Template talk:Rail-interchange/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
Template-protected edit request on 19 December 2018
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add: Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 21:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
sorry - poor formatting:
| fortworth ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | tre =[[File:TRE logo.png|{{{size|20}}}px|link={{{link|Trinity Railway Express}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Trinity Railway Express}}}}}}]] | tex =[[File:Aiga railtransportation 25.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|TEXRail}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|TEXRail}}}}}}]] }}
for Trinity Railway Express and upcoming TEXRail services - as they are independently operated, but under one agency. the "tre" switch could probably be repeated in the | dart
section, as it is jointly operated.
- Please don't paste code blobs into the talk page.
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- done - let's integrate it into the main template? Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Er, it seems that you are asking for a lot more changes than those you mention above. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sandbox was not synchronised. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Er, it seems that you are asking for a lot more changes than those you mention above. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- done - let's integrate it into the main template? Mjdestroyerofworlds (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 13:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 December 2018
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The link for Baltimore Light Rail in the Baltimore section needs to be changed to Baltimore Light RailLink. Dough4872 20:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 28 December 2018
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- please add the following to minnesota for an under construction light rail line:
southwest lrt = Southwest LRT Cubbie15fan (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Cubbie15fan:
Done (with additional options
southwest
,sw
andlrt
). Jc86035 (talk) 18:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)- @Jc86035: Thanks! Cubbie15fan (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Sydney Metro edit request
![]() | This edit request to Template:rint has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Sydney Metro will be opening soon.
{{rint|sydney|metro}} = [[Sydney Metro]]
{{rint|sydney|m1}} = [[Sydney Metro Northwest]]
{{rint|sydney|m2}} = [[Sydney Metro City & Southwest]]
J4lambert (talk) 21:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @J4lambert:
Not done: Your requested changes must be made to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. (P.S. You still haven't fixed your request from last month!) Useddenim (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Medina Metro edit request
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The code of Medina Metro used Jeddah Metro. The correct one should as follows: | 1 ={{RouteBox|1|Line 1 (Medina Metro)|#009530}} | 2 ={{RouteBox|2|Line 2 (Medina Metro)|#0354A6}} | 3 ={{RouteBox|3|Line 3 (Medina Metro)|#DC241F}} --owennson(Meeting Room、Certificates) 10:27, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. -- /Alex/21 13:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
singapore edit request
Request to update Singapore's line. Color for cross island line is updated.
| sg ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | smrt =[[File:SMRTsingapore.svg|{{{size|26}}}px|link={{{link|SMRT Trains}}}]] | sbst =[[File:SBS Transit Logo.svg|{{{size|26}}}px|link={{{link|SBS Transit}}}]] | branch ={{RouteBox|B|Branch MRT Line|#B85600}} | bp | l1 ={{RouteBox|BPLRT|Bukit Panjang LRT Line|#999999}} | cc | m4 ={{RouteBox|CCL|Circle MRT Line|#fa9e0d}} | cr | ci | m8 ={{RouteBox|CRL|Cross Island MRT Line|#A2CE2D}} | dt | m5 ={{RouteBox|DTL|Downtown MRT Line|#005ec4}} | ew | m2 ={{RouteBox|EWL|East West MRT Line|#009645}} | jr | m7 ={{RouteBox|JRL|Jurong Region MRT Line|#0099aa}} | ne | m3 ={{RouteBox|NEL|North East MRT Line|#9900aa}} | ns | m1 ={{RouteBox|NSL|North South MRT Line|#d42e12}} | pg | l3 ={{RouteBox|PGLRT|Punggol LRT Line|#999999}} | sk | l2 ={{RouteBox|SKLRT|Sengkang LRT Line|#999999}} | te | m6 ={{RouteBox|TEL|Thomson-East Coast MRT Line|#784008}} }}
-155.69.160.75 (talk) 06:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 27 January 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change this line:
| cr | ci | m8 ={{RouteBox|CRL|Cross Island MRT Line|#f266b5}}
to:
| cr | m8 ={{RouteBox|CRL|Cross Island MRT Line|#a2ce2d}}
Explanation: The 2-letter abbreviation is confirmed to be "CR" while the colour is confirmed to be light green (#a2ce2d), see Cross Island MRT line#Stations. For more information, check the relevant press release. Wpeneditor (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 07:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Taipei Metro
add this line
| lg=[[File:Taipei Metro Line Wanda Zhonghe Shulin.svg|{{{size|19}}}px|link={{{link|Wanda–Zhonghe–Shulin line}}}|{{{3|}}}]]
below the Circular line (Taipei Metro). Chinese Wikipedia already updated for it angys (Talk Talk) 17:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 29 January 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Changes are in line with the Philippines' Department of Transportation numbering based on documents since July 2017. The following changes are: No more LRT/MRT in short names, Line # or simply # only. Makati Subway is Line 5, Mega Manila Subway is Line 9, PNR East-West Rail is Line 8, and PNR North-South Commuter Rail is added. Also Line 9 aka Metro Manila Subway is Maroon on initial maps. Korean Rail Fan 04:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. -- Useddenim (talk) 04:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 24 February 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Changes to Ottawa:
- Change O-Train from wordmark logo to commonly-used "O" icon.
From this:
| otrain =[[File:O-Train logo.svg|{{{size|37}}}px||link=O-Train]]
to this:
| otrain ={{#switch: {{lc:{{{3|}}}}} | #default =[[File:O-Train icon.png|{{{size|16}}}px|link=O-Train]] }} {{#switch: {{lc:{{{3}}}}} | confederation | 1 =[[File:Ottawa - Line 1 Confederation Line.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link=Confederation Line]] | trillium | 2 =[[File:Ottawa - Line 2 Trillium Line.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link=Trillium Line]] }}
- Add icons for OC Transpo buses and transitway.
Add this:
| transitway =[[File:BSicon BUS3.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link=Transitway (Ottawa)]] | bus =[[File:Bus-logo.svg|{{{size|14}}}px|link=List of OC Transpo routes]] | octranspo =[[File:OC Transpo logo.svg|{{{size|72}}}px|link=OC Transpo]]
See Template:Rail-interchange/testcases#Ottawa. UmpireRay (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I've compared the live template with the sandbox, using the "sandbox diff" link in the box at the top. You seem to be asking for many more changes than relate directly to Ottawa. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I see that now. However, the only changes I have made to the sandbox were the ones directly related to Ottawa, which I listed above. The other sandbox changes have been made by others not related to this edit request. I'm new to this process, so is there anything I need to do with relation to the sandbox so that only the changes I am requesting are shown? UmpireRay (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Start off by synchronising the sandbox with the live template. This is normally done by copying all of the code from the live template to your clipboard; but since the page is protected, you may believe that you cannot copy the live code - but you can. On the live template page, you should see a "View source" tab at the top; click that. You get an edit window with a grey background instead of the normal white; below it there is no place to enter an edit summary, and no buttons for publish changes, etc. Click somewhere in that grey edit window, then use Ctrl+A to select all of its contents and Ctrl+C to copy. Then edit the sandbox, blank out all of the existing code and paste in the code from your clipboard, without altering it in any way; use an edit summary like "Synchronise from live template" and save this. Then make your changes to the sandbox and save. In this way the examples on the testcases page will highlight the effect of your changes alone, and not be affected by any pre-existing differences between live and sandbox. Since the sandbox will then contain only the changes that you desire, it's also unnecessary to paste code blobs into this talk page thread. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the help! I have edited the sandbox accordingly. UmpireRay (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Start off by synchronising the sandbox with the live template. This is normally done by copying all of the code from the live template to your clipboard; but since the page is protected, you may believe that you cannot copy the live code - but you can. On the live template page, you should see a "View source" tab at the top; click that. You get an edit window with a grey background instead of the normal white; below it there is no place to enter an edit summary, and no buttons for publish changes, etc. Click somewhere in that grey edit window, then use Ctrl+A to select all of its contents and Ctrl+C to copy. Then edit the sandbox, blank out all of the existing code and paste in the code from your clipboard, without altering it in any way; use an edit summary like "Synchronise from live template" and save this. Then make your changes to the sandbox and save. In this way the examples on the testcases page will highlight the effect of your changes alone, and not be affected by any pre-existing differences between live and sandbox. Since the sandbox will then contain only the changes that you desire, it's also unnecessary to paste code blobs into this talk page thread. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- I see that now. However, the only changes I have made to the sandbox were the ones directly related to Ottawa, which I listed above. The other sandbox changes have been made by others not related to this edit request. I'm new to this process, so is there anything I need to do with relation to the sandbox so that only the changes I am requesting are shown? UmpireRay (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 22:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Request to update Metro Manila Rail Line Route Box based on official DOTr documents
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The official Philippines' Department of Transportation (DOTr) released the official plans [1] for all 9 rail lines plus PNR lines map for Metro Manila. DOTr has put the names only in Lines 1-9. To reflect this, I suggest the following changes so as to simplify the icons similar to how most rail articles show only either a numeric (1) or an alphabet (A) on their routeboxes should they have numerical or alphabet names.
| manila ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | lrt-1 | lrt1 | 1 ={{RouteBox|1|Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 1|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|1}}}} | lrt-2 | lrt2 | mrt-2 | mrt2 | 2 ={{RouteBox|2|Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 2|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|2}}}} | mrt-3 | mrt3 | lrt-3 | lrt3 | 3 ={{RouteBox|3|Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 3|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|3}}|#000000}} | lrt-4 | lrt4 | 4 ={{RouteBox|4|Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 4|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|4}}}} | lrt-5 | lrt5 | 5 ={{RouteBox|5|Makati Intra-City Subway|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|5}}}} | lrt-6 | lrt6 | 6 ={{RouteBox|6|Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 6|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|6}}}} | mrt-7 | mrt7 | 7 ={{RouteBox|7|Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 7|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|7}}}} | mrt-8 | mrt8 | 8 ={{RouteBox|8|Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 8|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|8}}}} | mrt-9 | mrt9 | 9 ={{RouteBox|9|Metro Manila Subway|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|9}}}} | pnr | mc | orange ={{RouteBox|PNR|PNR Metro Commuter Line|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|PNR}}}} | nscr | nscr ={{RouteBox|NSCR|Philippine National Railways|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|PNR}}|black}} }}
Korean Rail Fan 04:55, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 00:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Alex 21: Thank you for approving although may I request for a minor change in the linked article for this entry:
| mrt-9 | mrt9 | 9 ={{RouteBox|9|Metro Manila Subway Line 9|#{{Manila Rail Transit color|9}}}}
- This is to update the template with the new name for the article. Thanks! Korean Rail Fan 10:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 12:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 28 February 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add icons for CTA (transit agency) service
{{rint|chicago|cta}}
and for Chicago "L" service
{{rint|chicago|l}}
as follows:
| l =[[File:Chicago Transit Authority Logo.svg|{{{size|14}}}px|link={{{link|Chicago "L"}}}]]
| cta =[[File:Chicago Transit Authority Logo.svg|{{{size|14}}}px|link={{{link|Chicago Transit Authority}}}]]
Add icon for Baltimore Metro SubwayLink service
{{rint|baltimore|subwaylink}}
as follows:
| subway = [[File:BSicon SUBWAY.svg|{{{size|14}}}px|link={{{link|Baltimore Metro SubwayLink}}}]]
The above changes have been made in the sandbox.
Also, it would be helpful to be able to add the word "Line" to CTA services and have it be removable, similar to the way Boston and LA Metrolink are set up. Same for Metra (plus the ability to spell out the whole name). I don't have the skills to do that but it would be super helpful. Rivkid007 (talk) 19:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 12:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the following ({{rint|ni|rail2}}
) as follows:
| rail2 =[[File:NI Railways icon.svg|{{{size|15}}}px|link={{{link|NI Railways}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|NI Railways}}}}}}]]
The reason for adding the icon is to easily differentiate between different Translink services (e.g. on the Glider (Belfast) article). It visually resembles the icon that Translink itself uses, and I have added the test to the sandbox. --RaviC (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 12:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit request
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the file used for London Buses from File:London Buses square.png to File:London Buses square.svg. This change has already been added to the sandbox. --RaviC (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 07:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 20 March 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hey, File:HefeiMetro.svg was deleted from commons 17 March 2019 - can find no sensible replacement KylieTastic (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 07:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 March 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, File:Ningbo Rail Transit Logo No Text.png was deleted 17:03, 30 March 2019 and is currently showing as an error of ~100 pages that just pooped up in Category:Articles with missing files. I suggest changing to File:Ningbo Rail Transit logo.svg as a simplified interpretation. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Partly done @Mbisanz: This file looks very similar to the deleted one so i'm not willing to put it back in when the community declared it should be deleted. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:58, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 2 April 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Due to BMA has submitted a statement for the BMA Light Cyan Line to Junta.
For Bangkok, change:
| bang na-suvarnabhumi | bang na | suvarnabhumi ={{RouteBox|BTS|Bang Na–Suvarnabhumi Line|{{BTS color|bangna}}|#000}}
to:
| bang na-suvarnabhumi | bang na | suvarnabhumi | light cyan | lightcyan ={{RouteBox|LRT|Light Cyan Line|#{{BTS color|light cyan}}|#000}}
and I think this line
| bm =[[File:Bangkok Monorail Logo.png|{{{size|14}}}px|link={{{link|Pink Line Khae Rai–Min Buri and Yellow Line Lat Phrao–Samrong electric trains}}}]]
should be deleted. Because of the official name of MRTA Yellow Line and MRTA Pink Line it called the MRT.--Magnamonkun (talk) 11:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Please do not paste code blobs into the talk page; as advised earlier, it not only leads to misunderstanding as to the exact desired change, but is also difficult to test. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 April 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Virgin Trains USA. This is the new name for the Brightline service in Florida. The related code and new public domain logo has been added to the sandbox. Jackdude101 talk cont 20:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- There are a lot of differences between live and sandbox. Did you sync the sandbox from live before you started making your amendments? Have you verified that the sandbox currently contains your desired changes and nothing else? Have you provided a demo at the testcases page? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I synched the sandbox with the live version, added Virgin Trains USA back to the former, and made the related entry on the testcases page. Jackdude101 talk cont 13:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Done Primefac (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 9 April 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change link for Hamilton 'B' from "B-Line (Hamilton)" to "Hamilton LRT" because the page was moved. I have made the change in the sandbox and synchronized it. See testcases at: Template:Rail-interchange/testcases#Hamilton. BLAIXX 14:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:13, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 29 March 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
For Washington, DC, add:
| streetcar = [[File:BSicon TRAM1.svg|{{{size|14}}}px|link={{{link|DC Streetcar}}}]]
and change
| purple | pu | p =[[File:WMATA Purple.svg|{{{size|15}}}px|link={{{link|Purple Line (Maryland)}}}]]
to
| purple | pu | p =[[Purple Line (Maryland)|{{colorbox|purple}}]]
WMSR (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Done -- /Alex/21 04:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Edit was reverted by another user. -- /Alex/21 23:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Please can I urge all users to make use of the sandbox. It is provided for a reason. Pasting code blobs into the talk page should not be the means by which desired amendments are communicated, otherwise we end up with mistakes like this. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- I made the edits in the sandbox though I believe the edits were copied from here instead. Can anyone put them back? (Also marking this as not answered since the change hasn't been made) WMSR (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- There are a lot of differences between live and sandbox. Did you sync the sandbox from live before you started making your amendments? Have you verified that the sandbox currently contains your desired changes and nothing else? Have you provided a demo at the testcases page? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have again made the edits in the sandbox and tested them in testcases. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do.WMSR (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- It shows as a plain purple square. Is that the desired effect? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Until it has an actual logo, yes. It's better than a link to an image that doesn't exist, and I don't know how to do the coding to augment the image with text. WMSR (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Until it has an actual logo, yes. It's better than a link to an image that doesn't exist, and I don't know how to do the coding to augment the image with text. WMSR (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- It shows as a plain purple square. Is that the desired effect? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have again made the edits in the sandbox and tested them in testcases. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do.WMSR (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- There are a lot of differences between live and sandbox. Did you sync the sandbox from live before you started making your amendments? Have you verified that the sandbox currently contains your desired changes and nothing else? Have you provided a demo at the testcases page? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- I made the edits in the sandbox though I believe the edits were copied from here instead. Can anyone put them back? (Also marking this as not answered since the change hasn't been made) WMSR (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Please can I urge all users to make use of the sandbox. It is provided for a reason. Pasting code blobs into the talk page should not be the means by which desired amendments are communicated, otherwise we end up with mistakes like this. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:10, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
- Edit was reverted by another user. -- /Alex/21 23:08, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 22 April 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the following:
| il | israel ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | carmelit =[[File:Carmelit-logo-crop.svg|{{{size|15}}}px|{{{link|Carmelit}}}]] | egged =[[File:Egged_logo.svg|{{{size|14}}}px|{{{link|Egged (company)}}}]] | rail = [[File:IsraelTrainLogoSymbolOnly.svg|{{{size|17}}}px|{{{link|Israel Railways}}}]] }}
Done in sandbox and tested in testcases. WMSR (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done. Useddenim (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- It seems I forgot to put
link=
before the link templates, so they are currently just linking to the image files. Any chance you could fix this? Sorry. WMSR (talk) 18:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)- This is why I ask for sandbox and testcases. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Done. Useddenim (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is why I ask for sandbox and testcases. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- It seems I forgot to put
Template-protected edit request on 8 May 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change image for Chicago Metra from current image to image in sandbox. I promise I tested everything correctly this time. WMSR (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 21 May 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In saopaulo category, add ViaQuatro (administrator of Line 4) and ViaMobilidade (administrator of Lines 5 and 17) companies and their respective lines. Jvalienforce (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done: @Jvalienforce: it sounds like you are talking about the article São Paulo Metro but you have ended up on a different page. Please post at Talk:São Paulo Metro or just make the edit yourself to the article. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:05, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 6 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Just adding an alias parameter, as Delhi Metro is using the "Orange Line" terminology more now. See here for changes. qedk (t 桜 c) 18:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Done Primefac (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 6 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update Lisbon per sandbox (make icons smaller so that they don't break RDTs, link directly to lines). WMSR (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Done Primefac (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 5 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Sao Paulo CPTM routes 10+ and 10E. This has already been done in the sandbox and tested. WMSR (talk) 23:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: Did you synch the sandbox before you made your proposed changes? There seem to be three sets of changes in there, and although there are also three pending requests, I can't reconcile QEDK's request with any of the proposed changes. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I did not sync the sandbox, but I did successfully test the changes (to both Sao Paulo and Lisbon), and I'm not sure whether I can sync anymore now that there are additional pending requests. WMSR (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: My edits are in a different sandbox, so it's fine. I saw you had changes so I didn't edit your sandbox. --qedk (t 桜 c) 05:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I know Redrose64 has worked on this template more, but do we regularly do this sort of thing? 10, 10+, and 10E all link to the same rail since + and E are just the "express" versions of the main line. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Since September 2018, I do indeed regularly ask for sandbox and testcases. The two main reasons that I do so are both related to the widespread disruption that can be caused by ill-judged edits to the live template. First, an incorrect edit can not only break the template but also the pages that it is transcluded to (currently numbering 25,194) - even if a fix is performed immediately, it can still take hours if not days for all affected pages to render correctly once again. Second, multiple successive edits to the live template will cause pages to be job-queued several times each, again with each transcluding page experiencing some delay. As an illustration, see the edits of September 2018, some of which were just minutes apart. Not one of those edits was sandboxed first, a practice which could have avoided all that disruption; hence why I came down hard at Template talk:Rail-interchange/Archive 2#Template-protected edit request on 23 September 2018. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Right. I meant that I was unsure of whether we regularly add different images which link to the same page. Primefac (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Since September 2018, I do indeed regularly ask for sandbox and testcases. The two main reasons that I do so are both related to the widespread disruption that can be caused by ill-judged edits to the live template. First, an incorrect edit can not only break the template but also the pages that it is transcluded to (currently numbering 25,194) - even if a fix is performed immediately, it can still take hours if not days for all affected pages to render correctly once again. Second, multiple successive edits to the live template will cause pages to be job-queued several times each, again with each transcluding page experiencing some delay. As an illustration, see the edits of September 2018, some of which were just minutes apart. Not one of those edits was sandboxed first, a practice which could have avoided all that disruption; hence why I came down hard at Template talk:Rail-interchange/Archive 2#Template-protected edit request on 23 September 2018. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- I know Redrose64 has worked on this template more, but do we regularly do this sort of thing? 10, 10+, and 10E all link to the same rail since + and E are just the "express" versions of the main line. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: My edits are in a different sandbox, so it's fine. I saw you had changes so I didn't edit your sandbox. --qedk (t 桜 c) 05:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I did not sync the sandbox, but I did successfully test the changes (to both Sao Paulo and Lisbon), and I'm not sure whether I can sync anymore now that there are additional pending requests. WMSR (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Done With no one actually answering my question, I think it's safe to assume that it's acceptable to perform this update. Primefac (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update wikilinks for NS Line and Loop Service by removing the disambiguator "(Porrtland Streetcar)". Thanks! --Truflip99 (talk) 16:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Done Just a small concern that Loop Service is a rather generic name.--Salix alba (talk): 13:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 20 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add bus interchange icon for Russian transport systems:
- add line
| bus =[[File:BSicon BUS.svg|{{{size|20}}}px|link={{{link|}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|}}}}}}]]
- after the railway line
| rail =[[File:BSicon BAHN.svg|{{{size|15}}}px|link={{{link|Russian Railways}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Russian Railways}}}}}}]]
Implemented in sandbox: Special:Diff/902526526/902712096. —andrybak (talk) 18:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Request withdrawn: using {{rint|bus}} is enough. —andrybak (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 21 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to suggest the addition of the West Yorkshire Metro transport network, adding:
| leeds =[[File:WestYorksireMetro.png|{{{size|20}}}px|link={{{link|West Yorkshire Metro}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|West Yorkshire Metro}}}}}}]]
in both the | gb
subsection and above | liverpool =[[File:Merseyrail alternative logo.svg|{{{size|10}}}px|link={{{link|Merseyrail}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Merseyrail}}}}}}]]
in the main section
(added to sandbox)
Jordan8396.ja (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 23 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- Kolkata Suburban Railway
- File:Indian Railways Suburban Railway Logo.svg (suburban)
- Kolkata Metro Railway
- Kolkata tramways
- File:Calcutta Tramways Company (logo).gif (tram) Saha ( talk ) 13:43, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Arnabsaha2212:
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:52, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: thanks for informing... :) Saha ( talk ) 16:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: i have put my request here Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox2/sandbox. if i have done anything incorrect, i apologize for that... :) Saha ( talk ) 16:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Why there, why not at Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox which is linked in the box above and also linked from the template documentation? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: i knew, i would mess up. sorry . what can i do now? Saha ( talk ) 08:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- The first thing to do is to "reset" whichever sandbox you're using. This means to copy the code from Template:Rail-interchange and paste it directly into Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox. Then, make your proposed changes. Note that when you make these changes you are just adding in extra lines of code, but there should be no == headers or anything like that (see for example the differences here when the Leeds request above was made). After you've made your changes to the code, go to Template:Rail-interchange/testcases and make sure your changes work. Primefac (talk) 13:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Primefac: i made changes there. please check. and sorry in advance if i have made mistakes again. Saha ( talk ) 16:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- The first thing to do is to "reset" whichever sandbox you're using. This means to copy the code from Template:Rail-interchange and paste it directly into Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox. Then, make your proposed changes. Note that when you make these changes you are just adding in extra lines of code, but there should be no == headers or anything like that (see for example the differences here when the Leeds request above was made). After you've made your changes to the code, go to Template:Rail-interchange/testcases and make sure your changes work. Primefac (talk) 13:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: i knew, i would mess up. sorry . what can i do now? Saha ( talk ) 08:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Why there, why not at Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox which is linked in the box above and also linked from the template documentation? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: i have put my request here Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox2/sandbox. if i have done anything incorrect, i apologize for that... :) Saha ( talk ) 16:57, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: thanks for informing... :) Saha ( talk ) 16:24, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Is there a default link or image that should be added if someone doesn't add a second parameter? See the first testcase. If not that's fine, most of the others don't, but I want to check before making it live. Primefac (talk) 17:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Primefac: no, the results of testcase is absolutely fine. Saha ( talk ) 17:41, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Done Primefac (talk) 17:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 28 June 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I have edited
{{rint|kolkata|bus}}
& Purple Line {{rint|kolkata|line 3}}
in the sandbox, and the result in the test case is also correct. Please check it and add it. Saha ( talk ) 08:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 9 July 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I have added three new icons for the CTrain system in Calgary. I am requesting to synchronize the sandbox (as of the current time) with the main template. BLAIXX 10:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Done revert if it breaks anything! — xaosflux Talk 15:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
New York Subway and SIR
Also for the attention of @LRG5784 and Epicgenius:
On 6 and 7 July 2019, I uploaded a complete set of New York City Subway bullets that used the Standard typeface, as it appears on official publicity such as timetables and maps (example, example, both archived snapshots).
I would like to ask if we are in a position to roll out the Standard set, starting with the update of this template: this is because I notice that the Russian branch of Wikipedia has already done so.
Best, --Minoa (talk) 16:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Minoa: I guess so, but we should create another input for parameter 1, like
nycs-standard
. Or we can relegate the current set of icons to another input, likenycs-helvetica
. epicgenius (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)- @Epicgenius: I can agree with retaining the Helvetica set under the
nycs-hlv
switch (shorter is better). I have little doubt that the MTA uses the Standard set when possible, and the Helvetica set is the fallback when (for any reason) the Standard set is not available … although those reasons are drying up with the Standard set now in the Commons! --Minoa (talk) 21:36, 18 July 2019 (UTC)- @Minoa: I guess i can agree with using a shorter code. Currently it's a toss-up regarding which icon is used more. I see helvetica logos on trains, but Standard on maps and schedule. epicgenius (talk) 21:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: I can agree with retaining the Helvetica set under the
Template-protected edit request on 19 July 2019
The link for M4 on the Copenhagen Metro network is wrong. M4 has it own article, since it includes two segments not part of the M3, the first of which is scheduled to open 2020.
Changes have been tested in the sandbox
Please change from:
| 4 | m4 =[[File:M4 icon.svg|{{{size|13}}}px|link={{{link|City Circle Line}}}]]
to
| 4 | m4 =[[File:M4 icon.svg|{{{size|13}}}px|link={{{link|M4 (Copenhagen)}}}]]
My sandbox test also included an entry for the DSB (state railway), but I'm using for that instead, so please ignore that part of the test. Valentinian T / C 14:27, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Done. Valentinian, next time make sure to use a {{TPER}} to make sure someone sees it in a timely manner. Thanks for doing the sandboxing! Primefac (talk) 14:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Adding SEPTA icons/routeboxes
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I have successfully tested and added SEPTA (Philadelphia) icons and labels for transit and Regional Rail routes in the sandbox. Please check and synchronize the sandbox to main template. Thanks. Bensh (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Done WMSR (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: Why was this signed off? Where are the testcases? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 06:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: On the testcases page... am I missing something? WMSR (talk) 04:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- The testcases page has twenty tests for Philadelphia, but this edit includes a number of parameter values for which there is no testcase. What happens when (for example)
{{Rail-interchange|philadelphia|trlcity}}
is used? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)- Removed code for which there was no test case. Didn't mean to overstep. My apologies. WMSR (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- The testcases page has twenty tests for Philadelphia, but this edit includes a number of parameter values for which there is no testcase. What happens when (for example)
- @Redrose64: On the testcases page... am I missing something? WMSR (talk) 04:56, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: Why was this signed off? Where are the testcases? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 06:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, File:Kunming Metro Logo.svg was deleted from commons 4 August 2019 so should be removed. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 24 July 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
For Vancouver, please add the following:
| rapidbus ={{#if: {{{3|}}} | {{#switch: {{lc: {{{3}}} }} | R1 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R1 RapidBus]] | R2 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R2 RapidBus]] | R3 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R3 RapidBus]] | R4 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R4 RapidBus]] | R5 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R5 RapidBus]] }} | [[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=Coast Mountain Bus Company#RapidBus]] }}
Briguychau (talk) 01:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Additionally, modify the following:
| [[File:Translinkbuses.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=List of bus routes in Metro Vancouver]]
and change Expo Line (TransLink) to Expo Line (SkyTrain) as it was moved:
| expo =[[File:Translinkexpo.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=Expo Line (SkyTrain)]]
Could also add a generic B-Line interchange using and linking to Coast Mountain Bus Company#B-Line services. —Northwest (talk) 02:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Briguychau and Northwest:
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Useddenim (talk) 04:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have modified the sandbox as suggested. —Northwest (talk) 03:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hi... please don't process this request. In particular, only one of those (
| R4 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R4 RapidBus]]
) has a legit article at the moment. - Link should be to Coast Mountain Bus Company#B-Line, also, not Coast Mountain Bus Company#B-Line services as that was a redundant section heading. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:09, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
please don't process this request
above indicates that this is controversial.. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit template-protected}}
template.- @Joeyconnick: these were the edits made to the sandbox template which should have complied with your request. Do you have any further objections? —Northwest (talk) 01:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- I'm okay with those ones. The whole "way too soon" aspect has been addressed. —Joeyconnick (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Pppery: appears that a consensus has been established. I have reapplied the tested edits to the sandbox template. If you're able to, please synchronize my edits to the main template. —Northwest (talk) 03:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't trust my own ability to understand and test this template, so I won't sync it myself, but I agree you do appear to have established a consensus in favor of your change. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- The code in the diff above looks valid to me and the request seems reasonable. BLAIXX 17:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- I don't trust my own ability to understand and test this template, so I won't sync it myself, but I agree you do appear to have established a consensus in favor of your change. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:10, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: can I ask why these changes were overlooked? —Northwest (talk) 21:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Northwest: because I am a new and temporary template editor and don't want to make changes that are at all controversial. WMSR (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: any controversy relating to these changes have been resolved. —Northwest (talk) 21:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Northwest: because I am a new and temporary template editor and don't want to make changes that are at all controversial. WMSR (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Joeyconnick: these were the edits made to the sandbox template which should have complied with your request. Do you have any further objections? —Northwest (talk) 01:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 28 July 2019
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Also for the attention of @LRG5784 and Epicgenius:
I am pleased to announce that I have made a proposal to update the New York City Subway bullets, while maintaining the ability to use the Helvetica bullets through the nycs-h
switch.
You can find my proposal at Template:Rail-interchange/testcases § New York. Hopefully I got it right this time.
Best, --Minoa (talk) 15:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think that I'm in a position yet to make this major of a change to this template, but these icons look great and I support their inclusion. WMSR (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 5 September 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change
| ru ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }}
| rail =[[File:BSicon BAHN.svg|{{{size|15}}}px|link={{{link|Russian Railways}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Russian Railways}}}}}}]]
}}
to
| ru ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }}
| rail =[[File:Russian Railways Logo.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Russian Railways}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Russian Railways}}}}}}]]
}}
replacing the generic railway symbol with the logo for Russian Railways. Sandbox has been synced and the change has been successfully tested. Best, WMSR (talk) 22:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
RfC on Crimea Railway
Crimea Railway operates passenger rail on the Crimean Peninsula, which is currently the subject of a territorial dispute between Russia and Ukraine. Should an icon for Crimea Railway be sorted under {{rint|ru|rail|crimea}}
, {{rint|ua|rail|crimea}}
, {{rint|crimea|rail}}
, something else, or some/all of the above? WMSR (talk) 00:45, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- @WMSR: Were the avenues suggested by WP:RFCBEFORE exhausted? If so, please link to the relevant discussion(s); if not, why have you gone straight to a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I went to an RfC because I thought the issue was both specific to this template and controversial enough to warrant discussion. If this is the wrong way to go about seeking editors' opinions before suggesting a change to the template, I am glad to pursue other means. Best, WMSR (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- There is nothing to stop you discussing this template on this talk page - indeed, that is the very reason for its existence. There is also no reason why you should not post neutrally-worded notices (see WP:CROSS-POST and WP:TALKFORK) on the talk pages of relevant WikiProjects (such as WT:RAIL) inviting to discuss here. But an RfC will cause various subscribers to WP:FRS to be informed over the next month of a matter in which they may have little or no interest. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- Removed RfC tag. I will create a new thread to discuss. Thanks. WMSR (talk) 02:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- There is nothing to stop you discussing this template on this talk page - indeed, that is the very reason for its existence. There is also no reason why you should not post neutrally-worded notices (see WP:CROSS-POST and WP:TALKFORK) on the talk pages of relevant WikiProjects (such as WT:RAIL) inviting to discuss here. But an RfC will cause various subscribers to WP:FRS to be informed over the next month of a matter in which they may have little or no interest. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I went to an RfC because I thought the issue was both specific to this template and controversial enough to warrant discussion. If this is the wrong way to go about seeking editors' opinions before suggesting a change to the template, I am glad to pursue other means. Best, WMSR (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
MNR
Hi all. I made some icons for Metro-North rail lines and branches in the sandbox. Test cases can be seen on the testcases page. I am wondering whether they should be listed as they are in the sandbox (as second augments after newyork), or as third augments after newyork|mnr. If the latter option is preferred, may need help implementing it. I plan to make similar icons for LIRR as well, and will follow the same pattern. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks! --WMSR (talk) 21:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
If it's possible, I would also appreciate help making both of these function similarly to Metrolink in LA, with different params resulting in different formats. WMSR (talk) 01:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 15 October 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
@Redrose64: The icons for Miami Metromover and Miami Metrobus should be updated to match the Miami Metrorail icon changed ten days ago. The sandbox and testcases pages have been edited accordingly. Jackdude101 talk cont 20:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Question: Do the Metromover and Metrobus actually have the same icon as the Metrorail? It may be confusing for multi-modal interchanges to have exactly the same icons, which is why most cities have slightly different icons for different modes and sometimes even lines (c.f. London roundels). Sceptre (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jackdude101: have you seen the question above? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Sceptre:, @MSGJ: The exact same "M" logo has been used on all three Miami-Dade Transit modes past and present with no variation of color or shape. Miami is very different from other cities in this regard (and not in a good way). Jackdude101 talk cont 20:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jackdude101, Sceptre, and MSGJ: Most RDTs I've seen use
{{rint|mono|link=Miami Metromover}}
for Metromover, and rarely see rint icons for buses at all. In this case it seems better to use the generic templates to avoid ambiguity. Whether those should be the rail-interchange template icons is another question. I don't like the situation now but I also don't like everything being changed to exactly the same logo. WMSR (talk) 22:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)- I have deactivated this request, as there doesn't seem to be consensus right now — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 29 October 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
@Redrose64: Add Lynx (Orlando), the Orlando, Florida, public bus system serving such places as Walt Disney World, the world's most-visited vacation resort; and Orlando International Airport, the busiest airport in Florida. The sandbox and testcases pages have been edited accordingly. Jackdude101 talk cont 02:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- It is polite to say please if you are asking someone to do something — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: Sorry. Please add Lynx (Orlando). Jackdude101 talk cont 13:55, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Done as
orlando|lynx
WMSR (talk) 14:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 15 November 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
@Redrose64 and WMSR: Please add the ex heritage railway icon to the generic interchange table. The sandbox and testcases pages have been edited accordingly. Jackdude101 talk cont 20:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Done looks straightforward, please update the documentation — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 10 November 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to propose the addition of a symbol to indicate international Eurostar connections at stations (for example at London St Pancras International). I have carried out a few experiments on the template's sandbox and my sandboxes (sbx1 & sbx2), and have bot the size of the icon and associated links, and believe it to be ready to integrate into the live template (if people other people agree it is a good idea). The code is all ready for integration in this sandbox or from this revision of the template's sandbox. Thank you for your considerations. Kind Regards, Jordan8396.ja (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Why does it begin with |sandbox|? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redrose64 (talk · contribs), I believe it may reference that the template being displayed is from the sandbox code not the main template code or I may have accidently not removed it when moving from my sand bo to the template's sandbox. If that is the case its a simple matter of removing
|sanbox|
from the first line of the template, I can godo that now if it is an thats the problem :). --Jordan8396.ja (talk) 18:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redrose64 (talk · contribs), I believe it may reference that the template being displayed is from the sandbox code not the main template code or I may have accidently not removed it when moving from my sand bo to the template's sandbox. If that is the case its a simple matter of removing
@Jordan8396.ja: please resync the sandbox and make your changes again. You seem to have removed lots of HTML comments from the code. Also, why is it necessary to add the code for this icon 5 times? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: Apologies, my initial thought was to have make it so each county that is part of the Eurostar network had code their own code for the symbol (e.g. the UK having
{{...|gb|eurostar}}
and France having{{...|fr|eurostar}}
), however upon reflection the single generalised{{...|eurostar}}
would probably suffice. I will resync and only add the the code for the generalised symbol. As for the HTML comments you mention, I'm unsure which you are referring to; I know I added a number of<!-- .... -->
separators between blocks of code referring to individual countries (honestly mainly for distinguishing between where to edit during experiments). but I would appreciate it if you could enlighten me further if there are any other aspects you were referring to. --Jordan8396.ja (talk) 22:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)- Sorry for the late reply. I have added that code to the template. I think I got confused with those html comments. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 21 November 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- Hello! Please add the following to minnesota for two operating and three in-planning BRT lines:
a = A Line
b = B Line
c = C Line
d = D Line
e = E Line
AvianEnRoute (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Primefac (talk) 00:21, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
- My apologies. I have added it to the template's sandbox. Thank you. AvianEnRoute (talk) 18:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Eurostar
The File:Eurostar icon.svg is being discussed and/or is being considered for deletion. See Files for discussion to help reach a consensus on what to do. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 23:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 December 2019
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
File:ChinaRailwayHighspeed-notext.svg was deleted from commons 28 December 2019, causing red-linked image errors to be flagged on hundreds of articles. KylieTastic (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Done qedk (t 桜 c) 19:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 7 January 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Under Vancouver, please change the following:
from
| rapidbus ={{#if: {{{3|}}} | {{#switch: {{lc: {{{3}}} }} | r4 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R4 RapidBus]] }} | [[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=Coast Mountain Bus Company#RapidBus]]
to:
| rapidbus ={{#if: {{{3|}}} | {{#switch: {{lc: {{{3}}} }} | r1 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R1 RapidBus]] | r2 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R2 RapidBus]] | r3 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R3 RapidBus]] | r4 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R4 RapidBus]] | r5 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R5 RapidBus]] }} | [[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=RapidBus (TransLink)]]
This is because the RapidBus system is launched as of today. Briguychau (talk) 00:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Do not approve. The R1 and R5 links are up for speedy deletion, and no consensus has been formally reached for where those two articles were moved to. —Northwest (talk) 06:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Not done for now: let's wait until these articles have stable names — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have declined one of those speedies to allow the RM to play out. @SounderBruce: would you like to comment on the other? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Can we please also have sandbox and testcases, in view of previous problems? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:51, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- Of course, I submitted changes to this template last July and am familiar with the process. Once we have reached a consensus with the articles names I will resubmit a request. —Northwest (talk) 07:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 20 January 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
LALUAN5 angys (Talk Talk) 10:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Not done: if there is any request here, please make it more specific — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
@MSGJ:, see this, please change Malaysia rail transit icon to those (see real photo), and added a new service for ETS2 business class line angys (Talk Talk) 11:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Not done for now: Please make an .svg image instead of HTML, use available
{{RouteBox}}
variants or create a template wrapper, to prevent cluttering this template with line-specific design syntax. qedk (t 桜 c) 14:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC)- ETS Business Class is a new line? From the link above, it does not seem so. Please clarify what changes you're making apart from the change itself. --qedk (t 桜 c) 14:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- @QEDK:, not a new line, but a new service with different train car. Some route are same from current services but with different stops (major station only) angys (Talk Talk) 15:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- @*angys*: The template is to add new lines, or different systems which coexist in the same system. If the line is the same, with the only difference being different service, there is no need to add it. --qedk (t 桜 c) 15:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- @QEDK:, not a new line, but a new service with different train car. Some route are same from current services but with different stops (major station only) angys (Talk Talk) 15:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- ETS Business Class is a new line? From the link above, it does not seem so. Please clarify what changes you're making apart from the change itself. --qedk (t 桜 c) 14:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- @QEDK:see this, already change it. angys (Talk Talk) 12:32, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Doing... qedk (t 桜 c) 13:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- @*angys*:
Done Could you please update the template documentation at
{{KLRT line symbol}}
? --qedk (t 桜 c) 13:39, 21 January 2020 (UTC)- @*angys*: and also Template:Rail-interchange/doc/MY.
@QEDK: the new symbols look too large. The default height for these icons should be 20px or less in order to not disrupt route diagrams. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 14:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Undone, can you please adjust the template to the request above. I tried modifying it to suit the dimensions but I'm not confident that we can include LALUAN in the 20x20 box and have it somehow readable. --qedk (t 桜 c) 14:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- @QEDK:, resized and adjusted, please check. (e.g.
{{KLRT line symbol|5|Kelpana Jaya Line}}
) angys (Talk Talk) 07:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)- @*angys*:
Done --qedk (t 桜 c) 09:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @*angys*:
- @QEDK:, resized and adjusted, please check. (e.g.
- @*angys*: and also Template:Rail-interchange/doc/MY.
- @*angys*:
Edit request (08/02/20)
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please make the following two edits (as tested in the sandbox)
| crossrail2 =[[File:Crossrail2.svg|{{{size|10}}}px|link={{{link|Crossrail 2}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Crossrail 2}}}}}}]]
| thameslink =[[File:ThameslinkSymbol.svg|{{{size|12}}}px|link={{{link|Thameslink}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Thameslink}}}}}}]]
Thank you
--RaviC (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 8 February 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hey,
File:MetroLisboa-linha-azul.svgFile:MetroLisboa-linha-amarela.svg andFile:MetroLisboa-linha-vermelha.svg
were all deleted from commons 8 February 2020 KylieTastic (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- All now recreated - so no action needed!
- Plus MetroLisboa-linha-verde.svg deleted from commons 9 February 2020 KylieTastic (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Done. Commented out for now, replaced with nbsp. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 19 February 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Resize the image of {{rint|kolkata|bus}} . I already resized in sandbox. ❯❯❯ S A H A 21:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- @ArnabSaha:
Done. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 11 March 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to change this:
| t1 | north | shore | northern | western =[[North Shore, Northern & Western Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|North Shore}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t2 | airport | inner | south =[[Airport, Inner West & South Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T2}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t3 | bankstown =[[Bankstown Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|Bankstown}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t4 | eastern | illawarra =[[Eastern Suburbs & Illawarra Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|Eastern Suburbs & Illawarra}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t5 | cumberland =[[Cumberland Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|Cumberland}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t6 | carlingford =[[Carlingford Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|Carlingford}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t7 | olympic =[[Olympic Park Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|Olympic Park}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]]
to this:
| t1 | north | shore | western =[[North Shore & Western Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T1}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t2 | inner | leppington =[[Inner West & Leppington Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T2}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t3 | bankstown =[[Bankstown Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T3}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t4 | eastern | illawarra =[[Eastern Suburbs & Illawarra Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T4}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t5 | cumberland =[[Cumberland Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T5}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t6 | carlingford =[[Carlingford Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T6}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t7 | olympic =[[Olympic Park Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T7}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t8 | airport | south = [[Airport & South Line|<span style="color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T8}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]] | t9 | northern = [[Northern Line (Sydney)|<span style = "color:#{{Sydney Trains color|T9}};font-size:125%;line-height:100%">■</span>]]
in the Sydney section. Already tested it in the sandbox. TheTrainNoch (talk) 04:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- To editor TheTrainNoch:
done. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 19:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 19 March 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I propose cleaning up calls to MBTA commuter rail lines so that {{rint}} can be used more effectively in Routemaps for these commuter rail lines without introducing clutter or repetition. Right now the routemaps use a hardcoded version of the template that is inconsistent and messy to edit (example here). This request is inspired by the template calls of the New Jersey and Pennsylvania commuter rail lines. NJ and PA use abbreviations for commuter rail lines in this template, which might be a good idea here too, but I think this could be a good starting point.
Remove "T" logo and the word "Line" or "Lines" from these routes:
Fairmount Line
Fitchburg Line
Framingham/Worcester Line
Franklin/Foxboro
Greenbush Line
Haverhill Line
Lowell Line
Needham Line
Newburyport/Rockport Line
Old Colony Lines
Providence/Stoughton Line
Remove "T" logo and the word "Branch" from these routes:
Remove "T" logo from these routes:
- Comment: There's no reason it can't be recoded to omit/add the Ⓣ icon and/or the word(s) Line/Branch, as is done with
{{rint|dart}}
or even the Boston rapid transit lines ({{rint|boston|red}}
etc.). AlgaeGraphix (talk) 17:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)- Seems like a good compromise to me. — C16SH (speak up) 19:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Primefac (talk) 13:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 28 March 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace Template:Rail-interchange with Revision 947742326 of Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox (diff). The changes remove the extra </span>
that was present when the 4th parameter was not present, causing the last
to not show. 501 (live) vs
501 (sandbox). – BrandonXLF (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- To editor BrandonXLF:
done. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 13:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 31 March 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Two requests actually.
The first is under the NJ Transit heading to replace this:
| brg | bergen | bergen county =[[Bergen County Line|<span style="color: black; background-color: #{{rcr|NJ Transit|Bergen County}}; border-radius: 2px; font-weight: bold; padding: 0 3px 0 3px; font-size:0.9em">BRG</span>]]
with this:
| brg | bcl | bergen | bergen county =[[Bergen County Line|<span style="color: black; background-color: #{{rcr|NJ Transit|Bergen County}}; border-radius: 2px; font-weight: bold; padding: 0 3px 0 3px; font-size:0.9em">BCL</span>]]
This would change the output for the Bergen County Line abbreviation to "BCL", which is the abbreviation used by the agency itself, and is consistent with the abbreviations for other lines in the system, such as RVL for the Raritan Valley Line, NJCL for the North Jersey Coast Line, and PVL for the Pascack Valley Line. (Not exactly a fan of "MOBO" for the Montclair–Boonton Line, either, as "M-B" is the most common, but I would want that one discussed first).
Secondly is to replace under the San Francisco header this: s =[[File:S Shuttle logo.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|S Castro Shuttle}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|S Castro Shuttle}}}}}}]]
with this:
s =[[File:S Shuttle logo.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|S Shuttle}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|S Shuttle}}}}}}]]
As the article on the Muni Metro's event shuttle service was moved almost two years ago, and the link is an outdated redirect. No need for a template to link to a redirect. oknazevad (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Done WMSR (talk) 04:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 March 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I have been recently working on articles related to the Mexico City Metro, mainly, and other railway transport in Mexico. I have noticed that icons at 20 or 18 pixels are a bit too big for infoboxes or other templates, therefore I think that leaving the icons size at 16 pixels (such as Paris Métro icons would work better.
Also, regarding the Tren Suburbano, the current icon link leads to a redirection instead of the actual article, and the logo already exists but with a different name, so the file name just needs to be changed.
| mexicocity ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | mcm =[[File:Mexico City Metro.svg|{{{size|20}}}px|link={{{link|Mexico City Metro}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Mexico City Metro}}}}}}]] | tl =[[File:DFGGH.JPG|{{{size|18}}}px|link={{{link|Xochimilco Light Rail}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Xochimilco Light Rail}}}}}}]] | fs =[[File:Tren-S-Logo.png|{{{size|25}}}px|link={{{link|Suburban Railway of the Valley of Mexico Metropolitan Area}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Suburban Railway of the Valley of Mexico Metropolitan Area}}}}}}]] | #default =[[File:MetroDF Línea {{{2}}}.svg|{{{size|18}}}px|link={{{link|Mexico City Metro Line {{{2}}}}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Mexico City Metro Line {{{2}}}}}}}}}]] }}
to this:
| mexicocity ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | mcm =[[File:Mexico City Metro.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|Mexico City Metro}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Mexico City Metro}}}}}}]] | tl =[[File:DFGGH.JPG|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|Xochimilco Light Rail}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Xochimilco Light Rail}}}}}}]] | fs =[[File:Ferrocarril Suburbano.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|Tren Suburbano}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Tren Suburbano}}}}}}]] | #default =[[File:MetroDF Línea {{{2}}}.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|Mexico City Metro Line {{{2}}}}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Mexico City Metro Line {{{2}}}}}}}}}]] }}
Thanks in advance. Cocu15 (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have copied these changes into the /sandbox. See /testcases here.
- Note 1: for
|2=fs
, file name changes from File:Tren-S-Logo.png (not found) to File:Ferrocarril Suburbano.svg. - Note 2: existing line number images are
|2=A, B, 1-9, 12
(through default option). - Edit request now can be "copy sandbox code into live template".
- I see no further issues in the tests, but maybe Cocu15 wants to confirm. -DePiep (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- @DePiep: Looks alright to me, thanks. --Cocu15 (talk) 19:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK then: please copy all sandbox code into live template. -DePiep (talk) 19:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- To editors DePiep and Cocu15: on the /testcases page, we still see missing files for
{{Rail-interchange/sandbox|mexicocity|10}}
and{{Rail-interchange/sandbox|mexicocity|11}}
. Is that really how you want it? P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 03:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- To editors DePiep and Cocu15: on the /testcases page, we still see missing files for
- @Paine Ellsworth: Per Cocu15's confirmation here, I say that is correct. (I refined my range-list above to reflect this).-DePiep (talk) 03:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth and DePiep: That is correct. Numeration for current Mexico City Metro lines is as follows: 1-9, A, B and 12. Lines 10 and 11 do not exist (yet).--Cocu15 (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- To editors DePiep and Cocu15:
done P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 03:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- To editors DePiep and Cocu15:
- @Paine Ellsworth and DePiep: That is correct. Numeration for current Mexico City Metro lines is as follows: 1-9, A, B and 12. Lines 10 and 11 do not exist (yet).--Cocu15 (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Paine Ellsworth: Per Cocu15's confirmation here, I say that is correct. (I refined my range-list above to reflect this).-DePiep (talk) 03:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 27 February 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can we add the new Danhai light rail in Taipei? The symbol is at New Taipei Metro Line V.png and the letter used is "V". ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk to me) 00:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Please add your proposed code to Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox. (Sorry AJP426 I had to reset your code temporarily.) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: I've put it in the sandbox. I don't really understand how this template works, so I really hope I did it right. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk to me) 21:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've added your code (without the "v" which I'm not sure was intended). Please check it works? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: Works well. Thanks! ◢ Ganbaruby! (remember to ping!) 07:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've added your code (without the "v" which I'm not sure was intended). Please check it works? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ganbaruby: Please update Template:Rail-interchange/doc/TW with the new icon, now that your request has been answered. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MSGJ: I've put it in the sandbox. I don't really understand how this template works, so I really hope I did it right. ◢ Ganbaruby! (talk to me) 21:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 2 April 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can we add a symbol for COTA, as seen on the testcases page. ɱ (talk) 21:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- To editor Ɱ:
done P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 05:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- As well, do you think it's worthwhile to create images for the route numbers, so something like COSI could look more like Metro Buenavista? Would use the icons COTA uses for its lines, like seen here and here, minus the small print like seen here. ɱ (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ɱ: Please update Template:Rail-interchange/doc/US#Ohio with the new icon, now that your request has been answered. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 13:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, done, thanks. ɱ (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ɱ: Please update Template:Rail-interchange/doc/US#Ohio with the new icon, now that your request has been answered. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 13:24, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 7 March 2020
![]() | This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Below is the requested changes for the RapidBus service in Metro Vancouver.
from:
| rapidbus ={{#if: {{{3|}}} | {{#switch: {{lc: {{{3}}} }} | r4 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R4 RapidBus]] }} | [[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=Coast Mountain Bus Company#RapidBus]]
to:
| rapidbus ={{#if: {{{3|}}} | {{#switch: {{lc: {{{3}}} }} | r1 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R1 King George Blvd]] | r3 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R3 Lougheed Hwy]] | r4 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R4 41st Ave]] | r5 =[[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=R5 Hastings St]] }} | [[File:Translinkbusrapid.svg|{{{size|x20}}}px|link=RapidBus (TransLink)]] }}
The requested changes have been added to the sandbox and have been tested. —Northwest (talk) 19:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Northwest: Please update Template:Rail-interchange/doc/CA#British Columbia with these (new) icons, now that your request has been answered. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 13:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Done —Northwest (talk) 02:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Philadelphia icons?
What do we think about using the icons for Philadelphia's rail system on here? The icons can be found in the infoboxes for Market–Frankford Line, Norristown High Speed Line, SEPTA subway–surface trolley lines, Broad Street Line, Trolleybuses in Philadelphia, SEPTA City Transit Division surface routes, and SEPTA Regional Rail. They seem to be copyrighted, but SEPTA's copyright terms say:
Permission to use, copy and distribute documents and related graphics from this World Wide Web Server ("Server") is granted provided that
(1) the copyright notice appears in all copies and that both the copyright notice and this permission notice appear;
(2) use of documents and related graphics available from this Server is for informational and non-commercial purposes only;
(3) no documents or related graphics available from this Server are modified in any way, and;
(4) no graphics available from this Server are used, copied or distributed separate from accompanying text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by SEPTA.
The information and materials contained in this World Wide Website - and the terms and conditions of the access to and use of such information and materials - are subject to change without notice.
This could permit their use on this template. Thoughts? --WMSR (talk) 20:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Those read like too restrictive for use as free use, and our fair use criteria wouldn't permit such mass reuse as they would see if they were used as the icons here. Even from a practical standpoint, we can't fulfill those permissions as we don't include copyright notices with each use, which a strict reading of those permissions would require. I wish we could, as they would match route bullets used for other cities (like NYC, DC, SF, and LA, but I don't think we can. oknazevad (talk) 20:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- If all you wish to use is the icons, that means that we cannot comply with restrictions 1 and 4. Also, even if we included all the text that they require, we simply cannot comply with restriction 2 at all.
- Claiming fair use is a non-starter, since that requires "the name of each article (a link to each article is also recommended) in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate, specific non-free use rationale for each use of the item" and I really cannot see you filling in several dozen FURs. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)