User talk:Abishe/Archive 2

Savoy Cinema

Abishe, the article you've created is a clear copyright violation, taken directly from :http://eapmovies.com/component/eapmovies/?controller=theaters&view=theater&task=displayTheater&cid=3&Itemid=154, in breach of Wikipedia's policies. On this basis the article should be deleted however rather than nominating for speedy deletion I'm proposing to give you 48 hours to address this issue. I will try and help with the re-write however you will need to do most of the work yourself. Dan arndt (talk) 10:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too late someone else has identified the copyright violations- I have been trying to locate independent reliable sources and so far the only one I can find is [1]. Dan arndt (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Savoy Cinema (Sri Lanka)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Savoy Cinema (Sri Lanka), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.whatsupcolombo.lk/site-search/3d-p-1.aspx. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Abishe! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:46, Friday, June 2, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Proposed deletion of Sri Lankan cricket team in India in 1986–87

The article Sri Lankan cricket team in India in 1986–87 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not encyclopedic article. Shri Lanka and India have been playing cricket with each-other since decades. Creating such articles for every year is not feasible. The article has also been incomplete since at least January 2016. Nobody cares about that stuff/particular year. Not notable. Just one randomly chosen year from long history of Indian cricket.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@User: usernamekiran I created this article because Wikipedia mentioned that any volunteer wikipedians can create articles related to international cricket tours in mid 1980's.I can call this article to be deleted at any moment.Abishe (talk) 08:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Abishe. The reasons given for that PROD are incorrect and inapproriate, based on total lack of understanding about the project and how WP operates. I have issued a caution because he was bang out of order. All first-class cricket tours are notable events per WP:CRIN and one of our aims at WP:CRIC is to create an article for every tour (in fact, I think we've nearly achieved it bar a few that have slipped through the net). Well done and all the best. Jack | ^{talk page} 20:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree with Jack that this article belongs in WP. Thank you Abishe for the contribution! Climate7298 (talk) 03:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ananda Wedisinghe, from its old location at User:Abishe/Ananda Wedisinghe. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 11:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ananda Wedisinghe (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably notable but you need to tell us how. What championships did he win?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ananda Wedisinghe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Time, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 9 M's

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 9 M's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.spencertom.com/2016/04/04/9-ms-resource-audit-checklist. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Straight Line Production Possibility Frontier (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

www.quora.com is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Straight Line Production Possibility Frontier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: You've got messages!

Hello, Abishe/Archive 2. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the belated welcome with cookies.And also the invitation of the tea house.rupa$$$ (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth

I notice that you have your exact date of birth posted on your user page. This can be used by identity thieves and other malicious people. I advise you to consider removing it and give just the year. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Community User Group Sri Lanka

Dear Abishe,

Thank you for your contributions to the Wikimedia Projects. As an editor from Sri Lanka, you are warmly invited to join the official Wikimedia Community User Group Sri Lanka and to subscribe to its mailing list, Wikimedia-LK.

The user group currently includes volunteers from Wikipedia and other projects, from the English, Sinhala, and Tamil speaking communities. It is the Wikimedia-approved platform for editors from Sri Lanka to enable wider collaboration, for both online and offline projects.

With your support, we hope to organize cross-project content improvement drives as part of online projects, as well as organize in-person edit-a-thons, training sessions, photowalks, and other such activities, in the near future. The ultimate goal(s) of these initiatives is to improve the overall coverage and quality of topics relating to Sri Lanka, as well as encourage new editors to join the Wikimedia community, while simultaneously empowering and retaining our existing team of editors.

There are no mandatory obligations for members who choose join the community, other than the usual editing rules for online projects, and the friendly space policy for in-person projects. You may also (or instead) subscribe to the mailing list, where any member could initiate discussions with volunteers across projects, notify members of events and meetings, stay up to date with competitions, organize your own events, and so on.

See you on board, and Happy Editing!

Reh man 00:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Disability

Welcome to the group Abishe, I have a challenge for you. You may have noticed that we have a project to create a "Disability in <country>" article that briefly summarises the basic information about disability in each country of the world. The aim is to turn every link in the Disability by country navbox blue.

I see you are from Sri Lanka, so here's the challenge - would you like to start Draft:Disability in Sri Lanka? Take a look at some of the articles that already exist to see the general pattern. Some good examples to follow are Disability in South Africa, Disability in Peru, Disability in Canada and Disability in Yemen. To get you started I have posted a few sources on the draft page Draft:Disability in Sri Lanka. It would really help the project if you could contribute to this, but you are of course under no obligation to do it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dodger67 I just created Disability in Sri Lanka with additional information and with the help of the information in the draft page.If I created this article without your permission,I kindly apologies for it. Abishe (talk) 10:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cake for you!

H'Birth day Bro. And congratulations for your 2000th edit rupa$$$ (talk) 10:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cricket Association for the Blind in Nepal (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the references provided establish notability. Three are written directly or indirectly by the organization itself and the one independent reference, from womensenews.org, does not appear to mention the organization using the name given in this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cricket Association for the Blind in Nepal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Your addition to Draft:Cricket Association for the Blind in Nepal has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. /wiae /tlk 13:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

News and notes: Non-English special edition! 99% no news about English-based wiki communities!

Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality

WikiProject report: Comic relief

In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity

Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list

Blog: Canadian Supreme Court rules against Google in favor of worldwide court orders

Special report: Sharing Wikipedia offline medical information in the Dominican Republic

Featured content: Everywhere in the lead

Technology report: Introducing TechCom

Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Help me to log in"

I wanted to know how to create a wikipedia account and I would like to contribute to wikipedia.112.134.68.179 (talk) 03:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-site file talk page

I see you just created File talk:Alastair Cook test batting career v1.png here on English Wikipedia, but the file itself is actually on the commons media site instead (transfered there over a year ago). en:File:Alastair Cook test batting career v1.png does not exist (the commons file propagates itself), so having a talkpage for it seems confusing. The actual commons:File:Alastair Cook test batting career v1.png does have a talkpage, but now that it's on a wider-audience site, I'm not sure it's really within local wikiproject scope. DMacks (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Muhammad Lafir

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Abishe, thanks for creating Muhammad Lafir!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:45, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello Abishe. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Alex Shih ^Talk 01:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of my article

https://everipedia.org/wiki/dallas-mccarver/

I always check for Wikipedia for any info didnt find any about dallas so added by copying from this site.i am sorry i am new to wikipedia. If am going wrong anywhere do guide me.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Abishe, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Stub sorting

Please don't use the {{Stub}} tag if you can find a more specific stub tag; stub sort when you can. To do otherwise will backlog Category:Stubs. Thank you. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bowed Outward Production Possibility Frontier (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Production–possibility frontier. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bowed Outward Production Possibility Frontier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

Many thanks for categorisation of the article Inside Science. Best wishes, Vorbee (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1939 Summer Deaflympics

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Abishe, thanks for creating 1939 Summer Deaflympics!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please help address these issues - how is it WP:NOTABLE?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Galkot primary health centre, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 22:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2001 Summer Deaflympics logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2001 Summer Deaflympics logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

From the editors: What happened at Wikimania?

News and notes: Basselpedia; WMF Board of Trustees appointments

Featured content: Warfighters and their tools or trees and butterflies

Traffic report: A fortnight of conflicts

Special report: Biomedical content, and some thoughts on its future

Recent research: Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia

In the media: Google's Ideological Echo Chamber; What makes someone successful?

WikiProject report: WikiProject YouTube

Technology report: Latest tech news

Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 4 wrap-up

Humour: Bots

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion - Confusing tag removal

hi, I hope you're doing great! I have altered the article (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bj%C3%B6rn_Forslund) as per your suggestions and have removed the suggestive error tag. Please be go thru with it once more and help me rectifying it further (in case I left any more problems to be resolved or so).

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Av0203 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi, thank you for your kind reply! Need more help (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bj%C3%B6rn_Forslund) I have removed all the info about his current professional life but now nothing much left in this article about him :/ ... He was a gold winner twice and now a days (specially during summers) he's coaching young sailors including his own son (Emil Forslund - Emil Forslund competed in Optimist World championship 2017 in Norway and ranked 3rd in the same competition for Norway)... He is now a full time entrepreneur founder & CEO of TargetEveryone AS (having worldwide branches). So, I can't mention anything about it within this page? Please help me - I will be really grateful! Av0203 (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Av0203 I will help you with it. I also wantedto ask you whether Forslund is an Olympian who has represented Sweden in 1992 according to a source. The birth date was also incorrect as he was born in 1972 and not in 1962. Well thanks for creating this article Abishe 14:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe hi, I hope you're doing great and thank you for all your help and guidance but that's a different Bjorn who is a speed skater this Bjorn I am writing about is a Sailor and gold medalist in sailing championship (OK Dinghy World Championship) and hence I am rectifying the info accordingly... --Av0203 (talk) 10:37, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Please stop following my edits around, I'm sure you mean well, but it feels like WP:STALKING. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mulakhro (1993 film)

Just a friendly heads up on Mulakhro (1993 film). I've declined your A1 speedy deletion request, because the context was clear from the title alone -- it's a 1993 film.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:42, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

There was nothing at all improper about the source in Hu Hong. As a reference to significant coverage in a book published by an academic publisher is was pretty well the most proper of sources possible. I would suggest that you adust your sights in this area. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reworking of Livetecs

Hi Abishe, thanks for your welcome and for flagging my page, Livetecs. I have tried to address all issues and would appreciate it if you could have another look, especially seeing as another user has flagged it for deletion without comment. Thank you! Richardaldinho (talk) 02:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Abishe, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

deleting housing (disambiguation)

r.e. see the redirect discussion is there another way to do this? what was bugging me here is that housing is an article about residential housing, however the term housing has other uses, e.g. gearbox housing, casings etc in engineering (e.g. see hidden headlamp). Is there any guideline friendly way to get link targets for these alternative meanings. Wikipedia is an amazing free resource of text, and IMO the links increase it's value: e.g. imagine the value to a foreign language speaker, seeing links that clarify the context (see the Hovercards feature); and imagine how it could evolve, with tools to auto-illustrate articles etc (imagine a tool that turned the text into text+speech slideshow) MfortyoneA (talk) 19:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Uzbekistan at the Deaflympics) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Uzbekistan at the Deaflympics, Abishe!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please avoid using slang in encyclopedic articles.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand 'A' cricket team in India in 2017

You can't vote twice and the erroneous scorecards have been removed. As you agree the teams are notable, do you wish to reconsider? Thanks. Jack | ^{talk page} 19:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL

In the media: Monkey settlement; Wikipedia used to give AI context clues

Humour: Chickenz

Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe

Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications

Gallery: Chicken mania

Special report: Two steps forward, one step backward: The Sustainability Initiative

Traffic report: Fights and frights

Featured content: Flying high

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red: October focus on disability

		Welcome to Women in Red's October 2017 worldwide online editathons. New: "Women and disability" "Healthcare" "Geofocus on the Nordic countries" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Begin preparing for November's big event: Women World Contest
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar Hemberg page

You tagged the "Oscar Hemberg" page with further referencing needed, I have expanded the referencing to a variety of published books as well as news paper sources. However you also tagged it as potentially not fulfilling the wikipedia notability guidelines? Could you please elaborate? Goose 09:15, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Ann-Ewa Karlsson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ann-Ewa Karlsson, Abishe!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Akram (blind cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Akram (blind cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Akram (blind cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2017 Blind T20 World Cup(Semifinals)

Template:2017 Blind T20 World Cup(Semifinals) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Greenbörg (talk) 17:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ganindu Nanayakkara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ganindu Nanayakkara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganindu Nanayakkara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 17:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Elsebeth Brehm

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Abishe, thanks for creating Elsebeth Brehm!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add a stub tag for articles of this length. Thanks for creating the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nowakowska) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nowakowska, Abishe!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed!

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 05:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!

		Welcome to Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons. New: The Women in Red World Contest Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Abishe, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!

Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables

Humour: Guys named Ralph

In focus: Offline Wikipedia developed at OFF.NETWORK Content Hackathon

Blog: The future of offline access to Wikipedia: The Kiwix example

In the media: Facebook and poetry

Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK

Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Digital Hash

May I please note that you patrolled an obvious hoax. The user copy-pasted another article changing only the first word. The article was about a completely different organization. Please be more careful. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruby Coffin

The article Ruby Coffin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I see no notability here, certainly not for tennis

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vienna Kumar

The article Vienna Kumar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has met none of the notability requirements for Tennis. No WTA tournaments at all, no jr top 3 ranking, no jr Grand Slams wins, etc...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dilhara Salgado for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dilhara Salgado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilhara Salgado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shashikala Kumarasinghe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shashikala Kumarasinghe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shashikala Kumarasinghe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dilhara Salgado, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Navin Samarasinghe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navin Samarasinghe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Samarasinghe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Romesh Weerawardane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Romesh Weerawardane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romesh Weerawardane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vienna Kumar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vienna Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vienna Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you + invitation

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women in sports!

We'd like to invite you to learn more about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in sports. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Participants page or visit one of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport/Task forces for specific sports. Thanks!

Draft:Ananda Wedisinghe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ananda Wedisinghe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contest

Abishe I'm very sorry about this, but I'm spotting too many serious issues with your work to allow you to continue to compete in the contest. It's a potential liability for people criticizing the contest later. The latest one shows some badly translated errors which would have been obvious to a fluent speaker of English and Spanish. I greatly appreciate the effort you have made to create articles and your enthusiasm and welcome you to continue to contribute to the 10,000 Asia Challenge, but I also have a responsibility in running this contest to promote accuracy and quality. Sorry to let you down, but I hope you understand why.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Bars 23

Thanks for your thanks. Try to write more articles. Bars 23 (talk) 08:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ben Sweetland concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ben Sweetland, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete my article?

hey

why u delet my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrym13 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Valery Rukhledev) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Valery Rukhledev, Abishe!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating all these articles on sportswomen.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Thanks for the appreciation and kind words for the creation of the sport governing pages. Best regards. UtubeGodwin (talk) 17:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! Keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd suggest trying out the new Rater tool which makes adding WikiProjects to new articles a breeze. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About adding tag

Greetings, thank you very much for your contribution on Wikipedia. Would you please consider waiting a few moments before adding a tag on a newly created article? Thanks again for your concern to keep Wikipedia updated.S Shamima Nasrin (talk) 11:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zimbabwe at the Deaflympics

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Abishe, thanks for creating Zimbabwe at the Deaflympics!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as having only primary sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Gaitri Seetahal) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gaitri Seetahal, Abishe!

Wikipedia editor Mahveotm just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your valuable contributions!

To reply, leave a comment on Mahveotm's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mahveotm (talk) 15:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

News and notes: Cons, cons, cons

Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely

Technology report: Searching and surveying

Interview: A featured article centurion

WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects

In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution

Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate

Featured content: We will remember them

Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text

Humour: Good faith (but still incomprehensible)

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miri Shilon

Some informations (their meeting) are repeated, notability controversial.Xx236 (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

This kitten, as observant as you for new pages to patrol.

Vami _IV✠ 09:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WiR December highlights

		Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons. New: "Seasonal celebrations" "First Ladies" "Go local!" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Remember the World Contest closes on Thursday, 30 November
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Contest

Abishe, I appreciated your effort earlier in the contest. If you help judge the contest over the next few days, check entries for vios, readability, encourage editors etc and sign your name up you'll get something small from the $250 judging prize fund I have as a thankyou. You're in Sri Lanka? Can Sri Lanka get Amazon goods?♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a reward for your effort with tagging and being involved with the contest let me know, it'll be about £18 UK. If you want it let me know if Sri Lanka can get Amazon goods and I'll buy you the reward on Amazon India site, OK?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a paypal account online?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does your father have an account?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your father will need to create an account in his name as you have to be over 18 I believe. It's very easy to set up but no worries if not. There's no other way I can really reward you. About time Amazon got their act together with shipping to certain countries.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tega Richard (tennis player)

Hello, Abishe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tega Richard (tennis player), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Adamtt9 (talk) 04:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dulce María Serret

I see you assessed this article as Stub (provides very little meaningful content). See Wikipedia:Assessing articles. It would be helpful if you would give advice on the article's talk page (not here) explaining what improvements would be needed to bring the article up to C (useful to a casual reader). Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 12:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand. The article is a biography not a list, and has not changed since it was assessed. Again, the question is what improvements are needed to get it up to C class. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Straight Line Production Possibility Frontier concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Straight Line Production Possibility Frontier, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Abishe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Churnin

Thank you for reviewing the biographical article I created on Nancy Churnin. If you have any suggestions, I would love to hear what they are. Andrea Parton (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Single factor resources

Hello, Abishe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Single factor resources".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 03:08, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Adi Shilon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Adi Shilon, Abishe!

Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Better sourcing required - it is available per BEFORE, but this won't pass an AfD with the two sources cited. A better pic would be nice as well.

To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Icewhiz (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Chengal Bhagavathy Kshethram

Hello Abishe. I am just letting you know that I deleted Chengal Bhagavathy Kshethram, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Jujutacular (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Roshan Abeysinghe

What is his name in his language?Xx236 (talk) 08:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC) @ Xx236, Well, I don't know to interpret a foreign language font into an article. But I know the correct native name in his mother language (Sinhala) Abishe (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there such page in the native Wikipedia?Xx236 (talk) 09:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Abishe, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Article Review Reqeust!

Hi Naguleswaran,

I hope you are well and that I am posting in the right spot. I came across your talk page and thought you might be able to help with an article for a notable musician that I created. There seems to be a very severe backlog on drafts and the period for acceptance of new articles could be many months long so I thought that I could perhaps ask for you to review this draft and push it through if you think it is up to standard. I believe it is written neutrally and well referenced and several other Wikipedians have already made changes to the draft since I created it so the community has helped to better it, as well. I would appreciate your assistance in removing it from drafts and putting it into the article space, if possible. Here is a link to the draft. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Ian_Erix Thank you kindly in advance for any help you can give. Best, Stefan

Bruinsects (talk) 07:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Joshua Tree - EP

Hi Abishe. You passed this on NPR, however I have redirected it to Moon Hooch since it does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM, and there are SPA/COI/PAID concerns. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up

Blog: Close encounters of the Wikipedia kind

Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017

In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more

Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors

Gallery: Wiki loving

Interview: Interview with Charlesjsharp, regular contributor of Wikipedia's Featured Pictures

Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"

Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech

Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys

Humour: On their way to the WMF Incubator

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

page revision

can u pls review my other page zone three 6 thanksChurchboyz (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page review request

Hi. I notice you've been reviewing some articles I've done; thanks for that! I was hoping you could review this one I did: Post Self. As a relatively new editor, it's the first article that I've put a lot of effort into, so I want to see where it lands and how I can improve it. Thanks in advance! CelestialWeevil (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A question about Sri Lanka

Hi, I spotted you in category:Wikipedians in Sri Lanka and decided to ask a question. I see World Heritage Sites of Sri Lanka article but is this all cultural heritage that is in Sri Lanka? In Ukraine we have monuments of different kinds that are protected as such on national or regional level, and Wikipedians made lists of them (in Wikipedia: namespace). Is there something like that for Sri Lanka? You know, if I go to Sri Lanka one dayI'd like to know what has to be pictured for Wikimedia Commons first of all Thanks! Please ping me when replying -- Ата (talk) 09:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Colin_Hemsley

Hi. This discussion may be of interest to you. Regards, Waj (talk) 07:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Rentier. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Artur Lauinger, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Rentier (talk) 15:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry about that - I didn't mean to unreview this page. I think I accidentally misclicked. Rentier (talk) 16:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rentier: It's okay and no problem. As we are humans we generally make mistakes. Thanks for your efforts in reviewing articles. Happy editing and Happy holidays. Abishe (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:A1 application

You recently tagged two articles as WP:A1, while they were deleted just not A1. A1 only applies to articles if you read the content of the article and do not understand what it is about. The first one said Banita Sandhu is a new actress in Bollywood. There is plenty there to understand that this is a real person, she is an actress and she works in Bollywood. There isn't enough to make a claim to significance but there is enough that A1 doesn't apply.

The second one is even less eligible for A1. It read Ikenna Dieke is a professor and Head of English and Literary Studies[1],University of Nigeria,Nsukka.[2] He was a professor in the University of Arizona,[3] Arizona, USA. It had three sources, not independent, that all worked. I deleted this one A7 also as there was no credible claim to significance.

Please make sure the criteria you use actually applies to the article. ~ GB fan 15:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was just coming here to say the same thing. Please be careful about which criteria you select - it makes it more likely that an unsuitable article will not get deleted. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page Curation on Sarah Daniels

Thank you for your advise. I have now cleaned up links to prevent link rot. Makro (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]