User talk:MPian
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Minor Barnstar | |
Thanks for your copyediting cleanup; it all adds up to make the encyclopedia more readable! - RevelationDirect (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC) |
- @RevelationDirect, Thank you so much. I'll be pleased to continue to help with the copyediting cleanup. Regards. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 05:40, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Minor barnstar |
Beat me to it! Thank you for reverting that recent vandalism - FarmerUpbeat (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you @FarmerUpbeat you also deserve a Barnstar. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 18:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
* Pppery * it has begun... 22:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for granting me Pending changes reviewer permission. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 00:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]
Hi MPian. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fathoms Below (talk) 23:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for granting me Rollback permission. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 23:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
SPI update
[edit]I have provided evidence for Saigon to Seoul/AGST Phantasy being a sock account on the SPI page Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saigon to Seoul
I don't blame you for doubting at first since I didn't link any edits. But I have now linked disruptive edits from all 4 accounts that are VERY similar in nature. The accounts all have very similar editing patterns, tending to vandalize the same articles (particularly the "Mobilize Limo" redirect)
Comparing the edit histories of the accounts make it fairly obvious that they're all socks. 2 of the older accounts (Tsing Yi and Nishun) were already banned for sockpuppetry, but AGST/Seoul are newer accounts.
Regardless, AGST should be blocked for persistent disruptive editing. ApexParagon (talk) 01:59, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- @ApexParagon Thanks for providing diffs; it helps the admins who handle SPI cases. I'm not an admin; hopefully, very soon an admin will look into the case and block suspected socks. They are highly likely socks; I've checked your provided evidence. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 02:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
RM ettiquette
[edit]Hi MPian, with regard to your bolded !vote of support on Talk:Nia (charity) § Requested move 27 February 2025, would you kindly remove the bold and "support" prior to your comment, or simply change '''Support'''
to '''Comment'''
.
As the nominator of the RM, it is presumed that you of course support your own proposal. This makes it easier for a closer to come along and determine consensus.
Thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Okay. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 01:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)