Template talk:Rail-interchange/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about Template:Rail-interchange. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Template-protected edit request on 27 July 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, I’ve been cleaning up articles relating to Chongqing Rail Transit, and I’d like to request to convert all “branch” in the anchor to lowercase. Thanks!
| chongqing={{#switch: {{lc: {{{3}}} }} | na={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | 0|l|lp|loop={{RouteBox|Loop|Loop line (Chongqing Rail Transit)|#{{CRT color|na}}}} | 3a={{RouteBox|3<sub>A</sub>|Line 3 (Chongqing Rail Transit)#Airport branch|#{{CRT color|na}}}} | 6i={{RouteBox|6<sub>I</sub>|Line 6 (Chongqing Rail Transit)#International Expo branch|#{{CRT color|na}}}} | #default={{RouteBox|{{{2}}}|Line {{{2}}} (Chongqing Rail Transit)|#{{CRT color|na}}}} }} | #default={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | metro|crt=[[File:CRT Logo.svg|{{{size|25}}}px|link={{{link|Chongqing Rail Transit}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Chongqing Rail Transit}}}}}}]] | csr=[[File:CSR Logo.svg|{{{size|25}}}px|link={{{link|Chongqing Suburban Railways}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Chongqing Suburban Railway}}}}}}]] | 0|l|lp|loop={{RouteBox|Loop|Loop line (Chongqing Rail Transit)|#{{CRT color|l}}|white}} | 3a={{RouteBox|3<sub>A</sub>|Line 3 (Chongqing Rail Transit)#Airport branch|#{{CRT color|3}}}} | 6i={{RouteBox|6<sub>I</sub>|Line 6 (Chongqing Rail Transit)#International Expo branch|#{{CRT color|6}}}} | #default={{RouteBox|{{{2}}}|Line {{{2}}} (Chongqing Rail Transit)|#{{CRT color|{{{2}}}}}}} | s={{#switch: {{lc: {{{4}}} }} | na={{RouteBox|S{{{3}}}|Line S{{{3}}} (Chongqing Suburban Railway)|#{{CRT color|na}}}} | #default={{RouteBox|S{{{3}}}|Line S{{{3}}} (Chongqing Suburban Railway)|#{{CRT color|s{{{3}}}}}}} }} | r={{#switch: {{lc: {{{4}}} }} | na={{RouteBox|R{{{3}}}|Line R{{{3}}} (Chongqing Suburban Railway)|#{{CRT color|na}}}} | #default={{RouteBox|R{{{3}}}|Line R{{{3}}} (Chongqing Suburban Railway)|#{{CRT color|r{{{3}}}}}}} }} }} }}
—David Xuang (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done Jc86035 (talk) 15:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Edit request: 26 July 2018
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Changing the Ballarat, Bendigo and Geelong line links to the "V/Line rail service" pages rather than the "railway line" pages (see this diff). In particular, Bendigo has an article discussing the track on the "railway line" page, and one on the actual service on the "V/Line rail service" page. – Pizza1016 (talk | contribs) 01:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Useddenim (talk) 20:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Lua
To page watchers, note that much of this template can now be Lua-ified through Module:Adjacent stations (an S-line successor). I've updated {{rail color box}} with extra options for this template. Notifying Trappist the monk, since you wrote Module:Rail transport colors. Jc86035 (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
If an icon function were added to the module then the templates based on the module would be able to replicate almost all of the functionality, although a lot of module subpages would need to be filled out. Jc86035 (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. If memory serves, there was a hugely underwhelming response to the last proposal to Luafy this template. Better luck this time.
- —Trappist the monk (talk) 21:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Trappist the monk and Jc86035: The trouble is that the number of Lua coders is, well, um, very low. Do you really want to take on the additional maintenance responsibility? Useddenim (talk) 04:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: If you can understand most of the code in Module:Adjacent stations/MTR without reading the documentation (which is unfinished anyway), then there shouldn't be much for more experienced coders to maintain since the module is basically complete other than the aforementioned icon function. I didn't write the module by myself (it was created by Szqecs), and given that such a module necessitated subpages containing data tables it wouldn't have made sense not to replace the other functions that the S-line templates perform as well. Jc86035 (talk) 05:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Trappist the monk and Jc86035: The trouble is that the number of Lua coders is, well, um, very low. Do you really want to take on the additional maintenance responsibility? Useddenim (talk) 04:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
{{Rail icon}} can now do this, although it's a bit limited right now since almost all the data is still in this template. Jc86035 (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Osaka Metro line symbols with transparent background
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Osaka Metro icons are in png and have white backgrounds. They should be changed with these svg icons.
--Yellowmonkey (talk) 18:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done chi (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Osaka Metro logo without text
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
should be replaced with this version without any text. [[File:Osaka Metro logo 2.svg|20px|link=Osaka Metro]]
--Yellowmonkey (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done chi (talk) 08:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 31 August 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
For all Portland MAX Light Rail lines (Blue, Green, Red, Orange, Yellow, WES), please change the rail color box to {{TMTC bullet|size=3}} template. I recommend size=3, but I'll let you determine that. Examples below:
{{TMTC bullet|blue}} {{TMTC bullet|green}} {{TMTC bullet|red}} {{TMTC bullet|orange}} {{TMTC bullet|yellow}} {{TMTC bullet|wes}}
Thank you! Truflip99 (talk) 20:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, please don't change WES. Truflip99 (talk) 20:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done, as an option. See Template:Rail-interchange/doc/US#Oregon. Useddenim (talk) 23:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim:
seems the bull option is not allowing links and is overriding all the other options. Could you please fix?Also, could you up to the size to 5? --Truflip99 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim:
- Edit: actually yes, the bull isn't allowing for the use of the link param. Sorry for being annoying.
{{rint|portland|red|bull|link=MAX Red Line}}
= --Truflip99 (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Edit: actually yes, the bull isn't allowing for the use of the link param. Sorry for being annoying.
Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Portland section, replace file:TriMet logo simplified.svg with file:TriMet icon.svg as it is the correct version of the logo. CouvGeek (talk) 00:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Before the change can be made, it must be established who, when and why the TriMet logo was changed from WP:NFCC. CouvGeek, you can't just arbitrarily upload a file and claim that it is PD. Useddenim (talk) 03:29, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: The main TriMet logo is PD and on commons. I merely took the icon out and uploaded as its own. Ask the uploader there for their determinations on why they considered it PD. There's a dupe of the same logo (although with slightly different colors) uploaded by someone from dewiki on commons, so obviously I am not the only one who thinks it's PD. Many files that were originally tagged as non-free are later converted to PD since they are too simple to be copyrighted to have non-free tags. I've had similar changes approved twice on a similar template by different
adminstemplate editors without resistance, so I am requesting this to be reconsidered. CouvGeek (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: The main TriMet logo is PD and on commons. I merely took the icon out and uploaded as its own. Ask the uploader there for their determinations on why they considered it PD. There's a dupe of the same logo (although with slightly different colors) uploaded by someone from dewiki on commons, so obviously I am not the only one who thinks it's PD. Many files that were originally tagged as non-free are later converted to PD since they are too simple to be copyrighted to have non-free tags. I've had similar changes approved twice on a similar template by different
- Done I see no reason to doubt CouvGeek's actions and have made the change — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:24, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Help with Baku Metro?
I have just made a list of stations here: (List of Baku metro stations) and I'm wondering if anybody is willing to help create a rail-interchange template for the 3 lines? It seems to be one of the few metro systems without any symbols for the lines. Thanks! Mattximus (talk) 01:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 23 September 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the Greece/Thessaloniki Metro section, please change all instances of the following:
- ∏1 → Π1 (∏ is a mathematica symbol)
- ∏2 → Π2 (∏ is a mathematica symbol)
- add
{{{link|Proastiakos Thessaloniki}}}
at the alt/link fields of both Π1, Π2, and pr (as it stands now, clicking the icons redirects to the images as opposed to Proastiakos Thessaloniki)
Thanks -- Michail (blah) 14:17, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Useddenim (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's been reverted back to the wrong version. --Michail (blah) 22:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- … because someone couldn't be bothered to fix a small typo. It's now corrected. Useddenim (talk) 00:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- No, Useddenim, it is you who couldn't be bothered. This is what you did, and that mess was propagated to a large number of pages; you should not be making typos in highly-used templates. When there is widespread disruption, a quick revert is much more effective than wasting time trying to trace through the template code. You should have spotted it before you put it live, by putting the proposed change into the sandbox (where I see no evidence of the proposed amendment) and verifying its operation at the testcases (where I see no evidence that the proposed amendment was verified) before putting the change live. This is all covered by WP:TPE and WP:TESTCASES.
- Now, you have three choices as to what should be done next:
- You file a request at WP:RFPP asking for Template:Rail-interchange to be raised from template-protected to fully-protected
- I take away your template editor privilege, in accordance with the last sentence of WP:TPE#Wise template editing(or you make a corresponding request at WP:PERM/TE)
- You promise to thoroughly test all proposed changes in future
- Which would you prefer? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- 3 (although I didn't see any problems when I used Show preview ). Useddenim (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thankyou. Now, I have synchronised the sandbox so that it may be used for trialling proposed amendments; once proven, the whole sandbox may be copied live. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- 3 (although I didn't see any problems when I used Show preview ). Useddenim (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
- … because someone couldn't be bothered to fix a small typo. It's now corrected. Useddenim (talk) 00:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's been reverted back to the wrong version. --Michail (blah) 22:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 September 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the link on the Thessaloniki Metro airport icon to avoid the redirect, since the airport page has been moved. Thessaloniki Airport "Makedonia" → Thessaloniki Airport --Michail (blah) 19:48, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 18 October 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the Hartford Line commuter rail system with c:File:Hartford Line logo.png. It looks like 18 pixels works best, and "hartford" could probably be used as the parameter. I have never done one of these requests before, but I put it in the sandbox. Not sure what, if anything, I need to do. Thank you! Daybeers (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Came here to request this, and you already did! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:12, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Question: is Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox good to go? Have you managed to test this version to see if performs correctly? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Daybeers: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, been busy with real life responsibilities! I'm not sure if I've tested it correctly, as I've never requested one of these edits before. If you tell me what I need to do, I'm more than willing to make it happen. Thanks! –Daybeers (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Daybeers: See WP:TESTCASES. Basically, having put your proposed amendment into Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox, you should set up some test cases at Template:Rail-interchange/testcases to verify that your proposal does what it is intended to do, and also does not break existing usage. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- I think I added it correctly on the testcases page. –Daybeers (talk) 02:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Daybeers: See WP:TESTCASES. Basically, having put your proposed amendment into Template:Rail-interchange/sandbox, you should set up some test cases at Template:Rail-interchange/testcases to verify that your proposal does what it is intended to do, and also does not break existing usage. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, been busy with real life responsibilities! I'm not sure if I've tested it correctly, as I've never requested one of these edits before. If you tell me what I need to do, I'm more than willing to make it happen. Thanks! –Daybeers (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Done Galobtter (pingó mió) 13:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 9 November 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Disambiguate the link to Cable car, substituting Aerial lift. I have attempted this in the sandbox. Previewing with Template:Luzern-Stans-Engelberg Bahn provides a suitable test case. Thanks, Certes (talk) 11:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Partly done: Changed the link. I have no opinion about the link text but if someone does prefer that more, they can further-complete this request. Izno (talk) 17:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've no opinion about the alt text either, so happy for that to stay as is and treat this request as done. (The link itself is an icon.) Certes (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Izno: You forgot to update the documentation. Useddenim (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: WP:Be bold. That aside, I do not see any reason to. Did you actually review the edit? --Izno (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks again. I'd have updated the documentation myself had I realised that it went into such detail. Certes (talk) 18:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes. And made the update. Your edit changed the target of the link icon, but it is explicitly listed in the documentation, so yes, there was a reason to. Useddenim (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Izno: You forgot to update the documentation. Useddenim (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've no opinion about the alt text either, so happy for that to stay as is and treat this request as done. (The link itself is an icon.) Certes (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 11 November 2018 (1)
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the following:
| marta =[[File:Logo of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority.svg|{{{size|70}}}px|link={{{link|Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority}}}}}}]]
This is for the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA), the principal public transport operator in the Atlanta metropolitan area of Georgia (U.S. state). The size will give the logo a height of 11 pixels (equivalent to bold text).
Change this:
| trirail =[[File:Tri-Rail logo.svg|{{{size|44}}}px|link={{{link|Tri-Rail}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Tri-Rail}}}}}}]]
to this:
| trirail =[[File:Tri-Rail logo.svg|{{{size|49}}}px|link={{{link|Tri-Rail}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Tri-Rail}}}}}}]]
The increased size will give the logo a height of 11 pixels (equivalent to bold text).
Change this:
| miami =[[File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|16}}}px|link={{{link|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}|alt={{{alt|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}}}}]]
to this:
| miami =[[File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}|alt={{{alt|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}}}}]]
The increased size will give the logo a height of 11 pixels (equivalent to bold text). Jackdude101 talk cont 04:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Partly done:
- MARTA added, but with a different file ( File:MARTA stripes logo.svg);
- Tri-Rail not changed (it would become too wide);
- Miami done.
Template-protected edit request on 11 November 2018 (2)
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove in-template documentation, and add <noinclude>{{subst:#ifexist:{{subst:#invoke:string|replace|{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|/sandbox$|plain=false}}/doc|{{{{subst:void}}documentation}}}}</noinclude>
(= the basic way of adding documentation). Current Template:Rail-interchange/doc has list as is in the parent template now (so no visible changes when subpage is used). Reasonable: when doc is outside, it is easier to maintain & update. DePiep (talk) 07:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Documentation revised, but not exactly as requested. (Note that this editor deleted most of Template:Rail-interchange/doc just before making this request.) Useddenim (talk) 13:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
{{documentation|content= {{Rail-interchange/doc}} {{columns-list|colwidth=15em|{{Rail-interchange/doc/countries}}}} }}
Why so? A simple {{subst:#ifexist:{{subst:#invoke:string|replace|{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|/sandbox$|plain=false}}/doc|{{{{subst:void}}documentation}}}}
would do. For example, the editlinks are missing from the documentation. Documentation should not be part of the edit restriction. -DePiep (talk) 17:25, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- That's debatable. Given your past history of disruptive edits and questionable BSicon design, I'm not sure that you should be making changes to the documentation. Useddenim (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Arh, so this kept you occupied for six years to the day? Better use that energy to improve edits. Such as: why the weird /doc construct?, and clarify why you attack me for removing a redundant list while you did the same to the other list? -DePiep (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @DePiep and Useddenim: I think the weird structure is probably from my 2015 attempt to prevent the parser limits from being reached by the transclusion of the documentation sub-pages. The structure obviously became redundant when the full list was no longer shown, but no one seems to have minded in the intervening years. Jc86035 (talk) 19:11, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- I see, a good solution -- back then. Leaves open the question why is was not removed today by Useddenim, as was exactly what I requested/proposed. Instead, I got a jab. -DePiep (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @DePiep: You seem to be ignoring the fact that you deleted most of the documentation in your attempt to remove a “duplicate” list that actually only displayed once. Useddenim (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- ... and then create one good /documentation page combining doc data from both pages. Not that difficult. Where do I ignore that? If only you had performed my simple request, I could have made the doc page OK (really bad code now). Anyway, you are wrong wrt "ignoring", and assuming BF. And oh, could you retract your six-year old frustration in PA form? Thanks. -DePiep (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how blanking most of a page is not bad faith editing; but nonetheless, I've changed the
{{Documentation}}
call. Useddenim (talk) 22:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)- Thanks. -DePiep (talk) 22:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how blanking most of a page is not bad faith editing; but nonetheless, I've changed the
- ... and then create one good /documentation page combining doc data from both pages. Not that difficult. Where do I ignore that? If only you had performed my simple request, I could have made the doc page OK (really bad code now). Anyway, you are wrong wrt "ignoring", and assuming BF. And oh, could you retract your six-year old frustration in PA form? Thanks. -DePiep (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @DePiep: You seem to be ignoring the fact that you deleted most of the documentation in your attempt to remove a “duplicate” list that actually only displayed once. Useddenim (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- I see, a good solution -- back then. Leaves open the question why is was not removed today by Useddenim, as was exactly what I requested/proposed. Instead, I got a jab. -DePiep (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @DePiep and Useddenim: I think the weird structure is probably from my 2015 attempt to prevent the parser limits from being reached by the transclusion of the documentation sub-pages. The structure obviously became redundant when the full list was no longer shown, but no one seems to have minded in the intervening years. Jc86035 (talk) 19:11, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Arh, so this kept you occupied for six years to the day? Better use that energy to improve edits. Such as: why the weird /doc construct?, and clarify why you attack me for removing a redundant list while you did the same to the other list? -DePiep (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Another badly-argued revert
Useddenim this edit(-summmary) is sloppy argued. Good documentation leads to the right detail asap -- which is what the additions did. On top of this, "poorly formatted" is an unfounded judgement (more like: "I would have done it differently", ie so what). I suggest strongly to revert (=add again). In general, please slow down on too early judgements, and try to consider the background of an edit. -DePiep (talk) 13:34, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 11 November 2018 (3)
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
For Taiwan (| tw
), please replace the following images with Wikipedia versions. These files, hosted on Commons, are not free images in home country and are to be removed from Commons.
| tym =[[File:Taoyuan Metro logo seal only.svg
replace with File:Taoyuan Metro logo plain.svg| tra | rail =[[File:TRA Logo.svg
replace with File:Taiwan Railways Administration logo plain.svg
Szqecs (talk) 15:25, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: Szqecs, images that are not free in their home country are allowed on Enwiki, as long as the image is free in the United States. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Galobtter: I think you misunderstood. The current files are on Commons and to be deleted. Please replace with the images on the right, which are identical copies on Wikipedia. Szqecs (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Szqecs, Ah, I didn't see that the files were identical except that they were hosted on enwiki. Done Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Galobtter: I think you misunderstood. The current files are on Commons and to be deleted. Please replace with the images on the right, which are identical copies on Wikipedia. Szqecs (talk) 15:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 11 November 2018 (4)
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the following:
| brightline =[[File:Brightline Logo.svg|{{{size|44}}}px|link={{{link|Brightline}}}|alt={{{alt|{{{link|Brightline}}}}}}]]
This is for Brightline in South Florida, the first privately run intercity passenger train service in the US in over three decades. The size selected is the same as Tri-Rail. Jackdude101 talk cont 22:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: I've added it to the sandbox for now, consensus is required. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 20:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- Done I've gone ahead and added it, as objection is unlikely and a full discussion is unnecessary bureaucracy in my opinion. Let me know if anyone disagrees with the proposed change, or just start another edit req. Courtesy ping to Bellezzasolo. Enterprisey (talk!) 03:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- For some reason your change didn't go through, so I've made the change. I'm fine with it, I just generally leave 48 hours on edit requests that haven't been discussed. I really need a Reddit style !remind me. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 12:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Enterprisey, Bellezzasolo, (Jackdude101): Please remember to update the documentation when making changes to the template. Thank you. Useddenim (talk) 13:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- For some reason your change didn't go through, so I've made the change. I'm fine with it, I just generally leave 48 hours on edit requests that haven't been discussed. I really need a Reddit style !remind me. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 12:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 17 November 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change this:
| miami =[[File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}|alt={{{alt|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}}}}]]
to this:
| miami ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | metrobus =File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metrobus (Miami-Dade County)}}}]] | metromover =File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metromover}}}]] | metrorail =File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}]] }}
The rail-interchange symbol currently used for Miami Metrorail (rapid transit) is also used by Metromover (people mover) and Metrobus, all of which are run by Miami-Dade Transit. Since the symbol does not apply to Metrorail exclusively, I think it would be appropriate if the other two were added. Jackdude101 talk cont 07:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Partly done:
| miami ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | metrobus =[[File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metrobus (Miami-Dade County)}}}|alt={{{alt|Metrobus (Miami-Dade County)}}}]] | metromover =[[File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metromover}}}|alt={{{alt|Metromover}}}]] | metrorail | #default =[[File:Logo Miami-Dade County.svg|{{{size|24}}}px|link={{{link|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}|alt={{{alt|Metrorail (Miami-Dade County)}}}]] }}
- I implemented the overall change, but I modified it a little so there is a #default param as well as alt params for each link. Also, you left off the opening [ of the File link. Primefac (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jackdude101 and Primefac: This it's why it's best to sandbox the proposal instead of dropping code blobs into talk page threads. That way the proposal may be tested properly. See my comments in various sections above, particularly those where breakage had occurred as a result of incomplete testing (or no testing at all). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- I totally agree, and if it were anything other than some minor coding points I would have asked for sandboxing. In this particular instance, though, I didn't think it was necessary. Primefac (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jackdude101 and Primefac: This it's why it's best to sandbox the proposal instead of dropping code blobs into talk page threads. That way the proposal may be tested properly. See my comments in various sections above, particularly those where breakage had occurred as a result of incomplete testing (or no testing at all). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 24 November 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace the current rail-interchange icon for Tri-Rail () with this: . Dimensions are the same as the SunRail icon. Jackdude101 talk cont 02:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: Requested change made to sandbox. Jackdude101 talk cont 00:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Done --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: Requested change made to sandbox. Jackdude101 talk cont 00:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 2 December 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Khon Kaen Light Rail Transit system, approved by Office of the Commission for the Management of Road Traffic. Reference
| khon kaen ={{#switch: {{lc: {{{2}}} }} | lrt = | red ={{RouteBox|LRT|Khon Kaen LRT Red Line|#{{BTS color|LRT Red Line (Khon Kaen)}}}} | yellow ={{RouteBox|LRT|Khon Kaen LRT Yellow Line|#{{BTS color|LRT Yellow Line (Khon Kaen)}}}} | blue ={{RouteBox|LRT|Khon Kaen LRT Blue Line|#{{BTS color|LRT Blue Line (Khon Kaen)}}}} | green ={{RouteBox|LRT|Khon Kaen LRT Green Line|#{{BTS color|LRT Green Line (Khon Kaen)}}}} | pink ={{RouteBox|LRT|Khon Kaen LRT Pink Line|#{{BTS color|LRT Pink Line (Khon Kaen)}}}} }}
Ncboss (talk) 07:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Ncboss: Do you actually want all the routes to display LRT ? The general convention is that the label displays the line name (for example either Black or Black Line etc.) Useddenim (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Guadalajara Metro
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The symbols for Guadalajara Metro (Guadalajara's rapid transit system) must be as follows:
- corresponds to
{{rint|guadalajara|1}}
and must be linked to Line 1 (Guadalajara Metro) - corresponds to
{{rint|guadalajara|2}}
and must be linked to Line 2 (Guadalajara Metro) - corresponds to
{{rint|guadalajara|3}}
and must be linked to Line 3 (Guadalajara Metro)
Thank you for your attention. J4lambert (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- @J4lambert: Not done: Your requested changes must be made to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. Useddenim (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 December 2018
This edit request to Template:Rail-interchange has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi, File:RAJA Logo.PNG was deleted from commons 4 December 2018 and is in use as {{rint|iran|rail}} so showing as errors on pages. I can't find a suitable replacement. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 13:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)