User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

71.106.161.74

Hi, could you do something about user 71.106.161.74 [1]? After your warnings about vandalizing the List of experiments from Lilo & Stitch page, they moved on to editing many other pages with fake information. Thanks. 82.243.43.190 (talk) 12:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for two weeks for repeated addition of fake information. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, the block has expired and user 71.106.161.74 [2] is still editing pages with fake information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.243.43.190 (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

I cleaned up the mess they made after their block expired and reset the block for 6 months. Thanks for the note. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Promotional article creation

You recently deleted this article under CSD A7.The same user is now creating articles for each of the characters related to the deleted article. The author of the comic is "John F Summers" and the account creating the articles is User:John f summers - is it possible to delete all of the articles as purely promotional, or do they need to go through the PROD process? --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for following-up; I had to log off shortly after stumbling across these articles, so I wasn't able to follow through as I had planned. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Todo Kong is not a personal attack.

He is real and has been nominated for all that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tehmelonguy (talk • contribs) 04:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Brentarded? - sorry for issue if one was caused

Hello Gogo, I realize that with the username chosen it seems like the brentarded is a reference, however here in the Vancouver both gary and brentarded are words being used regularly as described. I simply posted them as many I know are using the terms and including myself and I am constantly explaining their meaning. I'd like to simply refer them to Wiki for answers, easier. The user choice is simply due to the synonym. I apologize if I caused an issue, I do however think you may see the entry again soon from others as the terms are regularly used here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brentisgary (talk • contribs) 05:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Yo bro

Sorry, I had no idea that really went on, I'm new at this... thanks for fixing it though! Factspeayoff (talk) 19:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Block

Definitely time to block User talk:Krizzyxxx69. Just vandalised the featured article. Amandajm (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

karen fares

why did u delete the karen fares article chistory —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chistory (talk • contribs) 17:41, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hey there

I see you're blocking some sockpuppets. I just blocked some myself (the ones on Kevin Cheng). --Bsadowski1 02:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Kent Monkman

Unclear why you keep deleting the section about his boy friend? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WatermarkTO (talk • contribs) 03:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Derek Lemp

Hi, please repost my article on artist "Derek Lemp". I've worked a few hours on constructing the page, and I've looked at many, many other pages on artists. The page I created is JUST like ANY other article on musicians on your website. There is absolutely no reason for you to delete, and I don't have the information backed up to repost. And the article was actually very informative, so please don't try and say it isn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fauxfade (talk • contribs) 07:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

"3rd Floor Sandoz" please see 3rd Floor Sandoz

Recreated under slightly different name. FYI, your call, no response needed. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:19, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

The Auctioneers

I recently created a Wikipedia page for a band that i manage called the auctioneers. there bio was written by my staff and on my website subversiveinc.com--- How do i make there page without getting it taken down?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennyhyde (talk • contribs) 22:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Chang

The flock of 10 SPAs arguing in very similar ways to Keep this article suggest possible sock puppetry, unless it is just the result of canvassing somewhere off-Wikipedia. Does that seem like sufficient basis for requesting a sock puppet investigation? Edison (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

I do not see anyone checking that there is more than one person and socks or meatpuppets !voting for Keep.Edison (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

If I state the obvious :"YOU ARE A BUNCH OF SOCKPUPPETS!!" I always expect to be condemned for "not assuming good faith" and for "biting the newbies". Edison (talk) 04:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Why

did you delete Joey Bruno? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJOEYBRUNO (talk • contribs) 06:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:19, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

dont delete

why you want to delete the CTEVT, Nepal page? --Saraun npl (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Sisqual's article

Dear Gogo Dodo, I am writing to you in order to clarify why was the article "sisqual" removed. I deleted the non-neutral information that was inserted by mistake, and I believe I justified the reason why I believe that a medium-size company in Portugal should be part of Wikipedia. Please let me know your view on this.

Many thanks freddygusto Freddygusto (talk) 14:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:39, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

An article on the SQU Crew located in the Sultanate of Oman's Sultan Qaboos University.

I hope u have a good explanation for deletin my page man —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.154.153.175 (talk) 18:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted because the group is not notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Long enough?

How's three weeks for you? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Shahid

I've posted on the talk page multiple times (under multiple articles) regarding Shahid and he NEVER responds and instead reverts peoples edits if he doesn't like them. Did you know he even deleted someone's comments on a talk page because he didn't like them? lolololol AyanP (talk) 22:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Ayan

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

4chan

They're targeting AIV now. Please deal with it. Thanks. -Regancy42 (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Not very bright to attract the attention of additional admins. A few more blocks handed out. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

There appears to be a couple more lurking around. -Regancy42 (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh, probably, but they all appear to be trying to bug Bongwarrior, which isn't very effective. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, I just blocked two IPs, clearly evading their original block. --Bsadowski1 07:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

It's not evading. It's just more people piling on. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Good luck man, they're behind 7 proxies apiece. Just saying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.21.50 (talk) 07:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

You missed something on Square Enix

Check the infobox. Beside "Revenue" and "Net Income", it says "Mirrion" and "Birrion", as opposed to Million and Billion. I'm afraid this is the work of 4chan: http://boards.4chan.org/v/res/75234153#75236221 Anonycanadian (talk) 07:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Fraberj

You just made me really happy. That protection should take care of most of the petty vandalism. Any accounts that do turn up will be patently obvious and blocked on sight.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 07:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

.. Nevermind, I see you changed it back to what it was. Can't believe I didn't read the entirety, heh. Oh well.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 07:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Ahh, I see now. You protected the article with the same time. I'm still grateful.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 07:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ridgewood High School (Florida). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kudpung (talk) 09:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. - Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:16, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Ahhhhhhh

you can't leave it up for ten minutes? it was part of a birthday present. Is there any way to get the article back without publishing it? Spongerbakula (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Dude, Seriously

That wasn't really like critically disruptive. Sheesh, it's like your too new to picking out the warnings. The Chosen ONE (talk) 13:50, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Chris Gibson

Hey,

I have recently added a point of discussion to the talk page of the Chris Gibson disambiguation, and I noticed you had contributed to that so I wanted your input [3].

Thanks in advance!

Theeagleman (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

deletion

why are my pages being deleted, they are not slanderious?!?!!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umicharyanaudi (talk • contribs) 05:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

deletion valid reference on gemstone page

Hi

You deleted a reference I've been using on and off for years. Quoting Wikipedia guidelines point 3): "online textbooks" the reference is in fact according wikipedia linking guidelines. The page shows over 100 full text copyright-free (antique) scientific publications on gemological topics and is furthermore a non-commercial page without and advertisements. The reference I am referring to is This library page

Unless you have a valid reason to delete the reference I will be placing it back. I would furthermore appreciate it if you would contact me before deleting references I add. I take great care in the sources I use.

Upon further inspection I just noticed you were trying to undo the spammer's link addition so I presume it got lost in "the noise". I will wait with re-adding it until things get more "tranquil" to prevent confusion.

Thank you.

Gem-fanat (talk) 06:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

why?

why did you delete IamStaka page? what rule did I break? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealfury (talk • contribs) 23:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

ure stupid

you're a stupid dumbass... i was just trying to help out. fuck off, stupid nolifer!