Jump to content

User talk:Allthemilescombined1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your work on "Ask Me Again" at AFC (h/t the Teahouse). Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 08:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Is it appropriate to add to this article that a commenter on IMDb wrote "I keep my old VCR just so I can re-watch this" in 2020? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. IMDb is not considered a reliable source, because it's a wiki. — Diannaa (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Artis Henderson has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Artis Henderson. Thanks! Cl3phact0 (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your help! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Allthemilescombined1, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us along with writers and physicians. You might find it useful to look through our Primer for guidance on women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into difficulties or need assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rayne Rouce has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rayne Rouce. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel-Ryan Spaulding (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Interviews, what he says or has written are primary sources so cannot be used to establish notability. The Culture Fix is a weak source because they are a freelance site and there's no named author. The Berliner I would count toward notability but need a couple more reputable sources that have covered him in some depth. S0091 (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tracy Schorn (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
In Her World, Getting Cheated On Makes You a ‘Chump’ is mostly based on what she says, Everyone’s Breaking Up, but Nobody’s Bitter: What’s Going On? is a quote as is the Toronto Star and The New Yorker is a brief mention. There's mention of criticism in one of the NYT pieces but those sources are not included and there's only a brief mention in the draft's content.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Beckerman (musicologist) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Beckerman (musicologist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate your comment, this is helpful. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel-Ryan Spaulding has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel-Ryan Spaulding. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I made the changes. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:42, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Beckerman (musicologist) has been accepted

[edit]
Michael Beckerman (musicologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 21:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rayne Rouce has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rayne Rouce. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've made the changes. Thank you so much! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patti Varol (September 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
These all look like passing mentions. Can you find anything that has significant biographical coverage, or discusses her puzzles at length?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Bouchier has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Bouchier. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I added a couple more reviews - are we there yet? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry @Allthemilescombined1, I just noticed this now and I don't have time to check - just dropping you a warning that when you reply to these template messages, we usually have no idea you've done that! You have to specifically ping the person you're replying to, since the AfC templates don't automatically subscribe us to the discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 23:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering Thank you. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

WikiProject iconWomen writers NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and appreciation

[edit]

Hello. I responded to a comment you made on WT:WIR and a few other editors pointed out that I might have been somewhat harsh, especially given you were a new editor. I took a look and - you are a new editor, of only three months! And yet - you've done absolutely amazing work in those three months, multiple well written articles, and even getting blocked! (Which may not seem like a desirable achievement, but is certainly an achievement! Especially in surviving it, and continuing to do good work!) Anyway, I would like to show a bit of appreciation for that excellent work, by way of welcome.

  • I found and uploaded a free-licensed image for Laura Vanderkam and cropped it; if you believe the uncropped one would be better, please do use that one.
  • uncropped
    uncropped
  • cropped, in article
    cropped, in article

Anyway, the image is good, hope you like that one, and even more so hope you keep up the great work writing. Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 01:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GRuban Many thanks for your kind words and all your help. The actor playing Nelson Rodker didn't sound Scottish, though of course that doesn't mean a thing. There must be some podcaster out there who would like to take on this challenge, right? Someone who loves Scrabble... Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 02:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bouchier has been accepted

[edit]
David Bouchier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 14:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 17:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rayne Rouce has been accepted

[edit]
Rayne Rouce, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:31, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enough now. This is a warning to cease and desist with the WP:ASPERSIONS and general unhelpfulness at the Zionism article. Selfstudier (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Allthemilescombined1! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help with disambiguation please, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sabeeha Rehman

[edit]

Hi Allthemilescombined1 -- You asked for feedback at WiR on this; not sure what aspect you are concerned about? Some quick off-the-cuff thoughts... The subject looks notable to me under WP:AUTHOR but you probably could make this more obvious for a reviewer (whether in AfC or NPP) by linking the book reviews more clearly. I'd divide it slightly differently, esp moving hospital executive into the earlier section -- the Career is best focused on the wiki-notable career as an author, not on other aspects. I'd also take hospital exec out of the lead. Generally op eds in newspapers don't contribute (much) to notability, and can put reviewers off a bit. (It's a common promotional gambit to list tonnes of these.) I'd slim these down to a few of the most prominent examples. The word "speaker" is also loaded with promotional overtones for reviewers and you might like to remove this from the lead too. List the books that have multiple reviews in the lead with dates of publication and co-author. Hope this helps! Good luck! Espresso Addict (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside you do realise that it's completely ok to just move your creations to mainspace yourself? (Obligatory caveat: As long as you are not being paid to write them.) NPP can be harsh but it's generally a lot quicker than AfC. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And another one... I notice you are the editor who created Carol A. Carter -- I meant to thank the creating edit on that one, but hit the wrong line in the history. Anyway, thanks!, I read it with interest (used to work in the field of HIV). Glad you ignored the unhelpful comment at Teahouse on Carter's notability. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I think I'm an approval junkie. I want to make sure everything I move to mainspace is up to standards. But also there's an aspect of "look mom, I made this picture! Oh honey, it's so great!" (In Bossypants, Tina Fey makes her first picture in kindergarten, expecting praise like she gets at home, and the boy next to her rips it in half). I'll work on this latest draft with your comments in mind. Side point - you know who else has a beautiful smile, besides Carol A. Carter? Carol Ann Carter! With cool art stuff in the background. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 12:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think you have to run with Silence Equals Approval here or you go mad; there's so much bad content that needs fixing, people often neglect to praise the enormous effort that goes into creating decent content. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 02:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And, oh, now I see what you mean on Carol Ann Carter; pity we can't get that image into the article -- I do think bios especially are greatly enhanced by an image but there are so rarely free ones to be had. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spanx Updates

[edit]

Hi Allthemilescombined1, nice to meet you. I came across your name as a participant in WP: Women in Red and thought you'd be interested in looking at my draft proposal for Spanx. You'll notice that in 2021, Blackstone bought a majority stake in the company, and the deal was prepared by an all-female investment team and that the subsequent board of directors is all women. I'm eager to hear your thoughts on my draft proposal, as the current article is somewhat outdated, missing sources, and has several tags. Thank you in advance! Red Workout Pants (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Recent edits

[edit]

Here are recent diffs of your additions that fail WP:DUE, WP:WEIGHT, WP:NPOV and WP:RELEVANCE being reverted by various editors: [1], [2], [3], [4] and so on. Instead of addressing these reverts, you have re-added similar content in the same and other articles. Please stop doing this, as it is disruptive editing. If you want a particular piece of content added to a page, and it is challenged, seek consensus for it in talk. You have already been notified about this area being a WP:CTOP, so I won't repeat the earlier warning, but please keep this in mind when editing in future. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I posted two separate requests on the talk page and pinged you. Hearing no response after a couple of days, and with no discussion for several days after my edits, I re-added the content. I would appreciate if you would start a discussion on talk before reverting my edits without any discussion, or ping me so I can discuss with you. I look forward to discussing the material, since we still haven't. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I did not receive a ping for either of these - I believe a ping only happens after an edit (as seems to have happened on those two talk page threads) if you create a new line (WP:PINGFIX). I'll answer on the talk page, but the tl;dr is that neither piece of information has anything to do with the article, which is not about Palestinian views or antisemitic incidents. Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a public forum

[edit]

Your recent comment on talk:Gaza genocide is considered a repeated violation of our WP:Notforum policy after this comment on the same talk page. Consider this a formal warning and please restrain yourself from making similar mistake again, particularly on pages related to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Any further violation would be reported to administrators and may result in suspension of your editor privilege on Wikipedia. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 02:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Sheryl Sandberg

[edit]

I reverted your edit to Sheryl Sandberg. Your edit may very well have been correct, but isn't supported as far as I can see in the article. If you have a reliable source indicating specifically that Sandberg is an activist against antisemitism (as per WP:BLP, WP:NOR, WP:RS), feel free to add back your properly cited claim. --Yamla (talk) 23:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calling on Jewish leaders to unify against the rising tide of antisemitism, she urged them to stand resilient and to take action in combating misinformation and bias within educational institutions and society.[1] Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article already describes her work producing a documentary of antisemitic sexual crimes. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Producing a documentary would not be sufficient; see WP:NOR. Similarly, the article from jpost doesn't describe her as an activist against anti-semitism, though it would certainly be sufficient to indicate she is concerned about rising antisemitism, stnads against antisemitism, etc. etc. The key point is, we can only claim what is directly supported by reliable sources, not come to our own conclusions about what that means. --Yamla (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Update from Women in Green

[edit]

Hello Allthemilescombined1:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wendy Sachs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Republic and ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

  • Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Suggestion:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

WP:AIV

[edit]

This is not an appropriate report for AIV. WP:VANDALISM has a specific training on Wikipedia, and that meaning isn't "has removed content in the past." ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @ScottishFinnishRadish, what about WP:DIS? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism only. If you believe there is a chronic, intractable behavioral issue you can bring it to WP:ANI. I can almost guarantee you that in this situation the report would not go the way you would like. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Sheryl Sandberg: I sit on this stage as a proud Zionist and a proud Jew". The Jerusalem Post. 2024-11-13. Retrieved 2025-01-03.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Allthemilescombined1&oldid=1272312268"