Jump to content

User talk:Seb az86556: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by Sin un nomine (talk): If you don. (TW)
That was joke: new section
Line 18: Line 18:


I meant to thank you for this edit [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken&diff=469889789&oldid=469888766]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to [[WP:BLPN]]. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
I meant to thank you for this edit [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken&diff=469889789&oldid=469888766]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to [[WP:BLPN]]. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

== That was joke ==

So that's how "Senior" Wikipedians reply? By de-emphasising? Ha!
[[User:Sin un nomine|Sin un nomine]] ([[User talk:Sin un nomine|talk]]) 13:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:10, 8 January 2012

earlier on this program...
(archives)
(+)

2013

12285
  
january 2013
8185
  
february 2013
18650
  
march 2013
6264
  
april 2013

Oh the irony

You helped close a discussion about closing discussions. I know from your earlier comments and actions that you won't understand how bad that is. I can move on. I just hope that one day you and others like you with such closed perspectives can too. Good luck to you. I genuinely wish you well. HiLo48 (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For the quick work on the Art Baker article. That would have taken me a week. Noformation Talk 06:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Hatchet helps sometimes. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erich von Däniken

I meant to thank you for this edit [1]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to WP:BLPN. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. Dougweller (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was joke

So that's how "Senior" Wikipedians reply? By de-emphasising? Ha! Sin un nomine (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]