Jump to content

Talk:Yan Ruisheng

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement for Yan Ruisheng
Advertisement for Yan Ruisheng
  • ... that Yan Ruisheng (advertisement pictured) was China's first full-length feature film?
  • Source: Xiao, Zhiwei (1998). "Chinese Cinema". In Zhang, Yingjin; Xiao, Zhiwei (eds.). Encyclopedia of Chinese Film. New York, London: Routledge. pp. 3–30. ISBN 978-0-415-15168-9., among many others
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 697 past nominations.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. Nice work. A minor point: @Crisco 1492: Is it appropriate to say in the hook that it was China's first full-length feature film when the article seems to be a little less certain (Yan Ruisheng is commonly identified as the first Chinese-made full-length feature film / has been considered China's first full-length feature film)? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Yan Ruisheng/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 22:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Yovt (talk · contribs) 18:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on. Ping me if I'm not back by next week. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 18:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492 I have completed the review, please take some time to check it out. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is the appropriate 3 sentences long. Produced as short films were gaining traction among domestic producers, Yan Ruisheng was China's first full-length feature film. might read awkward, I'd suggest rewording to As short films were gaining traction among domestic producers, Yan Ruisheng was produced as China's first full-length feature film.

Works too. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 16:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriately comprehensive and concise.

Production and background seem right, nice illustrations. I'd suggest de-linking Shanghai Garrison Command if there is no article for that. Also footnote c has a red link.

I have reviewed references here and on reception, and although some are WP:MREL, I can see that som ae appropriate. Be sure to keep those inline citations up to date and archive when necessary.

Critical reception (in this case Legacy)

[edit]

Everything's alright here, just like in release, be sure to cite inline.

I myself have no further objections to this article passing GA given the subject. Although it may not seem like a GA pass due to lack of primary content sections, this lost film does't really have them. Good work!

  • Thanks for the review! It is tough with lost films, especially ones where so much is known on the inspiring circumstances... but given that some stage productions added things like Lianying's ghost appearing to her family, it wouldn't meet WP:V to assume everything lines up with how it was in reality. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.