User talk:15/Archive 2020

This is an archive of past discussions with User:15. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 2015

←

Archive 2018

Welcome!

Hi Caius G.! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Aivin G. (talk) 15:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Project Access

The article Project Access has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:SIRS and WP:ORGDEPTH. The secondary sources are either promotional(wework) or unreliable blog posts (sheinnovates stories). The straits times article consists of a bunch of quotes and focuses on Singaporean students applying to the UK and less on the organization itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Falumpaset (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

You may benefit from using RedWarn

Hello, Caius G.! I'm Ed6767, a developer for RedWarn. I was wondering if you'd like to try RedWarn, a new modern and user friendly tool specifically designed to improve your counter-vandalism experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over two hundred other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on RedWarn's talk page at WT:RW. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed talk! 18:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, will definitely do! <3 Caius G. (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

China's salami slicing

As funny as you mentioned, China's salami slicing itself is based on personal analysis, western community's own point of view. It is violating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.

@NatickTypeR: If you mean WP:NOR by "personal analysis", the article is reasonably well sourced as per WP:V. If you believe that the article is one-sided (which is not the same as "personal analysis"), thus violating WP:NPOV, then you are free to either raise this issue on the talk page or add a section describing a, following your terminology, "non-Western point of view". Calling it a "doubtful conspiracy" as you did in your edit would not alleviate that concern, particularly considering that it was violating both WP:NPOV and WP:V due to being unsourced. Caius G. (talk) 17:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You're doing great reverting vandalism! Thanoscar21^talk_contribs 23:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Joss Christensen

I am friends with Joss, can I at least add a picture to his profile? Smith5550 (talk) 00:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Smith5550: Sure, feel free to add a picture to his page, as long as it is either in the public domain or you own the rights to it. As adding photos can be a bit tricky, you can find information on how to do so at WP:IMAGE. Best, Caius G. (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Molly Malone

Thanks Caius G. Dbourke (talk) 02:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)