Warned user. I've issued an Only Warning for that attack. Any further disruption should be reported to WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. This isn't naked vandalism and there have been no edits since being warned. I also note that their last warning dates to September of '23. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
137.43.212.106(talk·contribs·deleted contribs·filter log·WHOIS·RDNS·RBLs·http·block user·block log) An IP with far too much knowledge of editing protocol to not be a SOCK; an SPA focused on articles relating to sexual abuse, where the IP makes edits and leaves comments that implicitly defend the abusers and are derogatory towards feminism (which the IP claims is an opinion that has no place on Wikipedia). Likely someone who was blocked for that last part, and shouldn't be given acknowledgement. Kingsif (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined. Edits are not WP:VANDALISM. If you suspect sockpuppetry report to WP:SPI. Most other forms of disruptive editing should be reported to WP:ANI after sufficient warnings. I note that no warnings have been issued. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
We don't exactly have a warning template for "your single focus on calling coverage of SA undue, and saying feminism is wrong, is tendentious and disruptive". I also do not want to give addressing it the time of day, to be honest. Kingsif (talk) 21:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
@Kingsif I'm sorry but this is not No Warning Block behavior. It's arguably disruptive. But it's not vandalism and this is not the correct noticeboard for that. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Yeah I understand, seems to be one of those things that is unacceptable but I suppose uncommon enough to not have a codified way of handling it besides 'wait for them to get worse'. Kingsif (talk) 22:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
@Kingsif A simple warning or caution for disruptive editing with an explanatory note would be a good start. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Also, three warnings were issued to this user in quick succession, hours after their last edits, so (for now) this report is moot. Complex/Rational 22:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Note: There's a problem here, in that the users one and only edit has been suppressed and therefore cannot be viewed by most users, including most admins. So this is basically not actionable at this time. Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 22:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I saw it and reported to OS. Technically not a violation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
I did give them a level 4 warning for promotion, though. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hi there! Requesting rollback rights to be able to use different tools for reverting vandalism. I'm open to any questions or feedback on my editing and counter-vandalism actions. Cheers. Rkieferbaum (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily: hi there. It's true that I seldom warn IP users that don't edit on a regular basis. I just feel like no one is going to see that warning and it might be confusing for other users from that IP. This might be a mistake on my part and I'll gladly fix it. You'll see that, with registered users, I've warned them 100% of the time or very close to that. Thanks for your time. Rkieferbaum (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been fighting vandalism for a while now and would like to use some other tools, like WP:HUGGLE to do so more efficiently. I've grown to have a good understanding of how to fight vandalism, including WP:RPPI and WP:AIV.
Thanks for considering and have a great rest of your day! MP1999❯❯❯Talk 16:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
