User:Ocaasi/dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 199.250.237.52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Wolfwolfnuke (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. As I said last night (my time) ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 2a02:a212:a7bf:dc00:a165:2519:8af:375e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- OfficialParticipACTION (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 21:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 74.132.73.79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 21:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 192.145.204.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 74.132.73.79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- YbgGilbert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Opium (record label) (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Only here to vandalize Opium. DACartman (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 92.251.150.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Oasis (band) (diff): Banned Irish editor User:DooksFoley147 who has also been active recently as Special:Contributions/92.251.150.187, Special:Contributions/92.251.131.222, Special:Contributions/178.167.150.154, Special:Contributions/178.167.131.74, Special:Contributions/178.167.178.15 and Special:Contributions/178.167.139.244. Binksternet (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 174.245.228.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA. Jdcomix (talk) 20:00, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Crapper Jim (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "CrapFoo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Bullshit-Watch (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- HESAFASCIST (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "fascis(m|t)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Many WP:NOTNEWS and WP:TRIVIA addition as the tournament is set to begin tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio 10:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Move protection: Page-move vandalism – Page constantly moved for no reason. CycloneYoris talk! 10:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined, reluctantly. This last occurred over a month ago and is due to a single user. I've added the page to my watchlist and will block them if it occurs again. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 11:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:00, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Annh07 (talk) 14:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit warring about the inclusion of infoboxes (IP adresses) Trade (talk) 17:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Killing_of_Brian_Thompson&diff=prev&oldid=1276403327
- Edit warring continued after you left this message
- How many reverts do we need for you to reconsider your declining? Trade (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- When the last occurrence at the time of declination was over a week ago, declination was more than reasonable (and I edit-conflicted with Bbb23 doing so). I will leave this for another administrator to evaluate. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been the subject of frequent COI editing and possibly sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Joslyn Rose Lyons for initial incident report. Kylemahar902 (talk) 17:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Marco raiden (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Marco raiden. We don’t have this article on the English Wikipedia. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This relates to an article on my.wikipedia. We are unable to do anything about an article on my.wikipedia. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Marco raiden: Please either contact one of the administrators at my:Special:ListUsers/sysop or make your request at m:GSR. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Banned editor User:DooksFoley147 has been using IPs from Ireland to evade their ban. The page Oasis discography needs the same protection. Binksternet (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Israeli passage through the Suez Canal and Straits of Tiran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA5. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topic restrictions in accordance with WP:ARBPIA. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs have been repeatedly (for months) adding names of characters for upcoming films without any source to backup hence WP:CRYSTALBALL. Some of the diff [1] [2] [3] [4]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Permanent semi-protection Large amounts of past 50 edits over a long time have been vandalism. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption, maybe sccks. win8x (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:43, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA, should be ECP even with the ongoing AfD. Thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The page has been targeted with repeated disruptive edits and unsourced changes. To maintain accuracy and prevent further vandalism, I request semi-protection for Mark Talukdar MarkTalukdar (talk) 20:36, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 20:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism Iranian112 (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations. Perception312 (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I don't want anyone to make changes to the page that I personally made because they would destroy it and make unwanted edits. AleksaCreatorWiki (talk) 21:35, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The page no longer attracts vandalism as the subject is no longer contentious. The person is no longer active in politics and the page view is low compared to previous data. The page is only protected due to one vandalism attempt by an IP address which had not edited wikipedia since. I see no reason why there could be persistent vandalism once the protection is decreased. Therefore, I request that the page be no longer protected. CS012831 (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- @CS012831: Biographies of still-living people are themselves a contentious topic. Have you spoken with the protecting admin? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- The protection wasn't an AE action. DatGuy has been active on Meta recently; perhaps he has some input here? Maybe pending changes could work as a trial. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The protection will expire later this year anyways, and Hancock is still in and out of the news (e.g. [6], #Bridgen v Hancock libel case). I'd say it's fine to let it expire naturally. DatGuyTalkContribs 20:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- The protection wasn't an AE action. DatGuy has been active on Meta recently; perhaps he has some input here? Maybe pending changes could work as a trial. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There is so much false information in the content of these articles, it is unacceptable, please unprotect it to correct it Mahmood2028 (talk) 17:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Mahmood2028: Even if this weren't protected under the auspices of WP:CT/HORN, the protecting administrator noted this article has had a history of constant protection, which is in the logs linked above. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:12, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Mahmood2028. If you have suggestions for improving the article, you can make them on the article talk page. The talk page is not protected. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected for now. Please follow the advice above and discuss with El C if you want it unprotected afterwards, though the CT prohibitions no longer apply. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Buck has been protected since 2011 but I think he has gotten significantly less polarizing in recent years. Probably best to relax this one. Esolo5002 (talk) 17:29, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Zzyzx11: Do you have any objections to reducing the protection? Sdrqaz (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: wrong content regarding to his arrest and confinement. which needs to be removed. for the same need access to edit and remove wrong information. Omkarjoshi1989 (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- This page was protected under the auspices of a contentious topic and cannot be unprotected at this venue. Request unprotection at User talk:Daniel Case or, assuming your account becomes autoconfirmed (4 days + 10 edits) appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:57, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – Favonian (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change section header:
"Gulf of America"
to:
"Gulf of America"
so that the redirect to the section still works (I can't edit either the page nor the redirect). Or the redirect can change from #REDIRECT [[Gulf of Mexico#Gulf of America]] to #REDIRECT [[Gulf of Mexico#"Gulf of America"]] (although I am unsure if that works). Altendo 16:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Forced to do some rewriting, lest the bot run amok. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
change wrong disputed narrative which is provided by wrong refferals BigReads2000 (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not done - Vague requests like this and the one above will not be entertained. Please read WP:EDITREQ and submit a more targeted request, with sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 8 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |
| 14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I would like to use AWB for repetitive editing tasks. I do these a lot for the projects I am a part of, and they have become very tedious. Edit: one of the projects I am a part of for a Church, does not have very many active contributors but a very large backlog. The effort to maintain the articles we have would be largely simplified by using AWB. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
This is a (new) alt account of User:RedactedHumanoid, and has been created with the sole purpose to edit articles that I do not want to edit on my main account (NSFW articles, etc). Most of these articles are semi-protected, so I am requesting confirmed rights so I can edit those pages. RedactedHumanoid66 (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:
I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to translate the article for "Carlos y Jose" into English. I would also like to translate the article for Infinity ECHS into German. I have already translated the Infinity ECHS article into Spanish. WesWall2003 (talk) 21:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have authored a few articles, improved the quality of many articles including adding high quality references and improving encyclopedic quality. I have also limited experiences in deletion. I also have just been granted AFC reviewer options and starting to increase my participation in that. Welcome feedback if I can qualify. Thanks for the consideration Trex32 (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Though I predominantly work with redirects, at least recently, I also engage with new pages and would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. I have made almost 46,000 edits and believe that I can help. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple (Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
I have authored a few articles, commonly support and help new editors, and enjoy helping the community by encouraging proper creation of articles and assisting with maintenance. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover[edit] |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I patrol recent changes, mainly for vandalism, but I also get in contact with a lot of pending changes and like to help. I am familiar with the related policies. Squawk7700 (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting reviewer rights to help improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles, particularly in areas related to Pakistan and some notable international articles like television shows and international cricket. I also created a page Kana Yaari directly, which is a result of my performances on Wikipedia. I have gained experience through consistent and constructive editing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. I aim to assist in maintaining the integrity of semi-protected pages and contribute to the efficient review of pending changes. Currently I'm a auto confirmed rights. Sackiii (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
After starting with Recent Changes Patrolling I found myself in a very rewarding position, seeing that I can help other Wikipedians and the Wiki as a whole. But I also experienced the limitation of not having the Rollback right so I'd like to switch to AntiVandal or Huggle. Squawk7700 (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
after 2 years I got alot of editing, wanna test another experience. thanks QalasQalas (talk) 00:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I've recently come across several instances where rollbacking would be faster than manually reverting nonconstructive consecutive edits. I don't patrol Recent Changes, but I am quite active and have more than 3,100 pages on my Watchlist. Thanks for your consideration. PRRfan (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: The main thing I do on Wikipedia is watch the recent changes page for changes that are not constructive. I would like these permissions so that instead of having to click the article > click view history > click undo, I would be able to just click one button. This would make what I mainly do MUCH easier, and would allow me to more quickly undo nonconstructive edits. MersmanD (talk) 16:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
I go through period a of spending lots of time patrolling recent changes, and rollback would make my task much more easier and efficient by giving me access to tools like juggle, and antivandal. Wolfwolfnuke (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |