User talk:Seb az86556: Difference between revisions
Seb az86556 (talk | contribs) Reverted 1 edit by Sin un nomine (talk): If you don. (TW) |
→That was joke: new section |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I meant to thank you for this edit [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken&diff=469889789&oldid=469888766]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to [[WP:BLPN]]. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
I meant to thank you for this edit [http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken&diff=469889789&oldid=469888766]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to [[WP:BLPN]]. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
== That was joke == |
|||
So that's how "Senior" Wikipedians reply? By de-emphasising? Ha! |
|||
[[User:Sin un nomine|Sin un nomine]] ([[User talk:Sin un nomine|talk]]) 13:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:10, 8 January 2012
earlier on this program... (archives) ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() | Editing of this talk page by unregistered users is not allowed because choosing to edit without logging into an account creates a power imbalance in communication. All such edits will be reverted without comment. Unless you have a static IP, you are purposely preventing other editors from observing patterns in your editing behavior as well as purposely choosing not to have a permanent place where other editors may reliably communicate with you about those behaviors. If you are allowed to make this choice, then I choose to rectify this imbalance by ignoring you. If you truly wish to communicate as equals, please create an account and become an established editor. Thank you. |
Oh the irony
You helped close a discussion about closing discussions. I know from your earlier comments and actions that you won't understand how bad that is. I can move on. I just hope that one day you and others like you with such closed perspectives can too. Good luck to you. I genuinely wish you well. HiLo48 (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For the quick work on the Art Baker article. That would have taken me a week. Noformation Talk 06:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks. Hatchet helps sometimes. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Erich von Däniken
I meant to thank you for this edit [1]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to WP:BLPN. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. Dougweller (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
That was joke
So that's how "Senior" Wikipedians reply? By de-emphasising? Ha! Sin un nomine (talk) 13:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)