User talk:AlexanderShakifan29/Archive 1

AlexanderShakifan29, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AlexanderShakifan29! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

List of best-selling Latin albums in the US

Per Billboard and the RIAA's guideline, an album has to be at least 51% recorded in Spanish to be considered a "Latin album". Shakira's Laundry Service is mostly sung in English and is therefore not considered to be a "Latin album" by either organization and is the reason why it did not rank on Billboard's Top Latin Albums chart. In addition, the list is based on this article by Nielsen SoundScan which provided the sales data and doesn't list Laundry Service because, again, it's not mostly sung in Spanish. Erick (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explain :D. Can you help me? the other day checking in ChartMaster I realized that Laundry Service already has 16 million sales so you can help me update on their Wikipedia page since the 13 million sales is very out of date. Can you update it or give me permission to update? Link: https://chartmasters.org/2018/04/data-collector-biggest-cspc-albums-of-the-2000s/?fbclid=IwAR2pbaD2iDZhm_hBFcQzj4L-0P1j-1F7XhDZAgiahVL8Z3XQT8qi8uiwHHw

Chart Masters is listed under Wikipedia:Record charts#Websites to avoid because they don't explain where they are getting their sales figures from. Erick (talk) 15:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, thank u. I'm sorry.

Shakira's Laundry Service sales

Hi AlexanderShakifan29,

I saw that you reverted my editions and that of other editors here on Wikipedia regarding the sales of Shakira's Laundry Service album. What we do here on Wikipedia is to put numbers closer to the amount of reliable information we have so that there are no promotional and inflated numbers by fans and record labels. One case that serves as an example is the Michael Jackson's Thriller album, for a long time it was said that sales of this album were around 55 million worldwide, but after his the media started to say that it sold over 100 million, then an RfC was made in the talk page of the article and it was agreed this number was unreal and totally disproportionate to the number of certificates that the album has in the world, so it remained at 66 million, the number was increased because after his death the sales and certifications increased. In the case of Shakira, this album sold around 3 million in the United States and 4 million in Europe and those were the places where she had the biggest sales. So we included in the article the 13 million claim (a gap of around 6 million) to cover missing sales from small markets and other places where the CD also sold well. That is why the 13 million sold is the most suitable to be kept in the article. A claim of 15 million would be very inflated and disproportionate to the number of certificates and sales information we have.--88marcus (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My answer to you

With 13 million claim we have a gap of 5 million records which includes little markets like you mentioned (Peru, Egypt...) in those countries an artists get a gold certification if the artist sold 5,000 or even 3,000 we can't expect the album sold in the millions in countries like that. About Avril Lavigne she is listed here with 16 million sold which is the more accurate to her certifications, she has way more certifications than Shakira and is listed with only 1 million copies more. Tottally disproportionate and inflated.--88marcus (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The best selling female albums

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The best selling female albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 01:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm Mattplaysthedrums. I have recently requested speedy deletion of your article The best selling female albums. This is because it currently has no useful content. If you would like to experiment with making an article on Wikipedia, you can use the Sandbox. If you think I have made a mistake, please message me at my talk page. Thanks! Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling albums by women moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of best-selling albums by women, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inflated sales in Draft:List of best-selling albums by women

I saw now that you are creating an article for the best-selling albums of female artists, the current list is full of inflated sales and even contains sales that were decided to be kept with much lower numbers with RFCs made on the article's discussion pages. Please do not do this, each album you include already has on its pages the correct sales, closer to the certificates, all of them are already increased enough considering the time of release, the streams, the certificates and the performance in charts over the years. There is no need for this type of content here.--88marcus (talk) 22:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The inflated 15/20 million copies of Shakira.

Your sum is wrong. The Laundry service has 9.7 million certified copies worldwide, see that in summaries is listed the quantity of all European countries together, there is no need to add all the European countries that are in the table, the 4 million cover even countries that are not in table. In the list you mentioned most of the albums that are in it that have 40 million in sales are albums from the 1970s, at that time there were few organizations that certified albums and all of these albums continued to appear on charts over the years, they are all great catalog sellers, they were released firstly in LP and than in K7 and then in CD and then in digital and than in streaming... The Laundry Service is the opposite of that, he stayed on the charts for about 2 years and then disappeared, there is no information that it continued to sell millions over the years, especially in the United States, which is the largest market for Shakira. It is a false idea that all CDs sell millions after their releases, when the artist finishes promoting the albums (no music videos, no performances, no tour) the interest of the audience decreases and the album become out of catalog soon. The 15 million claim of LS is already over-inflated, 13 million is enough for this album. Christina Aguilera's Stripped and Britney Spears' Britney appear with much less here, 10 million and 9 million even though their performance is similar to the Shakira CD.--88marcus (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:List of best-selling albums by women

Draft:List of best-selling albums by women, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of best-selling albums by women and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of best-selling albums by women during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of best-selling albums by women has been accepted

List of best-selling albums by women, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Laundry Service, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at El Dorado (Shakira album), you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Perro Fiel, you may be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andina. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 500 Greatest Albums of All Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ricky Martin invitation

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 500 Greatest Albums of All Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shakira Studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakira Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakira Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Apoxyomenus (talk) 22:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlexanderShakifan29, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Erick (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good afternoon, unfortunately in my past I opened several accounts due to a blocking of wikipedia in Spanish, from that date until now I have not used another account other than this one, I am aware of what I did but for about 7 months I have not use more beads besides this one. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 15:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erick (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlexanderShakifan29. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Hi Alexander nice to meet you. I saw on your profile that you are from Perú too. I have been on wikipedia for almost 3 years and have been working on making articles for Peruvian artists. If you're interested in working on articles for Peruvian artists let me know and maybe we can work on them together. English wikipedia is lacking articles from Peruvian pop culture. I have created several articles for Peruvian artists, mainly Gian Marco, and you can see which ones on my user page. Let me know if you're interested in working together on Peruvian articles. FanDePopLatino (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hola!, buenas noches. Disculpame, pensé que sí te había respondido, yo encantado en apoyar. :D AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 04:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Prensa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira - Te Felicito.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira - Te Felicito.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural impact of Shakira

Can you please explain how any of the "Dance" paragraph that you reverted displays any evidence of cultural impact? Richard3120 (talk) 14:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, sorry yesterday I reversed an edit thinking that it was again an unnamed user deleting information for no reason. I just read your reason and I think that the dance demonstrates the influence that various styles have on Shakira and how she demonstrates it in each concert she performs. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 23:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but that's "the influence that various styles have on Shakira"... the article is supposed to be the other way around, it's supposed to show the influence that Shakira has on various styles and public perceptions. Richard3120 (talk) 23:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Listen, I know I haven't been very welcoming, but I do know you mean well. I am inviting you because I think you have the potential to be a very contributor. Plus, we're having [[a contest this May, if you're interested. Erick (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon user, I know I've made several mistakes so far, I'm still learning on wikipedia, I'd love to contribute to the wikiproject, count me in. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 20:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, YouTube should generally never be used as a source for two reasons: 1) it is a self published source which is not suitable for Wikipedia 2) there's a matter of copyright issues, namely when a video is uploaded by someone who does not own the rights to the original video. Please do not hesitate to ask me anything about Wikipedia as I've been here for over 10 years and even worked on a few Shakira articles. Erick (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Verdad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shakira Wannabe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakira Wannabe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakira Wannabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Binksternet (talk) 19:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, good afternoon AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 23:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1990s in Latin music

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1990s in Latin music, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you upload a JPG when the cover already existed in PNG form?

Hello. 300×300 is a preferred equal, square format for cover artworks per Template:Infobox album, and PNG is the preferred file format for digital artworks over JPG. There was absolutely no need to attempt to replace my PNG on Don't You Worry (Black Eyed Peas, Shakira and David Guetta song) with your strangely dimensioned JPG upload half an hour later. Your file has been tagged for speedy deletion, and I'd suggest in future to not bother wasting your time attempting to replace better quality images that pre-date yours. Thanks. Ss112 10:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Impact of Shakira page is getting out of hand

Hello, your efforts on the article are really appreciated, however stop adding every single thing you read about her. Stick to her IMPACT and impact only. The article is way too long to read. Stop adding irrelevant information, I'm deleting some unimportant stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krups Music (talk • contribs) 09:52, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:WhatsApp Image 2022-08-29 at 5.39.25 PM (1).png

Thanks for uploading File:WhatsApp Image 2022-08-29 at 5.39.25 PM (1).png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Shakira tribute albums

added links pointing to Inevitable, Eyes Like Yours, Did It Again and Rabiosa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira Tribute Album.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira Tribute Album.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tour Pies Descalzos.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tour Pies Descalzos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shakira's articles

Hi, Alexander. I see you have started some drafts about Shakira, and you have others in your to do list. As other users, like Krups Music who gave you similar suggestions, I also think you must start to try trim vague info. Thus, I honestly think you shouldn't create those drafts (let me explain better below), but condense her cultural impact article.

I've noted you're borrowing whole ideas from a more established scholarly reviews on Madonna (my recommendation to you would don't take ES Wikipedia as a guideline to build these entire articles either), as a model to implement a similar treatment to Shakira. My concern with all of these relies that we are giving a false impression, and it can be labeled as original research and beyond. Part of the problems also relies that sources giving are from questionable to mid-quality; scholarly articles are a rarity if not inexistent actually.

I bring to you some examples: I remember seeing in one of these articles, a YouTube reference from a "philosopher", and currently in the Draft:Analysis of Shakira's musical work this from a Scribd document or Culturizando. This YouTube's user is a non-notable figure, and that's a self-published source. Scribd is an e-commerce source, but the main concern comes this article doesn't appear in a scholarly journal or from the University itself. Culturalizando is not a source to take into account per se, as author even is citing Milenio/Wikipedia. And all of them were used to build a whole idea that philosophers or academics have studied her or similar claims with self-made conclusions. Let me ask you something: If Bad Bunny received a course devoted to him or five scholarly articles, we could argue he's a topic among scholars? I honestly don't think so. I only interpret that is part of insolated examples. Shakira seems to be another example as such claims haven't been confirmed by neither an academic or a scholarly paper.

Please don't take it personal. I just think is necessary you to recognize key differences to avoid original research and similar terrains. Regards, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :D, good night user. Personally, the drafts that I have done so far are mostly due to the fact that information about them has been removed from the cultural impact page for reasons such as that it does not demonstrate her cultural impact. So I prefer to make it an annex with sources that little by little I will improve it. I only seek to amplify the legacies of artists like Gloria, Ricky and most of all Shakira. Now I had to leave editing for a while because I'm more busy with other things. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 04:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to draft

Hi AlexanderShakifan29. We generally discourage editors that are not new page patrollers from moving articles to draftspace, since this can be seen as bypassing the deletion policy and/or biting new editors. If you are going to do it, please be aware of the guidelines at WP:DRAFTIFY. Specifically, regarding Monotonía, you should not draftify an article if there is an assertion that the page belongs in mainspace, such as an objection to a proposed deletion. – Joe (talk) 09:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Analysis of Shakira's musical work for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Analysis of Shakira's musical work is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analysis of Shakira's musical work until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good day,Okay AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 13:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of cover versions of Selena songs

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of cover versions of Selena songs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of cover versions of Selena songs

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of cover versions of Selena songs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Best-Selling Latin Concert-Tours of All-Time

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Best-Selling Latin Concert-Tours of All-Time, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claims

I thought we are ove rthis, yet again, you make an unsourced claim here. --Muhandes (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user Muhandes, good afternoon, regarding the problem with the figures regarding the certifications on the "Te Felicito" page, it was an oversight of mine, I thought that I had really updated to 600,000 sales but it was a complete mistake. I'm very sorry about that. It won't happen again. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 21:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thught we were over this last time, but Special:Diff/1185733215. Muhandes (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding incorrect and unsourced certification numbers to all Shakira articles. Certifications smounts in Brazil, per consensus, go after the release date. The template adds the correct numbers per consensus. --Muhandes (talk) 12:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Waka Waka (This Time for Africa) into Draft:Shakira live performances. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thank u :) AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of best-selling female Latin artists

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of best-selling female Latin artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Thank you for updating the list of best-selling artists, but can you please leave a proper edit summary explaining your edits? TheWikiholic (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referenced and relevant information

Do not revert again, it is a valuable and referenced contribution--GeogieTax (talk) 23:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Best-Selling Latin Concert-Tours of All-Time

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Best-Selling Latin Concert-Tours of All-Time".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, I'm GeogieTax. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.GeogieTax (talk) 00:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Shakira: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 53 while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Moved to Talk:Shakira: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 53

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Shakira: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 53) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Best Selling artists

Hello, can you please update Shakira's certifications on List of best selling music artists? Try Everything is now updated to 3x platinum in the USA. that is +1M — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krups Music (talk • contribs) 10:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of best-selling female Latin artists collaboration

I'm almost done with the best-selling Latin artists page and was going over your draft for Draft:List of best-selling female Latin artists. Do you want to continue working on this list? Because it's an interesting topic and I would like to work with you. I already made some bold pages. You can tell me your thoughts. BTW, I lowered the threshold for female Latin music artists if that's alright with you. Erick (talk) 05:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon user :), the idea of collaborating with you on the page seems good to me, since I was more focused on other articles I almost didn't go there. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Sundays and Mondays are my days off from work, so that's my most active times editing. BTW, on the main best-selling Latin articles, Jona is proposing to only count certifications from the artist's Latin albums. Just wanted to give you a heads up in case you see Shakira's certifications lower. Thankfully, the best-selling female artists doesn't use certifications so it makes it easier. Erick (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished up on my end, feel free to add any Latin female artists. Or if you think it's done, let me know. Erick (talk) 03:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The List of best-selling Latin music artists is finally done! For certifications we are only including Spanish and Portuguese recordings, so when updating Shakira's certs, only include her Spanish/Portuguese recordings. I'm now ready to proceed to the List of best-selling female Latin artists list. Erick (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shakira impersonator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakira impersonator, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakira impersonator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fashion of Shakira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fashion of Shakira, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashion of Shakira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. The content removed has a valid source and supercedes the significantly older source you inserted instead. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Breaktheicees (talk) 06:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source cannot be used as true because the difference is abysmal between less than 35 million certified up to 100 million. In that case artists like Shakira who have 82 million can easily be put at 125 million or more and it is not like that because the certifications are not enough. Have you tried discussing that 100 million Gloria thing? AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 16:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The section on the best-selling artists list says "purported sales" and "claimed sales". Those sales are indeed purported and claimed. Your source claims 75 million (from 1997) and it is certainly possible that she has sold 25 million more records since then. The CBS source is valid. Breaktheicees (talk) 16:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria hasn't gotten any major certificates since the early 2000s to say she's sold over 25 million since then. His time where he sold well was between the 80's and 90's. Apart from the fact that the figure of 35 million certified hardly gives an estimated figure of 75 million (Enough in my opinion) to exaggerate it to 100 million (considering that her albums do not enter the sales charts in both Latin and foreign countries) AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 05:00, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your personal opinion, her claimed sales still fit the definition of "purported sales" and "claimed sales" on the best-selling music artists page. Estefan is far from being the only artist on that page with lower certified units than what the claimed sales are, and again, the source is still valid. Breaktheicees (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that Estefan doesn't have sales chart entries that justify 100 million, she doesn't get certificates, she doesn't enter charts (weekly, monthly or yearly) artists like Aretha who have low certificates are from the 60's so which sales are justified. The case does not occur with Estefan who is from the 80s. I am going to notify the necessary members of this to see how to solve this problem. Good night AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shakira as a Latin cultural icon

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shakira as a Latin cultural icon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shakira as a Latin cultural icon

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shakira as a Latin cultural icon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of best-selling female music artists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of best-selling female music artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of best-selling female music artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheWikiholic (talk) 06:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural impact of Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Te Felicito.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pies Descalzos

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pies Descalzos, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Shakira: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 53, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis worldwide sales

Hi can you help me out please ?. I think Oasis have now passed the 75 million records sold worldwide. Can you have a look at this and add them to the list of the beast selling artists please ?. Kind Regards 31.200.189.175 (talk) 17:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Shakira tribute albums

The article List of Shakira tribute albums has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:LISTN. No substantial coverage in secondary sources outside of catalog listings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. hinnk (talk) 21:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laundry Service (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MAM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Shakira tribute albums for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Shakira tribute albums is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shakira tribute albums until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

hinnk (talk) 20:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Shakira tribute albums for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Shakira tribute albums, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Shakira tribute albums until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pies Descalzos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Tiempo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A consensus is needed for the List of Best Selling Artists

After discussing with another editor, we decided that the page should be updated and are looking for other editors to discuss the matter so a consensus can be formed, please respond because input from you and other editors is welcome. Permission to edit the page would be welcome as i could implement the changes to the page that were discussed

Talk:List of best-selling music artists#Extended-confirmed protected Edit Request on April 16 2024 Never17 (talk) 16:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oasis have reached the threshold of 75 millon record sales wordwide.

Hello there how are you doing today. I am sure Oasis have reached the 75million album sales threshold. Can you look at this for me please ?. Can they be added to the list of the biggest selling artists of all time please ?. Regards 92.251.150.169 (talk) 10:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson was just certified for Dirty Diana, Bad and Chicago in the UK

https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/1294-168-1

https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/681-168-1

https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/13509-168-1

This would be another 500,000+ units added to his tally on this page

List of best-selling music artists Never17 (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perú Number Ones 1960s

Hola causa, I shared recently on the Latin Music Project talk page that I've been working on adding sources to the list of number one singles in Perú from the 1960s. I completed 1963 but I could use some help with completing 1962, 1964, 1965, and 1966 if you have time and are interested. The sources are found in archives of Billboard magazine in their "Hits of the World" section. FanDePopLatino (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of best-selling female Latin artists

Hello, AlexanderShakifan29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of best-selling female Latin artists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited She Wolf (Shakira song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cosmopolitan and Time Out.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shakira

Hi, I hope you're doing well. I'm currently in a tour fixing/expanding awards-related pages. And Shakira is probably the next to my list. I've seen a couple of missing awards, and perhaps her accolades are higher. If you're interested to bring me a hand, you're welcome. Here is my UP. You can drop links/names of (missing) awards into the talk page. Thanks, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]