (They said it was in a place where nobody would see it.) If you could help get this properly formatted and submitted, that would be very much appreciated. Thanks, +ILike2BeAnonymous 05:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Goodwood Plantation rc04488.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 15:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Problems with VandalProof
[edit]Firstly, I want to thank you for approving me to use VandalProof. Unfortunately, I have yet to actually use VandalProof. When I open the executable, my username automatically comes up, but when I click to verify authorization, nothing ever happens. I know it says to wait a few moments, I waited a few hours, and still nothing. Any help you could give would be greatly appreciated. Ganfon 13:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:VP TabbedLook.JPG)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:VP TabbedLook.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:VP newlook3.JPG)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:VP newlook3.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Testwiki
[edit]I emailed you regarding sysop access there. Hope you got it. Note, I'm actually requesting sysop/steward/bureaucrat access if it is possible. Thanks, --SunStar Net talk 16:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
da Vinci Barnstar
[edit]
|
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
| For fixing a serious MediaWiki bug less than an hour after I reported it. If only other software developers were this responsive! Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 05:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC) |
- Haha, thank you =D. It was a very minor fix -- thank you for reporting the problem, though! AmiDaniel (talk)
Testwiki
[edit]Thank you for giving me sysop access there. Some interesting features!! Shame I can't upload any images though... but the editor feature and sighted revision feature is good!! Thanks, SunStar Net talk 13:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
No longer have VP privileges?
[edit]I have been on a Wikipedia vandal-chasing vacation for a few months and was excited to return tonight but, for some reason, no longer appear to be among the approved users. Do I need to re-submit to the Awaiting Approval list or can I be added by some expedited process? I'm not sure exactly when I was originally approved but it would have been within the last 10 months. Ginsengbomb 04:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Issues with Vandalproof
[edit]Hi, there :) I was recently approved for VP and am having some troubles with it. When I patrol recent changes, it just gets the newest recent changes, and none of them are actually sorted out as vandalism. So, there is no way for me to revert anything simply because there is nothing in the recent changes pane to revert. I've played around with the RC preferences, but still can't seem to find the solution. On a smaller note, I keep getting messages about script errors every time I go to a new page. Hope you can help, Arky ¡Hablar Conmigo! 00:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof issues
[edit]Hello Daniel, I am having some issues with VP. I have been approved to use VP, and have installed the program per the directions on the VP page, but when I attempt to use the application while logged in in IE7, it says "No privileges found" in the box, and when I click on "Verify authorization" it does nothing. I have re-installed the program, but it was still messed up. Is there anything you can do to help? Thanks so much and you do great work, Neranei T/C 03:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
How does one help with this project, seems that page has quite a backlog. Q T C 06:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification
[edit]Just a super quick note, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 21 is out and can be downloaded at the usual places (if you've forgotten, WikipediaWeekly.com works wonders. -- Tawkerbot 01:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
[edit]Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 23:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! last Approval in 16 july ;), where are you?--OsamaK 08:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Done, by the way... Daniel→♦ 05:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
FlaggedRevs Extension
[edit]Hi,
I've been looking at your demonstration of the Wikipedia:Flagged revisions extension. This looks a very interesting proposal. (Is it still a proposal?) May I be really cheeky and question the wording of the 'information banner', for want of a better term?
It currently says:
- This is the latest quality revision, approved on 15 August 2007. The current one can be modified; 12 revisions await review. (details)'.
The current what I ask? The current revision/The current 'quality' revision (obviously not but ambiguous none-the-less). How would "the current version" sound? Another 'revision' isn't called for, but version might sound better than 'one'.
Also what would happen if the 'current' version was not automatically shown to the proven editors (unless there is no recorded quality revision)? In this way any proven editor who is just browsing/researching - believe it or not, it still happens - will still be sure of a non-vandalised version and would also be prompted to approve the recent edits (removing any backlog situation, and confirming any genuine edits that may not be displayed (to Joe Public) for a length of time.
I guess that is a question for the talk page, I'll post there as well.
Regardless, I like.
Best wishes, –MDCollins (talk) 23:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Help regarding the creation of thumbnail images
[edit]Hi,
I installed imagemagick on my wiki server for getting thumbnailing feature to work.I also made the follwowing changes to the loaclsettings.php file.But still iam getting this error "Warning: exec() [function.exec ]: Unable to fork [""C:\Program Files\ImageMagick-6.3.5-Q16\convert" -quality 80 -background white -size 180 "E:\Wiki\mediawiki-1.7.1/images/e/e4/EagletonTripPic2.JPG" -coalesce -resize "180x135!" -depth 8 "E:\Wiki\mediawiki- 1.7.1/images/thumb/e/e4/EagletonTripPic2.JPG/180px-EagletonTripPic2.JPG" 2>&1"] in E:\Wiki\mediawiki-1.7.1\includes\GlobalFunctions.php on line 1719" The modifications i did are
$wgEnableUploads = true; $wgUseImageResize = true; $wgUseImageMagick = true; $wgImageMagickConvertCommand = "/usr/bin/convert";
Kindly respond ASAP
Regards,
Priya.N —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Prinav (talk • contribs) 08:28, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
- Well, for starters it would appear that you are running this off a windows box, rather than a unix box -- as such, convert isn't going to be located at "/usr/bin/convert". You need to set $wgImageMagickConvertCommand to wherever ImageMagick is installed .. on Windows, I believe this is "C:\Program Files\ImageMagick\convert.exe" but please check first. AmiDaniel (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I checked the path and changed the path.But still it isnt working.Here are the modifications i did.
$wgImageMagickConvertCommand = "C:\Imagemagick\ImageMagick-6.3.5-6-Q16\convert.exe"; $wgImageMagickIdentifyCommand = "C:\Imagemagick\ImageMagick-6.3.5-6-Q16\identify.exe";
Also i altered the privilages for the C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe to (R/E) C:\Imagemagick\images to (R/W/E) C:\MediaWiki1.7.1\images to (R/W/E)
But still it isnt working.Am really puzzled what is wrong. Kindly help me out.
Regards, Priya.N —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prinav (talk • contribs) 07:57, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
VP
[edit]I cannot use Vandal Proof because every time I click on something IE pops up an error. Its a different error every time and its making me nuts. How can I get VP to run without all the errors? Minesweeper.007 (talk · contribs) 16:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Time
[edit]Please check out the requests for VandalProof, as there are a lot of people waiting. Dreamy \*/!$! 02:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof
[edit]Heyho AmiDaniel,
I'm a user from german wikipedia and have over 8k edits in all Wikimedia projects. Maybe it's possible for me to test VP, I would be happy (added myself to Approval list. Greetings, Conny 16:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC).
Greetings. Would you care to comment? Without more information your change is going to be reverted. --Gmaxwell 21:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
VP on AR
[edit]Hello
Is there anyway you can allow me or other users to customise VP such that we can login to AR WP and smash any vandalism that occurs ?
Let me know
--Lord Anubis 01:13, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Massive problems
[edit]In case you weren't already aware, new issue. I don't have a clue as to fixing it, though. Daniel 12:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 28
[edit]Good news, everyone: Wikipedia Weekly Episode 28 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/09/04/wikipedia-weekly-28/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project!
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 04:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
wikiscanner
[edit]hello daniel, it's me , drini I've emailed you a couple of weeks ago via Special:Emailuser but got no reply and the email address listed at the proxy scnaner page is bouncing.
I was asking if you could give me access to proxy scanner? Mainly to verify proxies on eswiki (where I'm checkuser), currently I suspect we've detected a few proxies but have no way to verify it. Reach me a t es:Special:Emailuser/drini if it's possible. Thank you. -- drini [meta:] [commons:] 13:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Did this get done Drini? Prodego talk 00:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- did = checing the ip? or did = getting the password? In the 1st case yes, in the 2nd not. Please use Special:Emailuser to bypass my spam filter. -- drini [meta:] [commons:] 00:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. HermesBot 01:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Vandalproof
[edit]Hi I was recently approved for vandal proof, but the program tells me the user list is corrupted. Could you help. Thanks in advance. Samuel 23:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
-2007-05-14T01:02:00.000Z-Image:Anonymous_Anonymous_VP_bug.PNG){kind=link}
-2007-05-14T06:49:00.000Z-Image:MOPProblem.jpg){kind=link}
-2007-05-14T08:31:00.000Z-Image:Run_time_error_13.jpg){kind=link}
-2007-05-14T10:49:00.000Z-Image:Whodunit_SS.JPG){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
[edit]|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 01:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Your deletion of Cooper's Law
[edit]I just realized (much after the fact) that you had deleted this article on 9 July, for reasons invisible to me. I've recreated it as a simple redirect to Martin Cooper. I trust this is not an issue, but thought I should let you know.LeadSongDog 16:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 31
[edit]Oh, boy! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 31 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/09/26/wikipedia-weekly-31-return-of-the-panel/ and as always, you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly. We're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project!
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
Thanks
[edit]For ignoring the abuse some members here exert on other, honest editors. Duly noted. At least now we who are actually trying to make this place a decent repository for accurate information know it's a lost cause because of admins like you. Thanks for the heads up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.58.52 (talk) 06:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
[edit]|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Image:VP newlook3.JPG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:VP newlook3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:VP newlook3.PNG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:VP newlook3.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image (Image:VP TabbedLook.JPG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:VP TabbedLook.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
_2){kind=link}
Foundation images .. other image nonsense
[edit]The use of images containing foundation logos, while they are indeed copyrighted, is permissible in userspace, even while other non-free images are not. It would indeed be quite absurd to suppose that a website's use of its own logo could violate its copyright on that logo. Each of the many, many times this issue has been raised, the consensus of the board and of Wikipedia has been that use of WMF-copyrighted logos in userspace is appropriate. Additionally, screenshots of a tool for Wikimedia, be the tool released under a free license or not, for the purpose of illustrating the software in question on its appropriate project page or discussion page are permissible on those pages by simple common sense. While the screenshots were mis-tagged, I should think it a far better use of your time to retag them or contact me to ask for an explanation of copyright than to go spam me with three redundant templates and mark the images for deletion. Tagging is a job for a bot, not a person. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- If Wikimedia logos, which violate no copyright, are permitted, then why would Mozilla logos (like the Firefox logo), which also violate no copyright, be prohibited? This makes no sense.
- Aside from the Wikipedia logo issue, which I am not pressing, screenshots of non-free software are typically non-free. I looked at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof#License and found that VandalProof is not under a free license, and therefore screenshots of it would also be non-free. However, since you have clarified that you have released copyright over the user interface elements present in the two screenshots, there is no longer a problem. So, thank you for clarifying! —Remember the dot (talk) 18:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)