User:Matty.007/Archive 5:September 2013-October 2013
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Matty.007. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey 21:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Userpage tabs
Excuse me, but could you explain to me how to make tabs for my USer page? I'd appreciate your help! Thanks!(: GraceSmileyface (talk) 02:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Note:moved from a page in my userspace (soon to be deleted) which GraceSmileyface created
- GraceSmileyface: do you want me to tell you, or design them for you? Matty.007 16:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Um...Just telling me would be fine! Thanks(:GraceSmileyface (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- OK, first, copy the source at this page. Then, fill in the relevant sections, noting that the first section is the image links, so that when they are clicked they will go to the page. Please create your own page for this, as opposed to doing it on my navigation page. Any questions, just ask. Thanks, Matty.007 16:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- GraceSmileyface: is that OK, or do you want me to make them for you/tell you again? Thanks, Matty.007 11:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- OK, first, copy the source at this page. Then, fill in the relevant sections, noting that the first section is the image links, so that when they are clicked they will go to the page. Please create your own page for this, as opposed to doing it on my navigation page. Any questions, just ask. Thanks, Matty.007 16:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Um...Just telling me would be fine! Thanks(:GraceSmileyface (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination
I don't mean to get into a fuss here, and I apologize if I come off as brusque (I know I'd hate it if someone else did it to me), but the article you've nominated is by no means GA material at this time. There are too many issues for it to simply be fixed during the review process, so I would encourage you to remove the nomination and don't put it back up for review until it's ready. LazyBastardGuy 19:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have addressed most of the issues, but there are few reliable sources available. Matty.007 19:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- Then perhaps we should wait until more are found, or until the article can be made longer with the ones we do have. A few issues I pointed-out are still in need of adjustment, such as the rather listy form of prose and two of the sources being of questionable reliability. LazyBastardGuy 19:37, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clarence Chesterfield Howerton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clarence Chesterfield Howerton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
No worries, bro
Take as much time as you need. If that article can possibly be saved, let alone made GA, I'm all for hearing what you have to say. LazyBastardGuy 07:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Matty.007! Thanks for all your hard work in patrolling and reporting problematic usernames. I just wanted to give you the heads up that most of the admins at WP:UAA (including myself) tend to wait until an editor had edited before blocking the account (except in certain rare situations). This is especially the case with possible company names. The edits help us determine what the correct remedy is, and until the account edits there are no problems, etc. Singularity42 (talk) 19:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip, I wasn't sure whether that was the case, and the couple of admins I asked said to report them and see what they said. I thought that it was best to get them 'on the radar'. Am I allowed to create a user subpage with a list of promo users who haven't edited, and then report them when they do? Thanks, Matty.007 19:44, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Of course. Nothing wrong with that. In any event, once they do edit, the edits will usually trigger an editor who sees those edits to report the username to UAA. Singularity42 (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 September 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia
- Featured content: Tintin goes featured
- Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!
- Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Large Retailer Accountability Act (LRAA)
This doesn't have a Wikipedia Page yet?
to force powerful companies moving into the city to address their use of low-wage employment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.83.158.75 (talk) 11:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- A brief search showed that this may be notable, so I will likely start work on it in my sandbox in the next few days if you're interested. Thanks, Matty.007 17:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clarence Chesterfield Howerton
The article Clarence Chesterfield Howerton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Clarence Chesterfield Howerton for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 06:52, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Buurtpoes Bledder
On 15 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Buurtpoes Bledder, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the death of the cat Buurtpoes Bledder (pictured) was covered in national news, including SBS 6 and De Telegraaf? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Buurtpoes Bledder. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK nomination of Tachikawa air disaster
Hello! Your submission of Tachikawa air disaster at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genocide of indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Buutpoes Bledder
I took the liberty to add your DYK article about the cat here Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Statistics#September_2013, in case you forgot to check it out it got over 5,000 views and are eligible to be added to the DYK stats. Good work.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I keep meaning to put my DYKs at that page when they get enough views, but I am quite busy, both in RL and making a list in my sandbox. Thanks, Matty.007 18:04, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 September 2013
- WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall
- Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh
- Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK for John Wheatley (physicist)
On 20 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Wheatley (physicist), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that John Wheatley died of a heart attack whilst on a bike ride? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Wheatley (physicist). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for Marinekazerne Suffisant
On 21 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marinekazerne Suffisant, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Dutch military base Marinekazerne Suffisant was visited by Queen Beatrix? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marinekazerne Suffisant. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
unique chattel
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Specific_performance (legal term) and UCC, routienly discuss the above subject.
However in tort law there is virtually no discussion, references or other ways to compare what is well founded Equitable Court resolution of contracts concerning unique chattel. (I have been researching?) this term for almost 3 years. It's unfortunate that "chattel" is associated with slavery. This may be the inhibition for discussing it in terms of Tort's remedy of injunction, or more clearly mandatory injunction. I hope you can elevate this subject to a status next to Specific_performance, or as part of tort so that Legal scholars can begin to elucidate this neglected remedy by Equity Courts. The neglected minority, unlucky enough to have unique chattel (unique personal property) damaged by accident or by intention, have no remedy. In other words Tort law is Dead for tort damaged unique chattel!
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Beswick_v_Beswick seems to approach the tort remedy.
Thanks for the scan and consideration
98.88.99.253 (talk) 00:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:20 Fenchurch Street
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:20 Fenchurch Street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clarence Chesterfield Howerton
The article Clarence Chesterfield Howerton you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Clarence Chesterfield Howerton for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LazyBastardGuy -- LazyBastardGuy (talk) 03:23, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Mark Sutton
On 25 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mark Sutton, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mark Sutton portrayed a skydiving James Bond during the opening ceremony of the 2012 Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Sutton. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Signpost: 25 September 2013
- Traffic report: Look on Walter's works
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the stage
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:29, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Erema
Hello! Your submission of Erema at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013 Wikification Drive
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up! |
This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK for 2013 Carlton Cannes heist
On 1 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2013 Carlton Cannes heist, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that jewels stolen at the Carlton Cannes in the July 2013 heist are worth $136 million? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:13, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 October 2013
- Discussion report: References to individuals and groups, merging wikiprojects, portals on the Main page, and more
- News and notes: WMF signals new grantmaking priorities
- Featured content: Bobby, Ben, Roger and a fantasia
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes: After the war
- WikiProject report: U2 Too
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Tachikawa air disaster
Hello! Your submission of Tachikawa air disaster at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tachikawa air disaster may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- France]] [[Boeing 707]] [[Air France Flight 007|crashed during takeoff]] in 1962.<ref name="Time">{{cite web | url=http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,889723,00.html | title=JAPAN:
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Erema may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{Open-source attribution|''The Academy'' (1877), Volume 12, page 446 (used for Plot section}}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- reported and the B-29 returned to base upon running low on fuel. However, when would-be rescuers (British planes, weather ships, submarine, several warships and the [[USS Coral Sea (CV-43)|USS
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 October 2013
- Traffic report: Shutdown shenanigans
- WikiProject report: Australian Roads
- Featured content: Under the sea
- News and notes: Extensive network of clandestine paid advocacy exposed
- In the media: College credit for editing Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute and Ebionites 3 cases continue; third arbitrator resigns
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 13:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Tachikawa air disaster
On 11 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tachikawa air disaster, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Douglas C-124 Globemaster II involved in the Tachikawa air disaster crashed into a watermelon patch, with all hands lost? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tachikawa air disaster. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Please comment on Talk:Great Dane
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Great Dane. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (All the copyright content has been removed and only reliable sources of wikipedia has been provoded,its an important article with so many relaible sources ,provided for that) --Nitishkumartn (talk) 15:15, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~ Matthewrbowker Make a comment! 17:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Again. ~ Matthewrbowker Make a comment! 18:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Erema
Hi Matty, I guess you are watching the Erema DYK nomination - but just to make sure, Nikkimaria has left a comment on what needs to be done about the Plot section. I've learnt something new from this, so all good! I'll finish the review once it's been corrected. SagaciousPhil - Chat 07:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Matty, thanks for your work on Erema - I've now given it an AGF tick for the ALT1 hook. On a different matter, I also had a quick glance at 1951 Atlantic C-124 this morning, (yeah, I know I'm plain nosey!). Good to see DoctorKubla has picked up the review and you have amended the ref that was going to a different page. When I was looking at it, I happened upon this site - perhaps it might help a little? SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think that that's nosy, just plain helpful. Most sources I could see were relating to this, but I forgot to look for it, so thanks for finding it. Thanks also for the review on Erema, I saw the AGF tick a few minutes ago. I will likely start to add some more information into the article now, thanks for the link. Matty.007 19:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I enjoy looking for different things and generally find it an enticing challenge. SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think that that's nosy, just plain helpful. Most sources I could see were relating to this, but I forgot to look for it, so thanks for finding it. Thanks also for the review on Erema, I saw the AGF tick a few minutes ago. I will likely start to add some more information into the article now, thanks for the link. Matty.007 19:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Erema
On 15 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Erema, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that R. D. Blackmore, author of Lorna Doone, considered Erema his "most unlucky novel", in part because the public could not pronounce the title character's name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Erema. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for Hermes Press
On 16 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hermes Press, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the popular comic strip The Phantom is in the fifth installment of reissues by Hermes Press? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hermes Press. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK
Hi, would you mind if I nominated William Bunting (eco-warrior) for DYK? Thanks, Matty.007 17:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for kindly offering to nominate the above article for DYK, but it's already been nominated here. But keep up the good work - there are lots of good ones out there. --Storye book (talk) 18:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. If you're searching for good new articles for DYK noms, it might be worth checking their talk pages as well - because the nomination process includes a DYK-nom-monitoring template which can be put on the article talk page, e.g. here. You're doing a great job anyway. --Storye book (talk) 07:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
FLC
I'm planning to review your FLC. Do you mind if I jump into the table portion and help out a bit (constructive work only).-Godot13 (talk) 19:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, go ahead by all means (that is the fun of a collaborative project). Thanks for any time you spend helping with the list. Matty.007 19:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. If you're still looking for a DYK nom to help with - I've just nominated the above, and progress of the nom can be seen on the above link. However I've nominated it at the last minute (4th or 5th day) and I'm going to be very busy in the next couple of days. So if you see any faults in it and would like to edit for DYK you are very welcome. However I appreciate that you may also be very busy? All the best. --Storye book (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion, but that has been passed, so not much for me to do there. Matty.007 16:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- OK, fair enough, and thanks for kindly looking. But am I missing something? I've checked the nom page and section for 12 Oct, and I can't see any note to say it's been passed?? Anyway I've got ten mins today so I'll look and see if I can make any small headway with it. Wish I had more time! --Storye book (talk) 20:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake, I was looking at the example link. I will have a look at the nom tomorrow. Thanks, Matty.007 21:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! I did a little bit more work on it last night, but of course it does need a review by someone else, so I'd appreciate any input. Thanks again. --Storye book (talk) 06:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake, I was looking at the example link. I will have a look at the nom tomorrow. Thanks, Matty.007 21:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- OK, fair enough, and thanks for kindly looking. But am I missing something? I've checked the nom page and section for 12 Oct, and I can't see any note to say it's been passed?? Anyway I've got ten mins today so I'll look and see if I can make any small headway with it. Wish I had more time! --Storye book (talk) 20:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance
On 17 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1951, a United States Air Force Douglas C-124 Globemaster II vanished, and neither the occupants nor the plane were ever recovered? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1951 Atlantic C-124 disappearance. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Ref
Note for me from me: input that link from Sagaciousphil at the weekend. Thanks, Me (Matty007 (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC))
GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up
Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter
– Your project coordinators: Torchiest and Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
|
hello
thank you for the message. Well i am all circled around here. i really will be happy if there is an easy way to chat and communicate. i need a good amount of help in writing things up and i need support to understand the way things work here. basically i was trying to write some really good quotes and put up some real good informations but most of the informations are based on myths and legends and if you want me to give a real proof that will be tough so i was trying to make a page about myself so that people can know who is the writer......see many people do a lot of things in life and i have a life of my own plus a life where i have done not a very log of things but still considerable amount of things. I was not going to write my love story or tips to find girls.
generally if a page about myself and about my biography is not allowed then why are there hundreds & thousands of pages about people ? Well see if i get a medal in olympics then a page can come up on me but if i am trying to something else i am breaking rule ?
please do help me out in this case and if possible can you really give me a look about wikipedia in your own words and not via pasting links ?
it would really be helpful if you can give me few informations regarding how things work here in wikipedia and what to write and what not to write.
Thank you for your help.
p.s. - "i could have used words like dude or he or she or my friend or lady ... but i actually don't know you, so i hope you can understand" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goluagarwa (talk • contribs) 20:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) We have notability guidelines that articles must satisfy. For biographies that would be WP:BIO. As we said on IRC, articles require significant coverage in reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines. Repeatedly re-creating an article on yourself without any indication of notability is not a good idea. Huon (talk) 20:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Another (talk page stalker): an important policy you should understand is Wikipedia:Verifiability which can be summed up in one sentence: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". So information based only on your personal knowledge is not suitable, and readers do not need to know about you, because they should be able to check anything you add, if they want to, by referring to the references you give. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- To build on what Huon and JohnCD said, Wikipedia is not a social media site, where everyone who wants has an article, you have to be notable, defined as having "significant coverage" in "independent sources". I would give you a few links, but Huon and JohnCD have already done this (and their links are probably better than the ones I would have given). Hope this is clear enough, thanks, Matty.007 11:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Another (talk page stalker): an important policy you should understand is Wikipedia:Verifiability which can be summed up in one sentence: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". So information based only on your personal knowledge is not suitable, and readers do not need to know about you, because they should be able to check anything you add, if they want to, by referring to the references you give. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 October 2013
- News and notes: Vice on Wiki-PR's paid advocacy; Featured list elections begin
- Traffic report: Peaceful potpourri
- WikiProject report: Heraldry and Vexillology
- Featured content: That's a lot of pictures
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case closes
- Discussion report: Ada Lovelace Day, paid advocacy on Wikipedia, sidebar update, and more
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 22:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Operation Crimson
Hello! Your submission of Operation Crimson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 13:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Tristan Stephenson
On 19 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tristan Stephenson, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Tristan Stephenson is considered to be one of London's best cocktail makers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tristan Stephenson. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Speedy deletion nomination of Haryana Seeds Development Corporation
Agree and sorry for this edit. GKCH (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)