Jump to content

User talk:15/Archive 2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 2015←Archive 2019Archive 2020Archive 2021Archive 2022

Spacing

Dear Caius, regarding your recent edit at Somerville College, Oxford, you might find MOS:PUNCTSPACE useful. Software condenses two or more spaces to just one when rendering a page, so editors may use any spacing style they prefer (e.g., a single space or two spaces after a period/full stop). So the double space is valid here, though no more or less so than single spacing, and the end result as to what is displayed is identical. That should save you a bit of time.

Regarding spacing in other contexts, there is further advice throughout the WP:MOS. Love, Aivin G. (talk) 20:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Chetsford (talk) 02:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cauis!

It seems the birthdate is incorrectly mentioned as "(born September 23, 1976[1][2][3]) ". The sources for this do not seem reliable.

The first one does not have a mention for his birthdate. The second link does not work And the third link has the incorrect birthdate, but it also incorrectly mentions that his birthplace is Stockport which it's not. It's Salford.

The correct birthdate is September 13, 1976. I'll be happy to provide you with sources.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:420:C0E0:1003:0:0:0:6BF (talk) 12:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey there, thank you for taking the time to sort this out! I am not terribly familiar with Robert James-Collier myself so I would suggest raising that issue on the articles talk page by creating a new section (top right) and posting your sources to allow others to contribute! Best, Caius G. (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Reversion at Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2021

Hi Caius G., thanks for your good faith edits to undo vandalism at Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2021. Unfortunately the edit you reverted was itself a reversion of vandalism. I cannot restore the page as I have already reached three reversions on that page today. This is the most recent unvandalised version of the page.  dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 16:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Dummelaksen, thanks for letting me know. I've restored the last version as edited by you. I'm surprised someone puts that much effort into vandalism! Best, Caius G. (talk) 16:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your work on this wiki. OrganicLag (talk) 19:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Caius G. (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Pending Changes Reviewer's barnstar

The Pending Changes Reviewer's barnstar
The Pending Changes Reviewer's barnstar is awarded to those who silently review pending changes behind the scenes, leaving only secluded log entries behind; it is awarded to those who are usually thanked only by a lack of any feedback regarding their reviews. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hey ToBeFree, you even improved the template - Thanks! Caius G. (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I didn't know there was one, I just found the barnstar on Wikimedia Commons 😄 I now replaced the template by the result. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Beautiful 😄 Caius G. (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2021 (UTC)


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
2,202 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Goat (talk) Add sources
139 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C NickMusic (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Laurent-Emmanuel Calvet (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Robert A. Pollak (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bodleian Law Library (talk) Add sources
454 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford (talk) Add sources
1,586 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Duolingo (talk) Cleanup
212 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Moon Valley High School (talk) Cleanup
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Virtual machining (talk) Cleanup
103 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Jean Tirole (talk) Expand
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Jacques Drèze (talk) Expand
1,283 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Field-programmable gate array (talk) Expand
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Flying disc techniques (talk) Unencyclopaedic
26 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Nominal income target (talk) Unencyclopaedic
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Rochdale College (talk) Unencyclopaedic
149 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Extended reality (talk) Merge
8,955 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Harvard University (talk) Merge
2,404 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Indian independence movement (talk) Merge
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Computer-mediated reality (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Nicole Stenger (talk) Wikify
199 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Microbiota (talk) Wikify
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start İbrahim Eren (talk) Orphan
57 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Vanessa Van Edwards (talk) Orphan
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Joy K. Ward (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Social Science Library, Oxford (talk) Stub
43 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Jabrayil District (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Oxford Libraries Information System (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Martin Browning (talk) Stub
42 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pradeep Dubey (talk) Stub
1,201 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nadiem Amiri (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Regarding 'List of most-viewed YouTube channels'

Hello Caius G. You had recently left a message on my talk page regarding my change in the article List of most-viewed YouTube channels and you had said that I didn't add proper citations for the information. Yes, I agree I did not add it on myself but the citations for all the channels youtube pages- as far as I checked- was already added, so I decided to let it be and updated the views because it is a dynamic list after all. I would love to receive a reply on what I can do next regarding this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Changing for a better future (talk • contribs) 18:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Changing for a better future, Thank you for taking the time to reach out to me. The reason I asked you for a source is because it seems to contradict the information provided by Youtube here, which says that T-Series has 140m (as opposed to 150m per your edit) views. Best, Caius G. (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Caius G. I am really sorry that was my mistake, it was an error on my side. I will look into it to fix it but the problem is I had fixed it for so many channels and had changed there positions as recently, some channels had surpassed others. I would request it to be the one I changed as I will fix that error. Regards, [[Changing for a better future]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Changing for a better future (talk • contribs) 04:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Also, Caius G. like cocomelon-nursery rhymes no more has 89 billion views it has 91 and that was the case for many others so I just tried to update the views. I hope you will understand and accept my draft I will make the changes where necessary. Thanking you, Changing for a better future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Changing for a better future (talk • contribs) 04:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Changing for a better future, the article is definitely in need of some updating! Don't worry about the mistake, the good thing about WP's collaborative nature is that others can check your work and I definitely appreciate your work on this article. One minor thing regarding talk page messages: You don't have to link to my name on my talk page because I will always get a notification if someone leaves a message here. If you do need to tag people, use {{u|USER NAME}} to send them a notification. Best, Caius G. (talk) 10:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much for understanding, Caius G. I have just started this Wikipedia journey, so I am still not very aware of the ways. I am trying my best to learn. I will remember that tip. Regards, Changing for a better future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Changing for a better future (talk • contribs) 11:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Nerds (candy)

Please be careful when reverting on Nerds (candy). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

HickoryOughtShirt?4, you reverted a moment before I reverted different vandalism by restoring. Thanks for letting me know. Caius G. (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
No worries, I hate when that happens. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Reuben College, Oxford

Hi, just to let you know that your edit to the Reuben College article added content between a reference and the assertions which the reference supports. This is not recommended (see WP:INTEGRITY) as it implies that your content is supported by the original reference. I have not checked the Telegraph reference, but when it was added the planned first entry of students was 2020 not 2021. I have resolved the issue by moving the information you added. TSventon (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Caius G.. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 03:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Npov on AFPAC

Hello Caius, I'd like to discuss your removal of my edits to the AFPAC article. Could you tell me what mistakes you think I made so that I can improve my writing?

Thanks, Emicho's Avenger (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Emicho's Avenger, sorry for being a bit blunt in reverting your (surely good faith!) edit, the article had experienced quite some disruption over the last time so I didn't give it too much thought. I appreciate you taking the time to reach out!
Regarding your first edit: "Who has been called" implies that the claims of Fuentes' political beliefs are doubtful or heavily contested (see MOS:CLAIM for a better explanation). Given that plenty reliable sources call him as a white nationalist, it is safe to directly say that he is one. WP:WIKIVOICE describes the distinction between "X is Y" and "X is called/described/alleged to be Y" in more detail. Nonetheless, "is" vs "is widely called" is a debate that comes up often, see Adolf Hitler's talk page for frequent discussions on if he is evil or only widely described as such, similarly, I don't believe that any BLP directly describes their subject as "racist", usually substituting it with "widely described as" and the like.
"Despite being described as being white nationalist, AFPAC 2021 had multiple speakers of colour. (YT link)" irks me because it implies ("despite") that having multiple non-white speakers contradicts its characterisation of being white nationalist. However, being a white nationalist does not imply blind hatred of people of colour. Even if hosting poc speakers contradicted its characterisation of being white nationalist, you would need sources that describe it as contradiction. Otherwise, it would be original research. General example of original research: If source X says that A, and source Y says that if A then B, adding B to an article would be original research. You would need a source Z saying that B. In this case, you would need a source explicitly calling it a contradiction.
Your edit replacing "political commentator" with "hosts a political commentary show" doesn't bother me too much, I didn't need to revert it - but it does seem a bit wordy.
This all seems needlessly complicated and there are countless instances of OR and POV on this project, but given the topic's political salience, I believe that it is important to adhere to these principles. I hope this helps! Happy editing, Caius G. (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked IP user

Hello Caius, i inform you that 92.233.52.170, who vandalize the AFPAC article, which has you requested at WP:RFPP yesterday, was blocked for editing in 48 hours and one other IP that attempts to brainwash the article is also quickly reverted by me. So, IMO, temporary semi-protection does not need. 36.77.74.149 (talk) 08:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Moors from spain

Hello, I deleted the word Moors from Spain and noticed that you have repeated it. I think playing with history is nothing worse than it. The word "moors" has nothing to do with dark skinned-Africans at all Xasazx123 (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Xasazx123, as ZP has also been portrayed as having an Arabic (so not sub-Saharan Africa black) background, the term "moors" can be correct. You would be well-advised to not accuse other editors of "playing with history". Best, Caius G. (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
But so that the reader does not understand in a wrong way, it is according to what is written that "he was black because he was moors from Spain" this will make them believe that the Moors in Spain were black and this is wrong. there's no need to use this word in the first place. Xasazx123 (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Xasazx123, I agree, people usually view those from Northern Africa as not "black", but something else. Perhaps "is black" should be replaced with "has dark skin" or "is dark-skinned". I think "moors" is relevant because it is often used to describe him and his origin. Best, Caius G. (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Not really, Moors was linked to him very wrongly, but the word Moors was given to various peoples as it is written, “Moors from Spain.” The word Moors was given to various peoples and whom Moors called them in Spain is not blacks think it should be deleted so as not to spread the wrong informations. Xasazx123 (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

hello,do you convinced? Xasazx123 (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Xasazx123, sorry for the late response. I have changed black to dark skin (which he undoubtedly has in any depiction). There are sources describing him as moorish, so the term will remain. Best, Caius G. (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, 15. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Apaugasma (talk|contribs) 00:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Apaugasma, Thanks! Caius G. (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Deleted page

I've moved the article to the requested location. If you plan to recreate it, I would recommend you do so in draft space and submit for review when ready. Deb (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Caius G. (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

AppuduPappudu

Can you explain why you removed notices from the talk page of User:AppuduPappudu in Special:Diff/1017111772? I hope you are aware that one should not be doing this unless it were their own talk page. Tayi Arajakate Talk 00:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Tayi Arajakate sorry, I didn't realise I had rollbacked and must have misclicked. Apologies again! Best, Caius G. (talk) 08:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Alright, would you mind undoing it? Tayi Arajakate Talk 01:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Tayi Arajakate, done. Caius G. (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Emily0R

Thank you for sharing the info about minor edits! I will cease using that now :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emily0r (talk • contribs) 14:04, 12 April 2921 (UTC)

Great! Caius G. (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Communist Party of Greece on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for your help, i'm not very familiar with editing in Wikipedia. Klevehagfd (talk) 01:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit request

Hi 15! On February 15 you were nice enough to address some of the Request Edits for David Edwards at Talk:David Edwards (engineer)#Request Edits December 15, 2020. Another editor had previously asked for more sources and raised some issues. I have now posted some very thorough responses. I used that editor’s User Name in the post, and they have not responded. Do you have the time to take a look? Many thanks. PC7956 (talk) 22:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi PC7956, thanks for reaching out. I'll give it a look. For transparency purposes: I have also added the section header. Best, 15 (talk) 21:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Schools of Opportunity

Thanks for reviewing my article Draft:Schools of Opportunity a few days ago. The Wikipedia article was denied due to lack of 3rd party sources. You left me a note saying "The Washington Post is also not independent, because they seem to be somehow affiliated with the program, even though the fact that they announce the decision is not sourced by the inline citations provided?" I reviewed these sources and found that Valerie Strauss, the reporter that decided to publish the article is not affiliated with the organization, but the organization it's self wrote sections of the article. Does that count as a third party source? Again, many thanks for reviewing my article, I thought it was going to take months but you did it in a week, thanks! Justiyaya (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Justiyaya, thanks for quickly getting back to improving your draft and bringing this up. I was mistakenly assuming that the (unsourced) fact that the Washington Post announces the winners means that they sponsor it, given that media committing themselves to make announcements on behalf of another entity are usually affiliated with it, although exceptions, e.g., Rhodes Scholarship winners' media coverage in the US, exist. I will add some further comments on the draft itself for other editors who might not be aware of this discussion on my talk page. 15 (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
No that was definitely my fault, the sentence that the Washington post announce the winners was basically a false claim by me. Justiyaya (talk) 02:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Does https://co.chalkbeat.org/2018/1/22/21104195/what-other-schools-can-learn-from-two-colorado-schools-of-opportunity count as a independent source? Justiyaya (talk) 03:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Sure. 15 (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Nate Morris request

Hello! I've been reviewing various pages about Wikipedia's edit request process and came across your profile at WikiProject Edit requests. I'm hoping you might have a moment to assist me, or at least confirm I'm following the edit request process appropriately.

I'm a representative of Nate Morris, attempting to collaborate with editors to improve the Wikipedia article. Back in January, I shared a replacement draft article, and when no one responded, I added the edit request template in February. Still no replies, so in May I submitted a separate request for just one section, hoping the smaller content review would be easier on editors. I've still not received any assistance, so I hope I'm following the process correctly.

I've tried reaching out to multiple individual editors and multiple WikiProjects. I saw you helped someone at WikiProject Edit requests and was wondering if you had a moment to review my request. Thanks for any consideration. All the best, MS rep 4 NMorris (talk) 23:57, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

MS rep 4 NMorris, no worries and thank you for using the edit request process. There is unfortunately a big backlog in the COI edit request queue, in part because working on it is not the most exciting thing in the world. Your request looks fine formatting wise, so you don't have to worry about that, but I'll have a proper look at it within the next few days. Best, 15 (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Question for you

Hey 15. Recently, you placed a PROD on Steamship Authority cyberattack. I am writing a book about how Wikipedia editors are handling the cyberattack + the article. Would you be comfortable sharing with me how you found the cyberattacks article? Were you reading another article and discovered it? Did you already have it bookmarked before today and just decided today to PROD it? ect...

Don't feel like you have to respond, because you don't. If you did respond, I would add that information into the book. Thank you for reading and a thank you for any possible responses you decide to give. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Elijahandskip, I believe I came across it when reading about the Colonial Pipeline cyber attack. Good luck with your book, although I still do not believe the event to be notable and might bring it to AfD soon. 15 (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Mayer-Kuvert

Hi, I'm currently working through the backlog at CAT:EDITREQ. I noticed that Talk:Mayer-Kuvert § COI edit request has been opened since March. What is the status of this request? Can it be closed? Thanks. JBchrch talk 23:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

JBchrch Thanks for letting me know and taking care of probably least popular task on the project. I'll get back to it as soon as I can. 15 (talk) 23:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much! And thanks for the encouragement 👍. JBchrch talk 08:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Verifiability

Is a core principle. Editors should in the first place attach RS refs. That's where the responsibility lies. --2603:7000:2143:8500:C1DD:B397:3F1C:8CDE (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Looking for references should come before removing and is easy to do, particularly if it is the second hit if you google a couple of words [1]. 15 (talk) 00:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
That is not the wp rule. You are free to do it. But not correct when you assert what others "should" do. You are either misstating wp policy, or stating your personal subjective preference as a "should." Please read wp:burden. And please don't engage in, or support those who engage in, adding unverified material to wp. --2603:7000:2143:8500:B4E4:B37B:11B0:7E4D (talk) 05:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
That I do so should be obvious, if I believed it to be policy, I would have left out the "should". Nowhere do I support adding unverified material, I support adding material and adding sources. Are you really getting so upset over being reverted and told to look for a source next time? I think we are both wasting our time here. 15 (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello 15:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1700 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Narendra Modi on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 93% Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 93% Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

93% Club has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, 15. I've nominated 93% Club, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

You are too kind! Thank you for improving the article and nominating it for DYK. It was very bare-bones and rushed when created, so the nom comes as a pleasant surprise for sure! 15 (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for 93% Club

On 15 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 93% Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 93% Club has been described as "the reverse Bullingdon Club"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/93% Club. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 93% Club), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Henley & Partners

Hi 15! We were recently chatting at Talk:Henley & Partners#Resolving UPE issues, where I proposed a UPE-free version of the article and then incorporated your two helpful comments into that draft. I would really appreciate it if you could go ahead and implement the proposed changes, so we can hopefully take a big step closer toward cleaning up this mess for good.

After that's done, I would love to move on to the Christian Kälin article and put it through the same treatment. I hope these steps will set the stage for both these articles to expand and improve following the proper avenues. Thanks, Sarah Nicklin (talk) 08:25, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Nicklin, thanks for following up on this. I've commented at Talk:Henley & Partners and am happy to help out at Christian Kälin too. 15 (talk) 22:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi 15, hope you're doing well. I've created a similar "clean" draft for Christian Kälin at User:Sarah Nicklin/Christian Kälin. Please take a look and let me know if I can go ahead and make these changes, as I did for the H&P article. Thanks, Sarah Nicklin (talk) 12:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Sarah Nicklin, thanks, I will be taking a look shortly. Sorry for not coming back to you earlier. 15 (talk) 13:54, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Just checking to make sure Talk:Henley & Partners#Criticism section and Talk:Christian Kälin#Resolving UPE issues are still on your radar. I have more ideas for improving both articles, but I'd rather not make any further suggestions until the above two open discussions are closed. Thanks, Sarah Nicklin (talk) 09:04, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Responded there. 15 (talk) 09:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Response to AFC comment

Thanks for your input on the Draft:Manscaped article. I made some amendments and added some further sources. If you could have another look, and let me know if you can see any other issues, that would be great. Iskandar_323 (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)}}

Request for assistance at Citrix Workspace

Hello, 15! Thank you for assisting with my request at Talk:Accenture. I wonder if you'd be willing to review another request of mine at Talk:Citrix Workspace? I originally posted the request in early June to slightly expand the existing stub based on third-party coverage of the software. I've reached out to WikiProject Technology, WikiProject Software, and a couple individual editors who previously responded to similar requests, but I haven't received any feedback yet. I appreciate your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Done. 15 (talk) 21:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Thank you! Inkian Jason (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Austria-Hungary on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michal Temkin Martinez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, Botswana The Rambling Man and New York (state) Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Republic of Venice Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, England Lee Vilenski, Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose, Rwanda Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. George Floyd mural Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John U. Monro

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John U. Monro you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John U. Monro

The article John U. Monro you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John U. Monro for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John U. Monro

The article John U. Monro you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John U. Monro for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks from WikiProject Articles for Creation!

Thank you for participating in the WikiProject Articles for creation July 2021 Backlog Drive. We hope to see you again next time!
On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey (talk!) 00:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Afghanistan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Historical rankings of presidents of the United States on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for John U. Monro

On 24 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John U. Monro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John U. Monro resigned as dean of Harvard College to work at a then-unaccredited, historically black college in Alabama? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John U. Monro. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John U. Monro), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

New Citrix request

Hello, 15! I have a new edit request at Talk:XenMobile on behalf of Citrix Systems. In short, the article is pretty outdated at this point (the title XenMobile itself refers to the product's former name), so I put together a draft that pares the article down to a stub and uses the product's new name, Citrix Endpoint Management. More details are on the request itself on the article Talk page, if you have the interest. I appreciate your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 18:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'll try to take a look the next days. 15 (talk) 20:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! I've responded on the article's talk page. I'm hoping to avoid direct editing, if you're willing to copy over the draft markup and complete the page move on my behalf. Inkian Jason (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Following up

Hi 15. Thanks for responding at Talk:Henley & Partners#Criticism section - I hope that, as you indicated, you'll find the time to consider my suggestions with respect to the Malta subsection there. I also want to draw your attention to a new edit request I posted at Talk:Christian Kälin, which I hope you'll be able to check out as well. Thanks! Sarah Nicklin (talk) 08:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 15

Thank you for creating Engine No. 1.

User:MainlyTwelve, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work on this article! You beat me to it and did a fantastic job.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mainly 13:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Working on it was a pleasure. And thank you for your valuable work at NPP! 15 (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Engine No. 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Loudoun County Public Schools on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

  1. Botswana The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
  3. Rwanda Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
  4. New York (state) Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
  5. Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
  6. Zulu (International Code of Signals) BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
  7. Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
  8. Republic of Venice Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Engine No. 1

On 4 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Engine No. 1, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that investment fund Engine No. 1 waged a successful proxy battle against ExxonMobil despite owning only 0.02 percent of the oil company's shares? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Engine No. 1. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Engine No. 1), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Surreal Barnstar
For being the first person to claim completion of a topic-specific challenge of mine. Thanks for all your hard work on biographies! — Bilorv (talk) 21:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Not that hard, if you look at the length of some of them :) Thank you, Bilorv, for your (quite creative) challenges, which give me something to work towards! 15 (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Yeah I did take a look, but I've certainly seen shorter, and they're good enough to be worthwhile. I'm glad people seem to be liking the challenges—I started it based on the Alphabet one because I noticed I was only missing 3/4 letters and then sought after the others. — Bilorv (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Help needed for Quad (company)

Hi. I'm Tina and I work for the Wisconsin-based company Quad. I found your name on the WP: Edit requests page, and I'm hoping that you can come to Talk: Quad/Further proposed edits and look over my edit request. I believe that my proposed edits add important information about the company's history to the page. If you agree, I'd really appreciate it if you would implement my suggestions. Thanks so much. Tina at Quad (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Responded there. 15 (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmed Naser Al-Raisi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Mark Bradford help

Hi 15, I was hoping you might take a look at my edit request at Talk:Mark Bradford. The article currently follows no logical order, so I've arranged it chronologically. I've also attempted to improve the structure for clarity, fixed some minor spelling errors, and addressed one other issue. Hope to discuss further there! Thanks for your help, Stewart for HW (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, looks good so far and thank you for using formatting that makes reviewing easy. I will try to have a closer look in the next few days and post a comment at the article talk page. Best, 15 (talk) 20:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Stewart for HW, just out of interest, how come you are contacting me about this? Curious because you're not the first COI/paid editor to do so. 15 (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, 15! I appreciate you taking the time to check it out, and look forward to your feedback. I've actually reached out to several other editors before turning to you in hopes that someone with an interest in art or LGBTQ+ topics might be willing to assist. Unfortunately no one responded helpfully. I'm being advised on Wikipedia best practices and have learned that it's important to take a collaborative approach, especially when working as a paid editor. I noticed your username in a few discussions on the topic of COI edits and thought it may be worth reaching out... I hope that's alright? I genuinely believe my suggestions improve the article from a reader's perspective, and would love to work with the community on this. By the way, I noticed that the link in my request is very obscure- in case you missed it, here it is again: User:Stewart for HW/Mark Bradford proposed edits. Thanks again so much for your time. Stewart for HW (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Stewart for HW, perhaps there is a misunderstanding but I think I mostly implemented it yesterday. Best, 15 (talk) 18:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I was focusing on this Talk page and hadn't even looked at the other yet. Thanks so much for taking the time! Stewart for HW (talk) 17:34, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lakhimpur Kheri violence on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Joe Gebbia title correction

Hello! Based on some of your posts at WikiProject Edit Requests, I am hoping you might be able to assist me with a fairly simple edit request at Talk:Joe Gebbia, which I've submitted on behalf of Airbnb. In short, I'm trying to correct Joe Gebbia by adding mention of his current roles. A couple editors assisted with the infobox request but seem uninterested in reviewing the most recent suggestion for the article body. One editor prefers to see sourcing which confirms when his role changed, but I don't agree the date is needed to clarify his current and former roles. Might you be able to take a look? Inkian Jason (talk) 19:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing and providing feedback. I've replied on the article's talk page and hope you might have a quick moment to revisit and update the entry on my behalf. Posting here as well since your profile says notifications are turned off. Thanks again! Inkian Jason (talk) 16:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Done. 15 (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:15/Archive_2021&oldid=1069039199"