Jump to content

User talk:Afdafadsfas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Afdafadsfas! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

March 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afdafadsfas (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm a little confused on the reason I got blocked

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afdafadsfas (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If you guys review my edits, both as this user and as 72.208.178.248, you can see that nothing I did can qualify as vandalism. Most of my edits consist of adding a vital article template to the talk page and upgrading the classification if the template rating is inconsistent with what the rest of the WikiProjects it belongs to list it under. There were Featured Articles that were still classified as a C-class under the VA template.

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence suggests other activity. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do not have other accounts. Afdafadsfas (talk) 23:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you guys please unblock me? I just discovered that Othniel Charles Marsh is listed under Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/People/Philosophers, historians, political and social scientists and Wikipedia:Vital articles/Level/5/People/Scientists, inventors, and mathematicians. Afdafadsfas (talk) 19:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, I don't know what I did wrong other than make you guys think I'm a bot. Afdafadsfas (talk) 20:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Afdafadsfas (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A bit of patience please. I know these waits can be frustrating. Superficially, I'd be inclined to help with this request. There is a problem though. Another account (no edits) was created at the end of January. Could we have some explanation of this please? -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what you're talking about. I guess I had created an account and then promptly forgot about it. Afdafadsfas (talk) 16:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to have to decline this request, since it seems apparent that there is other activity going on that you haven't told us about. This is now a checkuser block. Your appeal options adjust accordingly: WP:GAB. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Afdafadsfas (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So apparently I created an account on January and promptly forgot about it. I stand by my previous reasoning why I should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Unblock request does not address the grounds for the block, and suggests a rather slack approach towards Wikipedia's rules. Nick-D (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello? Afdafadsfas (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]